Rates of unanticipated premalignant and malignant lesions at the time of hysterectomy performed for pelvic organ prolapse in an underscreened population.

BACKGROUND: The rate of unanticipated premalignant or malignant pathology at the time of hysterectomy performed for pelvic organ prolapse has been previously reported to be 0.2%. It is not known whether this rate is similar in patients with limited access to regular medical care. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to describe the rates of unanticipated premalignancy and malignancy at the time of hysterectomy performed for pelvic organ prolapse in an underscreened population and to determine the risk factors for unanticipated pathology. STUDY DESIGN: Hysterectomies performed for pelvic organ prolapse at a large public hospital between July 2007 and July 2019 were reviewed. Patients undergoing surgery for malignancy or premalignancy were excluded. Medical records were reviewed for demographic information, medical history, preoperative workup, and final pathology. Frequencies of abnormal pathologies were calculated. Demographic and screening factors were correlated with pathologic findings using the Fisher exact test or Mann-Whitney U test, as appropriate. This study was approved by the institutional review board. RESULTS: Between 2007 and 2019, 759 cases of pelvic organ prolapse were identified. Of 759 patients, 667 (87.9%) self-identified as Hispanic. The median age was 57 years old, and 505 of 759 patients (66.5%) were in the postmenopausal stage. Abnormal uterine bleeding history was present in 217 of 759 patients (28.6%). Of 759 patients, 493 (65.4%) underwent preoperative ultrasonography, and 290 (38.3%) underwent preoperative endometrial biopsy. Of the 744 uterine specimens that had available histology results, there were 2 cases of endometrial hyperplasia and 1 case of endometrial cancer. Of the 729 cervical specimens that were available for review, there was 1 case of intraepithelial neoplasia and 2 cases of cervical cancer. In the 246 patients who underwent oophorectomy, no ovarian malignancy was found. CONCLUSION: For patients undergoing hysterectomy for pelvic organ prolapse in an underscreened population, the rates of endometrial dysplasia or cancer were 0.40% (3/744), and the rates of cervical dysplasia or cancer were 0.42% (3/729). Our results underscore the importance of considering screening history when interpreting preoperative cervical and endometrial cancer screening. Consideration of higher negative predictive value tests, such as cytology with human papillomavirus cotesting and preoperative counseling on the risks and management strategies of unanticipated premalignancy or malignancy within this population may be reasonable.

Estimated costs of preoperative evaluation of postmenopausal hysterectomy for prolapse at a safety-net hospital: an observational descriptive study.

BACKGROUND: In practice, preoperative evaluation prior to hysterectomy varies. Unnecessary preoperative evaluation may add cost and risk with little benefit to the patient. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to describe practice patterns and the associated costs related to preoperative evaluations before hysterectomy for prolapse at a safety-net hospital. STUDY DESIGN: This was a retrospective cohort study of postmenopausal women who underwent a hysterectomy for prolapse. Nonfacility-associated cost data were obtained from the Centers for Medicare Services. The biopsy cost was estimated to be $172.55 and $125.23 for ultrasounds. RESULTS: A total of 505 postmenopausal cases were identified. Of those, 155 (31%) underwent a preoperative biopsy, 305 (60%) had an ultrasound, and 124 (25%) had both. Of those, 72.9% had an indication for a biopsy. A total of 64 biopsies and 216 ultrasounds lacked clear indication. Of those, 56 biopsies were performed for bleeding in cases with an endometrial thickness of <4 mm. The total cost of nonvalue-added testing was $42,576. CONCLUSION: Adherence to a strict preoperative algorithm would have saved $38,092 over the study period, although 0.50% of these biopsies would potentially have detected endometrial cancer preoperatively. These results underscore the value of clinical algorithms at teaching institutions.

