Comparación de Latanoprostene bunod 0,024 % y Latanoprost 0,005 % en glaucoma de ángulo abierto e hipertensión ocular

Introducción: El glaucoma es la principal causa de ceguera irreversible en el mundo. La prevalencia mundial de glaucoma en personas de 40 a 80 años se estima en un 3,5 %. Objetivo: Comparar el efecto reductor de la PIO de Latanoprostene bunod (LBN) al 0,024% con Latanoprost al 0,005 % en sujetos con glaucoma de ángulo abierto (GAA) o hipertensión ocular (HTO). Metodología: Ensayo observacional de estudio de cohorte prospectivo. Resultados: Fue realizado en 28 pacientes (56 ojos) quienes fueron aleatorizados en 2 grupos paralelos (28 ojos por grupo), el grupo Latanoprost y el grupo LBN. En el grupo LBN la media de la PIO antes del tratamiento fue de 25,3 ± 6,6 mmHg y la media de la PIO luego de 1 mes de tratamiento fue de 16,5 ± 4,9 mmHg (p<0,05). En el grupo Latanoprost la media de la PIO antes del tratamiento fue de 23,6 ± 3,6 mmHg y la media de la PIO luego de 1 mes de tratamiento con Latanoprost al 0,005% fue de 15,3 ± 2,4 mmHg (p<0,05). Sin embargo, al comparar las PIOs luego de 1 mes de tratamiento con LBN 0,024% y Latanoprost 0,005% se objetiva que la diferencia en reducción de la presión intraocular entre estos dos fármacos no fue significativa (p= 0,238). Discusión: Las prostaglandinas tópicas, con su potente efecto hipotensor ocular son una importante opción de tratamiento para el glaucoma. La reducción de la PIO es la esperada con ambos medicamentos, sin embargo, no existen diferencias significativas entre ambas luego de 1 mes de uso. Con respecto a los efectos secundarios, en el grupo LBN se encontró más efectos adversos oculares.

Introduction: Glaucoma is the main cause of irreversible blindness worldwide. The global prevalence of glaucoma in people aged 40 to 80 years is estimated at 3.5%. Objective: To compare the intraocular pressure (IOP) lowering effect of 0.024% Latanoprostene bunod (LBN) with 0.005% Latanoprost in subjects with open-angle glaucoma (OAG) or ocular hypertension (OHT). Methods: Observational trial of prospective cohort study. Results: It was performed in 28 patients (56 eyes) who were randomized into 2 parallel groups (28 eyes per group), the Latanoprost group and the Latanoprostene bunod (LBN) group. In the LBN group, the mean intraocular pressure before treatment was 25.3 ± 6.6 mmHg and the mean intraocular pressure after 1 month of treatment was 16.5 ± 4.9 mmHg (p<0,05). In the Latanoprost group, the mean intraocular pressure before treatment was 23.6 ± 3.6 mmHg and the mean intraocular pressure after 1 month of treatment with 0.005% Latanoprost was 15.3 ± 2.4 mmHg (p<0,05). However, when comparing the IOPs to the 1-month treatment with Latanoprostene bunod 0.024% and Latanoprost 0.005%, it is observed, through ANOVA, that the difference in intraocular pressure reduction between these two drugs is not significant (p= 0,238). Discussion: Topical prostaglandins, with their potent ocular hypotensive effect (resulting from increased uveoscleral outflow), are an important treatment option for glaucoma. The IOP reduction is as expected with both drugs, however, there are no significant differences between the two. In the LBN group, more drug-related ocular adverse effects were found after 1 month of use.

