Stereotactic arc therapy for small elongated tumors using cones and collimator jaws; dosimetric and planning aspects.

Stereotactic arc treatment of small intracranial tumors is usually performed with arcs collimated by circular cones, resulting in treatment volumes which are basically spherical. For nonspherical lesions this results in a suboptimal dose distribution. Multiple isocenters may improve the dose conformity for these lesions, at the cost of large overdosages in the target volume. To achieve improved dose conformity as well as dose homogeneity, the linac jaws (with a minimum distance of 1.0 cm to the central beam axis) can routinely be used to block part of the circular beams. The purpose of this study was to investigate the feasibility of blocking cones with diameters as small as 1.0 cm and a minimum distance between the jaw and the central beam axis of 0.3 cm. First, the reproducibility in jaw positioning and resulting dose delivery on the treatment unit were assessed. Second, the accuracy of the TPS dose calculation for these small fields was established. Finally, clinically applied treatment plans using nonblocked cones were compared with plans using the partially blocked cones for several treatment sites. The reproducibility in dose delivery on our Varian Clinac 2300 C/D machines on the central beam axis is 0.8% (1 SD). The accuracy of the treatment planning system dose calculation algorithm is critically dependent on the used fits for the penumbra and the phantom scatter. The average deviation of calculated from measured dose on the central beam axis is -1.0%+/-1.4% (1 SD), which is clinically acceptable. Partial cone blocking results in improved dose distributions for elongated tumors, such as vestibular schwannoma and uveal melanoma. Multiple isocenters may be avoided. The technique is easy to implement and requires no additional workload.

Endovascular brachytherapy in coronary arteries: the Rotterdam experience.

Purpose: The use of endovascular coronary brachytherapy to prevent restenosis following percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) began in April 1997 at the Department of Interventional Cardiology of the Thoraxcenter at the University Hospital of Rotterdam. This article reviews the more than 250 patients that have been treated so far.Methods and Materials: The Beta-Cath System (Novoste), a manual, hydraulic afterloader with 12 90Sr seeds, was used in the Beta Energy Restenosis Trial (BERT-1.5, n=31), for compassionate use (n=25), in the Beta-Cath System trial (n=27) and in the Beta Radiation in Europe (BRIE, n=14). Since the Beta-Cath System has been commercialized in Europe, 57 patients have been treated and registered in RENO (Registry Novoste). In the Proliferation Reduction with Vascular Energy Trial (PREVENT), 37 patients were randomized using the Guidant-Nucletron remote control afterloader with a 32P source wire and a centering catheter. Radioactive 32P coated stents have been implanted in 102 patients. In the Isostent Restenosis Intervention Study 1 (IRIS 1), 26 patients received a stent with an activity of 0.75-1.5 µCi, and in the IRIS 2 (European 32P dose response trial), 40 patients were treated with an activity of 6-12 µCi. In two consecutive pilot trials, radioactive stents with non-radioactive ends (cold-end stents) and with ends containing higher levels of activity (hot-end stents) were implanted in 21 and 17 patients, respectively.Results: In the BERT-1.5 trial, the radiation dose, prescribed at 2 mm from the source train (non-centered), was 12 Gy (10 patients), 14 Gy (10 patients) and 16 Gy (11 patients). At 6-month follow-up, 8 out of 28 (29%) patients developed restenosis. The target lesion revascularization rate (TLR) was 7 out of 30 (23%) at 6 months and 8 out of 30 (27%) at 1 year. Two patients presented with late thrombosis in the first year. For compassionate use patients, a restenosis rate (RR) of 53% was observed. In the PREVENT trial, 34 of 37 patients underwent an angiographic 6-month follow-up. The doses prescribed at 0.5 mm depth into the vessel wall were 0 Gy (8), 28 Gy (9), 35 Gy (11) and 42 Gy (8). TLR was 14% in the irradiated patients and 25% in the placebo group. One patient developed late thrombosis. In the IRIS 1 trial, 23 patients showed an RR of 17% (in-stent). In the IRIS 2 trial, in-stent restenosis was not seen in 36 patients at 6-month follow-up. However, a high RR (44%) was observed at the stent edges.Conclusions: The integration of vascular brachytherapy in the catheterization laboratory is feasible and the different treatment techniques that are used are safe. Problems, such as edge restenosis and late thrombotic occlusion, have been identified as limiting factors of this technique. Solutions have been suggested and will be tested in future trials.

