Long-term efficacy and safety of solifenacin in pediatric patients aged 6 months to 18 years with neurogenic detrusor overactivity: results from two phase 3 prospective open-label studies.

INTRODUCTION: The standard recommended treatment for neurogenic detrusor overactivity (NDO) is clean intermittent catheterization combined with an antimuscarinic agent. However, the adverse systemic side-effects of oxybutynin, the most widely used agent, are of concern. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of solifenacin in pediatric patients with NDO, aged 6 months-<5 years and 5-<18 years. STUDY DESIGN: Two open-label, baseline-controlled, phase 3 studies were conducted in pediatric patients with NDO. Patients were treated with sequential doses of solifenacin oral suspension (pediatric equivalent doses 2.5-10 mg) for 12 weeks to determine each patient's optimal dose, followed by a fixed dose ≥40-week treatment period. Primary efficacy endpoint was change from baseline in maximum cystometric capacity (MCC) after 24 weeks. Secondary endpoints included bladder compliance, bladder volume until first detrusor contraction (>15 cmH2O), number of overactive detrusor contractions (>15 cmH2O), maximum catheterized volume (MCV)/24 h, and incontinence episodes/24 h. Safety parameters were treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), serious adverse events, laboratory variables, vital signs, electrocardiograms, and ocular accommodation and cognitive function assessments. RESULTS: After 24 weeks, MCC had significantly increased compared with baseline in patients aged 6 months -<5 years and 5-<18 years (37.0 ml and 57.2 ml, respectively; P < 0.001; Fig.). Improvement was also observed after 52 weeks' treatment. Significant changes were observed from baseline to week 24 in all secondary endpoints in both age groups: increase in bladder compliance, increase in bladder volume to first detrusor contraction as a percentage of expected bladder capacity, reduction in the number of overactive detrusor contractions, increase in MCV, and decreased incontinence episodes. TEAEs were mostly mild or moderate, and there were no new drug-related TEAEs compared with adult studies. Age-related improvements were noted in ocular accommodation and cognitive function. DISCUSSION: These long-term multicenter investigations demonstrated the efficacy and safety of solifenacin in pediatric patients with NDO. The observed increases in MCC were clinically relevant and demonstrated that an increase in fluid volume can be accommodated in the bladder prior to reaching intravesical pressures that endanger kidney function and/or are associated with leakage or discomfort. Solifenacin was well tolerated with low incidences of constipation and dry mouth (typically associated with antimuscarinics), central nervous system-related side-effects, and facial flushing. CONCLUSION: Solifenacin was effective and well tolerated in pediatric patients with NDO, aged 6 months-<18 years, suggesting that it is a viable alternative to oxybutynin, the current standard of care. STUDIES ARE REGISTERED AT CLINICALTRIALS.GOV: NCT01981954 and NCT01565694.

Long-Term Safety and Efficacy of Solifenacin in Children and Adolescents with Overactive Bladder.

PURPOSE: We evaluated the long-term safety and efficacy of once daily oral solifenacin suspension in children (5 to less than 12 years old) and adolescents (12 to less than 18 years old) with overactive bladder. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a 40-week, open label extension of a 12-week double-blind, placebo controlled trial. Outcome measures included incidence and severity of adverse events (primary end point), laboratory variables, vital signs, 12-lead electrocardiogram, post-void residual volume, and change from baseline to end of treatment in mean number of micturitions and incontinence episodes per 24 hours, number of incontinence-free days per 7 days and number of grade 3 or 4 urgency episodes per 24 hours (adolescents only). RESULTS: A total of 119 children and 29 adolescents were enrolled in the study. The incidence of drug related treatment emergent adverse events was 34.7% (children) and 37.9% (adolescents), the most common of which were constipation (11.9%), electrocardiogram QT prolonged (8.5%) and dry mouth (4.2%) in children, and electrocardiogram QT prolonged (13.8%) and nausea (6.9%) in adolescents. Adverse events resulted in 10.2% (children) and 13.8% (adolescents) of participants discontinuing treatment. There were no cases of urinary retention or increases in post-void residual volume and no clinically relevant changes in laboratory variables or vital signs. Two cases of dizziness but no other central nervous system drug related treatment emergent adverse events were reported. Improvements in all efficacy parameters and grade 3 or 4 urgency episodes observed by 3 weeks were further improved and/or maintained during the study. CONCLUSIONS: Once daily solifenacin oral suspension was well tolerated for up to 52 weeks in children 5 to less than 12 years old and adolescents 12 to less than 18 years old diagnosed with overactive bladder, with constipation and electrocardiogram QT prolonged as the most common adverse reactions, respectively. Improvements in efficacy at 3 weeks were sustained during the study.

