MIG6 Mediates Adaptive and Acquired Resistance to ALK/ROS1 Fusion Kinase Inhibition through EGFR Bypass Signaling.

Despite the initial benefit from tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) targeting oncogenic ALK and ROS1 gene fusions in non-small cell lung cancer, complete responses are rare and resistance ultimately emerges from residual tumor cells. Although several acquired resistance mechanisms have been reported at the time of disease progression, adaptative resistance mechanisms that contribute to residual diseases before the outgrowth of tumor cells with acquired resistance are less clear. For the patients who have progressed after TKI treatments, but do not demonstrate ALK/ROS1 kinase mutations, there is a lack of biomarkers to guide effective treatments. Herein, we found that phosphorylation of MIG6, encoded by the ERRFI1 gene, was downregulated by ALK/ROS1 inhibitors as were mRNA levels, thus potentiating EGFR activity to support cell survival as an adaptive resistance mechanism. MIG6 downregulation was sustained following chronic exposure to ALK/ROS1 inhibitors to support the establishment of acquired resistance. A higher ratio of EGFR to MIG6 expression was found in ALK TKI-treated and ALK TKI-resistant tumors and correlated with the poor responsiveness to ALK/ROS1 inhibition in patient-derived cell lines. Furthermore, we identified and validated a MIG6 EGFR-binding domain truncation mutation in mediating resistance to ROS1 inhibitors but sensitivity to EGFR inhibitors. A MIG6 deletion was also found in a patient after progressing to ROS1 inhibition. Collectively, this study identifies MIG6 as a novel regulator for EGFR-mediated adaptive and acquired resistance to ALK/ROS1 inhibitors and suggests EGFR to MIG6 ratios and MIG6-damaging alterations as biomarkers to predict responsiveness to ALK/ROS1 and EGFR inhibitors.

Prospective Clinical Prognostication of Endometrial Carcinomas Based on Next-Generation Sequencing and Immunohistochemistry-Real-World Implementation and Results at a Tertiary Care Center.

Based on findings from The Cancer Genome Atlas and the Proactive Molecular Risk Classifier for Endometrial Cancer algorithm, endometrial carcinoma can now be stratified into 4 prognostically distinct subgroups based on molecular alterations and immunohistochemical (IHC) aberrations. In this study, we describe the de novo adoption and clinical reporting of prognostic subgroup classification based on next-generation sequencing (NGS) and IHC analyses of all endometrial carcinoma resections at a single institution, framed by the Exploration, Preparation, Implementation, and Sustainment model. Results from the first 13 months show 188 tumors underwent analysis by a combination of IHC and a medium-sized (56 analyzed genes) NGS-based assay. All cases were assigned as either POLE (POLE-mutated) (5.3%), mismatch repair deficient (27.7%), no specific molecular profile (45.7%), or p53 abnormal (21.3%) inclusive of multiple-classifier cases. NGS-based analysis revealed additional distinctions among the subgroups, including reduced levels of PI3K pathway activation in the p53 abnormal subgroup, an increased rate of CTNNB1 activating mutation in the no specific molecular profile subgroup, and lower TP53 mutation variant allele frequencies in POLE and mismatch repair deficient subgroups compared with the p53 abnormal subgroup. Overall, we describe the testing protocol, reporting, and results of a combination of NGS and IHC to prospectively prognosticate endometrial carcinomas at a single tertiary care center.

Mutational Signatures in Cancer: Laboratory Considerations and Emerging Applications.

Patterns of somatic mutations have emerged from the broad sequencing of human cancer genomes. These mutational signatures reflect mechanisms of mutagenesis and DNA repair defects and represent an emerging class of cancer biomarkers. The appropriate interpretation of mutational signatures from sequencing assays holds implications in the reporting of molecular diagnostic results for patients with cancer. This brief review describes the scientific principles, laboratory considerations, and emerging clinical applications of mutational signature analysis from clinical cancer genomes.

Evolution of acquired resistance in a ROS1+ KRAS G12C+ NSCLC through the MAPK pathway.