Radius of Gyration as predictor of COVID-19 deaths trend with three-weeks offset

Total and perimetral lockdowns were the strongest nonpharmaceutical interventions to fight against Covid-19, as well as the with the strongest socioeconomic collateral effects. Lacking a metric to predict the effect of lockdowns in the spreading of COVID-19, authorities and decision-makers opted for preventive measures that showed either too strong or not strong enough after a period of two to three weeks, once data about hospitalizations and deaths was available. We present here the radius of gyration as a candidate predictor of the trend in deaths by COVID-19 with an offset of three weeks. Indeed, the radius of gyration aggregates the most relevant microscopic aspects of human mobility into a macroscopic value, very sensitive to temporary trends and local effects, such as lockdowns and mobility restrictions. We use mobile phone data of more than 13 million users in Spain during a period of one year (from January 6th 2020 to January 10th 2021) to compute the users daily radius of gyration and compare the median value of the population with the evolution of COVID-19 deaths: we find that for all weeks where the radius of gyration is above a critical value (70% of its pre-pandemic score) the number of weekly deaths increases three weeks after. The reverse also stands: for all weeks where the radius of gyration is below the critical value, the number of weekly deaths decreased after three weeks. This observation leads to two conclusions: i) the radius of gyration can be used as a predictor of COVID-19-related deaths; and ii) partial mobility restrictions are as effective as a total lockdown as far the radius of gyration is below this critical value. BackgroundAuthorities around the World have used lockdowns and partial mobility restrictions as major nonpharmaceutical interventions to control the expansion of COVID-19. While effective, the efficiency of these measures on the number of COVID-19 cases and deaths is difficult to quantify, severely limiting the feedback that can be used to tune the intensity of these measures. In addition, collateral socioeconomic effects challenge the overall effectiveness of lockdowns in the long term, and the degree by which they are followed can be difficult to estimate. It is desirable to find both a metric to accurately monitor the mobility restrictions and a predictor of their effectiveness. MethodsWe correlate the median of the daily radius of gyration of more than 13M users in Spain during all of 2020 with the evolution of COVID-19 deaths for the same period. Mobility data is obtained from mobile phone metadata from one of the major operators in the country. ResultsThe radius of gyration is a predictor of the trend in the number of COVID-19 deaths with 3 weeks offset. When the radius is above/below a critical threshold (70% of the pre-pandemic score), the number of deaths increases/decreases three weeks later. ConclusionsThe radius of gyration can be used to monitor in real time the effectiveness of the mobility restrictions. The existence of a critical threshold suggest that partial lockdowns can be as efficient as total lockdowns, while reducing their socioeconomic impact. The mechanism behind the critical value is still unknow, and more research is needed.

Emergence and spread of a SARS-CoV-2 variant through Europe in the summer of 2020

Following its emergence in late 2019, severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) has caused a global pandemic resulting in unprecedented efforts to reduce transmission and develop therapies and vaccines (WHO Emergency Committee, 2020; Zhu et al., 2020). Rapidly generated viral genome sequences have allowed the spread of the virus to be tracked via phylogenetic analysis (Worobey et al., 2020; Hadfield et al., 2018; Pybus et al., 2020). While the virus spread globally in early 2020 before borders closed, intercontinental travel has since been greatly reduced, allowing continent-specific variants to emerge. However, within Europe travel resumed in the summer of 2020, and the impact of this travel on the epidemic is not well understood. Here we report on a novel SARS-CoV-2 variant, 20E (EU1), that emerged in Spain in early summer, and subsequently spread to multiple locations in Europe. We find no evidence of increased transmissibility of this variant, but instead demonstrate how rising incidence in Spain, resumption of travel across Europe, and lack of effective screening and containment may explain the variants success. Despite travel restrictions and quarantine requirements, we estimate 20E (EU1) was introduced hundreds of times to countries across Europe by summertime travellers, likely undermining local efforts to keep SARS-CoV-2 cases low. Our results demonstrate how a variant can rapidly become dominant even in absence of a substantial transmission advantage in favorable epidemiological settings. Genomic surveillance is critical to understanding how travel can impact SARS-CoV-2 transmission, and thus for informing future containment strategies as travel resumes. Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is the first pandemic where the spread of a viral pathogen has been globally tracked in near real-time using phylogenetic analysis of viral genome sequences (Worobey et al., 2020; Hadfield et al., 2018; Pybus et al., 2020). SARS-CoV-2 genomes continue to be generated at a rate far greater than for any other pathogen and more than 500,000 full genomes are available on GISAID as of February 2020 (Shu and McCauley, 2017). In addition to tracking the viral spread, these genome sequences have been used to monitor mutations which might change the transmission, pathogenesis, or anti-genic properties of the virus. One mutation in particular, D614G in the spike protein, has received much attention. This variant (Nextstrain clade 20A) seeded large outbreaks in Europe in early 2020 and subsequently dominated the outbreaks in the Americas, thereby largely replacing previously circulating lineages. This rapid rise led to the suggestion that this variant is more transmissible, which has since been corroborated by phylogenetic (Korber et al., 2020; Volz et al., 2020) and experimental evidence (Plante et al., 2020; Yurkovetskiy et al., 2020). Following the global dissemination of SARS-CoV-2 in early 2020 (Worobey et al., 2020), intercontinental travel dropped dramatically. Within Europe, however, travel and in particular holiday travel resumed in summer (though at lower levels than in previous years) with largely uncharacterized effects on the pandemic. Here we report on a novel SARS-CoV-2 variant 20E (EU1) (S:A222V) that emerged in early summer 2020, presumably in Spain, and subsequently spread to multiple locations in Europe. Over the summer, it rose in frequency in parallel in multiple countries. As we report here, this variant, 20E (EU1), and a second variant 20A.EU2 with mutation S477N in the spike protein accounted for the majority of sequences in Europe in the autumn of 2020.

