Redefining Foot Symptoms in a Kidney-Pancreas-Transplanted Type 1 Diabetic Patient: Challenging the Conventional Charcot Foot Diagnosis.

BACKGROUND Acute Charcot foot can be difficult to diagnose, especially because of other alternate diagnoses that can mimic this condition, particularly stress fracture and acute bone and joint infections, which are 2 conditions that require immediate management. Here, we present the case of a patient who received kidney-pancreas-transplantation for type 1 diabetes mellitus, who consulted for right foot pain after walking. CASE REPORT Our patient was a 47-year-old man who had benefited from a kidney-pancreas transplantation in 2014 for type 1 diabetes and terminal kidney failure and was recently followed for a right foot plantar ulcer that was fully healed. He later presented for right foot pain after walking. Clinical examination showed a red, swollen, and warm foot. Blood test results were unremarkable. Imaging (X-ray/MRI) revealed features compatible with acute Charcot foot. The management consisted of prompt right-foot offloading followed by physiotherapy and adapted orthopedic insoles. CONCLUSIONS This case shows the successful treatment of an active phase of Charcot foot, which avoided the classic transition to chronic Charcot foot with severe osteoarticular destruction. Arguments were developed to rule out other possible diagnoses. The underlying mechanisms of Charcot foot in diabetic patients are related to the neurological and micro-vascular complications induced by poor glycemic control, but the mechanisms are unclear. This case report may help clinicians to better understand and consider another less known and less frequent diagnosis when faced with these clinical features.

[Total knee arthroplasty and soft tissue defect: what are the reconstructive options?] / Prothèse totale de genou et lésion des tissus mous : quelles options pour la reconstruction ?

Wound healing issues are not rare after total knee arthroplasty. While most patients heal with local wound care, a minority is susceptible to develop serious complications such as peri-prosthetic joint infection. If direct closure is not feasible, we recommend a multidisciplinary approach based on the ortho-plastic model to determine the optimal wound closure strategy. Negative pressure wound therapy can be used while waiting for definitive coverage to optimise wound environment. Medial gastrocnemius flap is considered as the gold standard procedure for peri-prosthetic substance loss around the knee.

Les problèmes de cicatrisation ne sont pas rares après l'implantation d'une prothèse totale de genou. La plupart des patients guérissent avec des soins locaux mais une minorité d'entre eux peut développer des complications redoutables allant jusqu'à l'infection périprothétique. Hormis les situations pour lesquelles une fermeture directe de la cicatrice chirurgicale peut être réalisée, nous recommandons une approche multidisciplinaire basée sur le modèle de l'ortho-plastique afin de déterminer la stratégie de reconstruction la plus adaptée. La thérapie par pression négative peut être utilisée pour conditionner la plaie en vue d'un geste de couverture définitive. Le lambeau gastrocnémien médial est considéré comme la procédure de référence pour les pertes de substance périprothétique du genou.

Fracture Nonunion of the Clavicle After Surgical Reduction in a 13-Year-Old Girl: A Case Report.

CASE: Although congenital nonunion of the clavicle is a well-known pathology in children, posttraumatic nonunion is a rare entity. Nonunion after open reduction and internal fixation of a clavicle fracture is exceptional in the pediatric population. We report on a patient presenting posttraumatic pseudarthrosis of the clavicle after surgical treatment. Pseudarthrosis was resected, and the defect was bridged with an iliac crest autograft, supplemented with bone morphogenetic protein, and fixed with an elastic stable intramedullary nail. CONCLUSION: This procedure offered enough stability for achieving fracture consolidation and is a safe alternative to plating in clavicle nonunion.

Proximal Radioulnar Translocation Associated with Posterior Fracture-Dislocation of Elbow in an Adolescent Girl: A Case Report.

