ABSTRACT
PURPOSE: To assess the effect of antisense therapy to block kallikrein-kinin pathway in COVID-19 patients. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Randomized, placebo-controlled, double blind, controlled trial enrolling hospitalized COVID-19 patients that required supplementary oxygen to sustain peripheral oxygen saturation. Key exclusion criteria included use of mechanical ventilation or vasopressors, and patients with more than 10 days since symptom onset or more than 48 h of oxygen use. Patients were randomized to either one subcutaneous dose of ISIS721744, an antisense that blocks prekallikrein, or placebo. The primary outcome was the number of days alive and free of oxygen support up to 15 days (DAFOR15). Secondary endpoints included organ failure score, need and duration of mechanical ventilation up to 15 days, and all-cause mortality at 30 days. Exploratory endpoints included physiological parameters, biomarkers, and quality of life. RESULTS: From October 10, 2020, to December 09, 2020, 111 patients were randomized at thirteen sites in Brazil (56 to treatment and 55 to control group). Average age was 57.5 years, and most patients were male (68.5%). There were no significant differences in DAFOR15 between groups (5.9 ± 5.2 days for the intervention arm and 7.7 ± 5.1 for the control group; mean difference - 0.65, 95% confidence intervals from -2.95 to 1.36, p = 0.520). CONCLUSION: Antisense therapy designed to block the kallikrein-kinin pathway did not demonstrate clinical benefits in increasing days-alive without respiratory support at 15 days in patients with COVID-19 during the first wave in 2020. GOV IDENTIFIER: NCT04549922.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Kallikrein-Kinin System , SARS-CoV-2 , Humans , Male , Female , Middle Aged , COVID-19/therapy , COVID-19/mortality , Double-Blind Method , Aged , Respiration, Artificial , Brazil/epidemiology , Oligonucleotides, Antisense/therapeutic use , COVID-19 Drug Treatment , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
Therapeutic anticoagulation showed inconsistent results in hospitalized patients with COVID-19 and selection of the best patients to use this strategy still a challenge balancing the risk of thrombotic and hemorrhagic outcomes. The present post-hoc analysis of the ACTION trial evaluated the variables independently associated with both bleeding events (major bleeding or clinically relevant non-major bleeding) and the composite outcomes thrombotic events (venous thromboembolism, myocardial infarction, stroke, systemic embolism, or major adverse limb events). Variables were assessed one by one with independent logistic regressions and final models were chosen based on Akaike information criteria. The model for bleeding events showed an area under the curve of 0.63 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.53 to 0.73), while the model for thrombotic events had an area under the curve of 0.72 (95% CI 0.65 to 0.79). Non-invasive respiratory support was associated with thrombotic but not bleeding events, while invasive ventilation was associated with both outcomes (Odds Ratio of 7.03 [95 CI% 1.95 to 25.18] for thrombotic and 3.14 [95% CI 1.11 to 8.84] for bleeding events). Beyond respiratory support, creatinine level (Odds Ratio [OR] 1.01 95% CI 1.00 to 1.02 for every 1.0 mg/dL) and history of coronary disease (OR 3.67; 95% CI 1.32 to 10.29) were also independently associated to the risk of thrombotic events. Non-invasive respiratory support, history of coronary disease, and creatinine level may help to identify hospitalized COVID-19 patients at higher risk of thrombotic complications.ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04394377.
Subject(s)
Humans , Middle Aged , Thromboembolism , COVID-19/complications , Hemorrhage , Anticoagulants/therapeutic useABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate deaths, hospitalizations, and persistence of symptoms in patients with COVID-19 after infection in an outpatient setting during the first COVID-19 wave in Brazil. METHODS: This prospective cohort was between April 2020 and February 2021. Hospitalized or non-hospitalized COVID-19 patients until five days after symptom onset were included. The outcomes measured were incidence of death, hospitalization, and persistence of more than two symptoms 60 days after discharge. RESULTS: Out of 1,198 patients enrolled in the study, 66.7% were hospitalized. A total of 289 patients died (1 [0.3%] non-hospitalized and 288 [36%] hospitalized). At 60 days, patients non-hospitalized during admission had more persistent symptoms (16.2%) compared to hospitalized (37.1%). The COVID-19 severity variables associated with the persistence of two or more symptoms were increased age (OR= 1.03; p=0.015), respiratory rate at hospital admission (OR= 1.11; p=0.005), length of hospital stay of more than 60 days (OR= 12.24; p=0.026), and need for intensive care unit admission (OR= 2.04; p=0.038). CONCLUSION: COVID-19 survivors who were older, tachypneic at admission, had a hospital length of stay >60 days, and were admitted to the intensive care unit had more persistent symptoms than patients who did not require hospitalization in the early COVID-19 waves.ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04479488.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Hospitalization , Adult , Aged , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Ambulatory Care/statistics & numerical data , Brazil/epidemiology , Cohort Studies , COVID-19/mortality , COVID-19/epidemiology , Hospitalization/statistics & numerical data , Length of Stay/statistics & numerical data , Outpatients/statistics & numerical data , Prospective Studies , Severity of Illness IndexABSTRACT
Chronic Chagas cardiomyopathy (CCC) has unique pathogenic and clinical features with worse prognosis than other causes of heart failure (HF), despite the fact that patients with CCC are often younger and have fewer comorbidities. Patients with CCC were not adequately represented in any of the landmark HF studies that support current treatment guidelines. PARACHUTE-HF (Prevention And Reduction of Adverse outcomes in Chagasic Heart failUre Trial Evaluation) is an active-controlled, randomized, phase IV trial designed to evaluate the effect of sacubitril/valsartan 200 mg twice daily vs enalapril 10 mg twice daily added to standard of care treatment for HF. The study aims to enroll approximately 900 patients with CCC and reduced ejection fraction at around 100 sites in Latin America. The primary outcome is a hierarchical composite of time from randomization to cardiovascular death, first HF hospitalization, or relative change from baseline to week 12 in NT-proBNP levels. PARACHUTE-HF will provide new data on the treatment of this high-risk population. (Efficacy and Safety of Sacubitril/Valsartan Compared With Enalapril on Morbidity, Mortality, and NT-proBNP Change in Patients With CCC [PARACHUTE-HF]; NCT04023227).
