ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND:HLA haploid allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation provides a chance of survival for patients with high-risk hematologic malignancies.In recent years,the research on the transplantation mode and graft selection of haploidentical transplantation is still ongoing.At present,the mixed transplantation model of non-extracorporeal T-cell removal bone marrow and peripheral blood stem cells established by the Hematology Research Center of Peking University is gradually becoming popular in China,but this model requires the collection of donor bone marrow fluid,which increases the pain and risk of the donor. OBJECTIVE:To explore the curative effect of infusion of umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cells replacing donor bone marrow cells in haploidentical peripheral blood hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for malignant hematological diseases. METHODS:Fifty hematological malignancies patients who underwent haploidentical hematopoietic stem cell transplantation from January 2019 to May 2022 were selected and randomly assigned to two study groups at a ratio of 2:3.Among them,19 patients received umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cell combined with peripheral blood stem cell transplantation,and 31 patients were treated with bone marrow cells combined with peripheral blood stem cells.The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Henan Provincial People's Hospital.The recipients of umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cells were first transfused with third-party umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cells(1×106/kg)on the day of transplantation,followed by peripheral blood hematopoietic stem cells 6 hours later.In the bone marrow group,donor bone marrow cells were transfused +1 day after transplantation and peripheral blood stem cells were transfused +2 days after transplantation.After transplantation,rabbit anti-human thymocyte immunoglobulin,cyclosporine A,mycophenolate mofetil,and a short-course methotrexate were used for graft-versus-host disease prophylaxis for all recipients. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION:No adverse events occurred during the reinfusion of umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cells.There were no significant differences between the mesenchymal stem cell group and the bone marrow group in the engraftment rate[100%(19/19)vs.96.8%(30/31),P>0.05],median duration for neutrophil engraftment(14 days vs.15 days,P>0.05)and median duration for platelet engraftment(20 days vs.19 days,P>0.05).The incidence of grade Ⅱ-Ⅳ acute graft-versus-host disease in the mesenchymal stem cell group was significantly lower than in the bone marrow group[21.1%(4/19)vs.58.1%(18/31),P = 0.01].There were no significant differences between the two groups in the incidence of chronic graft-versus-host disease[21.1%(4/19)vs.25.8%(8/31),P>0.05],the relapse rates[15.8%(3/19)vs.16.1%(5/31),P>0.05]and the incidence of early cytomegalovirus viremia[42.1%(8/19)vs.35.5%(11/31),P>0.05],and the 2-year overall survival rate[68.4%(10/19)vs.70.9%(16/31),P>0.05].It is indicated that umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cells replace donor bone marrow cells in haploidentical peripheral blood stem cell transplantation for malignant hematological diseases,which reduced the incidence of acute graft-versus-host disease after transplantation,did not increase the incidence of chronic graft-versus-host disease,recurrence rate and early cytomegalovirus viremia,and reduced the pain and risk of donor pulp extraction.
ABSTRACT
Objective@#To explore the efficacies of regimens of three-drug induction therapy (ATRA+ATO+anthracyclines) versus two-drug induction therapy (ATRA+ATO) in patients with acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL).@*Methods@#Of 184 patients diagnosed with APL from January 2009 to March 2016, 58 patients underwent three-drug induction therapy, while the rest were treated with two-drug induction therapy. Three-drug induction therapy was of ATRA (20 mg·m-2·d-1, d1-28) + ATO (0.16 mg·kg-1·d-1, d1-28) + Idarubicin (8 mg·m-2·d-1, d3-5) /daunorubicin (40 mg·m-2·d-1, d3-5) , while two-drug induction therapy ATRA+ATO with the same doses and methods as above. Of 184 cases, 69 cases accompanied with WBC counts>10×109/L, 115 cases with WBC counts≤10×109/L at onset.@*Results@#①Short-term efficacy: After one cycle induction therapy, the rates of hematologic remission, genetic remission, molecular remission and induced differentiation syndrome (DS) in three-drug regimen group were 98.3%, 87.9%, 72.4% and 0 respectively, while those in two-drug regimen group were 87.3%, 65.9%, 51.6% and 12.7% respectively. In patients with WBC >10×109/L, DS rate and early mortality in three-drug regimen group were lower than in two-drug regimen group (0 vs 15.6%, 4.2% vs 15.6%, respectively). In patients with WBC≤10×109/L, DS rate in three-drug regimen group was also lower than in two-drug regimen group (0 vs 12.3%) , but there were no statistical differences in terms of relapse and early mortality. ② Long-term efficacy: The relapse rate, overall survival (OS) and disease free survival (DFS) in three-drug regimen group were 0, 98.5%, 96.6% respectively, while those in two-drug regimen group were 8.6%, 86.5% and 84.1% respectively; the advantages of three-drug over two-drug regimen, especially in cases of WBC >10×109/L were observed. ③ Side effects: the incidences of gastrointestinal reaction, liver dysfunction, myocardial damage and headache in three-drug regimen group hardly increased.@*Conclusion@#The efficacies of three-drug induction therapy were superior to two-drug one.