CASE: A 14-year-old girl sustained a posterior elbow dislocation and presented with a proximal radioulnar translocation (PRUT) and a displaced fracture of the radial head. Reduction of the elbow dislocation and the proximal radioulnar translocation were achieved by external manipulation in the operating room. The radial head was not amenable to closed reduction and remained entrapped in the anteromedial compartment of the elbow. So open reduction and internal stabilization was carried out. CONCLUSIONS: In PRUT, closed reduction should be attempted. The radial head should be preserved even if it is fully dislocated from metaphysis. Retrograde intramedullary radial nailing provides enough stability of the fracture to promote early mobilization and facilitate union.

Should antibiotic prophylaxis before orthopedic implant surgery depend on the duration of pre-surgical hospital stay?

Background: Prolonged hospital stay before surgery is a risk for colonization with antibiotic-resistant microorganisms and possible antibiotic-resistant surgical site infections (SSI), which lacks acknowledgement in international guidelines for perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis. Method: Retrospective cohort study focusing on prophylaxis-resistant SSI in adult orthopedic implant patients; with emphasis on length of hospital stay prior to the index surgery. Results: We enrolled 611 cases of SSI (median age, 65 years; 241 females and 161 immune-suppressed) in four large implant groups: arthroplasties (n = 309), plates (n = 127), spondylodeses (n = 31), and nails (n = 46). The causative pathogen was resistant to the perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis regimen in 307 cases (307/611; 50%), but the length of pre-surgical hospitalization did not influence the incidences of prophylaxis-resistant SSIs. These incidences were (107/211;51%) for the admission day, (170/345;49%) within 10 days of delay, (19/35;54%) between 10 and 20 days, and (11/20; 55%) beyond 20 days of hospital stay before surgery. The corresponding incidences of methicillin-resistant staphylococci were 13%, 14%, 17%, and 5%, respectively. In adjusted group comparisons, the length of prior hospital stay was equally unrelated to future prophylaxis-resistant SSI (odds ratio 1.0, 95% confidence interval 0.99-1.01). Conclusions: In our retrospective cohort of orthopedic implant SSI, the length of pre-surgical hospital stay was unrelated to the incidence of prophylaxis-resistant pathogens.

Native septic arthritis is not an immediate surgical emergency.

Acute native joint septic arthritis is generally considered a surgical emergency, requiring drainage within hours, including during night, weekend or holiday shifts. However, there are few data supporting the need for the disruption caused by this degree of urgency. METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of all adult patients seen in our medical center from 1997-2015 with culture-proven septic arthritis and noted the epidemiology of sequelae, and their possible association with a delay in surgical drainage. RESULTS: Of 204 septic arthritis episodes, 46 (23%) involved interdigital hand and foot joints. Large joints involved included the knee (n = 67), shoulder (48), hip (22), ankle (8), acromio-clavicular (5), elbow (4), wrist (3), and sterno-clavicular (1) regions. All patients underwent surgical drainage of the joint and received targeted systemic antibiotic therapy. Sequelae of varying severity occurred in 83 patients (41%): recurrences (n = 15); secondary arthrosis (30); persistent pain (9); Girdlestone procedure (9); arthrodesis (9); amputation (8); stiffness (8); and Chronic Regional Pain Syndrome (2). By multivariate Cox regression analysis factors did not predict sequelae included: age; treatment with systemic corticosteroids; pre-existing clinical or radiological arthropathy; total duration of antibiotic therapy; type of joint; and, number of surgical interventions. Similarly, there was no association of sequelae with the number of days of pre-hospitalization joint symptoms (hazard ratio 1.0, 95% confidence interval 0.99-1.01) or hours spent in the emergency department (HR 1.0, 0.9-1.2). Notably, patients who had joint lavage within 6 h of presentation had similar functional outcomes as those with lavage done at 6-12 h, 12-24 h, or > 24 h after presentation. CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that for native septic arthritis, in the absence of clinical sepsis immediate joint drainage does not appear to reduce the risk of sequelae compared with delayed drainage.