Subject(s)
Aminobutyrates , Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists , Biphenyl Compounds , Chagas Cardiomyopathy , Drug Combinations , Enalapril , Heart Failure , Tetrazoles , Valsartan , Humans , Biphenyl Compounds/therapeutic use , Aminobutyrates/therapeutic use , Enalapril/therapeutic use , Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists/therapeutic use , Chagas Cardiomyopathy/drug therapy , Heart Failure/drug therapy , Tetrazoles/therapeutic use , Stroke Volume/physiology , Peptide Fragments/blood , Chronic Disease , Natriuretic Peptide, Brain/blood , Male , Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Female , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: It is unknown whether lymphopenia is a risk factor for the reactivation of Chagas disease in heart transplantation (HTx), as recently described in the reactivation of cytomegalovirus in transplant patients. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether lymphopenia in the perioperative period of heart transplantation is related to early Trypanosoma cruzi parasitemia. METHODS: This observational, retrospective study analyzed a sample from January 2014 to January 2023). Parasitemia was evaluated in the first 3 months after HTx using serum polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and compared with the total lymphocyte count in the perioperative period of HTx using receiver operating characteristic curves. Baseline characteristics were compared with PCR for Chagas using independent Cox proportional hazards models. A significance level of 5% was adopted. RESULTS: The sample (n = 35) had a mean age of 52.5 ± 8.1 years, and 22 patients (62.8%) had positive PCR for Chagas. The mean lowest lymphocyte values in the first 14 days after HTx were 398 ± 189 and 755 ± 303 cells/mm3 in patients with and without parasitemia, respectively, within 3 months after HTx (area under the curve = 0.857; 95% confidence interval: 0.996 to 0.718, sensitivity and specificity of 83.3% and 86.4%). A cutoff value of less than 550 lymphocytes/mm3 was determined as a risk factor for the presence of parasitemia. Patients with lymphocytes < 550 units/mm3 in the first 14 days after HTx presented positive PCR in 80% of cases. For every increase of 100 lymphocytes/mm3, the risk of PCR positivity was reduced by 26% (hazard rate ratio = 0.74; 95% confidence interval: 0.59 to 0.93, p = 0.009). CONCLUSION: There was an association between lymphopenia in the perioperative period of HTx and early T. cruzi parasitemia detected by PCR.
FUNDAMENTO: É desconhecido se a linfopenia é fator de risco para a reativação da doença de Chagas no transplante cardíaco (TxC), como recentemente descrito na reativação de citomegalovírus em pacientes transplantados. OBJETIVO: Avaliar se a linfopenia no perioperatório do TxC está relacionada à parasitemia precoce pelo Trypanosoma cruzi. MÉTODOS: Amostra analisada (janeiro de 2014 a janeiro de 2023) em estudo observacional e retrospectivo. A parasitemia foi avaliada nos primeiros 3 meses após o TxC por meio da reação em cadeia da polimerase sérica (PCR) e comparada com a contagem total de linfócitos no perioperatório do TxC por curvas ROC. Comparadas características de base com a PCR Chagas por modelos de risco proporcionais de Cox independentes. Nível de significância adotado de 5%. RESULTADOS: Amostra (n = 35) apresentou idade média de 52,5 ± 8,1 anos e PCR Chagas positiva em 22 pacientes (62,8%). As médias dos menores valores de linfócitos nos primeiros 14 dias do TxC foram 398 ± 189 e 755 ± 303 células/mm3 em pacientes com e sem parasitemia nos 3 meses após o TxC, respectivamente (área sob a curva = 0,857; intervalo de confiança de 95%: 0,996 a 0,718, sensibilidade e especificidade de 83,3% e 86,4%). Determinado valor de corte inferior a 550 linfócitos/mm3 como fator de risco para presença de parasitemia. Pacientes com linfócitos < 550 unidades/mm3 nos primeiros 14 dias do pós-TxC apresentaram PCR positiva em 80% dos casos. Para cada aumento de 100 linfócitos/mm3, o risco de positividade da PCR é reduzido em 26% (razão de riscos = 0,74; intervalo de confiança de 95%: 0,59 a 0,93, p = 0,009). CONCLUSÃO: Houve associação entre a linfopenia no perioperatório do TxC com a parasitemia precoce pelo T. cruzi detectada por PCR.
