Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 9 de 9
Filter
1.
Trials ; 23(1): 404, 2022 May 14.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35568917

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Common and frequent as acute pain is, it is often underestimated and undertreated in older people with dementia in nursing homes and inadequate pain management remains an issue. METHODS: The study is designed to be a randomized, sham-controlled trial and is underway in nursing homes located in China. A total of 206 dementia patients are being recruited from nursing homes in Yinchuan, China. They are randomly allocated to an intervention or a controlled group in a 1:1 ratio. The intervention group will be treated with true APP therapy, while the other group will receive APP at sham point stimulation therapy. The patients will be assessed at baseline (T0), at 5 min during performing the intervention (T1), and at 5 min after completion of the intervention (T2). The primary outcome is the level of pain relief at T1 and T2. Physiological parameters, side effects and additional use of analgesics during the procedure, satisfaction from caregivers, and acceptance of patients are evaluated as secondary outcomes. DISCUSSION: The results of this study are expected to verify the analgesic effect of APP for acute pain in patients with mild dementia in nursing homes. It has the potential to prompt APP therapy to be implemented widely in dementia patients with acute pain in nursing homes. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry ChiCTR2100047932 . Registered on 27 June 2021. Currently, patient recruitment is ongoing. Recruitment is expected to take place from December 2020 to December 2021.


Subject(s)
Acupressure , Acute Pain , Dementia , Acupressure/methods , Acute Pain/diagnosis , Acute Pain/therapy , Aged , Analgesics/adverse effects , Dementia/complications , Dementia/diagnosis , Dementia/therapy , Humans , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Treatment Outcome
2.
J Adv Nurs ; 76(12): 3623-3630, 2020 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32951241

ABSTRACT

AIM: This study aims to evaluate the safety and analgesic efficacy of pre-mixed nitrous oxide/oxygen mixture treatment of pain induced by dressing change for perianal abscess. DESIGN: This protocol is a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. METHODS: This study will be implemented in the Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine. Subjects enrolled in this study are hospitalized patients who suffered from moderate to severe pain due to dressing change after incision and drainage. Two hundred patients will be selected and randomly assigned to either an intervention or a control group. The intervention group will get routine pain treatment plus pre-mixed nitrous oxide/oxygen mixture treatment and the control group will be treated with routine pain management plus medical air treatment. All these patients, medical staff and investigators are blind to the nature of the gas in each cylinder, which is randomized. Data will be collected at baseline (T0), 5 min (T1) after the starting of intervention and 5 min post intervention (T2) for each group. The primary outcome is the level of pain relief at T1 and T2. The secondary outcomes cover physiological parameters, adverse events, satisfaction of patients and health professionals and the acceptance from patients. DISCUSSION: Results of this study will be discussed and the safety and effect of nitrous oxide/oxygen treatment of pain induced by dressing change will be proven. IMPACT: When the finding of this study has an active effect on the treatment of pain caused by dressing change, it may provide more options for nursing staff to choose nurse-led analgesia techniques and then improving the level and quality of pain care as well as patients' overall satisfaction with the Anorectal Department in China.


Subject(s)
Abscess , Nitrous Oxide , Abscess/therapy , Bandages , China , Double-Blind Method , Humans , Oxygen , Pain/drug therapy , Pain/etiology , Pain Measurement , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Treatment Outcome
3.
Trials ; 21(1): 102, 2020 Jan 20.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31959220

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Hysterosalpingography (HSG) is an accepted radiologic diagnostic modality for initial infertility workup, and is generally considered uncomfortable and painful. However, the management of pain related to HSG remains inefficient. As an emerging nonpharmacologic and noninvasive pain control strategy, virtual reality (VR) distraction has been successfully used in areas such as burns, blunt force trauma, hospital-based needle procedures, dental/periodontal procedures, and urological endoscopy patients. This study aims to evaluate the analgesic effect of VR during HSG. METHODS/DESIGN: A single-center, parallel-group, randomized controlled trial will be carried out in the Radiology Department of Yinchuan Women and Children Healthcare Hospital, Yinchuan. A total of 200 participants who are scheduled for HSG will be enrolled in this study. The participants will be randomized (1:1) into two groups: a VR group and a blank control group. The VR group will receive routine care plus immersive VR intervention and the blank control group will receive routine care. Outcomes will be monitored at baseline, immediately after HSG and 15 min after HSG for each group. The primary outcome is the worst pain score during HSG by a visual analog scale (VAS). The secondary outcomes include: affective pain, cognitive pain, and anxiety during the HSG procedure; worst pain within 15 min after HSG; patient satisfaction and acceptance with pain management; physiological parameters; adverse effects; HSG results; and immersion perception score of the VR system (for the VR condition only). DISCUSSION: This study will focus on exploring a simply operated, noninvasive and low-cost analgesia during the HSG procedure. The results of this trial will provide data on the feasibility and safety of VR distraction therapy during HSG. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Chinese Clinical Trial Register, ChiCTR1900021342. Registered on 16 February 2019.


