Second cancers following oral and pharyngeal cancer: patients' characteristics and survival patterns.

A survey was made of second primary cancers among patients who were enrolled in a large case-control investigation of oral and pharyngeal cancer, hereafter called oral cancer, during 1984-1985 in four areas of the United States. Among the original 1090 patients with oral cancer (nearly all squamous cell carcinomas), 107 developed a second cancer (one-half of them squamous cell) by the end of follow-up in June 1989 (average follow-up 2.6 years), with 69% occurring in the oral cavity, pharynx, oesophagus, larynx or lung. Rates of second tumours varied by age and socioeconomic status, but not sex or race, and were higher among those whose initial cancer was localised, even after adjusting for their longer survival. Long-term survival was lower among those with second cancers. Conditional on surviving for 2 years, the survival at 5 years was under 50% and nearly 70%, respectively, for those with versus those without a second cancer in the first 2 years. These findings confirm the exceptionally high rate of second cancers (especially of the aerodigestive tract) following oral cancer, describe the clinical and pathological features of patients with multiple cancers and indicate the importance of preventive measures.

Carcinogenic risk of dark vs. light liquor.

A previous report suggested that the cancer risk associated with hard liquor is greater among users of dark liquors, which may contain more potentially carcinogenic compounds than light liquors. To test this hypothesis, we examined alcohol consumption data obtained by interview with 921 cases and 900 controls who participated in 1984-1985 in a population-based case-control study of oral and pharyngeal cancer conducted in 4 areas of the United States. Among heavy liquor drinkers (30+ drinks/week), odds ratios were 13.2 (95% CI = 5.2-33.5) for those who usually drank light liquors vs. 4.6 (95% CI = 2.7-7.9) for those who usually drank dark liquors, with higher risks for light vs. dark liquors at each anatomical subsite. This analysis provides no support for the notion that dark liquors are more carcinogenic than light liquors or that non-ethanolic ingredients of alcoholic beverages are major contributors to the excess risk of oral and pharyngeal cancer.

Dietary factors and second primary cancers: a follow-up of oral and pharyngeal cancer patients.

To investigate the possible relationship between dietary factors and the development of multiple primary cancer, a nested case-control study was carried out within a cohort of 1,090 oral and pharyngeal cancer patients. This patient group, enrolled in 1984-1985 in a population-based case-control study conducted in four areas of the United States, was followed up through June 1989 for the occurrence of second primary cancer. Information on a number of risk factors, including diet, ascertained from interviews conducted at baseline (1984-1985) and at follow-up were compared between 80 patients with histologically confirmed second primary cancers (39% in the upper aerodigestive tract, 32% in the lung, 29% elsewhere) and 189 sex- and survival-matched control patients free of second cancers. Although few significant trends emerged, the results were suggestive of a protective effect provided by higher intake of vegetables. Risk of second primary cancers was 40-60% lower among those with the highest levels of intake for total vegetables and most vegetable subgroups, including dark yellow, cruciferous, and green leafy vegetables and legumes. Risks were also nonsignificantly lower among those with high consumption of vitamin C and carotenoids, with the adverse effects of alcohol being most evident among heavy drinkers with low vitamin C or carotenoid intake. There was also some evidence of an interaction between smoking and vitamin C consumption, but numbers of nonsmokers were small. Among other dietary factors considered, positive associations were found with increasing consumption of meats, liver, and retinol. The findings suggest that dietary factors contribute along with alcohol and smoking to the excess risks of second primary cancers among patients with oral and pharyngeal cancers.

Second cancers following oral and pharyngeal cancers: role of tobacco and alcohol.

