A pooled subgroup analysis of glucarpidase treatment in 86 pediatric, adolescent, and young adult patients receiving high-dose methotrexate therapy in open-label trials.

BACKGROUND: Delayed methotrexate elimination can occur in patients undergoing high-dose methotrexate cancer treatment. Effectiveness of glucarpidase for rapidly reducing methotrexate concentrations was shown in compassionate-use trials in patients aged 0-84 years. METHODS: We performed post hoc analyses of infants (≥28 days to <2 years), children (≥2 to <12 years), adolescents (≥12 to <15 years), and young adults (≥15 to <25 years) from four multicenter, open-label, single-arm, glucarpidase compassionate-use trials. Patients had toxic methotrexate levels due to delayed methotrexate elimination and/or renal dysfunction, and received glucarpidase (50 U/kg). The primary endpoint was clinically important reduction (CIR) in plasma methotrexate (methotrexate ≤1 µmol/L at all post-glucarpidase measurements) based on high-performance liquid chromatography. RESULTS: Among 86 patients included in efficacy analyses, CIR was achieved by zero of one infant (0.0%), five of 16 children (31.3%), seven of 24 adolescents (29.2%), and 26/45 young adults (57.8%). Median methotrexate reduction was 98.7% or higher in each group 15 minutes post-glucarpidase. Patients with pre-glucarpidase methotrexate less than 50 µmol/L (35/42, 83.3%) were more likely to achieve CIR than those with methotrexate 50 µmol/L or higher (1/37, 2.7%). The most common treatment-related adverse event was paresthesia, occurring in three adolescents (4.5%) and six young adults (5.2%). No other treatment-related adverse event occurred in 5% or higher of any age group. CONCLUSION: After accounting for pre-glucarpidase methotrexate levels, glucarpidase efficacy at inducing CIR in pediatric/young adult patients was consistent, with efficacy observed in the overall study population (i.e., patients aged 0-84), and no unexpected safety findings were observed. These findings demonstrate glucarpidase (50 U/kg) is an effective and well-tolerated dose for pediatric, adolescent, and young adult patients.

Total CroFab and Anavip Antivenom Vial Administration in US Rattlesnake Envenomations: 2019-2021.

INTRODUCTION: In 2018, Anavip became available for the treatment of rattlesnake envenomations in the USA. No comparisons between the treatment characteristics of patients have been made since Anavip and CroFab have both been widely available. The objective of this study was to compare the number of antivenom vials administered of CroFab and Anavip during the treatment of rattlesnake envenomations in the USA. METHODS: This was a secondary analysis of rattlesnake envenomations utilizing the North American Snakebite Registry (NASBR) from 2019 through 2021. Frequencies and proportions were used to summarize demographics and baseline clinical characteristics. The primary outcome was total antivenom vials administered during treatment. Secondary outcomes included the number antivenom administration events, total treatment time, and hospital length of stay. RESULTS: Two hundred ninety-one rattlesnake envenomations were analyzed; most occurred in the Western USA (n = 279, 96 %). One hundred one patients (35%) received only CroFab, 110 (38%) received Anavip only, and 80 (27%) received both products. The median number of vials used was 10 for CroFab, 18 for Anavip, and 20 for both antivenoms. More than one antivenom administration was necessary in thirty-nine (39%) patients that received only CroFab and 76 (69%) patients that received Anavip only. The median total treatment time was 5.5 hours for CroFab, 6.5 for Anavip, and 15.5 hours when both antivenoms were administered. All antivenom groups had a median hospital length of stay of 2 days. CONCLUSIONS: Rattlesnake envenomated patients in the Western USA treated with CroFab had fewer antivenom vials and fewer antivenom administrations compared to patients treated with Anavip.