Subject(s)
Chagas Disease , Heart Transplantation , Lymphopenia , Parasitemia , Polymerase Chain Reaction , Trypanosoma cruzi , Humans , Heart Transplantation/adverse effects , Male , Middle Aged , Female , Trypanosoma cruzi/genetics , Trypanosoma cruzi/isolation & purification , Retrospective Studies , Lymphocyte Count , Chagas Disease/complications , Polymerase Chain Reaction/methods , Adult , Risk Factors , Time Factors , Predictive Value of Tests , Chagas Cardiomyopathy/surgery , Chagas Cardiomyopathy/blood , ROC CurveABSTRACT
Importance: Sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT-2) inhibitors improve outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes, heart failure, and chronic kidney disease, but their effect on outcomes of critically ill patients with organ failure is unknown. Objective: To determine whether the addition of dapagliflozin, an SGLT-2 inhibitor, to standard intensive care unit (ICU) care improves outcomes in a critically ill population with acute organ dysfunction. Design, Setting, and Participants: Multicenter, randomized, open-label, clinical trial conducted at 22 ICUs in Brazil. Participants with unplanned ICU admission and presenting with at least 1 organ dysfunction (respiratory, cardiovascular, or kidney) were enrolled between November 22, 2022, and August 30, 2023, with follow-up through September 27, 2023. Intervention: Participants were randomized to 10 mg of dapagliflozin (intervention, n = 248) plus standard care or to standard care alone (control, n = 259) for up to 14 days or until ICU discharge, whichever occurred first. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was a hierarchical composite of hospital mortality, initiation of kidney replacement therapy, and ICU length of stay through 28 days, analyzed using the win ratio method. Secondary outcomes included the individual components of the hierarchical outcome, duration of organ support-free days, ICU, and hospital stay, assessed using bayesian regression models. Results: Among 507 randomized participants (mean age, 63.9 [SD, 15] years; 46.9%, women), 39.6% had an ICU admission due to suspected infection. The median time from ICU admission to randomization was 1 day (IQR, 0-1). The win ratio for dapagliflozin for the primary outcome was 1.01 (95% CI, 0.90 to 1.13; P = .89). Among all secondary outcomes, the highest probability of benefit found was 0.90 for dapagliflozin regarding use of kidney replacement therapy among 27 patients (10.9%) in the dapagliflozin group vs 39 (15.1%) in the control group. Conclusion and Relevance: The addition of dapagliflozin to standard care for critically ill patients and acute organ dysfunction did not improve clinical outcomes; however, confidence intervals were wide and could not exclude relevant benefits or harms for dapagliflozin. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05558098.
Subject(s)
Benzhydryl Compounds , Critical Illness , Glucosides , Multiple Organ Failure , Sodium-Glucose Transporter 2 Inhibitors , Aged , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Benzhydryl Compounds/therapeutic use , Critical Illness/therapy , Glucosides/therapeutic use , Glucosides/adverse effects , Hospital Mortality , Intensive Care Units , Length of Stay , Multiple Organ Failure/drug therapy , Multiple Organ Failure/mortality , Renal Replacement Therapy , Sodium-Glucose Transporter 2 Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Sodium-Glucose Transporter 2 Inhibitors/adverse effects , BrazilABSTRACT
This secondary analysis of a randomized clinical trial investigates the association of COVID-19 vaccination with incidence of cardiopulmonary events among patients who had experienced acute coronary syndromes.
Subject(s)
Acute Coronary Syndrome , COVID-19 Vaccines , COVID-19 , SARS-CoV-2 , Humans , COVID-19/prevention & control , Female , Male , COVID-19 Vaccines/adverse effects , Aged , Middle Aged , Vaccination/adverse effectsABSTRACT
Therapeutic anticoagulation showed inconsistent results in hospitalized patients with COVID-19 and selection of the best patients to use this strategy still a challenge balancing the risk of thrombotic and hemorrhagic outcomes. The present post-hoc analysis of the ACTION trial evaluated the variables independently associated with both bleeding events (major bleeding or clinically relevant non-major bleeding) and the composite outcomes thrombotic events (venous thromboembolism, myocardial infarction, stroke, systemic embolism, or major adverse limb events). Variables were assessed one by one with independent logistic regressions and final models were chosen based on Akaike information criteria. The model for bleeding events showed an area under the curve of 0.63 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.53 to 0.73), while the model for thrombotic events had an area under the curve of 0.72 (95% CI 0.65 to 0.79). Non-invasive respiratory support was associated with thrombotic but not bleeding events, while invasive ventilation was associated with both outcomes (Odds Ratio of 7.03 [95 CI% 1.95 to 25.18] for thrombotic and 3.14 [95% CI 1.11 to 8.84] for bleeding events). Beyond respiratory support, creatinine level (Odds Ratio [OR] 1.01 95% CI 1.00 to 1.02 for every 1.0 mg/dL) and history of coronary disease (OR 3.67; 95% CI 1.32 to 10.29) were also independently associated to the risk of thrombotic events. Non-invasive respiratory support, history of coronary disease, and creatinine level may help to identify hospitalized COVID-19 patients at higher risk of thrombotic complications.ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04394377.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Fibrin Fibrinogen Degradation Products , Hemorrhage , Thrombosis , Humans , COVID-19/blood , COVID-19/complications , COVID-19/diagnosis , Fibrin Fibrinogen Degradation Products/analysis , Fibrin Fibrinogen Degradation Products/metabolism , Hemorrhage/blood , Hemorrhage/diagnosis , Hemorrhage/etiology , Hemorrhage/chemically induced , Male , Female , Thrombosis/blood , Thrombosis/etiology , Thrombosis/diagnosis , Aged , Middle Aged , Hospitalization , Risk Factors , SARS-CoV-2 , Anticoagulants/therapeutic use , Anticoagulants/adverse effectsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Driving pressure has been suggested to be the main driver of ventilator-induced lung injury and mortality in observational studies of acute respiratory distress syndrome. Whether a driving pressure-limiting strategy can improve clinical outcomes is unclear. OBJECTIVE: To describe the protocol and statistical analysis plan that will be used to test whether a driving pressure-limiting strategy including positive end-expiratory pressure titration according to the best respiratory compliance and reduction in tidal volume is superior to a standard strategy involving the use of the ARDSNet low-positive end-expiratory pressure table in terms of increasing the number of ventilator-free days in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome due to community-acquired pneumonia. METHODS: The ventilator STrAtegy for coMmunIty acquired pNeumoniA (STAMINA) study is a randomized, multicenter, open-label trial that compares a driving pressure-limiting strategy to the ARDSnet low-positive end-expiratory pressure table in patients with moderate-to-severe acute respiratory distress syndrome due to community-acquired pneumonia admitted to intensive care units. We expect to recruit 500 patients from 20 Brazilian and 2 Colombian intensive care units. They will be randomized to a driving pressure-limiting strategy group or to a standard strategy using the ARDSNet low-positive end-expiratory pressure table. In the driving pressure-limiting strategy group, positive end-expiratory pressure will be titrated according to the best respiratory system compliance. OUTCOMES: The primary outcome is the number of ventilator-free days within 28 days. The secondary outcomes are in-hospital and intensive care unit mortality and the need for rescue therapies such as extracorporeal life support, recruitment maneuvers and inhaled nitric oxide. CONCLUSION: STAMINA is designed to provide evidence on whether a driving pressure-limiting strategy is superior to the ARDSNet low-positive end-expiratory pressure table strategy for increasing the number of ventilator-free days within 28 days in patients with moderate-to-severe acute respiratory distress syndrome. Here, we describe the rationale, design and status of the trial.
