Epidural analgesia and emergency delivery for presumed fetal compromise: post-hoc analysis of RAVEL multicenter randomized controlled trial.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the association between epidural analgesia (EDA) vs patient-controlled remifentanil analgesia (PCRA) and emergency delivery for presumed fetal compromise, in relation to birth-weight quintile. METHODS: This was a post-hoc per-protocol analysis of the RAVEL multicenter equivalence randomized controlled trial. Non-anomalous singleton pregnancies between 36 + 0 and 42 + 6 weeks' gestation were randomized at the time of requesting pain relief to receive EDA or PCRA. The primary outcome was emergency delivery for presumed fetal compromise. Secondary outcomes included mode of delivery and neonatal outcomes. Analysis was performed according to birth-weight quintile and was corrected for relevant confounding variables. RESULTS: Of 619 pregnant women, 336 received PCRA and 283 received EDA. Among women receiving EDA, 14.8% had an emergency delivery for presumed fetal compromise, compared with 8.3% of women who received PCRA. After adjusting for parity, women receiving EDA had higher odds of presumed fetal compromise compared to those receiving PCRA (odds ratio, 1.69 (95% CI, 1.01-2.83)). A statistically significant linear-by-linear association was observed between presumed fetal compromise and birth-weight quintile (P = 0.003). The incidence of emergency delivery for presumed fetal compromise was highest in women receiving EDA and delivering a neonate with a birth weight in the lowest quintile. CONCLUSIONS: Intrapartum EDA is associated with a higher rate of emergency delivery for presumed fetal compromise compared to treatment with PCRA. Birth-weight quintile is a strong predictor of this outcome, independent of pain management method. © 2023 The Authors. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

Effect of intrapartum epidural analgesia on rate of emergency delivery for presumed fetal compromise: nationwide registry-based cohort study.

OBJECTIVES: To determine the rate of emergency delivery for presumed fetal compromise after epidural analgesia (EDA) compared with that after alternative analgesia or no analgesia, and to assess whether this rate is increased in pregnancies with reduced placental reserve. METHODS: This was a nationwide registry-based cohort study of 629 951 singleton pregnancies delivered at 36 + 0 to 42 + 0 weeks of gestation that were recorded in the Dutch national birth registry between 2014 and 2018, including 120 426 cases that received EDA, 86 957 that received alternative analgesia and 422 568 that received no analgesia during labor. Pregnancies with congenital anomaly, chromosomal abnormality, fetal demise, planned Cesarean delivery, non-cephalic presentation at delivery and use of multiple forms of analgesia were excluded. The primary outcome was emergency delivery for presumed fetal compromise. Secondary outcomes included delivery characteristics and neonatal outcome. Negative binomial regression analysis was stratified by parity and results are presented according to birth-weight centile, after adjusting for confounding. RESULTS: Among women who received EDA, 13.2% underwent emergency delivery for presumed fetal compromise, compared with 4.1% of women who had no analgesia (relative risk (RR), 3.23 (95% CI, 3.16-3.31)) and 7.0% of women who received alternative analgesia (RR, 1.72 (95% CI, 1.67-1.77)). Independent of birth weight, the RR of presumed fetal compromise after EDA vs no analgesia was higher in parous women (adjusted RR (aRR), 2.15 (95% CI, 2.04-2.27)) compared with nulliparous women (RR, 1.88 (95% CI, 1.84-1.94)). Stratified for parity, the effect of EDA was modified significantly by birth-weight centile (interaction P-value, < 0.001 for nulliparous and 0.004 for parous women). The emergency delivery rate following EDA was highest in those with a birth weight < 5th centile (25.2% of nulliparous and 16.6% of parous women), falling with each increasing birth-weight centile category up to the 91st -95th centile (11.8% of nulliparous and 7.2% of parous women). CONCLUSIONS: Intrapartum EDA is associated with a higher risk of emergency delivery for presumed fetal compromise compared with no analgesia and alternative analgesia, after adjusting for relevant confounding. The highest rate of emergency delivery for presumed fetal compromise was observed at the lowest birth-weight centiles. RRs of emergency delivery for presumed fetal compromise after EDA were modestly but consistently modified by birth-weight centile, supporting the hypothesis that the adverse effects of EDA are exacerbated by reduced placental function. While EDA provides effective pain relief during labor, alternative strategies for pain management may be preferable in pregnancies with a high background risk of fetal compromise. © 2023 The Authors. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

Study protocol for a randomized trial on timely delivery versus expectant management in late preterm small for gestational age pregnancies with an abnormal umbilicocerebral ratio (UCR): the DRIGITAT study.

