Liposomal bupivacaine intercostal block placed under direct vision reduces morphine use in thoracic surgery.

Background: Thoracic epidural analgesia (TEA) and liposomal bupivacaine (LB) are two methods used for postoperative pain control after thoracic surgery. Some studies have compared LB to standard bupivacaine. However, data comparing the outcomes of LB to TEA after minimally invasive lung resection is limited. Therefore, the objective of our study was to compare postoperative pain, opioid usage, and outcomes between patients who received TEA vs. LB. Methods: We conducted a retrospective chart review of patients who underwent minimally invasive lung resections over an 8-month period. Intraoperatively, patients received either LB under direct vision or a TEA. Pain scores were obtained in the post-anesthesia care unit (PACU) and at 12, 24, and 48 hours postoperatively. Morphine milligram equivalents (MMEs) were calculated at 24 and 48 hours postoperatively. Postoperative outcomes were then compared between groups. Results: In total, 391 patients underwent minimally invasive lung resection: 236 (60%) wedge resections, 51 (13%) segmentectomies, and 104 (27%) lobectomies. Of these, 326 (83%) received LB intraoperatively. Fewer patients in the LB group experienced postoperative complications (18% vs. 34%, P=0.004). LB patients also had lower median pain scores at 24 (P=0.03) and 48 hours (P=0.001) postoperatively. There was no difference in MMEs at 24 hours (P=0.49). However, at 48 hours, patients who received LB required less narcotics (P=0.02). Median hospital length of stay (LOS) was significantly shorter in patients who received LB (2 vs. 4 days, P<0.001). On multivariable analysis, increasing age, postoperative complications, and use of TEA were independently associated with a longer hospital LOS. Conclusions: Compared to TEA, LB intercostal block placed under direct vision reduced morphine use 48 hours after thoracic surgery. It was also associated with fewer postoperative complications and shorter median hospital LOS. LB is a good alternative to TEA for pain management after minimally invasive lung resection.

Perioperative Esophagectomy Outcomes in Older Esophageal Cancer Patients in Two Different Time Eras.

To investigate perioperative outcomes of esophagectomies by age groups. Retrospective analysis of esophageal cancer patients undergoing esophagectomy from 2005 to 2020 at a single academic institution. Baseline characteristics and outcomes were analyzed by 3 age groups: <70, 70-79, and ≥80 years-old. Sub-analysis was done for 2 time periods: 2005-2012 and 2013-2020. Of 1135 patients, 789 patients were <70, 294 were 70-79, and 52 were ≥80 years-old. Tumor characteristics, and operative technique were similar, except positive longitudinal margins rates (all <3%) (P = 0.008). Older adults experienced increased complications (53.6% vs 69.7% vs 65.4% respectively; P < 0.001) attributable to grade II complications (41.4% vs 62.2% vs 63.5% respectively; P < 0.001). Hospital length of stay (LOS) and rehabilitation requirements were higher in older adults (both P < 0.05). 30-day readmissions, reoperation, and 30-day mortality rates (all <2%) showed no association with age group. Overall complications, LOS, discharge disposition and re-operative rates improved from 2005 to 2012 to 2013-2020 for all (P < 0.05). Increasing age was an independent risk factor for cardiovascular complications (OR 1.7, 95% CI 1.23-2.46 for ages 70-79 and OR 2.7, 95% CI 1.37-5.10 for ages ≥80 ), inpatient rehabilitation (OR 3.3, 95% CI 2.26-5.05 for ages 70-79 and OR 12.1 95% CI 5.83-25.04 for ages ≥80), and prolonged LOS (OR 1.64 95% CI 1.16-2.31 for ages 70-79 and OR 3.6 95% CI 1.71-7.67 for ≥80. After adjusting for time period, older age remained associated with complications (P < 0.05). Highly selected older adults at a large volume esophagectomy center can undergoesophagectomy with increased minor complication and rehabilitation needs.

