Three-year results of ab interno trabeculectomy (Trabectome): Berlin study group.

PURPOSE: To assess the long-term outcome of Trabectome surgery in the treatment of primary open angle glaucoma (POAG) and pseudoexfoliative glaucoma (PEX): 3-year results. METHODS: Trabectome surgery (NeoMedix, Tustin, CA, USA) was performed in 268 POAG patients (women 57.46%, men 42.54%, age 72.35 ± 9.63 years) and 98 PEX glaucoma patients (women 58.16%, men 41.84%, age 73.42 ± 8.54 years), and uncontrolled intraocular pressure (IOP). Parameters were examined preoperatively, 1 day, 6 weeks, 3, 6, 12, 24 and 36 months post surgery. Kaplan-Meier analysis was performed using Criteria A (IOP ≤ 21 mmHg or ≥20% reduction from preoperative IOP), Criteria B (IOP ≤ 18 mmHg or ≥20% IOP reduction), Criteria C (IOP ≤ 21 mmHg, with or without medication) and D (IOP ≤ 18 mmHg, with or without medication). Complete success was defined as IOP ≤ 21 mmHg (Criteria E) and IOP ≤ 18 mmHg without medication (Criteria F). RESULTS: IOP was reduced from 19.10 ± 4.11 mmHg to 14.27 ± 2.93 mmHg (p < 0.001) and glaucoma medication was decreased from 2.40±0.92 to 1.77±1.00 (p < 0.001) in POAG after 36 months. In PEX, IOP decreased from 22.49±9.40 mmHg to 14.57±5.05 mmHg after 36 months (p < 0.001). Medications dropped from 2.31±1.02 to 1.75±0.91 (p = 0.006). Kaplan-Meier analysis showed a success rate of 80.5% for POAG and 80.8% for PEX using criteria A (p = 0.933) and 62.4% for POAG and 73.7% for PEX using criteria B (p = 0.147) at 36 months postoperatively. Complete success showed a low survival rate (criteria E-13.5% in POAG and 7.9% in PEX, p = 0.070 and criteria F-12.8% in POAG and 5.9% in PEX, p = 0.083). CONCLUSIONS: Trabectome is a safe method to lower IOP in patients with POAG and PEX glaucoma in the long-term period. It is beneficial to inform patients prior to surgery about adjuvant glaucoma medication after the surgery.

Predictive risk factors for radiation retinopathy and optic neuropathy after proton beam therapy for uveal melanoma.

PURPOSE: This study was performed in order to evaluate the incidence of radiation retinopathy and optic neuropathy occurring after proton beam therapy for uveal melanoma. METHODS: Included in this study were all patients who had been treated with primary proton beam therapy for uveal melanoma at the oncology service between May 1998 and June 2014 with a minimum follow-up of 12 months. Excluded were all patients who underwent re-irradiation, or vitrectomy due to exudative retinal detachment or for tumor-resection. RESULTS: During this period, 1127 patients matched the inclusion criteria, of whom 768 (68.1 %) and 463 (41.0 %) developed radiation retinopathy and optic neuropathy after a median time of 18.9 months (2.0-99.84 months) and 19.8 months (0.2-170.4 months), respectively. Mean follow-up was 53.4 months (12-170.4 months). Included were 558 men (49.5 %) and 569 women (50.5 %). Mean age was 61 years (16-89 years). Visual acuity slightly decreased from initial levels of 0.3 logMAR-0.4 logMAR in patients without developing any radiation-induced complication but severely decreased to 1.0 logMAR or 1.5 logMAR in the case of developing radiation retinopathy only or optic neuropathy, respectively. Independent risk factors for radiation retinopathy were a centrally (<2.5 mm from sensitive structures) located tumor or a thick tumor located more than 2.5 mm from sensitive structures, while those for radiation optic neuropathy comprised a short distance and applied dose to the optic disk. CONCLUSION: The risk for radiation retinopathy is higher in central uveal melanoma. Mid-/peripheral tumors are at high risk for radiation retinopathy and maculopathy if presenting with increased thickness.

Antiangiogenic or Corticosteroid Treatment in Patients With Radiation Maculopathy After Proton Beam Therapy for Uveal Melanoma.

PURPOSE: To reveal differences or advantages in regard to different treatment options after proton beam therapy for uveal melanoma. DESIGN: Retrospective, comparative, interventional case series. METHODS: All patients receiving intravitreal treatment between January 2011 and July 2014 for radiation maculopathy after proton beam therapy were included. Excluded were all patients who required re-irradiation, vitrectomies, or tumor resections; and those whose treatment was performed for potentially other reasons, such as radiation-induced optic neuropathy, or where visual outcome was influenced by tumor growth under the macula or macular ischemia. Minimum follow-up was 12 months after last injection. RESULTS: Of 78 patients, 38 (48.7%) received bevacizumab injections, 35 (44.9%) triamcinolone acetonide injections, and 5 (6.4%) a dexamethasone implant. In the bevacizumab group visual acuity improved in 11 patients (28.9%) by 0.25 logMAR (0.1-0.4 logMAR) and remained stable in 24 patients (63.2%) 4 weeks after injection. In the triamcinolone group visual acuity showed improved outcomes in 10 patients (28.6%) by 0.25 logMAR (0.1-0.4 logMAR) and stability in function in 20 patients (57.1%). Four weeks after dexamethasone implantation visual acuity remained stable in 4 patients (80%). No differences among the groups were detected regarding functional outcome or reduction in central foveal thickness. CONCLUSIONS: This study showed that antiangiogenic or corticosteroid intravitreal treatment led to reduced central foveal thickness and visual improvement in some patients without showing differences or advantages. Therefore a patient-specific treatment choice can be recommended.