Solifenacin in Children and Adolescents with Overactive Bladder: Results of a Phase 3 Randomised Clinical Trial.

BACKGROUND: Solifenacin, an effective, well-tolerated treatment for adult overactive bladder (OAB) symptoms, has not been evaluated in placebo-controlled paediatric clinical trials. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of once-daily oral solifenacin suspension in OAB patients aged 5-<12 yr (children) and 12-<18 yr (adolescents). DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: The study involved a 4-wk urotherapy run-in followed by 1:1 randomisation to 12-wk double-blind solifenacin or placebo treatment alongside urotherapy. INTERVENTION: Solifenacin paediatric equivalent doses (PEDs) of adult doses: 2.5mg, 5mg, 7.5mg, and 10mg. The starting dose was PED 5mg; all patients were titrated to an optimum dose at 3-wk intervals over 9 wk, resulting in ≥3 wk at the optimum dose before end of treatment (EoT). OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICS: Superiority of solifenacin versus placebo in change from baseline to EoT for mean volume voided/micturition (MVV, primary endpoint); daytime maximum volume voided/micturition (DMaxVV); incontinence episodes (mean/24h); mean number of incontinence-free days or nights/7 d; micturition frequency; and Micturition frequency adjusted for baseline total voided volume (VTB) as an exploratory parameter). Efficacy parameters were analysed using analysis of covariance. Safety parameters (treatment-emergent adverse events, serious adverse events, laboratory variables, vital signs, electrocardiogram, postvoid residual volume) are summarised using descriptive statistics. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: In children, solifenacin was superior to placebo in terms of the change from baseline to EoT for MVV (solifenacin-placebo difference 12.1ml, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.2-24.0; p=0.046), DMaxVV (difference in adjusted mean change from baseline for solifenacin-placebo 31.9ml, 95% CI 4.3-59.5; p=0.024), VTB-adjusted micturition frequency (p=0.028). Other endpoints were not significantly different. Solifenacin was well tolerated. For adolescents, it was not possible to draw firm efficacy conclusions because of the low numbers recruited. CONCLUSIONS: Once-daily solifenacin oral suspension in children with OAB was superior to placebo for MVV (primary efficacy endpoint) and was well tolerated. PATIENT SUMMARY: In this 12-wk study, a once-daily oral suspension of solifenacin in children aged 5-<12 yr with overactive bladder was superior to placebo in increasing mean volume voided/micturition, the primary efficacy variable in the study. Solifenacin was well tolerated, with a low incidence of dry mouth and constipation. This study is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov as NCT01565707.

Roles of radiation dose, chemotherapy, and hormonal factors in breast cancer following Hodgkin's disease.

BACKGROUND: Female survivors of Hodgkin's disease (HD) have a strongly elevated risk of breast cancer, but factors responsible for the increased risk are not well known. METHODS: We investigated the effects of radiation dose, chemotherapy (CT), and reproductive factors on breast cancer risk in a nested case-control study in The Netherlands in a cohort of 770 female patients who had been diagnosed with HD before age 41. Detailed treatment information and data on reproductive factors were collected for 48 case patients who developed breast cancer 5 or more years after diagnosis of HD and 175 matched control subjects. The radiation dose was estimated to the area of the breast where the case patient's tumor had developed and to a comparable location in matched control subjects. Relative risks (RRs) of breast cancer were calculated by conditional logistic regression. Statistical tests were two-sided. RESULTS: The risk of breast cancer increased statistically significantly with radiation dose (P(trend) =.01); patients who received 38.5 Gy or more had an RR of 4.5 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.3 to 16) times that of patients who received less than 4 Gy. Patients who received both CT and radiotherapy (RT) had a statistically significantly lower risk than those treated with RT alone (RR = 0.45, 95% CI = 0.22 to 0.91). Breast cancer risk increased with increasing radiation dose among patients who received RT only (RR = 12.7, 95% CI = 1.8 to 86, for patients receiving > or =38.5 Gy) but not among patients treated with CT and RT. Sixty-nine percent of control subjects treated with RT and more than six cycles of CT, but only 9% of those who received RT alone, reached menopause before age 41. Reaching menopause before age 36 was associated with a strongly reduced risk of breast cancer (RR = 0.06, 95% CI = 0.01 to 0.45). CONCLUSION: Breast cancer risk increases with increasing radiation dose up to at least 40 Gy. The substantial risk reduction associated with CT may reflect its effect on menopausal age, suggesting that ovarian hormones promote tumorigenesis after radiation has produced an initiating event.