Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters











Database
Publication year range
1.
J Am Heart Assoc ; 9(18): e018403, 2020 09 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32893704

ABSTRACT

The considerable progress made in the field of cancer treatment has led to a dramatic improvement in the prognosis of patients with cancer. However, toxicities resulting from these treatments represent a cost that can be harmful to short- and long-term outcomes. Adverse events affecting the cardiovascular system are one of the greatest challenges in the overall management of patients with cancer, as they can compromise the success of the optimal treatment against the tumor. Such adverse events are associated not only with older chemotherapy drugs such as anthracyclines but also with many targeted therapies and immunotherapies. Recognizing this concern, several American and European governing societies in oncology and cardiology have published guidelines on the cardiovascular monitoring of patients receiving potentially cardiotoxic cancer therapies, as well as on the management of cardiovascular toxicities. However, the low level of evidence supporting these guidelines has led to numerous discrepancies, leaving clinicians without a consensus strategy to apply. A cardio-oncology expert panel from the French Working Group of Cardio-Oncology has undertaken an ambitious effort to analyze and harmonize the most recent American and European guidelines to propose roadmaps and decision algorithms that would be easy for clinicians to use in their daily practice. In this statement, the experts addressed the cardiovascular monitoring strategies for the cancer drugs associated with the highest risk of cardiovascular toxicities, as well as the management of such toxicities.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Agents/toxicity , Cardiovascular Diseases/chemically induced , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Antineoplastic Agents/administration & dosage , Cardiovascular Diseases/prevention & control , Europe , Humans , Immunotherapy/adverse effects , Neoplasms/drug therapy , United States
2.
BMC Res Notes ; 13(1): 313, 2020 Jul 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32616070

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to describe return to work determinants in patients with haematological malignancy. RESULTS: This medico-social pilot study included patients with haematological malignancy in the département of Calvados, aged 18 to 55 years, diagnosed between 1st January and 31st December 2010 and alive at 1st January 2015. Patients were identified via consultation of the Lower Normandy haematological malignancy Registry. They completed a specially developed self-questionnaire, in addition to validated questionnaires for anxiety-depression, quality of life and fatigue. Of the patients contacted, 50% accepted to participate. The mean age at diagnosis was 49.8 years, and the majority of patients (79.2%) was professionally active at the time of diagnosis. Only 64.9% of subjects had stopped work due to illness. The psychological impact (demonstrated anxiety) was significantly greater in men (p = 0.01). The majority of subjects returned to work after treatment (80.7%) and among them, the mean duration of absence from work was 16.1 months. Only 52.6% of subjects had informed their occupational physician and 56.7% had benefited from a pre-return visit. The satisfactory response rate obtained is promising for the extension of the present project as a prospective multicentric study.


Subject(s)
Hematologic Neoplasms , Return to Work , Adolescent , Adult , Anxiety , Depression , Fatigue , Female , Hematologic Neoplasms/psychology , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Pilot Projects , Quality of Life , Social Factors , Young Adult
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL