ABSTRACT
Background: Liver failure is the most threatening complication after hepatectomy for colorectal liver metastases. Recent studies indicate that liver functional evaluation by hepatobiliary scintigraphy (HBS) could be more sensitive than volumetry to predict the risk of post-hepatectomy liver failure (PHLF). The aim of this study was to evaluate the performance of 99mTc-mebrofenin HBS, when used as the main preoperative assessment before major hepatectomy in patients with liver metastases from colorectal cancer. Methods: This retrospective study reviewed data from all patients with colorectal liver metastases treated at Montpellier Cancer Institute between 2013 and 2020. Only patients who underwent HBS before surgery were included. The primary aim was to evaluate how the use of this functional imaging modifies the surgical management of patients with colorectal liver metastases. Results: Among the 80 patients included, 26 (32.5%) underwent two-stage hepatectomy and 13 (16.3%) repeated hepatectomies. Severe postoperative complications occurred in 16 patients (20%) and all-grade liver failure occurred in 13 patients (16.3%). Seventeen patients (21.3%) underwent major liver surgery based on sufficient mebrofenin uptake, although the retrospectively evaluated future liver remnant (FLR) volume was insufficient (<30% of total liver). None of these patients had PHLF. Conclusions: This study showed the reliability of HBS for the preoperative functional assessment of patients with colorectal liver metastases. Indeed, it allowed performing major hepatectomy safely in 20% more patients who would not have been considered for surgery on the basis of volumetric assessment.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: PIPAC (Pressurized IntraPeritoneal Aerosol Chemotherapy) is a minimally invasive approach relying on physical principles for improving intraperitoneal drug delivery, including optimizing the homogeneity of drug distribution through an aerosol. Feasibility and safety of the new approach are now consolidated and data on its effectiveness are continuously increasing. Although any surgical procedure associated with PIPAC had always been discouraged due to the high risk of complications, surgical practice is constantly changing: with growing expertise, more and more surgical teams associate PIPAC with surgery. METHODS: PLUS study is part of the retrospective international cohort studies including 10 centers around the world (India, Italy, France, Germany, Belgium, Russia, Saudi Arabia, Switzerland) and 96 cases of combined approaches evaluated through a propensity score analysis. RESULTS: the procedures most frequently associated with PIPAC were not only adhesiolysis, omentectomy, adnexectomy, umbilical/inguinal hernia repairs, but also more demanding procedures such as intestinal resections, gastrectomy, splenectomy, bowel repair/stoma creation. Although the evidence is currently limited, PLUS study demonstrated that PIPAC associated with additional surgical procedures is linked to an increase of surgical time (p < 0.001), length of stay (p < 0.001) and medical complication rate (p < 0.001); the most frequently reported medical complications were mild or moderate in severity, such as abdominal pain, nausea, ileus and hyperthermia. No difference in terms of surgical complications was registered; neither reoperation or postoperative deaths were reported. CONCLUSIONS: these results suggest that PIPAC can be safely combined in expert centers with additional surgeries. Widespread change of practice should be discouraged before the results of ongoing prospective studies are available.
