Sigma-1 receptor stimulation attenuates calcium influx through activated L-type Voltage Gated Calcium Channels in purified retinal ganglion cells.

Sigma-1 receptors (σ-1rs) exert neuroprotective effects on retinal ganglion cells (RGCs) both in vivo and in vitro. This receptor has unique properties through its actions on several voltage-gated and ligand-gated channels. The purpose of this study was to investigate the role that σ-1rs play in regulating cell calcium dynamics through activated L-type Voltage Gated Calcium Channels (L-type VGCCs) in purified RGCs. RGCs were isolated from P3-P7 Sprague-Dawley rats and purified by sequential immunopanning using a Thy1.1 antibody. Calcium imaging was used to measure changes in intracellular calcium after depolarizing the cells with potassium chloride (KCl) in the presence or absence of two σ-1r agonists [(+)-SKF10047 and (+)-Pentazocine], one σ-1r antagonist (BD1047), and one L-type VGCC antagonist (Verapamil). Finally, co-localization studies were completed to assess the proximity of σ-1r with L-type VGCCs in purified RGCs. VGCCs were activated using KCl (20 mM). Pre-treatment with a known L-type VGCC blocker demonstrated a 57% decrease of calcium ion influx through activated VGCCs. Calcium imaging results also demonstrated that σ-1r agonists, (+)-N-allylnormetazocine hydrochloride [(+)-SKF10047] and (+)-Pentazocine, inhibited calcium ion influx through activated VGCCs. Antagonist treatment using BD1047 demonstrated a potentiation of calcium ion influx through activated VGCCs and abolished all inhibitory effects of the σ-1r agonists on VGCCs, implying that these ligands were acting through the σ-1r. An L-type VGCC blocker (Verapamil) also inhibited KCl activated VGCCs and when combined with the σ-1r agonists there was not a further decline in calcium entry suggesting similar mechanisms. Lastly, co-localization studies demonstrated that σ-1rs and L-type VGCCs are co-localized in purified RGCs. Taken together, these results indicated that σ-1r agonists can inhibit KCl induced calcium ion influx through activated L-type VGCCs in purified RGCs. This is the first report of attenuation of L-type VGCC signaling through the activation of σ-1rs in purified RGCs. The ability of σ-1rs to co-localize with L-type VGCCs in purified RGCs implied that these two proteins are in close proximity to each other and that such interactions regulate L-type VGCCs.

Methylene blue protects primary rat retinal ganglion cells from cellular senescence.

PURPOSE: Glaucoma is a progressive optic neuropathy characterized by loss of retinal ganglion cells (RGCs) and optic nerve degradation. Existing treatments focus on lowering IOP; however, vision loss may still progress. Neuroprotective drugs may be useful as an adjunct approach to prevent further loss of RGCs, although efficacious drugs are lacking. One agent, methylene blue, protects neurons during several neurodegenerative models. Methylene blue potentiates the electron transport chain by shuttling elections from NADH and FADH2 to coenzyme Q (CoQ) and cytochrome c. The purpose of this study was to determine if methylene blue could protect RGCs from noxious stimuli. METHODS: Primary rat RGCs were isolated and cultured following a sequential immunopanning technique using P3-P7 Sprague-Dawley rats. Approximately 25,000 RGCs were seeded per coverslip and cultured for 3 days before testing. The RGCs were treated for 24 hours with rotenone or staurosporine or for 72 hours of hypoxia. Methylene blue was then assessed for protection of RGCs during each of these insults. Cell viability was measured using calcein Am and ethidium homodimer-1. Cytochrome c oxidase activity was measured using a cytochrome c oxidase assay kit to monitor the health of mitochondria. RESULTS: Methylene blue (1 µM and 10 µM) significantly protected RGCs against 24 hours of 1 µM rotenone. Methylene blue (1 µM and 10 µM) significantly protected RGCs against 24 hours of treatment with 1 µM staurosporine and protected RGCs against 72 hours of hypoxia. Methylene blue increased cytochrome c oxidase activity in the presence of hydrogen peroxide. CONCLUSIONS: Methylene blue is a neuroprotective compound that can protect RGCs from toxic insults. Methylene blue's ability to increase cytochrome c oxidase and protect RGCs against these noxious stimuli supports its suggested mechanism of action, which is to preserve the electron transport chain. Further testing is needed to determine if methylene blue would be an efficacious treatment for the protection of neurodegeneration that occurs during optic neuropathy.