Subject(s)
Community-Acquired Infections , Positive-Pressure Respiration , Respiratory Distress Syndrome , Humans , Brazil/epidemiology , Colombia/epidemiology , Community-Acquired Infections/therapy , Intensive Care Units , Pneumonia/therapy , Positive-Pressure Respiration/methods , Prospective Studies , Respiratory Distress Syndrome/therapy , Respiratory Distress Syndrome/physiopathology , Tidal Volume , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Multicenter Studies as TopicABSTRACT
PURPOSE: Cyclin inhibitors plus endocrine therapy represent the reference standard for hormone receptor-positive (HR+)/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2-) locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer (ABC). Efficacy results on hard end points such as overall survival come from well-designed randomized clinical trials (RCTs). However, a limitation of RCTs is the low external results validity, and their extrapolation to a broader population may not be appropriate. Real-world studies can overcome these limitations, also increasing the reliability of RCTs. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The BrasiLEEira was an observational, longitudinal, retrospective, multicenter study to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of ribociclib plus nonsteroidal aromatase inhibitors in Brazilian women age 18 years or older with HR+/HER2- ABC. The study was approved by the institutional review boards of all 11 hospitals. Data were collected anonymously from medical records using an electronic case report form designed by an independent academic research organization, which conducted the study considering all recommendations of international guidelines. The primary end point was 1-year progression-free survival (PFS) rate. Secondary end points included mortality, dose reduction, and safety. RESULTS: The mean age of 76 patients was 57 years, and 28.9% were Black/Brown. The most prevalent comorbidity was arterial hypertension (34.7%). About 26.0% had endocrine-resistant disease, and 54.1% had more than three metastatic sites. The PFS rate was 77.6%. Three patients died (3.9%). Dose reductions occurred in 37.7% of patients. The most common adverse event was neutropenia (68.4%). CONCLUSION: The high-quality evidence from the BrasiLEEira study corroborates the RCTs' findings, expanding its validity to a broader spectrum and underrepresented population who may benefit from ribociclib treatment.
Subject(s)
Aromatase Inhibitors , Breast Neoplasms , Purines , Female , Humans , Aminopyridines/adverse effects , Aromatase Inhibitors/adverse effects , Breast Neoplasms/drug therapy , Breast Neoplasms/pathology , Middle AgedABSTRACT
INTRODUÇÃO: A troca valvar aórtica transcateter (TAVI) está estabelecida para o tratamento da estenose aórtica, independente do risco cirúrgico. Estudos demonstram prevalência variável de doença arterial coronária (DAC) nesta população, podendo chegar a até 81% dos pacientes tratados. A presença de DAC em concomitância com a estenose aórtica oferece um pior prognóstico a estes pacientes e o melhor momento para o tratamento da doença coronária ainda é controverso. OBJETIVO: Avaliar a incidência de DAC com angio-tomografia (angio-TC) em pacientes submetidos a TAVI em um hospital terciário de cardiologia e o impacto prognóstico da presença de DAC após um ano de seguimento. MEÌTODOS: Estudo longitudinal, retrospectivo, com inclusão de pacientes submetidos consecutivamente a TAVI entre set/2020 a Dez/2023. A indicaçaÌo de TAVI esteve baseada em diretriz da Sociedade Brasileira de Cardiologia, corroborada pelo Heart Team institucional. A investigação de DAC seguiu as recomendações mais recentes da mesma diretriz. Dados demográficos, comorbidades e eventos adversos foram computados para análise estatística. Análise multivariada foi realizada para avaliar fatores preditivos associados a ocorrência de eventos cardiovasculares (EC) em 1 ano. RESULTADOS: Um total de 268 pacientes submetidos a TAVI, com idade média de 79 anos, a maioria do sexo feminino (66%), com STS mortalidade médio de 3,1 ( 2.1 4.1) e alta prevalência de comorbidades associadas (tabela 1). As lesões foram avaliadas por angio-TC (Tabela 2). 96 pacientes possuíam dados após 1 ano de acompanhamento para análise de desfechos (tabela 3), com incidência de eventos cardiovasculares de 9% (tabela 4). Após análise multivariada, a presença de lesão de tronco da coronária esquerda e coronária direita foram fatores preditores para ocorrência de EC (Figura 1). Conclusão: Os resultados de nossa experiência estão alinhados aos resultados dos mais recentes ensaios clínicos randomizados. Apesar da alta incidência de DAC detectada através de angio-TC, a incidência de EC na população foi baixa durante o seguimento. A presença lesão em tronco da coronária esquerda e coronária direita, foram associados a maior prevalência de eventos adversos no seguimento de 1 ano.
Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Aged , Aortic Valve Stenosis , Coronary Artery Disease , Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement , Multivariate AnalysisABSTRACT
INTRODUÇÃO: A utilização de modelos preditores de risco, como o "The Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) risk score" e o "European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation (EuroSCORE II)", é recomendada para avaliação da mortalidade operatória na cirurgia de revascularização do miocárdio (CRM). Entretanto, seus desempenhos são questionáveis em centros brasileiros. OBJETIVO: Avaliar o desempenho do STS score e do EuroSCORE II na cirurgia revascularização do miocárdio isolada em um centro de referência no Brasil. MÉTODOS: Estudo observacional e prospetivo incluindo 438 pacientes submetidos à CRM isolada no período de maio de 2022 a maio de 2023 em um centro de referência brasileiro. A mortalidade observada foi comparada com a mortalidade predita (STS score e EuroSCORE II) por discriminação (área abaixo da curva - AUC) e calibração (razão observado/esperado - O/E) na amostra total e nos subgrupos de doença arterial coronariana (DAC) estável e síndrome coronariana aguda (SCA). RESULTADOS: A mortalidade observada foi de 4,3% (n=19) e estimada em 1,21% e 2,74% pelo STS e EuroSCORE II, respetivamente. Avaliação da discriminação foi deficitária para o STS (AUC=0,646; IC95% 0,760-0,532) e Euro II (AUC=0,697; IC95% 0,802-0,593). A calibração foi ausente para o modelo norte-americano (p<0,05) e razoável para o modelo europeu (O/E=1,59, p=0,056). . Nos subgrupos, o EuroSCORE II apresentou AUC de 0,616 (IC95% 0,752-0,480) e 0,826 (IC95% 0,991-0,661), enquanto o STS obteve AUC de 0,467 (IC95% 0,622-0,312) e 0,855 (IC95% 1,0-0,706) em pacientes com SCA e DAC (figura 1), respetivamente, demonstrando bom desempenho dos modelos em pacientes estáveis (eletivos), como observado em outros estudos (tabela 1), provavelmente por se tratar de uma população semelhante àquela onde esses modelos foram criados/validados. CONCLUSÃO: Os modelos preditores não apresentaram desempenho ideal na amostra total, mas o modelo europeu foi superior, sobretudo em pacientes estáveis eletivos, onde a acurácia foi satisfatória.
Subject(s)
Forecasting , Myocardial Revascularization/adverse effects , Risk AssessmentABSTRACT
INTRODUÇÃO: A insuficiência cardíaca com fração de ejeção preservada (ICFEP) aumenta significativamente o risco de desenvolvimento de doença renal crônica (DRC), afetando adversamente desfechos clínicos como mortalidade prematura, morbidade, complicações multiorgânicas e custos de saúde. Este estudo investiga fatores que contribuem para a deterioração da função renal em pacientes com ICFEP, visando aprimorar o entendimento da doença e as estratégias de manejo. MÉTODOS: Em uma análise transversal, dados clínicos, laboratoriais e ecocardiográficos de pacientes ambulatoriais com suspeita de ICFEP foram avaliados. A probabilidade de ICFEP foi determinada usando os escores H2FPEF e HFA-PEFF. A função renal foi avaliada por níveis de eGFR, creatinina e microalbuminúria. Modelos de regressão logística multivariada foram utilizados para identificar fatores associados ao declínio da função renal. RESULTADOS: Dados de 569 pacientes (idade mediana: 64 anos; 66% feminino) foram analisados. Observamos uma correlação inversa entre eGFR mediano e escores de risco de ICFEP. O escore HFA-PEFF demonstrou um valor preditivo ligeiramente superior para DRC (OR: 1.8; IC 95%: 1.6-2.0) em comparação ao escore H2FPEF (OR: 1.5; IC 95%: 1.3-1.7). Maiores chances de DRC (eGFR< 60 mL/min/1.73m²) foram vinculadas ao escore HFA-PEFF com o marcador NT-ProBNP, independentemente de fibrilação atrial (FA - OR: 6.5; IC 95%: 3.1-14.1; Ritmo sinusal - OR: 3.4; IC 95%: 2.0-5.7), e com marcadores ecocardiográficos de disfunção diastólica (OR: 1.9; IC 95%: 1.4-2.7). O escore H2FPEF foi associado com idade (OR: 4.6; IC 95%: 2.8-7.9), hipertensão (OR: 3.2; IC 95%: 1.3-9.6), disfunção diastólica (OR: 2.0; IC 95%: 1.3-3.0) e fibrilação atrial (OR: 1.3; IC 95%: 1.1-1.5). Notavelmente, análises adicionais indicaram que um declínio no débito cardíaco foi associado com maiores chances de desenvolver DRC (OR: 1.6; IC 95%: 1.2-2.1). No entanto, fatores de risco tradicionais como obesidade, diabetes mellitus tipo 2 (DM2) e dislipidemia não mostraram associação significativa com o desenvolvimento de DRC nesta população. CONCLUSÃO: Associações significativas foram identificadas entre o declínio da função renal e escores de risco de ICFEP, destacando idade, hipertensão, disfunção diastólica e fibrilação atrial como fatores cruciais associados ao aumento do risco de DRC em pacientes com ICFEP. Estes resultados enfatizam o papel crucial da deterioração da função cardíaca na contribuição para o desenvolvimento de DRC em indivíduos em risco para ICFEP.
