Retrospective Evaluation of Cystatin C as a Measure of Renal Function in Pediatric Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant Patients Receiving Foscarnet for Cytomegalovirus Reactivation.

BACKGROUND: Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection following allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation has considerable morbidity and mortality, and foscarnet is a treatment option that requires renal dose adjustment. Serum creatinine (SCr)-based estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) equations are used to estimate renal function for patients receiving foscarnet, but cystatin C (cysC) has been shown as a possible alternative. Data examining cysC-based eGFR in this population is sparse. Our primary objective was to evaluate outcomes of patients treated with foscarnet dosed utilizing cysC-based eGFR versus SCr-based eGFR. METHODS: We analyzed patients on the transplantation and cellular therapies service at Memorial Sloan Kettering Kids from January 2011 to September 2021 who received allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation and ≥14 days of foscarnet for CMV infection. Patients with cysC-based eGFR were compared to a historical cohort of patients who only had SCr-based eGFR. Outcomes included time to CMV clearance, death or change in anti-CMV therapy. Cumulative incidence curves and cause-specific hazards model were used for analysis. RESULTS: In 61 analyzed patients, no differences were found between the cohorts in cumulative incidence of change in anti-CMV therapy ( P = 0.17) or death ( P = 0.69). After adjustment for multiple confounders, patients in the SCr cohort seemed to have a higher chance of CMV clearance compared with the cysC cohort, but the difference was not statistically significant (hazard ratio = 2.42, P = 0.089). Patients who received corticosteroids appeared to have lower incidence of CMV clearance ( P = 0.056). CONCLUSIONS: We did not find differences in outcomes when dosing foscarnet using cysC versus SCr for treatment of CMV infection.

Outpatient clinical pharmacy practice in the face of COVID-19 at a cancer center in New York City.

PURPOSE: With the rapid spread of COVID-19 in New York City since early March 2020, innovative measures were needed for clinical pharmacy specialists to provide direct clinical care safely to cancer patients. Allocating the workforce was necessary to meet the surging needs of the inpatient services due to the COVID-19 outbreak, which had the potential to compromise outpatient services. We present here our approach of restructuring clinical pharmacy services and providing direct patient care in outpatient clinics during the pandemic. DATA SOURCES: We conducted a retrospective review of electronic clinical documentation involving clinical pharmacy specialist patient encounters in 9 outpatient clinics from March 1, 2020 to May 31, 2020. The analysis of the clinical pharmacy specialist interventions and the impact of the interventions was descriptive. DATA SUMMARY: As hospital services were modified to handle the surge due to COVID-19, select clinical pharmacy specialists were redeployed from the outpatient clinics or research blocks to COVID-19 inpatient teams. During these 3 months, clinical pharmacy specialists were involved in 2535 patient visits from 9 outpatient clinics and contributed a total of 4022 interventions, the majority of which utilized telemedicine. The interventions provided critical clinical pharmacy care during the pandemic and omitted 199 in-person visits for medical care. CONCLUSION: The swift transition to telemedicine allowed the provision of direct clinical pharmacy services to patients with cancer during the COVID-19 pandemic.