Relationship between patient-reported symptoms, limitations in daily activities, and psychological impact in varicose veins.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to evaluate the relationship between patient-reported symptoms, functional limitations, and psychological impact of varicose veins (VVs) vs pathophysiologic mechanism, incorporating demographic and behavioral factors. METHODS: We conducted a pooled analysis from two clinical studies (Efficacy and Safety Study of Polidocanol Injectable Foam for the Treatment of Saphenofemoral Junction Incompetence [VANISH-1] and Polidocanol Endovenous Microfoam Versus Vehicle for the Treatment of Saphenofemoral Junction Incompetence [VANISH-2]) in patients with VVs (superficial venous reflux only). Health outcomes were classified on the basis of the Wilson-Cleary conceptual framework continuum linking clinical and anatomic factors (Clinical, Etiology, Anatomy, and Pathophysiology [CEAP] clinical class and great saphenous vein [GSV] diameter, respectively) to patient-reported outcomes: Varicose Vein Symptoms Questionnaire (VVSymQ) score; modified Venous Insufficiency Epidemiologic and Economic Study on Quality of Life/Symptoms (m-VEINES-QOL/Sym) limitations in daily activities (functional limitations hereafter) score; and m-VEINES-QOL/Sym psychological impact score. Association of clinical and anatomic categories with each of the patient-reported outcomes was assessed using analysis of variance for statistical significance and standardized mean differences for clinical meaningfulness. Hierarchical regression modeling was applied to evaluate the direct association of the VVSymQ symptom score with the m-VEINES-QOL/Sym functional limitations score and the indirect association with the m-VEINES-QOL/Sym psychological impact score, adjusting for clinical, behavioral, and demographic factors. RESULTS: Among 516 patients, approximately three-fourths were women (mean age, 49 years), approximately 70% were overweight or obese, 42% were C2 and 32% were C3, and 88% reported never or only intermittently wearing compression stockings. VVSymQ (symptom) scores did not vary by GSV diameter but were significantly worse for those with severe disease stage, especially C5 or C6. Among m-VEINES-QOL/Sym work-related function items, 47% of patients reported difficulty at work and 31% reported cutting down at work. On nonwork function items, standing for prolonged periods was most affected; 53% were limited a little and 22% were limited a lot. Concern about appearance and choice of clothing predominated among psychological impact items, with 74% and 65%, respectively, affected all or most of the time. The m-VEINES-QOL/Sym functional limitation and psychological impact scores varied by neither GSV diameter nor CEAP C class, but they varied directly with VVSymQ (symptom) score quartiles. Multivariable regression analysis revealed that VVSymQ symptom scores continued to be associated with m-VEINES-QOL/Sym psychological impact scores, even after adjustment for m-VEINES-QOL/Sym functional limitation scores. CONCLUSIONS: Substantial patient-reported functional limitation and psychological impact of VVs were observed. Limitations on work, standing for prolonged periods, concern about appearance, and clothing choice were most affected. Patient-reported VVSymQ (symptom) score, an objective patient-reported measure of symptom severity in VVs, was the key predictor of patient-reported m-VEINES-QOL/Sym functional limitations. Symptoms and functional limitations led to greater psychological impact. Physicians should routinely ascertain symptoms and functional limitations to enhance quality of care and to document medical necessity.

EUS-guided paclitaxel injection as an adjunctive therapy to systemic chemotherapy and concurrent external beam radiation before surgery for localized or locoregional esophageal cancer: a multicenter prospective randomized trial.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: OncoGel (Protherics Salt Lake City, Inc, Salt Lake City, UT) is paclitaxel (PTX) formulated in a thermosensitive, biodegradable copolymer for focused cytotoxicity and radiosensitization. A phase 2a study suggested that EUS-guided PTX injection into esophageal tumors subsequently receiving radiotherapy was safe. METHODS: In an international multicenter, prospective, randomized phase 2b study, patients with local or locoregional adenocarcinoma or squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) of the esophagus/gastroesophageal junction and eligible for neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT) before surgery were randomized to standard of care (SOC) plus EUS-guided PTX injection or SOC alone. PTX was injected in 0.5 to 1.0 mL aliquots throughout the tumor. Planned CRT as SOC was intravenous 5-fluorouracil for the first 4 days (weeks 1 and 5), intravenous cisplatin on the first day of each 5-fluorouracil course, and radiotherapy over 5.5 weeks. Patients were evaluated weekly during CRT and re-evaluated at 12 weeks for surgical eligibility and CT for change in overall tumor volume. RESULTS: The analysis included 137 patients (97 males; mean age, 58 ± 9.1 years) randomized to PTX + SOC (n = 72) and SOC (n = 65) by using a modified intention-to-treat approach. Overall response by tumor volume between the PTX (12.5%) and the SOC group (20.0%; P = .24; odds ratio, 0.57; 95% confidence interval, 0.23-1.44) was similar. Pathologic complete response was higher in the SOC group (26.2% vs 12.5%; P = .046); however, 12-month survival (P = .412) and the overall frequency of 1 or more adverse events (P = .17) were similar between the 2 groups. CONCLUSIONS: SOC + PTX is safe but does not improve overall survival or overall tumor response at the primary tumor site for patients with local or locoregional cancer of the esophagus/gastroesophageal junction. (Clinical trial registration number: NCT00573131.).