Subject(s)
Renal Insufficiency, Chronic , Heart Failure, Diastolic , Heart FailureABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Obesity represents a major obstacle for controlling hypertension, the leading risk factor for cardiovascular mortality. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to determine the long-term effects of bariatric surgery on hypertension control and remission. METHODS: We conducted a randomized clinical trial with subjects with obesity grade 1 or 2 plus hypertension using at least 2 medications. We excluded subjects with previous cardiovascular events and poorly controlled type 2 diabetes. Subjects were assigned to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) combined with medical therapy (MT) or MT alone. We reassessed the original primary outcome (reduction of at least 30% of the total antihypertensive medications while maintaining blood pressure levels <140/90 mm Hg) at 5 years. The main analysis followed the intention-to-treat principle. RESULTS: A total of 100 subjects were included (76% women, age 43.8 ± 9.2 years, body mass index: 36.9 ± 2.7 kg/m2). At 5 years, body mass index was 36.40 kg/m2 (95% CI: 35.28-37.52 kg/m2) for MT and 28.01 kg/m2 (95% CI: 26.95-29.08 kg/m2) for RYGB (P < 0.001). Compared with MT, RYGB promoted a significantly higher rate of number of medications reduction (80.7% vs 13.7%; relative risk: 5.91; 95% CI: 2.58-13.52; P < 0.001) and the mean number of antihypertensive medications was 2.97 (95% CI: 2.33-3.60) for MT and 0.80 (95% CI: 0.51-1.09) for RYGB (P < 0.001). The rates of hypertension remission were 2.4% vs 46.9% (relative risk: 19.66; 95% CI: 2.74-141.09; P < 0.001). Sensitivity analysis considering only completed cases revealed consistent results. Interestingly, the rate of apparent resistant hypertension was lower after RYGB (0% vs 15.2%). CONCLUSIONS: Bariatric surgery represents an effective and durable strategy to control hypertension and related polypharmacy in subjects with obesity. (GAstric bypass to Treat obEse Patients With steAdy hYpertension [GATEWAY]; NCT01784848).
ABSTRACT
Resumo Fundamento É desconhecido se a linfopenia é fator de risco para a reativação da doença de Chagas no transplante cardíaco (TxC), como recentemente descrito na reativação de citomegalovírus em pacientes transplantados. Objetivo Avaliar se a linfopenia no perioperatório do TxC está relacionada à parasitemia precoce pelo Trypanosoma cruzi. Métodos Amostra analisada (janeiro de 2014 a janeiro de 2023) em estudo observacional e retrospectivo. A parasitemia foi avaliada nos primeiros 3 meses após o TxC por meio da reação em cadeia da polimerase sérica (PCR) e comparada com a contagem total de linfócitos no perioperatório do TxC por curvas ROC. Comparadas características de base com a PCR Chagas por modelos de risco proporcionais de Cox independentes. Nível de significância adotado de 5%. Resultados Amostra (n = 35) apresentou idade média de 52,5 ± 8,1 anos e PCR Chagas positiva em 22 pacientes (62,8%). As médias dos menores valores de linfócitos nos primeiros 14 dias do TxC foram 398 ± 189 e 755 ± 303 células/mm3 em pacientes com e sem parasitemia nos 3 meses após o TxC, respectivamente (área sob a curva = 0,857; intervalo de confiança de 95%: 0,996 a 0,718, sensibilidade e especificidade de 83,3% e 86,4%). Determinado valor de corte inferior a 550 linfócitos/mm3 como fator de risco para presença de parasitemia. Pacientes com linfócitos < 550 unidades/mm3 nos primeiros 14 dias do pós-TxC apresentaram PCR positiva em 80% dos casos. Para cada aumento de 100 linfócitos/mm3, o risco de positividade da PCR é reduzido em 26% (razão de riscos = 0,74; intervalo de confiança de 95%: 0,59 a 0,93, p = 0,009). Conclusão Houve associação entre a linfopenia no perioperatório do TxC com a parasitemia precoce pelo T. cruzi detectada por PCR.
Abstract Background It is unknown whether lymphopenia is a risk factor for the reactivation of Chagas disease in heart transplantation (HTx), as recently described in the reactivation of cytomegalovirus in transplant patients. Objective To evaluate whether lymphopenia in the perioperative period of heart transplantation is related to early Trypanosoma cruzi parasitemia. Methods This observational, retrospective study analyzed a sample from January 2014 to January 2023). Parasitemia was evaluated in the first 3 months after HTx using serum polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and compared with the total lymphocyte count in the perioperative period of HTx using receiver operating characteristic curves. Baseline characteristics were compared with PCR for Chagas using independent Cox proportional hazards models. A significance level of 5% was adopted. Results The sample (n = 35) had a mean age of 52.5 ± 8.1 years, and 22 patients (62.8%) had positive PCR for Chagas. The mean lowest lymphocyte values in the first 14 days after HTx were 398 ± 189 and 755 ± 303 cells/mm3 in patients with and without parasitemia, respectively, within 3 months after HTx (area under the curve = 0.857; 95% confidence interval: 0.996 to 0.718, sensitivity and specificity of 83.3% and 86.4%). A cutoff value of less than 550 lymphocytes/mm3 was determined as a risk factor for the presence of parasitemia. Patients with lymphocytes < 550 units/mm3 in the first 14 days after HTx presented positive PCR in 80% of cases. For every increase of 100 lymphocytes/mm3, the risk of PCR positivity was reduced by 26% (hazard rate ratio = 0.74; 95% confidence interval: 0.59 to 0.93, p = 0.009). Conclusion There was an association between lymphopenia in the perioperative period of HTx and early T. cruzi parasitemia detected by PCR.