Patients with metastatic NSCLC bearing a ROS1 gene fusion usually experience prolonged disease control with ROS1-targeting tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI), but significant clinical heterogeneity exists in part due to the presence of co-occurring genomic alterations. Here, we report on a patient with metastatic NSCLC with a concurrent ROS1 fusion and KRAS p.G12C mutation at diagnosis who experienced a short duration of disease control on entrectinib, a ROS1 TKI. At progression, the patient continued entrectinib and started sotorasib, a small molecule inhibitor of KRAS p.G12C. A patient-derived cell line generated at progression on entrectinib demonstrated improved TKI responsiveness when treated with entrectinib and sotorasib. Cell-line growth dependence on both ROS1 and KRAS p.G12C was further reflected in the distinct downstream signaling pathways activated by each driver. Clinical benefit was not observed with combined therapy of entrectinib and sotorasib possibly related to an evolving KRAS p.G12C amplification identified on repeated molecular testing. This case supports the need for broad molecular profiling in patients with metastatic NSCLC for potential therapeutic and prognostic information.

Novel RAF Fusions in Pediatric Low-Grade Gliomas Demonstrate MAPK Pathway Activation.

Brain tumors are the most common solid tumor in children, and low-grade gliomas (LGGs) are the most common childhood brain tumor. Here, we report on 3 patients with LGG harboring previously unreported or rarely reported RAF fusions: FYCO1-RAF1, CTTNBP2-BRAF, and SLC44A1-BRAF. We hypothesized that these tumors would show molecular similarity to the canonical KIAA1549-BRAF fusion that is the most widely seen alteration in pilocytic astrocytoma (PA), the most common pediatric LGG variant, and that this similarity would include mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway activation. To test our hypothesis, we utilized immunofluorescent imaging and RNA-sequencing in normal brain, KIAA1549-BRAF-harboring tumors, and our 3 tumors with novel fusions. We performed immunofluorescent staining of ERK and phosphorylated ERK (p-ERK), identifying increased p-ERK expression in KIAA1549-BRAF fused PA and the novel fusion samples, indicative of MAPK pathway activation. Geneset enrichment analysis further confirmed upregulated downstream MAPK activation. These results suggest that MAPK activation is the oncogenic mechanism in noncanonical RAF fusion-driven LGG. Similarity in the oncogenic mechanism suggests that LGGs with noncanonical RAF fusions are likely to respond to MEK inhibitors.

Clinical and molecular features of subungual melanomas are site-specific and distinct from acral melanomas.

Subungual melanomas (SUM) arise beneath the nails of the hands and feet, and account for 0.7-3.5% of all malignant melanomas. Most studies include SUM in the category of acral melanoma, but understanding the specific features of SUM is critical for improving patient care. In this study, we performed a site-specific comparison of the clinical and molecular features between 54 cases of SUM and 78 cases of nonsubungual acral melanoma. Compared to patients with acral melanoma, patients with SUM were younger at diagnosis, had a higher prevalence of primary melanomas on the hand, and had more frequent reports of previous trauma at the tumor site. SUM was deeper than acral melanoma at diagnosis, which correlated with an increased frequency of metastases. Analysis of common melanoma driver genes revealed KIT and KRAS mutations were predominantly found in SUM, whereas BRAF and NRAS mutations occurred almost exclusively in acral melanoma. We also discovered molecular differences in the cell cycle pathway, where CDK4/CCND1 amplifications were more frequent in SUM and CDKN2A/B loss occurred mostly in acral melanoma, and in the PI3K/mTOR pathway, where RICTOR amplification and TSC1 K587R mutations were exclusively in SUM and PTEN loss and AKT1 mutations were exclusively in acral melanoma. Comparison of hand versus foot tumors revealed more frequent ulceration of SUM foot tumors, which correlated with more distal metastases and poorer overall survival. In summary, we find SUM are both clinically and molecularly distinct from acral melanoma, and our data suggest KIT, CDK4/6, and mTOR inhibitors may be particularly relevant and effective treatments for patients with SUM.