Medically significant late bleeding after treated crotaline envenomation: a systematic review.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: We estimate the proportion of patients with crotaline snake envenomation who are treated with Crotalidae polyvalent immune Fab (ovine) antivenom and who develop medically significant late bleeding. METHODS: We performed a systematic review of all published cohort studies of North American crotaline snake envenomation patients treated with Fab antivenom. We searched PubMed, Ovid MEDLINE, and EMBASE from January 1, 1997, to April 30, 2012. Data were extracted by 2 trained researchers. Late bleeding was defined as bleeding that began or recurred after initial control of the envenomation syndrome. Medically significant late bleeding was defined a priori as late bleeding treated with RBC transfusion, vasoactive drug infusion, surgery, or rehospitalization or associated with a hemoglobin decrease of greater than or equal to 3 g/dL, hematocrit decrease of greater than or equal to 8%, disability, or death. Summary incidence and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated with a random-effects Poisson regression model. RESULTS: Nineteen unique cohort studies were identified. Four studies collected data prospectively, and in 9 studies, patients were followed actively after hospital discharge. A total of 1,017 subjects were enrolled in these cohort studies. Late bleeding was reported in 9 subjects (0.9%; 95% CI 0.4% to 2.2%), of whom 5 subjects (0.5%; 95% CI 0.1% to 1.7%) had medically significant late bleeding. Three patients received RBC transfusion; no deaths or permanent sequelae were reported. Estimates of risk may be affected by underreporting. CONCLUSION: Medically significant late bleeding appears to be uncommon in snakebite victims treated with Fab antivenom.

Efficacy of glucarpidase (carboxypeptidase g2) in patients with acute kidney injury after high-dose methotrexate therapy.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: Because the incidence rate of renal impairment is 2-10% for patients treated with high-dose methotrexate and renal impairment develops in 0-12.4% of patients treated for osteosarcoma, we sought to evaluate the efficacy of glucarpidase, a recently approved drug that rapidly hydrolyzes methotrexate to inactive metabolites, which allows for nonrenal clearance in patients with delayed renal methotrexate elimination. DESIGN: Pooled analysis of efficacy data from four multicenter single-arm compassionate-use clinical trials using protocols from 1993 to 2007. PATIENTS: Of 476 patients with renal toxicity and delayed methotrexate elimination who were treated with intravenous glucarpidase for rescue after high-dose methotrexate, 169 patients had at least one preglucarpidase (baseline) plasma methotrexate concentration greater than 1 µmol/L and one postglucarpidase methotrexate concentration measurement by high-performance liquid chromatography and were included in the efficacy analysis; renal recovery was assessed in 436 patients who had at least one recorded preglucarpidase and postglucarpidase serum creatinine concentration measurement. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Efficacy was defined as rapid and sustained clinically important reduction (RSCIR) in plasma methotrexate concentration, with a concentration of 1 µmol/L or lower at all postglucarpidase determinations. Median age of efficacy-evaluable patients was 20 years (range 5 weeks-84 years). Osteosarcoma (36%), non-Hodgkin lymphoma (27%), and acute lymphoblastic leukemia (20%) were the most frequent underlying diagnoses. Median preglucarpidase serum methotrexate was 11.7 µmol/L. At the first (median 15 minutes) through the last (median 40 hours) postglucarpidase measurement, plasma methotrexate concentrations demonstrated consistent 99% median reduction. RSCIR was achieved by 83 (59%) of 140 patients. A total of 64% of patients with renal impairment greater than or equal to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events grade 2 recovered to grade 0 or 1 at a median of 12.5 days after glucarpidase administration. CONCLUSION: Glucarpidase caused a clinically important 99% or greater sustained reduction of serum methotrexate levels and provided noninvasive rescue from methotrexate toxicity in renally impaired patients.