Report on lung cancer surgery during COVID-19 pandemic at a high volume US institution.

Background: The impact of COVID-19 has been felt in every field of medicine. We sought to understand how lung cancer surgery was affected at a high volume institution. We hypothesized that patients would wait longer for surgery, have more advanced tumors, and experience more complications during the COVID-19 crisis. Methods: A retrospective review was conducted, comparing pathologically confirmed non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) surgical cases performed in 2019 to cases performed from March to May 2020, during the height of the COVID-19 crisis. Clinical and pathologic stage, tumor size, time to surgery, follow up time, and complications were evaluated. Results: A total of 375 cases were performed in 2019 vs. 58 cases in March to May 2020. Overall, there were no differences in the distribution of clinical stages or in the distribution of median wait times to surgery between groups (COVID-19 16.5 days vs. pre-COVID-19 17 days, P=0.54), nor were there differences when subdivided into Stage I-II and Stage III-IV. Case volume was lowest in April 2020 with 6 cases vs. 37 in April 2019, P<0.01. Tumor size was clinically larger in the COVID-19 group (median 2.1 vs. 1.9 cm, P=0.05) but not at final pathology. No differences in complications were observed between groups (COVID-19 31.0% vs. pre-COVID-19 30.9%, P=1.00). No patients from the COVID-19 group tested positive for the disease during their hospital stay or by the median 15 days to first follow-up. Conclusions: Surgical wait time, pathologic tumor size, and complications were not different among patients undergoing surgery before vs. during the pandemic. Importantly, no patients became infected as a result of their hospital stay. The significant decrease in surgical cases is concerning for untreated cancers that may progress without proper treatment.

Salvage surgery for local recurrence after sublobar surgery in Stages I and II non-small cell lung cancer.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: To examine if patients undergoing salvage surgery for local recurrence following sublobar resection (SLR) have similar perioperative complications and overall survival (OS) compared to lobectomy patients for early stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). METHODS: Patients undergoing lobectomy and SLR (segmentectomy or wedge resection) for Stages I and II NSCLC from 2010 to 2016 were reviewed. Lobectomy patients and those who underwent salvage surgery for local recurrence after SLR were compared. Salvage surgeries were curative-intent resections for recurrence. RESULTS: Cases included 634 lobectomies and 986 SLR. Fifty-nine SLR patients (6.0%) recurred at a local site compared to 11 lobectomy patients (1.7%; p < 0.001). Twenty-three locally recurrent SLR patients (39.0%) went on to salvage surgery. Peri-operative complications after salvage surgeries were similar to lobectomies (34.8% 8/23 vs. 34.7% 220/634, p = 1.00). OS at 5 years for salvage surgery patients was similar to lobectomy patients (79.6% 13/23 vs. 70.6% 227/634, p = 0.23). OS for patients who underwent salvage surgery was significantly better than those who did not have salvage surgery for recurrence (79.6% vs. 53.0%, p = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Patients who undergo salvage surgery for local recurrence after SLR had similar perioperative complications and OS compared to lobectomy patients but less than half underwent salvage surgery.

Long-term Outcomes Following Esophagectomy in Older and Younger Adults with Esophageal Cancer.