BACKGROUND: The clinical inability to correctly identify late fetal growth restriction (FGR) within a group of fetuses who are identified as small for gestational age (SGA) is an everyday problem for all obstetrician-gynecologists. This leads to substantial overtreatment of healthy small fetuses but also inadequate detection of the growth-restricted fetuses that may benefit from timely delivery. Redistribution of the fetal circulation, signaled by an abnormal ratio of the Doppler velocity flow profiles of the umbilical artery and the middle cerebral artery, more specifically an increased umbilicocerebral ratio (UCR) (or its inverse: a decreased cerebroplacental ratio (CPR)), is an adaptation to chronic hypoxemia and nutritional scarcity with long-term consequences in survivors. The relevance of an abnormal UCR has been signaled extensively, and there is a general consensus that it is a signal of FGR, independent of size, with a strong association with poor outcomes. Yet, in the current literature, no comparisons of a monitoring-delivery strategy based on unfavorable UCR have been published. The objective of the Doppler Ratio In fetal Growth restriction Intervention Trial At (near) Term (DRIGITAT) is to evaluate if the timing of the delivery based on an abnormal UCR in late preterm fetuses identified as SGA improves neurodevelopmental outcomes at 2 years of age. METHODS: The DRIGITAT study is a national multicenter cohort study of women with singleton pregnancies between 32 and 37 weeks of gestation identified as SGA, with a nested randomized controlled trial (RCT) in case of an abnormal UCR (> 0.8). Recruiting centers are in The Netherlands. In the nested RCT, women are randomized to either immediate induction of labor or expectant management from 34 weeks in case of severely abnormal size (EFW or FAC < p3) and from 36 weeks in case of mildly abnormal size (EFW or FAC p3-p10). The primary outcome measure is the 7-point average difference in the composite cognitive score (CCS) and composite motor score (CMS) on the Bayley-3 at 2 years. Secondary outcome measures include a composite outcome of neonatal morbidity, perinatal mortality, mode of delivery, maternal quality of life, costs, and predictive value of serum biomarkers. Analyses will be by intention to treat. The required sample size is determined for the nested RCT as 185 patients. DISCUSSION: This study will provide insight into the diagnostic efficacy of UCR measurement in the evaluation of SGA fetuses in order to differentiate the healthy SGA fetus from the growth-restricted fetus and to determine if a fetus with abnormal UCR benefits from early delivery. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Healthcare Evaluation Netherlands NTR6663 . Registered on 14 August 2017.

Pregnancy outcomes in women with Budd-Chiari syndrome or portal vein thrombosis - a multicentre retrospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate current practice and outcomes of pregnancy in women previously diagnosed with Budd-Chiari syndrome and/or portal vein thrombosis, with and without concomitant portal hypertension. DESIGN AND SETTING: Multicentre retrospective cohort study between 2008 and 2021. POPULATION: Women who conceived in the predefined period after the diagnosis of Budd-Chiari syndrome and/or portal vein thrombosis. METHODS AND MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: We collected data on diagnosis and clinical features. The primary outcomes were maternal mortality and live birth rate. Secondary outcomes included maternal, neonatal and obstetric complications. RESULTS: Forty-five women (12 Budd-Chiari syndrome, 33 portal vein thrombosis; 76 pregnancies) were included. Underlying prothrombotic disorders were present in 23 of the 45 women (51%). Thirty-eight women (84%) received low-molecular-weight heparin during pregnancy. Of 45 first pregnancies, 11 (24%) ended in pregnancy loss and 34 (76%) resulted in live birth of which 27 were at term (79% of live births and 60% of pregnancies). No maternal deaths were observed; one woman developed pulmonary embolism during pregnancy and two women (4%) had variceal bleeding requiring intervention. CONCLUSIONS: The high number of term live births (79%) and lower than expected risk of pregnancy-related maternal and neonatal morbidity in our cohort suggest that Budd-Chiari syndrome and/or portal vein thrombosis should not be considered as an absolute contraindication for pregnancy. Individualised, nuanced counselling and a multidisciplinary pregnancy surveillance approach are essential in this patient population. TWEETABLE ABSTRACT: Budd-Chiari syndrome and/or portal vein thrombosis should not be considered as an absolute contraindication for pregnancy.