'It's the ultimate observer role you're feeling and seeing what's happening to you': students' experiences of peer simulation.

Introduction: Simulation-based education (SBE) benefits learners, but multiple barriers limit curriculum integration. Peer simulation, where students are formally educated to portray patient roles in simulated interactions with their peers, might maintain the educational benefits of SBE, be cost-effective, and enable additional learning. Our research question was: 'What are the perspectives and experiences of physiotherapy students who participated in peer simulation?'. Methods: Second-year physiotherapy students (n=16) participated in a blended peer simulation programme that included preparation for patient role portrayal and simulated clinical interactions with peers. Using an interpretivist approach, students' experiences and perspectives were explored in two focus groups. Inductive thematic analysis was completed by two researchers. Results: Three primary themes were identified that characterised the experiences and perspectives of physiotherapy students: peer simulation is a valuable learning experience, specific design features enable effective peer simulation, and portraying a patient provides unique insight. Peer simulation was unexpectedly realistic, revealed knowledge and skill deficits, and improved their clinical skills. Specific design features included consistent engagement, repetitive, individualised practice, multiple forms of feedback, and detailed role preparation. Being the patient in peer simulation gave students unique and valuable insight into patients' experiences of and feelings about health issues and healthcare interactions. Conclusion: Physiotherapy students acquire new insights during peer simulation that may enrich their capabilities for practice through understanding healthcare interactions from patients' perspectives. Physiotherapy students' learning in peer simulation appears to align with the powerful learning experiences of health professional students in other immersive simulation modalities.

Students as patients: A systematic review of peer simulation in health care professional education.

CONTEXT: Evidence supports the substitution of both clinical placement time and traditional educational activities with simulation-based education (SBE). However, lack of resources can be a barrier to SBE implementation. Peer simulation provides an alternative to simulated patient (SP)-based SBE by educating students to portray patient roles. This diversifies learning experiences for students using SBE and may decrease costs. OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to determine the impact of students portraying the roles of patients in a simulation-based learning environment (peer simulation) on learning outcomes in entry-level health care professional students. METHODS: Seven databases were searched (from inception to 8 May 2019) using terms including 'peer simulation,' 'role-play' and 'simulated/standardised patient.' The studies included described a health care professional student SBE interaction involving peer simulation. Data were extracted by two independent investigators. Study quality was assessed using the Medical Education Research Study Quality Instrument (MERSQI) and Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP). A descriptive analysis was completed and meta-analysis conducted in instances in which outcomes could be pooled. RESULTS: A total of 12 studies met the inclusion criteria. Constructs measured by the studies included communication, empathy, self-efficacy and confidence. Five randomised controlled trials compared peer simulation with the use of SPs and demonstrated greater or equivalent patient empathy gains in peer simulation. Meta-analysis determined no difference in communication capabilities between the two groups. Students perceived peer simulation as comparably valuable and frequently superior to other forms of learning. This review was unable to determine effective design features of peer simulation initiatives. CONCLUSIONS: Students were positive about peer simulation, but there has been limited evaluation of learning outcome attainment. Significant heterogeneity was observed; studies were diverse in design, outcome measures and the training provided for peer patients. Peer simulation positively influences student communication and development of patient empathy and offers an alternative to learning with SPs. Further rigorous research is required to understand the impact of peer simulation for a broader range of learning outcomes and to confirm the impact of this developing educational approach.

Preparing Physiotherapy Students for Clinical Placement: Student Perceptions of Low-Cost Peer Simulation. A Mixed-Methods Study.

INTRODUCTION: Simulation is increasingly used in health care education, yet the organizational and financial costs can be prohibitive. This study aimed to investigate whether peer simulation is perceived by third-year undergraduate physiotherapy students as valuable for clinical placement preparation. METHODS: Third-year undergraduate physiotherapy students participated in a 9-week peer simulation program, using each other as patients, and were invited to complete two surveys evaluating perceptions of the program. The program consisted of weekly patient interactions during which students were required to assess and treat a "patient" under strict simulation guidelines and in accordance with stated learning objectives. Items rated included self-perceived skills, confidence, time management, and clinical placement readiness and included collection of qualitative responses. Surveys were released at commencement and completion of the simulation program. RESULTS: Of 79 third-year students, 63% completed survey 1 and 66% completed survey 2. Students had high expectations of the program and these were consistently met. Peer simulation rated highly for all items, including identifying knowledge and skill deficits, and improving confidence, clinical reasoning, time management, and communication. Simulation was considered safe, supportive, engaging, and valuable for clinical placement preparation. Students identified some lack of authenticity when working with peers. CONCLUSIONS: Peer simulation was perceived by students as valuable in preparing them for clinical placement, despite a perceived lack of realism. These findings support the use of peer simulation as an alternative to the use of more formalized standardized patients in an undergraduate physiotherapy program. Further investigation is required to establish a detailed cost analysis of the program and to determine the amount of realism required to optimize the benefits of this promising educational strategy.