BACKGROUND: Patterns of overall and disease-free survival after esophagectomy for esophageal cancer in older adults have not been carefully studied. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of all patients with esophageal cancer undergoing esophagectomy from 2005 to 2020 at our institution was performed. Differences in outcomes were stratified by age groups, < 75 and ≥ 75 years old, and two time periods, 2005-2012 and 2013-2020. RESULTS: A total of 1135 patients were included: 979 (86.3%) patients were < 75 (86.3%), and 156 (13.7%) were ≥ 75 years old. Younger patients had fewer comorbidities, better nutritional status, and were more likely to receive neoadjuvant and adjuvant therapy (all p < 0.05). However, tumor stage and operative approach were similar, except for increased performance of the McKeown technique in younger patients (p = 0.02). Perioperatively, younger patients experienced fewer overall and grade II complications (both p < 0.05). They had better overall survival (log-rank p-value < 0.001) and median survival, 62.2 vs. 21.5 months (p < 0.05). When stratified by pathologic stage, survival was similar for yp0 and pathologic stage II disease (both log-rank p-value > 0.05). Multivariable Cox models showed older age (≥ 75 years old) had increased hazard for reduced overall survival (HR 2.04 95% CI 1.5-2.8; p < 0.001) but not disease-free survival (HR 1.1 95% CI 0.78-1.6; p = 0.54). Over time, baseline characteristics remained largely similar, while stage became more advanced with a rise in neoadjuvant use and increased performance of minimally invasive esophagectomy (all p < 0.05). While overall complication rates improved (p < 0.05), overall and recurrence-free survival did not. Overall survival was better in younger patients during both time periods (both log-rank p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Despite similar disease-free survival rates, long-term survival was decreased in older adults as compared to younger patients. This may be related to unmeasured factors including frailty, long-term complications after surgery, and competing causes of death. However, our results suggest that survival is similar in those with complete pathologic responses.

Geographic differences in therapy for stage I non-small-cell lung cancer in older adults.

BACKGROUND: Geographic and socioeconomic factors impact patient treatment choices for certain cancers. Whether they impact treatment in older adults with lung cancer is unknown. We investigated geographic differences in treatment for stage I non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in older adults in the United States. METHODS: Using the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results Database 18th submission, a cohort of stage I NSCLC patients ≥60-years-old was created. Treatment differences (surgery or radiation alone) by geographic location and socioeconomic factors were analyzed. RESULTS: Forty-three thousand three hundred and eighty-seven stage I NSCLC patients were analyzed. Demographics and socioeconomic factors varied across all 13 states (p < 0.001). Surgery was the most common treatment in all states (range 58.6% in AK to 86.5% in CT) (all p < 0.001). Our multivariable analysis found older individuals had higher odds of getting radiation as compared to surgery (odds ratio [OR]: 1.22 for 65-69 years-old to OR: 8.95 for 85+ years-old; p < 0.001). Multiple states (LA, HI, IA, MI, WA, NM) were associated with increased odds of radiation use (vs. surgery alone) (all p < 0.05). People with lower education level (OR: 0.98) and median income (OR: 0.99) and non-Black race (OR: 0.52 for "other" to OR: 0.68 for "White" race with respect to Black race) were associated with lower odds of radiation (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Our study identified treatment differences for stage I NSCLC patients in the United States related to demographics, socioeconomic factors, and geographic location.

Risk of chyle leak after robotic versus video-assisted thoracoscopic esophagectomy.

BACKGROUND: We investigate the incidence and risk factors for post-operative outcomes including chyle leak following minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE). METHODS: Patients undergoing MIE from May 2016 until August 2020 were prospectively followed. Outcomes of robotic and video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) esophagectomy were analyzed. RESULTS: 347 esophagectomies were performed: 70 cases were done robotically by 2 surgeons and 277 by VATS by 14 surgeons. Patients had similar demographics, surgical technique, length of stay (LOS), and re-operation rates. Overall complication rates between robotic and VATS MIE were statistically similar (61% vs. 50%; p = 0.082). The majority of complications for either VATS (41.5%) or robotic-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy (RAMIE) (51.4%) were grade II. Nineteen patients developed a chyle leak. Patients with a chyle leak were similar in age, gender, and hospital LOS (all p > 0.05), but were more likely to undergo a three-hole or robotic esophagectomy (both p < 0.05) as well as have higher rehabilitation requirements on discharge (26% vs. 10%; p = 0.05). Among the two surgeons who each performed > 20 robotic esophagectomies (n = 70), nine chyle leaks occurred. Rates varied by surgeon (7 vs. 2; p = 0.003). Lower leak rates occurred in the surgeon with more robotic esophagectomy experience (n = 47 vs. 23). Patients were similar in age, and gender (p > 0.05), but those with a chyle leak were more likely to undergo three-hole esophagectomies, prophylactic thoracic duction ligations, undergo the abdominal portion via laparotomy, and not have a prophylactic omental flap (all p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Robotic and VATS esophagectomy have similar rates of re-operation, length of stay, discharge needs and complications. Differences in outcomes between VATS and Robotic esophagectomy appears to be related to surgeon experience with the robot but may also be associated with techniques such as anastomotic height, omental flap utilization and performance of laparoscopy.