ABSTRACT
ABSTRACT Background: Driving pressure has been suggested to be the main driver of ventilator-induced lung injury and mortality in observational studies of acute respiratory distress syndrome. Whether a driving pressure-limiting strategy can improve clinical outcomes is unclear. Objective: To describe the protocol and statistical analysis plan that will be used to test whether a driving pressure-limiting strategy including positive end-expiratory pressure titration according to the best respiratory compliance and reduction in tidal volume is superior to a standard strategy involving the use of the ARDSNet low-positive end-expiratory pressure table in terms of increasing the number of ventilator-free days in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome due to community-acquired pneumonia. Methods: The ventilator STrAtegy for coMmunIty acquired pNeumoniA (STAMINA) study is a randomized, multicenter, open-label trial that compares a driving pressure-limiting strategy to the ARDSnet low-positive end-expiratory pressure table in patients with moderate-to-severe acute respiratory distress syndrome due to community-acquired pneumonia admitted to intensive care units. We expect to recruit 500 patients from 20 Brazilian and 2 Colombian intensive care units. They will be randomized to a driving pressure-limiting strategy group or to a standard strategy using the ARDSNet low-positive end-expiratory pressure table. In the driving pressure-limiting strategy group, positive end-expiratory pressure will be titrated according to the best respiratory system compliance. Outcomes: The primary outcome is the number of ventilator-free days within 28 days. The secondary outcomes are in-hospital and intensive care unit mortality and the need for rescue therapies such as extracorporeal life support, recruitment maneuvers and inhaled nitric oxide. Conclusion: STAMINA is designed to provide evidence on whether a driving pressure-limiting strategy is superior to the ARDSNet low-positive end-expiratory pressure table strategy for increasing the number of ventilator-free days within 28 days in patients with moderate-to-severe acute respiratory distress syndrome. Here, we describe the rationale, design and status of the trial.
RESUMO Contexto: Em estudos observacionais sobre a síndrome do desconforto respiratório agudo, sugeriu-se que a driving pressure é o principal fator de lesão pulmonar induzida por ventilador e de mortalidade. Não está claro se uma estratégia de limitação da driving pressure pode melhorar os desfechos clínicos. Objetivo: Descrever o protocolo e o plano de análise estatística que serão usados para testar se uma estratégia de limitação da driving pressure envolvendo a titulação da pressão positiva expiratória final de acordo com a melhor complacência respiratória e a redução do volume corrente é superior a uma estratégia padrão envolvendo o uso da tabela de pressão positiva expiratória final baixa do protocolo ARDSNet, em termos de aumento do número de dias sem ventilador em pacientes com síndrome do desconforto respiratório agudo devido à pneumonia adquirida na comunidade. Métodos: O estudo STAMINA (ventilator STrAtegy for coMmunIty acquired pNeumoniA) é randomizado, multicêntrico e aberto e compara uma estratégia de limitação da driving pressure com a tabela de pressão positiva expiratória final baixa do protocolo ARDSnet em pacientes com síndrome do desconforto respiratório agudo moderada a grave devido à pneumonia adquirida na comunidade internados em unidades de terapia intensiva. Esperamos recrutar 500 pacientes de 20 unidades de terapia intensiva brasileiras e duas colombianas. Eles serão randomizados para um grupo da estratégia de limitação da driving pressure ou para um grupo de estratégia padrão usando a tabela de pressão positiva expiratória final baixa do protocolo ARDSnet. No grupo da estratégia de limitação da driving pressure, a pressão positiva expiratória final será titulada de acordo com a melhor complacência do sistema respiratório. Desfechos: O desfecho primário é o número de dias sem ventilador em 28 dias. Os desfechos secundários são a mortalidade hospitalar e na unidade de terapia intensiva e a necessidade de terapias de resgate, como suporte de vida extracorpóreo, manobras de recrutamento e óxido nítrico inalado. Conclusão: O STAMINA foi projetado para fornecer evidências sobre se uma estratégia de limitação da driving pressure é superior à estratégia da tabela de pressão positiva expiratória final baixa do protocolo ARDSnet para aumentar o número de dias sem ventilador em 28 dias em pacientes com síndrome do desconforto respiratório agudo moderada a grave. Aqui, descrevemos a justificativa, o desenho e o status do estudo.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Critical illness is a major ongoing health care burden worldwide and is associated with high mortality rates. Sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors have consistently shown benefits in cardiovascular and renal outcomes. The effects of sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors in acute illness have not been properly investigated. METHODS: DEFENDER is an investigator-initiated, multicenter, randomized, open-label trial designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of dapagliflozin in 500 adult participants with acute organ dysfunction who are hospitalized in the intensive care unit. Eligible participants will be randomized 1:1 to receive dapagliflozin 10mg plus standard of care for up to 14 days or standard of care alone. The primary outcome is a hierarchical composite of hospital mortality, initiation of kidney replacement therapy, and intensive care unit length of stay, up to 28 days. Safety will be strictly monitored throughout the study. CONCLUSION: DEFENDER is the first study designed to investigate the use of a sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitor in general intensive care unit patients with acute organ dysfunction. It will provide relevant information on the use of drugs of this promising class in critically ill patients. CLINICALTRIALS.GOV REGISTRY: NCT05558098.