Social inequalities in human mobility during the Spanish lockdown and post-lockdown in the Covid-19 pandemic of 2020

Many countries established strong population lockdowns as a response to the pandemic of COVID-19 in 2020. While these measures proved efficient in stopping the spreading of the virus, they also introduced collateral effects in the economies of these countries. We report in this work that the imprints in mobility of both the lockdown and post-lockdown on the Spanish population are measurable by means of the daily radius of gyration using mobile phone data. We cross mobility with economic data segmented by average salary per person so as to find large inequalities between low- and high-income populations. Indeed, low-income populations typically show a 17% higher radius of gyration than high-income ones during pre-lockdown (8.1 km vs. 6.9 km). However, this relative difference grows to a maximum during lock-down (3.3 km vs. 900 m) since most of the essential workers (carriers, nurses, supermarket cashiers, farmworkers, etc.) belong to the first segment. Post-lockdown shows reversed inequality in the weeks during summer vacations as high-income populations multiplied their pre-lockdown radius by 70% as a rebound effect driven by leisure, while low-income populations recovered their normal pre-lockdown radius. This period is correlated with an extraordinary increase in the number of new Covid cases, which stabilized after the holyday weeks once at the so-called new normal. We find that this new normal emphasizes the pre-lockdown inequalities in mobility between low- and high-income population, increasing the inequality up to a 47%. These results show the relevance of devising measures that could account for potential collateral inequalities.

Effects of mobility and multi-seeding on the propagation of the COVID-19 in Spain

Assessing the impact of mobility on epidemic spreading is of crucial importance for understanding the effect of policies like mass quarantines and selective re-openings. High mobility between areas contribute to the importation of cases, affecting the spread of the disease. While many factors influence local incidence and making it more or less homogeneous with respect to other areas, the importance of multi-seeding has often been overlooked. Multi-seeding occurs when several independent (non-clustered) infected individuals arrive at a susceptible population. This can give rise to autonomous outbreaks that impact separate areas of the contact (social) network. Such mechanism has the potential to boost local incidence and size, making control and tracing measures less effective. In Spain, the high heterogeneity in incidence between similar areas despite the uniform mobility control measures taken suggests that multi-seeding could have played an important role in shaping the spreading of the disease. In this work, we focus on the spreading of SARS-CoV-2 among the 52 Spanish provinces, showing that local peaks of incidence and mortality strongly correlate with mobility occurred in the early-stage weeks from and to Madrid, the main mobility hub and where the initial local outbreak unfolded. These results clarify the higher order effects that mobility can have on the evolution of an epidemic and highlight the relevance of its control.

Recurrent myxoid liposarcoma of the hand.

Malignant hand tumors are rarely observed in clinical practice which makes distinguishing them from benign soft tissue masses particularly challenging. A 41-year-old male presented with joint pain and swelling of his left index metacarpophalangeal joint. Radiological studies showed pronounced swelling around the affected joint with no bony abnormality, but incision and drainage of the site yielded negative cultures. Subsequent gross total resection confirmed the diagnosis of myxoid liposarcomas after cytogenetic pathology examination. Recurrence occurred after 1 year, followed by second resection and adjuvant radiotherapy. At 2 years follow-up, the patient was recurrence free. In conclusion, myxoid liposarcoma should be in the differential diagnosis of an older patient with erythema and swelling surrounding a subfascial mass of the hand.