Subject(s)
Analgesia/methods , Hysterosalpingography/methods , Pain, Procedural/therapy , Virtual Reality , Adult , Affect , Anxiety/psychology , Female , Humans , Hysterosalpingography/psychology , Middle Aged , Pain Measurement , Pain, Procedural/psychology , Patient Acceptance of Health Care , Patient Satisfaction , Treatment Outcome , Young Adult
4.
J Emerg Med ; 57(4): 444-452, 2019 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31514988

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Acute pain is the most common complaint in Emergency Department (ED) admissions, and options for analgesia are limited. Nitrous oxide/oxygen possesses many properties showing it may be an ideal analgesic in the ED. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study is to evaluate the safety and analgesic effect of the fixed nitrous oxide/oxygen mixture for trauma patients in the ED. METHODS: We enrolled 60 patients in this double-blind, randomized study. The treatment group received conventional pain treatment plus a mixture of 65% nitrous oxide/oxygen. The control group received the conventional pain treatment plus oxygen. Primary outcome was the reduction in pain intensity at 5 and 15 min after the start of intervention. Secondary outcomes include adverse events, physiological parameters, and satisfaction from both patients and health care professionals. RESULTS: Initial pain scores for the nitrous oxide/oxygen group (6.0 [5.0-8.0]) and the oxygen group (6.75 [5.0-9.0]) were comparable (p = 0.57). The mean numerical rating scale scores at 5 min were 3.4 ± 1.8 and 7.0 ± 1.8 for nitrous oxide/oxygen and oxygen, respectively (p < 0.01). The mean pain intensity at 15 min in the treatment group was 3.0 ± 1.9, compared with 6.3 ± 2.2 in the control group (p < 0.01). Both patients' (8.0 [7.0-9.0] vs. 4.0 [2.0-6.0], p < 0.01) and physicians' (8.5 [8.0-9.0] vs. 4.0 [3.0-6.0], p < 0.01) satisfaction scores in the treatment group were significantly higher than the oxygen group. No serious adverse events were observed. CONCLUSIONS: This study gives supporting evidence for the safety and effectiveness of using self-administered nitrous oxide/oxygen mixture in the ED for moderate-to-severe traumatic pain.


Subject(s)
Analgesics/standards , Nitrous Oxide/pharmacology , Oxygen/pharmacology , Pain Management/standards , Wounds and Injuries/drug therapy , Acute Pain/drug therapy , Adult , Analgesics/therapeutic use , Double-Blind Method , Drug Combinations , Emergency Service, Hospital/organization & administration , Emergency Service, Hospital/statistics & numerical data , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Nitrous Oxide/therapeutic use , Oxygen/therapeutic use , Pain Management/methods , Pain Management/statistics & numerical data , Pain Measurement/methods , Patient Satisfaction , Treatment Outcome , Wounds and Injuries/complications
5.
Trials ; 20(1): 399, 2019 Jul 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31272502

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The morbidity of knee arthritis is increasing among aged people and total knee arthroplasty has been its mainstream treatment to date. Postoperative rehabilitation is an important part of the procedure. However, the intense pain during the functional exercise involved has always been a challenge for both patients and health care professionals. The aim of this study is to test the analgesic effect of a mixture of nitrous oxide/oxygeb (1:1) inhalation for patients who are doing functional exercise 1 month after total knee arthroplasty. METHODS/DESIGN: This double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study will be implemented in the Rehabilitation Department in the General Hospital of Ningxia Medical University. Patients aged between 50 and 75 years who underwent a primary unilateral total knee arthroplasty are eligible for inclusion. The key exclusion criteria include: epilepsy, pulmonary embolism, intestinal obstruction, aerothorax. The treatment group (A) will receive a pre-prepared nitrous oxide/oxygen mixture plus conventional treatment (no analgesics), and the control group (B) will receive oxygen plus conventional treatment (no analgesics). Patients, physicians, therapists, and data collectors are all blind to the experiment. Assessments will be taken immediately after functional exercise begins (T0), 5 min (T1) after functional exercise begins, and 5 min after functional exercise has finished (T2). Patients will be randomly allocated between a treatment group (A) and a control group (B) in a ratio of 1:1. Primary outcome, including pain severity in the procedure, will be taken for each group. Secondary outcomes include blood pressure, heart rate, oxygen saturation, side effects, knee joint range of motion, Knee Society Score (KSS), rescue analgesia need, and satisfaction from both therapists and patients. DISCUSSION: This study will focus on exploring a fast and efficient analgesic for patients who are doing functional exercise after total knee arthroplasty. Our previous studies suggested that the prefixed nitrous oxide/oxygen mixture was an efficacious analgesic for the management of burn-dressing pain and breakthrough cancer pain. The results of this study should provide a more in-depth insight into the effects of this analgesic method. If this treatment proves successful, it could be implemented widely for patients doing functional exercise in the rehabilitation department. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ChiCTR-INR-17012891 . Registered on 6 October 2017.


