Dosimetric Comparison of Proton Versus Photon Radiosurgery for Treatment of Pituitary Adenoma.

PURPOSE: To compare the dosimetric differences in stereotactic radiosurgery between use of passively scattered protons (PSRS) versus photons (XSRS) for pituitary adenomas. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Nine patients with pituitary adenomas were selected among patients receiving single-fraction proton stereotactic radiosurgery (PSRS) between 2016 and 2017. These cases were replanned with XSRS using volumetric-modulated arc therapy with 2.5 mm and 5 mm multileaf collimators (2.5XSRS and 5XSRS, respectively). PSRS was planned with a dedicated single scattering stereotactic proton unit delivered via 3 equally or unequally weighted isocentric fields. XSRS plans were created with optimization to spare organs at risk. Plans were generated using the original total treatment dose delivered in 1 fraction. RESULTS: Plans were evaluated for target volume dosimetry and estimated clinical toxicity. There was no significant difference in clinical target volume V100%, V95%, V90% or homogeneity index between treatment modalities. PSRS offered lower maximum dose (Dmax) to organs at risk and equivalent uniform dose (EUD) compared with 5XSRS and 2.5XSRS, respectively, for critical structures including optic nerve (right, Dmax 4.18, 5.32, 5.41; EUD 3.35, 4.08, 4.20) and hypothalamus (Dmax 1.71, 3.94, 3.77; EUD 0.94, 2.47, 2.39; P < .05 for PSRS vs 5XSRS and 2.5XSRS). The projected risk of secondary tumors in excess of baseline was lowest for PSRS plans (PSRS 5.28, 5XSRS 12.93, 2.5XSRS 12.66 cases per 10,000 patient-years; P = .008 for PSRS vs 5XSRS, PSRS vs 2.5XSRS, and P = .77 for 5XSRS vs 2.5XSRS). CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrate that neither modality has empirically superior dosimetry and identify potential clinical advantages as well as limitations of each technique. PSRS, 5XSRS and 2.5XSRS demonstrate comparable target volume dosimetry for pituitary adenoma. PSRS compared with XSRS modalities offers modestly decreased maximum dose and EUD to critical proximal structures and decreases risk of radiation-induced secondary tumors by more than half.

Modelling of late side-effects following cranial proton beam therapy.

BACKGROUND: The limited availability of proton beam therapy (PBT) requires individual treatment selection strategies that can be based on normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) models. We developed and externally validated NTCP models for common late side-effects following PBT in brain tumour patients to optimise patients' quality of life. METHODS: Cohorts from three PBT centres (216 patients) were investigated for several physician-rated endpoints at 12 and 24 months after PBT: alopecia, dry eye syndrome, fatigue, headache, hearing and memory impairment, and optic neuropathy. Dose-volume parameters of associated normal tissues and clinical factors were used for logistic regression modelling in a development cohort. Statistically significant parameters showing high area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) values in internal cross-validation were externally validated. In addition, analyses of the pooled cohorts and of time-dependent generalised estimating equations including all patient data were performed. RESULTS: In the validation study, mild alopecia was related to high dose parameters to the skin [e.g. the dose to 2% of the volume (D2%)] at 12 and 24 months after PBT. Mild hearing impairment at 24 months after PBT was associated with the mean dose to the ipsilateral cochlea. Additionally, the pooled analyses revealed dose-response relations between memory impairment and intermediate to high doses to the remaining brain as well as D2% of the hippocampi. Mild fatigue at 24 months after PBT was associated with D2% to the brainstem as well as with concurrent chemotherapy. Moreover, in generalised estimating equations analysis, dry eye syndrome was associated with the mean dose to the ipsilateral lacrimal gland. CONCLUSION: We developed and in part validated NTCP models for several common late side-effects following PBT in brain tumour patients. Validation studies are required for further confirmation.

Proton therapy for head and neck paragangliomas: A single institutional experience.