BACKGROUND: The exceptionally high rate of second primary cancers among patients with oral and pharyngeal cancers is well recognized, yet there has been limited epidemiologic study of risk factors for second tumors. PURPOSE: To evaluate the relation of smoking and alcohol consumption to the development of second cancers among this high-risk patient group, we conducted a nested case-control study. METHODS: A total of 1090 patients enrolled in a 1984-1985 population-based, case-control study of oral cancer in four areas of the United States were followed through June 1989 for the occurrence of second primary cancers. Information on tobacco and alcohol consumption was obtained from the original interviews and was updated by follow-up interviews obtained for 80 case patients with second cancers and 189 sex-, study area-, and survival-matched cancer patients free of second cancers (control subjects). RESULTS: Tobacco smoking and alcohol drinking each contributed to risk of second cancers, with the effects of smoking more pronounced than those of alcohol. The odds ratios (ORs) for smoking (adjusted for alcohol) rose with duration and intensity of smoking and were strongest for tumors of the aerodigestive tract (oral cavity, pharynx, esophagus, larynx, and lungs), with ORs reaching 4.7 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.4-16) among smokers of 40 or more cigarettes per day for 20 or more years. Current smokers as of the baseline survey experienced a fourfold increased risk of a second aerodigestive tract cancer relative to nonsmokers and former smokers. No reduction in risk was associated with cessation of smoking or drinking at or after the index diagnosis, although the short median interval (27 months) between tumor diagnoses limited observation of the effects due to recent cessation. Risk was significantly reduced, however, 5 years after smoking cessation. Among drinkers, second cancer risk was greatest for beer intake, with an OR for a second aerodigestive tract cancer of 3.8 (95% CI = 1.2-12) for 15 or more beers per week. CONCLUSIONS: Oral and pharyngeal cancer patients with the highest intakes of tobacco and alcohol are the ones most prone to develop second primary cancers. IMPLICATIONS: Avoidance of tobacco smoking and alcohol drinking is the most desirable way not only to prevent primary oral cancers, but also to reduce risk of second cancers of the aerodigestive system.

Racial differences in risk of oral and pharyngeal cancer: alcohol, tobacco, and other determinants.

BACKGROUND: In the United States, Blacks have increasingly higher rates of oral and pharyngeal cancer (oral cancer) than Whites, but determinants of the racial disparity have not been clear. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to explore reasons for the higher incidence of oral cancer among Blacks than Whites. METHODS: We used data from a large, population-based case-control study of oral cancer risk factors conducted in four areas of the United States. On the basis of interviews that ascertained characteristics of 1065 oral cancer patients (871 Whites and 194 Blacks) and 1182 controls (979 Whites and 203 Blacks), we examined racial differences in exposure prevalences and relative risks for a number of known etiologic factors, including tobacco and alcohol consumption, diet, and socioeconomic and other variables. To evaluate the extent to which the major risk factors explained the excess risk of oral cancer among Blacks, population-attributable risks were calculated. RESULTS: Differences with respect to alcohol consumption, especially among current smokers, emerged as the most important explanatory variables. After adjusting for smoking, heavy drinking (> or = 30 drinks/week) resulted in a 17-fold increased risk among Blacks and a ninefold increase among Whites. Among drinkers, Blacks tended to drink more than Whites. Also, a higher (P = .01) percentage of Blacks (37%) than Whites (28%) were current smokers, although there were little or no racial differences in relative risks or patterns of use for other smoking variables, including number of cigarettes smoked per day, years of smoking, and age started smoking. From population-attributable risk calculations, we estimated that differences in alcohol and tobacco use account for the bulk of the higher incidence of oral cancer among Blacks in the United States and that, in the absence of alcohol and tobacco, the rates of this cancer according to race (Black, White) and gender would be nearly equal. With regard to other potential etiologic factors, protective effects provided by higher dietary intake of fruits and vitamin C were more pronounced for Whites, while Blacks more often tended to be in sociodemographic and medical or dental health categories associated with increased risk. CONCLUSIONS: These analyses provide evidence that various environmental or lifestyle determinants of oral cancer may contribute to the higher oral cancer rates in Blacks than in Whites in the United States, but that patterns and risks associated with alcohol consumption, particularly among current smokers, are the most important contributors to the excess risk in Blacks. IMPLICATIONS: These findings suggest that the key to prevention of oral and pharyngeal cancers among both Blacks and Whites is reduced intake of alcoholic beverages and, because of strong interactive effects, the cessation of smoking.

Second primary tumors in patients with oral cancer.

BACKGROUND: Patients with cancer of the oral cavity and pharynx have been described to be particularly susceptible to the development of new cancers. METHODS: Using data collected during 1973-1987 by nine population-based cancer registries in the United States, the authors evaluated risks of second primary cancers among 21,371 patients in whom oral and pharyngeal cancers were diagnosed. RESULTS: The rate of development of second tumors was 3.7% per year. The risk of a second primary cancer was 2.8 times greater than expected, with 20-fold excesses of second oral or esophageal cancers and 4-fold to 7-fold increases of respiratory cancers. Increased risks persisted unabated for cancers diagnosed 5 or more years after oral cancer, suggesting that the second cancers were new primary tumors and not misdiagnosed metastases. The increased risks of second primary tumors were found among both men and women and black and white patients; they were most prominent among patients who were 60 years or younger. CONCLUSIONS: The exceptionally high rate of cancer recurrence among patients with oral cancer (exceeding that for all other cancers) points to the need for close medical surveillance. Special emphasis should be placed on advising patients to avoid or limit consumption of tobacco and alcohol, the main risk factors for oral and most second cancers.