ABSTRACT
Patients presenting with severe COVID-19 are predisposed to acquire secondary fungal infections such as COVID-19-associated candidemia (CAC), which are associated with poor clinical outcomes despite antifungal treatment. The extreme burden imposed on clinical facilities during the COVID-19 pandemic has provided a permissive environment for the emergence of clonal outbreaks of multiple Candida species, including C. auris and C. parapsilosis. Here we report the largest clonal CAC outbreak to date caused by fluconazole resistant (FLZR) and echinocandin tolerant (ECT) C. parapsilosis. Sixty C. parapsilosis strains were obtained from 57 patients at a tertiary care hospital in Brazil, 90% of them were FLZR and ECT. Although only 35.8% of FLZR isolates contained an ERG11 mutation, all of them contained the TAC1L518F mutation and significantly overexpressed CDR1. Introduction of TAC1L518F into a susceptible background increased the MIC of fluconazole and voriconazole 8-fold and resulted in significant basal overexpression of CDR1. Additionally, FLZR isolates exclusively harboured E1939G outside of Fks1 hotspot-2, which did not confer echinocandin resistance, but significantly increased ECT. Multilocus microsatellite typing showed that 51/60 (85%) of the FLZR isolates belonged to the same cluster, while the susceptible isolates each represented a distinct lineage. Finally, biofilm production in FLZR isolates was significantly lower than in susceptible counterparts Suggesting that it may not be an outbreak determinant. In summary, we show that TAC1L518F and FKS1E1393G confer FLZR and ECT, respectively, in CAC-associated C. parapsilosis. Our study underscores the importance of antifungal stewardship and effective infection control strategies to mitigate clonal C. parapsilosis outbreaks.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Candidemia , Antifungal Agents/pharmacology , Antifungal Agents/therapeutic use , Brazil/epidemiology , COVID-19/epidemiology , Candida parapsilosis/genetics , Candidemia/drug therapy , Candidemia/epidemiology , Candidemia/microbiology , Disease Outbreaks , Echinocandins/pharmacology , Echinocandins/therapeutic use , Fluconazole/pharmacology , Fluconazole/therapeutic use , Humans , Intensive Care Units , Microbial Sensitivity Tests , Pandemics , Voriconazole/therapeutic useABSTRACT
Fluconazole-resistant Candida parapsilosis (FLZR-CP) outbreaks are a growing public health concern and have been reported in numerous countries. Patients infected with FLZR-CP isolates show fluconazole therapeutic failure and have a significantly increased mortality rate. Because fluconazole is the most widely used antifungal agent in most regions with outbreaks, it is paramount to restore its antifungal activity. Milbemycin oxim (MOX), a well-known canine endectocide, is a potent efflux pump inhibitor that significantly potentiates the activity of fluconazole against FLZR C. glabrata and C. albicans. However, the FLZ-MOX combination has not been tested against FLZR-CP isolates, nor is it known whether MOX may also potentiate the activity of echinocandins, a different class of antifungal drugs. Furthermore, the extent of involvement of efflux pumps CDR1 and MDR1 and ergosterol biosynthesis enzyme ERG11 and their link with gain-of-function (GOF) mutations in their transcription regulators (TAC1, MRR1, and UPC2) are poorly characterized among FLZR-CP isolates. We analyzed 25 C. parapsilosis isolates collected from outbreaks in Turkey and Brazil by determining the expression levels of CDR1, MDR1, and ERG11, examining the presence of potential GOF mutations in their transcriptional regulators, and assessing the antifungal activity of FLZ-MOX and micafungin-MOX against FLZR and multidrug-resistant (MDR) C. parapsilosis isolates. ERG11 was found to be universally induced by fluconazole in all isolates, while expression of MDR1 was unchanged. Whereas mutations in MRR1 and UPC2 were not detected, CDR1 was overexpressed in three Brazilian FLZR-CP isolates, which also carried a novel TAC1L518F mutation. Of these three isolates, one showed increased basal expression of CDR1, while the other two overexpressed CDR1 only in the presence of fluconazole. Interestingly, MOX showed promising antifungal activity against FLZR isolates, reducing the FLZ MIC 8- to 32-fold. However, the MOX and micafungin combination did not exert activity against an MDR C. parapsilosis isolate. Collectively, our study documents that the mechanisms underpinning FLZR are region specific, where ERG11 mutations were the sole mechanism of FLZR in Turkish FLZR-CP isolates, while simultaneous overexpression of CDR1 was observed in some Brazilian counterparts. Moreover, MOX and fluconazole showed potent synergistic activity, while the MOX-micafungin combination showed no synergy.