Subject(s)
Analgesics, Non-Narcotic/administration & dosage , Arthralgia/prevention & control , Arthritis/surgery , Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee/rehabilitation , Exercise Therapy , Knee Joint/surgery , Nitrous Oxide/administration & dosage , Oxygen Inhalation Therapy , Pain, Postoperative/prevention & control , Aged , Analgesics, Non-Narcotic/adverse effects , Arthralgia/diagnosis , Arthralgia/etiology , Arthralgia/physiopathology , Arthritis/diagnosis , Arthritis/physiopathology , Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee/adverse effects , China , Double-Blind Method , Exercise Therapy/adverse effects , Female , Humans , Knee Joint/physiopathology , Male , Middle Aged , Nitrous Oxide/adverse effects , Oxygen Inhalation Therapy/adverse effects , Pain Measurement , Pain, Postoperative/diagnosis , Pain, Postoperative/etiology , Pain, Postoperative/physiopathology , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome
6.
J Pain Symptom Manage ; 57(6): 1043-1050, 2019 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30853549

ABSTRACT

CONTEXT: Leukemia is the most common cancer in the childhood population. Lumbar puncture (LP) plays central role in the diagnosis and treatment process, but options for analgesia are limited. OBJECTIVES: The present study aims to evaluate the efficacy of a fixed N2O/O2 mixture to reduce pain in children with leukemia during LP as compared with placebo. METHODS: A double-blind, placebo-controlled, and randomized clinical trial involving children who needed LP for diagnosis or treatment was conducted in the pediatrics department of the General Hospital of Ningxia Medical University. Eligible patients were randomly assigned to inhale either a fixed N2O/O2 mixture or O2. The primary endpoint was the maximal pain level felt by the patient during the procedure measured using a numerical rating scale (0-10). RESULTS: One-hundred fourteen consecutive patients were enrolled in this study and randomized. Pain scores during the procedure showed a significant decrease in N2O/O2 mixture-treated patients to 1.05 ± 1.40 versus 8.00 ± 2.13 in controls (P < 0.01). No serious adverse effects were attributed to N2O/O2 mixture inhalation. Analysis of the satisfaction of patients receiving N2O/O2 mixture indicated that medical staff were satisfied with this treatment. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated that self-administered fixed N2O/O2 is efficient to reduce pain related to LP in children with leukemia.


Subject(s)
Analgesics, Non-Narcotic/therapeutic use , Leukemia/complications , Nitrous Oxide/therapeutic use , Oxygen/therapeutic use , Pain/drug therapy , Pain/etiology , Spinal Puncture/methods , Administration, Inhalation , Adolescent , Analgesics, Non-Narcotic/adverse effects , Child , Child, Preschool , Double-Blind Method , Female , Humans , Male , Nitrous Oxide/adverse effects , Oxygen/adverse effects , Pain Measurement/drug effects , Patient Satisfaction , Spinal Puncture/adverse effects , Treatment Outcome
7.
Trials ; 19(1): 527, 2018 Sep 29.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30268163

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Acute pain is always the most common complaint in Emergency Department admissions and options for analgesia are limited. Nitrous oxide/oxygen possess many properties showing it may be an ideal analgesic method for the Emergency Department; it is quick-acting, well-tolerated, and does not mask signs and symptoms. The aim of this study is to evaluate the safety and analgesic effect of the fixed nitrous oxide/oxygen mixture for trauma patients in a busy emergency environment. METHODS: The randomized, double-blind, prospective, placebo-controlled study will be carried out in the Emergency Department of General Hospital of Ningxia Medical University. The target research objects are trauma patients who present to the Emergency Department and report moderate to severe intensities of acute pain. A total of 90 patients will be recruited and randomly assigned into the treatment and control group. The treatment group will receive conventional pain treatment plus nitrous oxide/oxygen mixture and the control group will receive conventional pain treatment plus oxygen. Neither patients, nor investigators, nor data collectors will know the nature of the gas mixture in each cylinder and the randomization list. Outcomes will be monitored at baseline(T0), 5 min (T1), and 15 min (T2) after the beginning of intervention and at 5 min post intervention (T3) for each group. The primary outcome is the level of pain relief after the initial administering of the intervention at T1, T2, and T3. Secondary outcomes include adverse events, physiological parameters, total time of the gas administration, satisfaction from both patients and healthcare professionals, and the acceptance of patients. DISCUSSION: Our previous studies suggested that a fixed nitrous oxide/oxygen mixture was an efficacious analgesic for the management of burning dressing pain and breakthrough cancer pain. The results of this study will provide a more in-depth understanding of the effect of this gas. If this treatment proves successful, it could help to generate preliminary guidelines and be implemented widely in trauma patients with pain in Emergency Departments. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Chinese Clinical Trial Register, ChiCTR-INR-16007807 . Registered on 21 January 2016.


