ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Aortic graft infection is a rare, but grave, complication in vascular surgery. Graft removal together with extra-anatomical bypass or in situ graft replacement is usually advocated, but these procedures are associated with significant morbidity and mortality. METHODS AND RESULTS: Two cases of aortic graft infection in high-risk surgical candidates managed by open debridement and omental wrapping with graft preservation are described. Both remain well at 3 years without any adjunctive procedures. CONCLUSION: Debridement and omental wrapping may offer an alternative to graft removal and revascularization in selected patients. This relatively low-risk procedure may allow long-term survival.
Subject(s)
Aortic Aneurysm/surgery , Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation/adverse effects , Blood Vessel Prosthesis/adverse effects , Debridement , Omentum/surgery , Prosthesis-Related Infections/surgery , Surgical Flaps , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Aortography/methods , Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation/instrumentation , Humans , Male , Prosthesis-Related Infections/diagnostic imaging , Prosthesis-Related Infections/microbiology , Reoperation , Time Factors , Tomography, X-Ray Computed , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Patients with critical limb ischemia have a perioperative cardiovascular morbidity comparable to patients with acute coronary syndromes. We hypothesized that perioperative dual antiplatelet therapy would improve biomarkers of atherothrombosis without causing unacceptable bleeding in patients undergoing surgery for critical limb ischemia. METHODS: In a double-blind randomized controlled trial, 108 patients undergoing infrainguinal revascularization or amputation for critical limb ischemia were maintained on aspirin (75 mg daily) and randomized to clopidogrel (600 mg prior to surgery, and 75 mg daily for 3 days; n = 50) or matched placebo (n = 58). Platelet activation and myocardial injury were assessed by flow cytometry and plasma troponin concentrations, respectively. RESULTS: Clopidogrel reduced platelet-monocyte aggregation before surgery (38%-30%; P = 0.007). This was sustained in the postoperative period (P = 0.0019). There were 18 troponin-positive events (8 [16.0%] clopidogrel vs. 10 [17.2%] placebo; relative risk [RR]: 0.93, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.39-2.17; P = 0.86). Half of troponin-positive events occurred preoperatively with clopidogrel causing a greater decline in troponin concentrations (P < 0.001). There was no increase in major life-threatening bleeding (7 [14%] vs. 6 [10%]; RR: 1.4, 95% CI: 0.49-3.76; P = 0.56) or minor bleeding (17 [34%] vs. 12 [21%]; RR 1.64, 95% CI: 0.87-3.1; P = 0.12), although blood transfusions were increased (28% vs. 12.6%, RR: 2.3, 95% CI: 1.0-5.29; P = 0.037). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with critical limb ischemia, perioperative dual antiplatelet therapy reduces biomarkers of atherothrombosis without causing unacceptable bleeding. Large-scale randomized controlled trials are needed to establish whether dual antiplatelet therapy improves clinical outcome in high-risk patients undergoing vascular surgery.