Antimicrobial stewardship programs in adult intensive care units in Latin America: Implementation, assessments, and impact on outcomes.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the impact of antimicrobial stewardship programs (ASPs) in adult medical-surgical intensive care units (MS-ICUs) in Latin America. DESIGN: Quasi-experimental prospective with continuous time series. SETTING: The study included 77 MS-ICUs in 9 Latin American countries. PATIENTS: Adult patients admitted to an MS-ICU for at least 24 hours were included in the study. METHODS: This multicenter study was conducted over 12 months. To evaluate the ASPs, representatives from all MS-ICUs performed a self-assessment survey (0-100 scale) at the beginning and end of the study. The impact of each ASP was evaluated monthly using the following measures: antimicrobial consumption, appropriateness of antimicrobial treatments, crude mortality, and multidrug-resistant microorganisms in healthcare-associated infections (MDRO-HAIs). Using final stewardship program quality self-assessment scores, MS-ICUs were stratified and compared among 3 groups: ≤25th percentile, >25th to <75th percentile, and ≥75th percentile. RESULTS: In total, 77 MS-ICU from 9 Latin American countries completed the study. Twenty MS-ICUs reached at least the 75th percentile at the end of the study in comparison with the same number who remain within the 25th percentile (score, 76.1 ± 7.5 vs 28.0 ± 7.3; P < .0001). Several indicators performed better in the MS-ICUs in the 75th versus 25th percentiles: antimicrobial consumption (143.4 vs 159.4 DDD per 100 patient days; P < .0001), adherence to clinical guidelines (92.5% vs 59.3%; P < .0001), validation of prescription by pharmacist (72.0% vs 58.0%; P < .0001), crude mortality (15.9% vs 17.7%; P < .0001), and MDRO-HAIs (9.45 vs 10.96 cases per 1,000 patient days; P = .004). CONCLUSION: MS-ICUs with more comprehensive ASPs showed significant improvement in antimicrobial utilization.

Postoperative Empyema After Pleurectomy Decortication for Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma.

BACKGROUND: Postoperative empyema after pleurectomy decortication (PDC) for malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) is a serious complication that necessitates prolonged hospitalization. This study determined the incidence, risk factors, and prognosis in patients when postoperative empyema develops after PDC. METHODS: The background, type of PDC, neoadjuvant treatment, date of empyema, pleural fluid cultures, treatment after empyema, and prognosis from a series of consecutive 355 patients treated over 9 years at a single high-volume center were investigated. Fisher exact test, Kaplan-Meier estimators, and log-rank test were used to identify significant risk factors for postoperative empyema and compare the overall survival. RESULTS: During the 9-year period, 355 patients (263 men) underwent PDC for MPM at a median age of 69 years. Neoadjuvant therapy was given to 87, and 282 received intraoperative heated chemotherapy. During the study, empyema developed in 24 patients (6.8%). The length of stay of patients with postoperative empyema was significantly longer. Median survival was 11.7 months for patients with postoperative empyema and 21.3 months for patients without empyema (hazard ratio, 1.78; P = .009). Postoperative empyema was associated with male sex, prolonged air leak, and use of prosthetic mesh. CONCLUSIONS: Postoperative empyema after PDC is associated with prolonged length of stay and higher mortality. The rates of this serious postoperative complication might decrease by developing better strategies to avoid prolonged air leak after PDC.