Clinical and molecular characterization of a multi-institutional cohort of pediatric spinal cord low-grade gliomas.

BACKGROUND: The mitogen-activated protein kinases/extracelluar signal-regulated kinases pathway is involved in cell growth and proliferation, and mutations in BRAF have made it an oncogene of interest in pediatric cancer. Previous studies found that BRAF mutations as well as KIAA1549-BRAF fusions are common in intracranial low-grade gliomas (LGGs). Fewer studies have tested for the presence of these genetic changes in spinal LGGs. The aim of this study was to better understand the prevalence of BRAF and other genetic aberrations in spinal LGG. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 46 spinal gliomas from patients aged 1-25 years from Children's Hospital Colorado (CHCO) and The Hospital for Sick Children (SickKids). CHCO utilized a 67-gene panel that assessed BRAF and additionally screened for other possible genetic abnormalities of interest. At SickKids, BRAF V600E was assessed by droplet digital polymerase chain reaction and immunohistochemistry. BRAF fusions were detected by fluorescence in situ hybridization, reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction, or NanoString platform. Data were correlated with clinical information. RESULTS: Of 31 samples with complete fusion analysis, 13 (42%) harbored KIAA1549-BRAF. All 13 (100%) patients with confirmed KIAA1549-BRAF survived the entirety of the study period (median [interquartile range] follow-up time: 47 months [27-85 months]) and 15 (83.3%) fusion-negative patients survived (follow-up time: 37.5 months [19.8-69.5 months]). Other mutations of interest were also identified in this patient cohort including BRAF V600E , PTPN11, H3F3A, TP53, FGFR1, and CDKN2A deletion. CONCLUSION: KIAA1549-BRAF was seen in higher frequency than BRAF V600E or other genetic aberrations in pediatric spinal LGGs and experienced lower death rates compared to KIAA1549-BRAF negative patients, although this was not statistically significant.

Retrospective analysis of combination carboplatin and vinblastine for pediatric low-grade glioma.

INTRODUCTION: Low-grade glioma (LGG) represent the most common pediatric central nervous system tumor. When total surgical resection is not feasible, chemotherapy is first-line therapy in children. Multiple pediatric LGG chemotherapy regimens have been investigated with variable 2-year event free survival (EFS) rates of 39-69%. To date, treatment of pediatric LGG with a carboplatin and vinblastine (C/VBL) chemotherapy regimen has only been evaluated in a phase 1 dose-finding study. METHODS: A retrospective review of pediatric patients with LGG who were treated with C/VBL at Children's Hospital of Colorado or Akron Children's Hospital from 2011 to 2017 was conducted. Data collected included patient demographics, tumor location, disease response, neurofibromatosis 1 (NF1) status, therapy duration and toxicities. Response to therapy was determined by objective findings on imaging and treating physicians' evaluation. RESULTS: Forty-six patients were identified for analysis, all of whom were chemotherapy-naive. Only five patients treated in this cohort had NF1. BRAF fusion was identified in 65% (22/34) of tested tumors. Best therapy response was partial response in nine patients and stable disease in twenty-five patients. Twelve patients had progressive disease. One-year, 3-year, and 5-year EFS probabilities for all patients were 69.6%, 39.4%, and 34.5%, respectively. Nine patients had admissions for febrile neutropenia and seven patients experienced one delay in chemotherapy due to neutropenia. Only two patients had to discontinue this chemotherapy regimen because of treatment-related toxicities [carboplatin allergy (n = 1) and vinblastine neuropathy (n = 1)]. CONCLUSION: C/VBL achieves similar EFS rates to other single-agent and combination cytotoxic chemotherapy regimens for pediatric LGG with manageable toxicities.

Comparison of Tissue Molecular Biomarker Testing Turnaround Times and Concordance Between Standard of Care and the Biocartis Idylla Platform in Patients With Colorectal Cancer.