Effect of prunes on gastrointestinal function after benign gynecological surgery: a randomized control trial.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effect of postoperative prune consumption on time to first bowel movement after benign gynecologic surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this randomized, open label, controlled trial, 77 adult women who had benign gynecologic surgery that required at least one night in the hospital were enrolled from July 2018 to April 2019. Participants were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to one of two groups using a randomization assignment: 4 oz prunes daily plus docusate sodium 100 g twice daily versus docusate alone. The study's primary objective was time to first bowel movement (BM). Secondary outcomes were pain associated with first BM, stool consistency using Bristol stool scale, and patient satisfaction with bowel regimen and surgery experience. RESULTS: Postoperative survey data was available for 68.4% of participants (n = 52). There was no difference in time to first BM between the two groups (p = 0.29); however, consumption of > 12 prunes was associated with an increased likelihood of having a BM in the study period. Among women who consumed at least 12 prunes, hospital discharge was earlier, and there was a not statistically significant greater satisfaction with postoperative bowel regimen. CONCLUSIONS: The addition of prunes to postoperative bowel regimen of docusate sodium may be a beneficial adjunct to postoperative bowel regimen. CLINICAL TRIAL: The Institutional Review Board at the University of Southern California approved the study, and the study was registered at clinicaltrials.gov (ID: NCT03523715).

Opioid Consumption After Urogynecologic Surgery: A Prospective Multicenter Observational Study Using a Text-Messaging Survey Tool.

IMPORTANCE: Understanding postoperative opioid consumption is key to reducing opioid misuse. OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to quantify the amount of outpatient opioids consumed after urogynecologic surgery. STUDY DESIGN: This is a prospective multicenter cohort study sponsored by the American Urogynecologic Society Fellow's Pelvic Research Network. Women undergoing pelvic organ prolapse or urinary incontinence surgery between May 2019 and January 2021 were included. Patients used text messaging to report daily opioid consumption, pain levels, and nonopioid analgesic consumption 2 weeks postoperatively. Demographic and perioperative factors associated with high opioid use (>75th percentile) were identified. RESULTS: Two hundred sixty-one patients were included from 9 academic centers. The median (interquartile range) morphine milligram equivalents (MME) consumed were 28 (0-65) and prescribed were 75 (50-113). The median ibuprofen and acetaminophen tablets consumed were 19 (10-34) and 12 (4-26). The median pain level was 2.7 of 10 (1.7-4.4). Factors associated with high MME use (>65 MME) included body mass index greater than 30 ( P < 0.01), chronic pain ( P < 0.01), elevated baseline pain score ( P < 0.01), elevated blood loss ( P < 0.01), longer operating time ( P < 0.01), and southern region ( P < 0.01). High MME consumers more frequently underwent perineorrhaphy ( P = 0.03), although this was not significant on multivariate analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Urogynecology patients consume a median of 28 MME (3-4 oxycodone 5-mg tablets) after surgery, and surgeons prescribe 3 times this amount (75 MME, 10 oxycodone tablets). In addition, there are several factors that can be used to identify patients who will require greater numbers of opioids. These data may be used to enhance existing prescribing guidelines.

Acceptability of Text Messaging and Disparities in Mobile Health Access in Women's Health Care: A Survey Study.

Objective: Few studies in women's health care have utilized text messaging as a data collection tool. Our aims were to (1) determine the willingness of Obstetrics and Gynecology (Ob/Gyn) patients to participate in text message surveys, (2) determine the patient-preferred mode of survey distribution, (3) compare preferences between a low-resource and university population, and (4) review the practical aspects of implementing text message surveys. Methods: Paper surveys were distributed to Ob/Gyn clinic patients at two academic centers. English and Spanish speakers were included. Questions assessed sociodemographic data, survey preferences, and text messaging preferences. Appropriate tests were used to look for associations between demographics and survey preferences. Results: One hundred eighty-two participants completed the survey. Respondents were seen at either a university (42%) or a safety net (58%) clinic. Most owned a mobile phone (94%), used text messaging everyday (88%), and had an unlimited data plan (83%). Of the respondents willing to participate in a survey, text messaging was the preferred survey method (70%), followed by phone (14%) and mobile applications (8%). Fifty-six percent of respondents were willing to participate in a daily text message survey. There were no associations between socioeconomic status and survey preferences or willingness to participate in text message surveys. Survey preference was associated with age (p < 0.01). Respondents of all age groups preferred text message surveys; however, those aged 31-60 years were most likely to prefer text messaging (odds ratio: 8.3, confidence interval: 2.6-29.8). Conclusions: Most Ob/Gyn patients are willing and able to participate in text message surveys, and text messaging is the most preferred survey method across sociodemographic categories.