Internal Staging Discordance in National Cancer Databases for Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.

BACKGROUND: The Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) and the National Cancer Database (NCDB) are databases for cancer analysis that may be subject to error in data reporting. This study examined the rates and impact of discordant data for non-small cell lung cancer. METHODS: NCDB and SEER were queried for non-small cell lung cancer pathologic tumor, node, metastasis data (NCDB) or "derived" data (SEER). Discordancy between descriptors with stage and impact of outlier data were analyzed. RESULTS: Incomplete staging was noted in 71.5% of the NCDB and 10.3% of SEER patients. A total of 174 829 patients from the NCDB and 117 114 from SEER were analyzed. The NCDB had 97 cases with ≥20 positive lymph nodes recorded vs 27 in SEER (P < .001). Mean and median sampled lymph nodes were skewed with inclusion of these data points (P < .001). The NCDB misclassified 0.99% tumors >5 cm as stage I vs 0.04% in SEER (P < .001). The NCDB misstaged positive lymph nodes as pathologic N0 (0.59%) or stage 0 or stage I (0.65%). The NCDB misclassified pathologic N1 as lower than stage II (0.91%) or N2 as lower than stage III (0.36%). The NCDB misclassified stage I with documentation of pathologic N1 or N3 disease (0.24%) or stage II with evidence of N2 or N3 disease (0.50%). The NCDB misclassified pathologic M1 as pathologic stage

Risk factors for prolonged air leak and need for intervention following lung resection.

OBJECTIVES: Prolonged air leak (PAL; >5 days) following lung resection is associated with postoperative morbidity. We investigated factors associated with PAL and PAL requiring intervention. METHODS: Retrospective review of all patients undergoing lobectomy, segmentectomy or wedge resection from 2016 to 2019 at our institution. Bronchoplastic reconstructions and lung-volume reduction surgeries were excluded. Incidence and risk factors for PAL and PAL requiring intervention were evaluated. RESULTS: In total, 2384 patients were included. PAL incidence was 5.4% (129/2384); 22.5% (29/129) required intervention. PAL patients were more commonly male (56.6% vs 39.7%), older (mean age 69 vs 65 years) and underwent lobectomy or thoracotomy (all P < 0.001). Patients with PAL had longer length of stay (9 vs 3 days), more discharge needs and increased odds of complication (all P < 0.050).Twenty-nine patients required intervention (9 chest tubes; 4 percutaneous drains; 16 operations). In 50% of operative interventions, an air leak source was identified; however, the median time from intervention to resolution was 13 days. Patients requiring intervention had increased steroid use, lower diffusion capacity for carbon monoxide and twice the length of stay versus PAL patients (all P < 0.050).On univariable analysis, forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) <40%, diffusion capacity for carbon monoxide <50%, steroid use and albumin <3 had increased odds of intervention (P < 0.050). CONCLUSIONS: Age, gender and operative technique were related to PAL development. Patients with worse forced expiratory volume in 1 s or diffusion capacity for carbon monoxide, steroid use or poor nutrition were less likely to heal on their own, indicating a population that could benefit from earlier intervention.

Routine Chest Roentgenogram After Chest Tube Removal Is Not Indicated for Minimally Invasive Lung Resection.