OBJECTIVES: Management of colorectal cancer warrants mutational analysis of KRAS/NRAS when considering anti-epidermal growth factor receptor therapy and BRAF testing for prognostic stratification. In this multicenter study, we compared a fully integrated, cartridge-based system to standard-of-care assays used by participating laboratories. METHODS: Twenty laboratories enrolled 874 colorectal cancer cases between November 2017 and December 2018. Testing was performed on the Idylla automated system (Biocartis) using the KRAS and NRAS-BRAF cartridges (research use only) and results compared with in-house standard-of-care testing methods. RESULTS: There were sufficient data on 780 cases to measure turnaround time compared with standard assays. In-house polymerase chain reaction (PCR) had an average testing turnaround time of 5.6 days, send-out PCR of 22.5 days, in-house Sanger sequencing of 14.7 days, send-out Sanger of 17.8 days, in-house next-generation sequencing (NGS) of 12.5 days, and send-out NGS of 20.0 days. Standard testing had an average turnaround time of 11 days. Idylla average time to results was 4.9 days with a range of 0.4 to 13.5 days. CONCLUSIONS: The described cartridge-based system offers rapid and reliable testing of clinically actionable mutation in colorectal cancer specimens directly from formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue sections. Its simplicity and ease of use compared with other molecular techniques make it suitable for routine clinical laboratory testing.

Targeted fusion analysis can aid in the classification and treatment of pediatric glioma, ependymoma, and glioneuronal tumors.

BACKGROUND: The use of next-generation sequencing for fusion identification is being increasingly applied and aids our understanding of tumor biology. Some fusions are responsive to approved targeted agents, while others have future potential for therapeutic targeting. Although some pediatric central nervous system tumors may be cured with surgery alone, many require adjuvant therapy associated with acute and long-term toxicities. Identification of targetable fusions can shift the treatment paradigm toward earlier integration of molecularly targeted agents. METHODS: Patients diagnosed with glial, glioneuronal, and ependymal tumors between 2002 and 2019 were retrospectively reviewed for fusion testing. Testing was done primarily using the ArcherDx FusionPlex Solid Tumor panel, which assesses fusions in 53 genes. In contrast to many previously published series chronicling fusions in pediatric patients, we compared histological features and the tumor classification subtype with the specific fusion identified. RESULTS: We report 24 cases of glial, glioneuronal, or ependymal tumors from pediatric patients with identified fusions. With the exception of BRAF:KIAA1549 and pilocytic/pilomyxoid astrocytoma morphology, and possibly QKI-MYB and angiocentric glioma, there was not a strong correlation between histological features/tumor subtype and the specific fusion. We report the unusual fusions of PPP1CB-ALK, CIC-LEUTX, FGFR2-KIAA159, and MN1-CXXC5 and detail their morphological features. CONCLUSIONS: Fusion testing proved to be informative in a high percentage of cases. A large majority of fusion events in pediatric glial, glioneuronal, and ependymal tumors can be identified by relatively small gene panels.

Targetable molecular alterations in congenital glioblastoma.

INTRODUCTION: Congenital glioblastomas (cGBMs) are uncommon tumors presenting in early infancy, variably defined as diagnosed at birth or at age less than 3 months by strict criteria, or more loosely, as occurring in very young children less than 12 months of age. Previous studies have shown that cGBMs are histologically indistinguishable from GBMs in older children or adults, but may have a more favorable clinical outcome, suggesting biological differences between congenital versus other GBMs. Due to the infrequency of cGBMs, especially when employing strict inclusion criteria, molecular features have not been sufficiently explored. METHODS: Archer FusionPlex Solid Tumor Kit, Archer VariantPlex Solid Tumor Kit, Illumina RNAseq were utilized to study cGBMs seen at our institution since 2002. A strict definition for cGBM was utilized, with only infants less than age 3 months at clinical presentation sought for this study. RESULTS: Of the 8 cGBM cases identified in our files, 7 had sufficient materials for molecular analyses, and 3 of 7 cases analyzed showed fusions of the ALK gene (involving MAP4, MZT2Bex2 and EML4 genes as fusion partners). One case showed ROS1 fusion. Somatic mutations in TSC22D1, BMG1 and DGCR6 were identified in 1 case. None of the cases showed alterations in IDH1/2, histone genes, or the TERT gene, alterations which can be associated with GBMs in older children or adults. CONCLUSIONS: Our results show that cGBMs are genetically heterogeneous and biologically different from pediatric and adult GBMs. Identification of ALK and ROS1 raise the possibility of targeted therapy with FDA-approved targeted inhibitors.

