Brief Interventions for Suicidal Youths in Medical Settings: A Meta-Analysis.

CONTEXT: Most youths who die by suicide have interfaced with a medical system in the year preceding their death, placing outpatient medical settings on the front lines for identification, assessment, and intervention. OBJECTIVE: Review and consolidate the available literature on suicide risk screening and brief intervention with youths in outpatient medical settings and examine common outcomes. DATA SOURCES: The literature search looked at PubMed, OVID, CINAHL, ERIC, and PsychInfo databases. STUDY SELECTION: Interventions delivered in outpatient medical settings assessing and mitigating suicide risk for youths (ages 10-24). Designs included randomized controlled trials, prospective and retrospective cohort studies, and case studies. DATA EXTRACTION: Authors extracted data on rates of referral to behavioral health services, initiation/adjustment of medication, follow-up in setting of assessment, suicidal ideation at follow-up, and suicide attempts and/or crisis services visited within 1 year of initial assessment. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in subsequent suicide attempts between intervention and control groups. Analysis on subsequent crisis service could not be performed due to lack of qualifying data. Key secondary findings were decreased immediate psychiatric hospitalizations and increased mental health service use, along with mild improvement in subsequent depressive symptoms. LIMITATIONS: The review was limited by the small number of studies meeting inclusion criteria, as well as a heterogeneity of study designs and risk of bias across studies. CONCLUSIONS: Brief suicide interventions for youth in outpatient medical settings can increase identification of risk, increase access to behavioral health services, and for crisis interventions, can limit psychiatric hospitalizations.

Surgical experiences in adolescents and young adults with differences of sex development: A qualitative examination.

BACKGROUND: Surgical intervention in youth with differences of sex development (DSD) is a controversial topic. Historically, evidence suggests that genital surgery in DSD is associated with mixed patient satisfaction. However, less is known about surgical outcomes under therapeutic advancements in the past several decades. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of the current study is to provide an updated and empirical qualitative examination of the surgical experiences and responses to care of adolescents and young adults (AYA) with DSD in order to fill this gap in the literature and inform patient care. METHODS: Qualitative interviews were conducted with 37 AYA (ages 12-26) with DSD. Interviews were transcribed, coded, and analyzed thematically. RESULTS: Three major themes were identified: 1) knowledge related to surgery; 2) surgical and medical experience; and 3) psychosocial factors related to surgery. Results demonstrated that most AYA were not involved in the decision to pursue surgery and were observed to have varying levels of knowledge regarding their surgeries. Most participants in the current study had received a DSD-related surgery and the majority described having positive surgical experiences and few regrets. Nonetheless, AYA described both medical and psychosocial challenges related to their surgeries and recoveries and offered feedback on ways to improve the surgical process. DISCUSSION: The current study provides a qualitative examination of the surgical experiences of 37 AYA with DSD. Findings highlight the importance of regular and ongoing communication with providers to improve knowledge related to surgery during the decision-making process as well as after surgical intervention. Results underscore the benefits of multidisciplinary teams and the value of patient handouts and decision aids in assisting AYA in the decision to pursue surgical intervention. Other specific recommendations for providers include increased patient privacy during genital exams, greater emphasis on psychoeducation and pain management strategies, and the use of behavioral health services to assist with challenges and social support. CONCLUSIONS: The decision to pursue surgical intervention in youth with DSD remains a complex and controversial issue, and more information regarding patients' perspectives on surgery is needed. The current study provides novel insights into patient experiences of surgical intervention and highlights the need for psychosocial support throughout the shared decision-making process.