BACKGROUND: Chest roentgenograms after chest tube removal are common practice in postoperative thoracic surgery patients. Whether these roentgenograms change clinical management is debatable. We investigated prevalence and management of post-pull pneumothoraces after lung resection. METHODS: Patients undergoing minimally invasive wedge resections, segmentectomies, and lobectomies between March 2018 and September 2018 were retrospectively reviewed. Baseline factors, operative technique, chest tube management, and outcomes after post-pull chest roentgenograms, and factors associated with post-pull pneumothoraces were analyzed. RESULTS: The study analyzed 200 consecutive patients comprising 117 wedge resections (59%), 24 segmentectomies (12%), and 59 lobectomies (30%). Wedge resections compared with segmentectomy or lobectomy had lower rates of chest tube use, drain duration, air leaks, and need for a clamp trial, with Blake drains most often removed last compared with segmentectomy or lobectomy (all P < .001). Post-pull pneumothoraces, which were largely small/tiny/trace (96%), occurred in 110 patients (55%). Five patients experienced symptoms, and no patients required intervention. Resection type was associated with the pneumothorax rate, need for additional imaging, and discharge timing (all P < .05). Those with pneumothoraces compared with those without differed in type of resection and chest drain, presence of air leak within 24 hours of removal, need for clamp trial, order of tube removal, and hospital length of stay (all P < .05). Multivariable regression showed only clamp trial was associated with post-pull pneumothorax development (odds ratio, 2.48; 95% CI, 1.13-5.45; P = .024). CONCLUSIONS: Although routine use of post-pull chest roentgenograms identified a high prevalence of pneumothorax, no intervention was required. Our study demonstrates post-pull imaging may not be indicated in asymptomatic patients without prior air leak or clamp trial.

Outcomes of trimodality CROSS regimen in older adults with locally advanced esophageal cancer.

BACKGROUND: Chemoradiotherapy for Esophageal cancer followed by Surgery (CROSS regimen) is standard of care for locally-advanced esophageal cancer. We evaluated CROSS completion rates, toxicity, and postoperative outcomes between older and younger adults receiving trimodality therapy. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of patients with locally-advanced esophageal cancer who underwent CROSS regimen from May 2016 to January 2020 at a single academic center. Outcomes of those aged ≥70-years-old and <70 years-old were analyzed. RESULTS: Of 201 patients, 136 were <70 and 65 were ≥70 years. Older adults were more likely to be male (91% vs. 79%; p = 0.045), have higher ECOG scores (median 1 vs. 0; p = 0.003), Charlson-comorbidity index (median 6 vs. 4; p < 0.001), and undergo open procedures (20% vs. 8% p = 0.008). Most completed CROSS regimen (78% vs. 84% respectively) with similar rates of treatment discontinuation and dose reduction (all p > 0.05). Time to surgery following neoadjuvant therapy was similar between age groups, except in those ≥80-years-old as compared to <70-years-old (p < 0.05). Overall toxicity rates were similar (68% vs. 71% respectively; p = 0.676). Only rates of delirium (19% vs. 5%) and urinary retention (9% vs. 0%) were higher in older adults (both p < 0.05). Length of stay, discharge disposition, mortality, and overall survival were similar. Age was not an independent risk factor for complication, neoadjuvant toxicity or completion, surgery timing, nor worse overall or recurrence-free survival (p > 0.05). CONCLUSION: Trimodality CROSS regimen for esophageal cancer in older adults is feasible, with similar completion rates and postoperative outcomes as compared to their younger counterparts.

Analysis of Lymph Node Sampling Minimums in Early Stage Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer.

Analyze "number of nodes" as an integer-valued variable to identify possible minimum lymph node (LN) number to sample during lung cancer resection. The National Cancer Database (NCDB) queried 2004-14 for surgically treated clinical stage I/II non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Overall survival (OS) by number of LN sampled was examined for the complete dataset, by adenocarcinoma, and by degree of resection using number of sampled LN both as integer-valued (0-30 nodes) variable and collapsed into classes. A total of 102,225 patients were analyzed. Median sampled LNs were 7. Median overall survival was 59 months if no LNs were sampled (95% confidence interval [CI]: 57.0-62.4), 74.7 months for 1 sampled LN (95% CI: 69.6-78.1), 80.2 (95% CI: 74.2-85.6) for 2 sampled LN, up to 81.5 mos. for 29 sampled LN. A Cox regression model using "0 LN" as baseline level, showed association with increased overall survival starting at 1 LN (hazard ratio [HR] 0.81, 95% CI 0.76-0.87; P <0.001). A "moving baseline" Cox regression model, showed no additional benefit when sampling additional nodes. We noticed a decreasing, linear association between OS and a number of 0-5 sampled LNs, most pronounced between 0 and 1 LN sampled, using a martingale residual plot from a null Cox model; no association was observed for more sampled LNs. For patients undergoing lobectomy, difference in OS was noted between 0 and 1LN sampled but not between 2 and 30 LN. These differences were not statistically significant until the number of 4 removed LN (respectively 3 for wedge-resections). For segmentectomies, median survival was not statistically associated with number of LN sampled. Based on NCDB data, LN sampling for lung cancer resections is recommended. Lobectomy survival is positively associated with 4 LN sampled, but ideal sampling may lie at 5LN in most cases. NCDB data does not seem to justify the quality metric of minimum 10 LNs.