BACKGROUND: Although slow growing, head and neck paragangliomas (HNPG) can cause significant morbidity. We evaluated the efficacy of proton therapy in the management of HNPG. METHODS: Retrospective review of an institutional proton therapy experience of treating patients between 1997 and 2016; 37 patients and 40 tumors were included. RESULTS: Proton therapy was delivered to a median of 50.4 Gy(RBE) (range: 45-68). Having a genetic/family predisposition for HNPG was associated with multifocal tumors (P = .02) and younger diagnosis age (P = .02). Twenty-six (70%) patients had symptom improvement posttreatment, and 65% of treated tumors showed ≥20% volumetric shrinkage. The 5-year recurrence-free and overall survival rates were both 97%. Grade 2 to grade 3 toxicities (54%) included subjective hearing impairment (19%), middle ear inflammation (14%), and dry mouth (8%). There were no grade 4-5 toxicities. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with HNPGs can be effectively and safely treated with proton therapy with excellent tumor control, successful volumetric tumor reduction, and symptomatic improvement.

Development and validation of NTCP models for acute side-effects resulting from proton beam therapy of brain tumours.

BACKGROUND: The limited availability of proton beam therapy (PBT) requires individual treatment selection strategies, such as based on normal tissue complication probability (NTCP). We developed and externally validated NTCP models for common acute side-effects following PBT in brain tumour patients in effort to provide guidance on optimising patient quality of life. METHODS: An exploration cohort including 113 adult brain tumour patients who underwent PBT was investigated for the following endpoints: alopecia, scalp erythema, headache, fatigue and nausea. Dose-volume parameters of associated normal tissues were used for logistic regression modelling. Statistically significant parameters showing high area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) values in internal cross-validation were externally validated on two cohorts of 71 and 96 patients, respectively. RESULTS: Statistically significant correlations of dose-volume parameters of the skin for erythema and alopecia were found. In internal cross-validation, the following prognostic parameters were selected: V35Gy (absolute volume receiving 35 Gy) for erythema grade ≥1, D2% (dose to 2% of the volume) for alopecia grade ≥1 and D5% for alopecia grade ≥2. Validation was successful for both cohorts with AUC >0.75. A bivariable model for fatigue grade ≥1 could not be validated externally. No correlations of dose-volume parameters of the brain were seen for headache or nausea. CONCLUSION: We developed and successfully validated NTCP models for scalp erythema and alopecia in primary brain tumour patients treated with PBT.

Proton Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Brain Metastases: A Single-Institution Analysis of 370 Patients.

PURPOSE: To report the first series of proton stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for the treatment of patients with single or multiple brain metastases, including failure patterns, survival outcomes, and toxicity analysis. METHODS AND MATERIALS: This was a single-institution, retrospective study of 815 metastases from 370 patients treated with proton SRS between April 1991 and November 2016. Cumulative incidence estimates of local failure, distant brain failure, and pathologically confirmed radionecrosis and Kaplan-Meier estimates of overall survival were calculated. Fine and Gray and Cox regressions were performed to ascertain whether clinical and treatment factors were associated with the described endpoints. RESULTS: The median follow-up from proton SRS was 9.2 months. The 6- and 12-month estimates of local failure, distant brain failure, and overall survival were 4.3% (95% confidence interval [CI] 3.0%-5.9%) and 8.5% (95% CI 6.7%-10.6%), 39.1% (95% CI 34.1%-44.0%) and 48.2% (95% CI 43.0%-53.2%), and 76.0% (95% CI 71.3%-80.0%) and 51.5% (95% CI 46.3%-56.5%), respectively. The median survival was 12.4 months (95% CI 10.8-14.0 months) after proton SRS. The most common symptoms were low-grade fatigue (12.5%), headache (10.0%), motor weakness (6.2%), seizure (5.8%), and dizziness (5.4%). The rate of pathologically confirmed radionecrosis at 12 months was 3.6% (95% CI 2.0%-5.8%), and only target volume was associated on multivariate analysis (subdistribution hazard ratio 1.13, 95% CI 1.0-1.20). CONCLUSIONS: To the best of our knowledge, this is the first reported series of proton SRS for the management of brain metastases. Moderate-dose proton SRS is well tolerated and can achieve good local control outcomes, comparable to those obtained with conventional photon SRS strategies. Although proton SRS remains resource-intensive, future strategies evaluating its selective utility in patients who would benefit most from integral dose reduction should be explored.