Subject(s)
Acute Pain/drug therapy , Analgesics, Non-Narcotic/administration & dosage , Emergency Medical Services , Nitrous Oxide/administration & dosage , Oxygen Inhalation Therapy , Wounds and Injuries/drug therapy , Acute Pain/diagnosis , Acute Pain/physiopathology , Administration, Inhalation , Analgesics, Non-Narcotic/adverse effects , China , Double-Blind Method , Humans , Nitrous Oxide/adverse effects , Pain Measurement , Patient Satisfaction , Prospective Studies , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome , Wounds and Injuries/diagnosis , Wounds and Injuries/physiopathology
8.
Pain Manag Nurs ; 19(5): 506-515, 2018 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29506898

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Breakthrough pain is an extremely painful symptom that impairs quality of life in cancer patients. It negatively impacts their emotional wellbeing, physical function, and mental health. The aim of this study is to use a qualitative methodology to examine the perception of cancer patients with breakthrough pain in the Northwest of China. METHODS: A semi-structured, face-to-face interview was conducted with nine cancer patients who experienced breakthrough pain; and a qualitative content analysis was performed. RESULTS: Five themes were generated: (1) sufferings from breakthrough cancer pain, (2) hopelessness and helplessness, (3) perception of breakthrough cancer pain and analgesia, (4) strong as a Chinese, and (5) support needed from health care system. CONCLUSION: Although certain traditional cultural worldviews increase patients' acceptance of pain, healthcare providers need proper treatment guidelines to improve the quality of cancer patient care in Northwest China. We recommend that healthcare workers and hospital managers place cancer pain management in higher priority. Relevant pain management education programs should be provided to both healthcare providers and patients to improve their knowledge in these area. Healthcare professionals need to establish a mutual communication channel between patients and healthcare workers to meet patients' needs during breakthrough pain episodes in order to improve pain management. Nevertheless, the government and the healthcare system need to recognize the importance and urgency of palliative care services.


Subject(s)
Breakthrough Pain/complications , Neoplasms/complications , Adult , Aged , Breakthrough Pain/etiology , Breakthrough Pain/psychology , China , Female , Humans , Interviews as Topic/methods , Male , Middle Aged , Neoplasms/psychology , Pain Management/methods , Pain Management/standards , Palliative Care/psychology , Qualitative Research , Quality of Life/psychology
9.
BMJ Open ; 7(9): e015727, 2017 Sep 21.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28939570

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To obtain in-depth insight into the perceptions of parents and paediatricians in China regarding current procedural pain management on bone marrow aspirations and lumbar punctures in paediatric haemato-oncology department. DESIGN, SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: This qualitative study was conducted in a 4500-bed university hospital in northwest China. To collect data, in-depth semistructured interviews were conducted with parents of children with acute leukaemia (n=12) and haemato-oncology paediatricians (n=11) using purposive sampling. Interviews were audiotaped and transcribed and subjected to thematic analysis. RESULTS: The suffering of procedural pain among paediatric patients was not adequately recognised and properly treated at the paediatric haemato-oncology department. The current paediatric procedural pain management is inadequate for paediatric patients. Crucial factors were identified including lack of awareness about the damage of uncontrolled pain in children, parents' low supportive ability, the limited capacity to provide general analgesia by anaesthetists, inadequate knowledge in the usage of analgesia and sedation and lack of efficient analgesic for children's procedural pain. The participants strongly expected optimal interventions to improve paediatric procedural pain management. CONCLUSIONS: The result suggested a perceived and actual poor management of paediatric procedural pain in haemato-oncology department in northwest China. A relevant pain management education programme for paediatricians and parents as well as an effective pain medication are urgently needed in northwest China. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry. Identifier: ChiCTR-INR-16007989.


Subject(s)
Bone Marrow Examination/methods , Pain Management , Pain/etiology , Parents/psychology , Pediatricians/psychology , Spinal Puncture/adverse effects , Acute Disease , Analgesics/therapeutic use , Child , Child, Preschool , China , Female , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Humans , Interviews as Topic , Leukemia/pathology , Male , Qualitative Research
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...