Opportunities for quality improvement in the morbidity pattern of older adults undergoing pulmonary lobectomy for cancer.

BACKGROUND: There is limited information on the frequency of complications among older adults after oncological thoracic surgery in the modern era. We hypothesized that morbidity and mortality in older adults with lung cancer undergoing lobectomy is low and different than that of younger patients undergoing thoracic surgery. METHODS: All patients undergoing lobectomy at a large volume academic center between May 2016 and May 2019 were included. Patients were prospectively monitored to grade postoperative morbidity by organ system, based on the Clavien-Dindo classification. Patients were divided into two groups: Group 1 included patients 65-91 years of age, and Group 2 included those <65 years. RESULTS: Of 680 lobectomies in 673 patients, 414(61%) were older than 65 years of age (group 1). Median age at surgery was 68 years (20-91). Median hospital stay was 4 days (1-38) and longer in older adults. Older adults experienced higher rates of grade II and IV complications, mostly driven by an increased incidence of delirium, atrial fibrillation, prolonged air leak, respiratory failure and urinary retention. In this modern cohort, there was only 1 stroke (0.1%), and delirium was reduced to 7%. Patients undergoing minimally invasive (MI) surgery had a lower rate of Grade IV life-threatening complications. Older adults were more likely to be discharged to a rehabilitation facility, however this difference also disappeared with MI surgical procedures. CONCLUSIONS: Current morbidity of older adults undergoing lobectomy for cancer is low and is different than that of younger patients. Thoracotomy may be associated with postoperative complications in these patients. Our findings suggest the need to consider MI approaches and broad-based, geriatric-focused perioperative management of older adults undergoing lobectomy.

Impact of Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation on Adverse Events After Bronchial Sleeve Resection.

BACKGROUND: We analyzed the association between neoadjuvant chemoradiation in patients undergoing bronchial sleeve resection with the incidence of postoperative pulmonary and airway complications. METHODS: After instructional review board approval we performed a retrospective review of a prospectively maintained database of 136 patients who underwent sleeve resection in our institution between January 1998 and December 2016. Administration of neoadjuvant chemoradiation treatment was the studied exposure. Outcomes of interest were rates of postoperative pulmonary and airway complications. Nonparametric testing of demographic, surgical, and pathologic characteristics and morbidity was performed. Logistic regression models evaluated postoperative pulmonary complications and airway complications. Analysis was performed using Stata/IC 15. RESULTS: We analyzed 136 patients (18 underwent neoadjuvant chemoradiation), 77 (57%) of whom had non-small cell lung cancer. Postoperative pulmonary complications were observed in 44 of 136 patients (32%). Incidences of pulmonary complications were higher in the neoadjuvant chemoradiation group compared with the non-neoadjuvant radiation group (15/18 patients [83%] vs 29/118 patients [25%], respectively; P < .001). Likewise, rates of pneumonia, atelectasis, respiratory insufficiency, bronchial stenosis, prolonged air leak, bronchopleural fistula, and completion pneumonectomy (2/18 [11%]) were higher in the neoadjuvant chemoradiation group, reaching statistical significance in all cases except bronchial stenosis and prolonged air leak. Only neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy remained significant for postoperative pulmonary and airway complications on logistic regression (both P < .05) CONCLUSIONS: Patients who undergo neoadjuvant chemoradiation before sleeve resection are at an increased risk of pulmonary and airway complications.

