ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Carotid web (CaW)-related contrast stagnation on digital subtraction angiography (DSA) may be a marker supporting the pathophysiological theory of stasis and thrombosis/embolization. We aim to assess the correlation between DSA hemodynamic parameters with CT angiography (CTA) structural measurements and clinical characteristics. METHODS: Cross-sectional analysis of consecutive patients with CaW who underwent CTA+DSA. DSA-derived hemodynamic parameters were calculated based on a region of interest at the carotid bulb (time-density curves; TDC). The correlation between duration of contrast stagnation with CaW structural features and with clinical characteristics was evaluated with a mixed effects model. RESULTS: Sixty patients of mean±SD age 52.2±10.3 years were included, of whom 38 (63.3%) were women, 51 (85%) were black, and 59 (98.3%) had symptomatic lesions. The median CaW base was 2.46 mm (range 1.95-3.76), length 2.7 mm (range 2.15-3.96), thickness (length/base) 1.05 (IQR 0.81-1.36), caudal angle 31.93° (IQR 22.35-43.58), mean±SD distal angle 66.91±15.84°, pocket area 1.62 mm² (0.96-1.62), and pocket perimeter 6.03±2.6 mm. The TDC consistently showed an initial fast decay from the peak concentration followed by a plateau with a negative exponential pattern. The median stagnation time from peak density to 80% contrast clearance was 2.91 s (range 1.81-4.94). No significant associations were observed between the stagnation time and CaW CTA structural measurements (length/base/thickness, caudal and cranial angles web surface angles, web pocket area/perimeter) or clinical characteristics. CONCLUSIONS: A negative exponential pattern in the DSA contrast clearance of the CaW pocket was observed. There were no morphological or clinical features clearly associated with the duration of contrast stagnation on DSA. The hemodynamic disruption caused by CaW and its thrombotic risk may not be appropriately measured by contrast stagnation time.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Early identification of intracranial atherosclerotic disease (ICAD) may impact the management of patients undergoing mechanical thrombectomy (MT). We sought to develop and validate a scoring system for pre-thrombectomy diagnosis of ICAD in anterior circulation large vessel/distal medium vessel occlusion strokes (LVOs/DMVOs). METHODS: Retrospective analysis of two prospectively maintained comprehensive stroke center databases including patients with anterior circulation occlusions spanning 2010-22 (development cohort) and 2018-22 (validation cohort). ICAD cases were matched for age and sex (1:1) to non-ICAD controls. RESULTS: Of 2870 MTs within the study period, 348 patients were included in the development cohort: 174 anterior circulation ICAD (6% of 2870 MTs) and 174 controls. Multivariable analysis ß coefficients led to a 20 point scale: absence of atrial fibrillation (5); vascular risk factor burden (1) for each of hypertension, diabetes, smoking, and hyperlipidemia; multifocal single artery stenoses on CT angiography (3); absence of territorial cortical infarct (3); presence of borderzone infarct (3); or ipsilateral carotid siphon calcification (2). The validation cohort comprised 56 ICAD patients (4.1% of 1359 MTs): 56 controls. Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.88 (0.84-0.91) and 0.82 (0.73-0.89) in the development and validation cohorts, respectively. Calibration slope and intercept showed a good fit for the development cohort although with overestimated risk for the validation cohort. After intercept adjustment, the overestimation was corrected (intercept 0, 95% CI -0.5 to -0.5; slope 0.8, 95% CI 0.5 to 1.1). In the full cohort (n=414), ≥11 points showed the best performance for distinguishing ICAD from non-ICAD, with 0.71 (95% CI 0.65 to 0.78) sensitivity and 0.82 (95% CI 0.77 to 0.87) specificity, and 3.92 (95% CI 2.92 to 5.28) positive and 0.35 (95% CI 0.28 to 0.44) negative likelihood ratio. Scores ≥12 showed 90% specificity and 63% sensitivity. CONCLUSION: The proposed scoring system for preprocedural diagnosis of ICAD LVOs and DMVOs presented satisfactory discrimination and calibration based on clinical and non-invasive radiological data.