Clinicopathologic Characteristics, Treatment Outcomes, and Acquired Resistance Patterns of Atypical EGFR Mutations and HER2 Alterations in Stage IV Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer.

BACKGROUND: The clinicopathologic characteristics, acquired resistance patterns, and outcomes among patients with atypical EGFR mutations and HER2 alterations remain underexplored. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A single-center retrospective review was conducted. Oncogenes assessed include typical EGFR (t-EGFR; exon 19 del and L858R), atypical EGFR (a-EGFR; G719X, exon 20, L861Q), HER2 (exon 19, exon 20, amplifications), gene fusions (ALK, ROS1, RET), RAS (KRAS, NRAS), and RAF (BRAF V600E). Progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), disease control rate, and objective response rate (Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors 1.1) were collected. RESULTS: Among 570 patients, we found 55 a-EGFR mutations (13 G719X, 38 exon 20, 4 L861Q) and 31 HER2 alterations (2 exon 19 mutations, 27 exon 20 insertions, 2 amplifications). Patients with EGFR and HER2 alterations had increased lung and bone metastases relative to patients with gene fusions, RAS/RAF mutations, and no identified driver oncogenes (P < .001). Patients with EGFR exon 20 insertions had a median PFS to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) of 5 months and an OS of 16 months-significantly worse than exon 19 del and L858R (Bonferroni correction; P < .001), but not G719X or L861Q. Relative to t-EGFR mutations, T790M and MET amplification occurred less frequently as acquired resistance mechanisms among a-EGFR samples (P < .001). Ten patients with a-EGFR mutations and HER2 alterations received single-agent immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) with no radiographic responses and a median PFS of 2 months. CONCLUSION: EGFR and HER2-mutated NSCLC have a high rate of synchronous lung and bone metastases. Patients with a-EGFR mutations have inferior responses to EGFR-directed therapies with lower rates of acquired T790M and MET amplification. Responses to ICIs are uniformly poor. Novel therapeutic approaches are needed.

Oncogenic Gene Fusion Detection Using Anchored Multiplex Polymerase Chain Reaction Followed by Next Generation Sequencing.

Gene fusions frequently contribute to the oncogenic phenotype of many different types of cancer. Additionally, the presence of certain fusions in samples from cancer patients often directly influences diagnosis, prognosis, and/or therapy selection. As a result, the accurate detection of gene fusions has become a critical component of clinical management for many disease types. Until recently, clinical gene fusion detection was predominantly accomplished through the use of single-gene assays. However, the ever-growing list of gene fusions with clinical significance has created a need for assessing fusion status of multiple genes simultaneously. Next generation sequencing (NGS)-based testing has met this demand through the ability to sequence nucleic acid in massively parallel fashion. Multiple NGS-based approaches that employ different strategies for gene target enrichment are now available for use in clinical molecular diagnostics, each with its own strengths and weaknesses. This article describes the use of anchored multiplex PCR (AMP)-based target enrichment and library preparation followed by NGS to assess for gene fusions in clinical solid tumor specimens. AMP is unique among amplicon-based enrichment approaches in that it identifies gene fusions regardless of the identity of the fusion partner. Detailed here are both the wet-bench and data analysis steps that ensure accurate gene fusion detection from clinical samples.

Wake Up and Smell the Fusions: Single-Modality Molecular Testing Misses Drivers.

Multitarget assays have become common in clinical molecular diagnostic laboratories. However, all assays, no matter how well designed, have inherent gaps due to technical and biological limitations. In some clinical cases, testing by multiple methodologies is needed to address these gaps and ensure the most accurate molecular diagnoses.See related article by Benayed et al., p. 4712.