Risk of Urinary Recatheterization for Thoracic Surgical Patients with Epidural Anesthesia.

BACKGROUND: Current quality guidelines recommend the removal of urinary catheters on or before postoperative day two, to prevent catheter-associated urinary tract infections (CAUTI). The goal of this study was to evaluate the impact urinary catheter removal on the need for urinary recatheterization (UR) of patients with epidural anesthesia undergoing thoracic surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All patients undergoing thoracic surgery between November 4th, 2017 and January 9th, 2018 who had a urinary catheter placed at the time of intervention were prospectively evaluated. Patient characteristics including: history of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), catheter related variables and rates of UR were collected through chart review and daily visits to the wards. BPH was defined as history of transurethral resection of the prostate or treatment with selective α1-adrenergic receptor antagonists. RESULTS: Over a two-month period 267 patients were included, 124 (46%) were male. Epidural catheters were placed in 88 (33%) patients. Median duration of urinary catheters for the cohort was 1 day (0 days - 18 days), and it was significantly higher in patients with epidural anesthesia (Table 1). Overall 20 (7%) patients required UR. On initial analysis, there was no statistical difference in the rate of UR among patients with and without epidural catheters [9/88 (10%) vs 11/179 (6%), p=0.23). The rate of UR was higher in males than in females (14/124 (11%) vs 6/143 (4%), p=0.03). Fifteen (12%) patients had a diagnosis of BPH. The rate of UR was three-times higher in this group than in those without BPH [4/15 (27%) vs 10/109 (9%) p=0.05]. Four (1%) patients developed a CAUTI during follow-up, and the rate of CAUTI was not different between those with and without epidural catheters. CONCLUSION: Urinary catheters in patients with thoracic epidural anesthesia can be safely removed, as evidenced by low reinsertion and infection rates. Removal of urinary catheters in patients with a history of BPH should be carefully evaluated, as over 1/4 will require urinary recatheterization in this subgroup. Further study of this group is needed to avoid unnecessary patient discomfort associated with recatheterization.

Routine surveillance for diagnosis of venous thromboembolism after pleurectomy for malignant pleural mesothelioma.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine the incidence of venous thromboembolism and utility of a routine surveillance program in patients undergoing surgery for mesothelioma. METHODS: Patients undergoing pleurectomy from May 2016 to August 2018 were included. A standardized surveillance program to look for venous thromboembolism in this group included noninvasive studies every 7 days postoperatively or earlier if symptomatic. All patients received external pneumatic compression sleeves in addition to prophylactic heparin. If deep vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolus was discovered, heparin drip was initiated until conversion to therapeutic anticoagulation. RESULTS: A total of 100 patients underwent pleurectomy for mesothelioma. Seven patients were found to have preoperative deep vein thrombosis, and as such only 93 patients were included for analysis. The median age of patients at surgery was 71 years (30-85 years). During the study, 30 patients (32%) developed evidence of thrombosis; 20 patients (22%) developed only deep vein thrombosis without embolism, 3 patients (3%) developed only pulmonary embolism, and 7 patients (7%) developed both deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolus. Of the 27 patients who developed deep vein thrombosis, 9 (33%) were asymptomatic at the time of diagnosis, and none of these developed a pulmonary embolus or other bleeding complications. There were 2 (2%) events of major postoperative bleeding related to therapeutic anticoagulation. CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of venous thromboembolism is high (32%) among patients undergoing surveillance after pleurectomy for mesothelioma. Up to 33% of patients with deep vein thrombosis are asymptomatic at the time of diagnosis, and the incidence of complications related to anticoagulation is low. Routine surveillance may be useful to diagnose and treat deep vein thrombosis before it progresses to symptomatic or fatal pulmonary embolus.