Subject(s)
Critical Illness , Sodium-Glucose Transporter 2 Inhibitors , Adult , Humans , Critical Illness/therapy , Multiple Organ Failure/drug therapy , Sodium-Glucose Transporter 2 Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Multicenter Studies as TopicABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Chest pain is often encountered in emergency rooms and the detection of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) is a major focus. However, a notable percentage of patients present with a diverse range of nonACS conditions. Accurately identifying the causes and outcomes of these cases can prevent unnecessary interventions, reduce healthcare costs, and optimize resource allocation. This study aims to explore how advanced AI algorithms can enhance risk assessment, refine classification, and predict outcomes in nonACS chest pain patients using conventional ECG analysis. METHODS: We studied 3458 nonACS patients referred to the Emergency Room at Instituto Dante Pazzanese de Cardiologia with chest pain. A total of 185 features, including sex, height, ECG diagnostic statements, and measures, were used. The predicted outcome was defined as hospitalization within 14 days and/or death (1 or 0). We employed the AutoGluon framework for feature engineering and early model selection. XGBoost, a tree-based model, was chosen as the architecture. Training and k-fold stratified cross-validation were performed using an oversampled balanced dataset, and evaluation metrics such as AUROC, specificity, and sensitivity were measured using the original data. RESULTS: In this study, 18.2% (630 patients) had a positive outcome. The sex distribution was comparable between outcome groups, with men accounting for 57-58% and women for 42-43%. Significant differences (p<0.01) were observed in ECG intervals (QRS, corrected QT, RR interval, PSP) between the groups. The AI model identified important diagnostic statements, including normal ECG (19.4), atrial fibrillation (7.4), left ventricular hypertrophy (7.1), Ischemic T-wave inversion in inferior leads (6.7), T-wave changes in inferior leads (5.9), and first-degree atrioventricular block (5.8). The AI model performed exceptionally well, with a sensitivity of 97.93%, specificity of 96.08%, and an AUROC of 0.97. CONCLUSIONS: The AI model demonstrated its ability to predict outcomes in patients with acute chest pain without ACS, making it an appealing tool for effective risk stratification. The early identification provided by the AI model presents an opportunity for timely intervention to mitigate adverse outcomes.
ABSTRACT
SARS-CoV-2 and its different variants caused a "wave and wave" pandemic pattern. During the first wave we demonstrated that standardized Brazilian green propolis extract (EPP-AF®) reduces length of hospital stay in adult patients with COVID-19. Afterwards, we decided to evaluate the impact of EPP-AF in hospitalized patients during the third wave of the pandemic. BeeCovid2 was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial in hospitalized COVID-19 adult patients. Patients were allocated to receive an oral dose of 900 mg/day of EPP-AF® or placebo for 10 days. The primary outcome was length of hospital stay. Secondary outcomes included safety, secondary infection rate, duration of oxygen therapy dependency, acute kidney injury and need for intensive care. Patients were followed up for 28 days after admission. We enrolled 188 patients; 98 were assigned to the propolis group and 90 to the placebo group. The post-intervention length of hospital stay was of 6.5 ± 6.0 days in the propolis group versus 7.7 ± 7.1 days in the control group (95% CI - 0.74 [- 1.94 to 0.42]; p = 0.22). Propolis did not have significant impact on the need for oxygen supplementation or frequency of AKI. There was a significant difference in the incidence of secondary infection between groups, with 6.1% in the propolis group versus 18.9% in the control group (95% CI - 0.28 [0.1-0.76], p = 0.01). The use of EPP-AF was considered safe and associated with a decrease in secondary infections. The drug was not associated with a significant reduction in length of hospital stay. ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04800224).
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Coinfection , Propolis , Adult , Humans , COVID-19/epidemiology , SARS-CoV-2 , Propolis/therapeutic use , Brazil/epidemiology , Coinfection/drug therapy , Double-Blind Method , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
INTRODUÇÃO: É desconhecido se a linfopenia é um fator de risco para a reativação da Doença de Chagas (RDC) no transplante cardíaco (TxC), como recentemente descrito na reativação de citomegalovírus em pacientes transplantados. O objetivo do estudo é avaliar se a linfopenia no perioperatório do TxC tem relação com a RDC. MÉTODOS: Foram avaliados prontuários médicos (janeiro/2014 a janeiro/2023) em estudo observacional e retrospectivo. A RDC (avaliada nos primeiros três meses após o TxC por meio da reação em cadeia da polimerase/biópsia endomiocárdica) foi comparada com a contagem total de linfócitos no perioperatório do TxC. Análise estatística: Características de base da amostra comparadas por testes exatos de Fisher ou testes t-student. Realizados modelos de risco proporcionais de Cox para mostrar a chance de RDC, a partir dos valores de linfócitos de base. Ajustado modelo considerando os linfócitos como covariável tempo dependente, por razão de risco (HR) com intervalos de confiança de 95%. RESULTADOS: Amostra (n=35) apresentou idade média de 52,5±8,1 anos, sendo 63% do sexo masculino. A RDC ocorreu em 22 pacientes (62,8%). Os valores mínimos de linfócitos nos primeiros quinze dias do TxC foram 398±189 e 755±303 células/mm³ em pacientes com e sem RDC nos três meses após o TxC, respectivamente (AUC=0,857; com sensibilidade de 83.3% e especificidade de 86.4%). Foi determinado o valor de corte inferior a 550 linfócitos/mm³ como fator de risco para RDC. Pacientes com linfócitos <550 unidades/ mm³ nos primeiros quinze dias do pós-TxC apresentaram RC em 100% dos casos, em até 60 dias do TxC. Para cada aumento de 100 linfócitos/mm³, o risco de RDC é reduzido em 26% (HR = 0.74 [IC95%: 0.59 a 0,93]). CONCLUSÃO: Há associação entre a linfopenia no perioperatório do TxC com a RDC.