A CT-assisted method of dosimetry in brachytherapy of lung cancer. Rotterdam Oncological Thoracic Study Group.

BACKGROUND: The toxicity of endobronchial brachytherapy (EB), in particular fatal haemoptysis and bronchial wall necrosis, has been correlated with the total dose, fraction size, volume encompassed by the 100% isodose, and a proximal tumor location. We describe a CT-based planning method which, by improving target volume definition and volumetric dose information, can improve the therapeutic ratio of EB. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixteen CT-assisted EB procedures were performed in patients who were treated with palliative high-dose rate EB. The CT data were used to analyze applicator position in relation to anatomy. An example of a three-dimensional optimized treatment plan was generated and analyzed using different types of dose-volume histograms. RESULTS: The procedure was well tolerated by patients and no post-procedure complications were observed. The bronchial applicator was eccentrically positioned at the level of the carina/mainstem bronchus in 12 (of 14) CT scans. A planning CT prior to EB was not found to be useful as the final target volume and/or the final applicator position were not reliably predicted before the therapeutic bronchoscopy. CT-scans performed with the applicator in situ allowed the bronchial segments in the target volume to be identified and enabled dose prescription to the bronchial mucosa. CONCLUSIONS: CT-assisted EB is feasible and underlines the need for using centered applicators for proximally located tumors. By enabling accurate mucosal dose prescription, CT-assisted EB may reduce the toxicity of fractionated EB in the curative setting. However, faster on-line EB treatment planning is needed for the routine clinical application of this technique.

Mucosal dose prescription in endobronchial brachytherapy: a study based on CT-dosimetry.

PURPOSE: To investigate the consequences of using different dose prescription methods for endobronchial brachytherapy (EB), both with and without the use of a centered applicator. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A CT scan was performed during EB procedures in 13 patients after insertion of the lung applicator. A dosimetric analysis was subsequently performed in five of these patients using a 3D-brachytherapy treatment planning system (PLATO v13.3, Nucletron). RESULTS: Dose prescription to the mucosa yields uniform dose distributions to the bronchial mucosa when a centrally positioned applicator is used. When non-centrally positioned applicators are used, mucosal dosing results in a significant underdosage to parts of the target volume. Due to the rapid dose fall-off in EB, dose prescription to the mucosa resulted in inadequate coverage of the outer portion of the bronchial wall and adjacent peribronchial space. When compared to mucosal dose prescription, prescription to the outer aspect of the bronchial wall appears to improve target coverage while limiting the hyperdose (i.e., 200%) volume. The diameters of the different bronchial segments, as determined by CT measurements in 13 patients, correlated well with calculated values based upon the tracheal diameter. CONCLUSIONS: Mucosal dose prescription should only be used in combination with centered EB applicators. Given the rapid dose fall-off in EB mucosal dose prescription should be used with caution in curative treatments where EB, without additional external radiotherapy, is used as the sole treatment modality. In curative EB, both improved target coverage and a limited hyperdose volume can be achieved by dose prescription to the outer aspect of the bronchial wall.

Endovascular brachytherapy in coronary arteries: the Rotterdam experience.

PURPOSE: The use of endovascular coronary brachytherapy to prevent restenosis following percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) began in April 1997 at the Department of Interventional Cardiology of the Thoraxcenter at the University Hospital of Rotterdam. This article reviews the more than 250 patients that have been treated so far. METHODS AND MATERIALS: The Beta-Cath System (Novoste), a manual, hydraulic afterloader with 12 90Sr seeds, was used in the Beta Energy Restenosis Trial (BERT-1.5, n = 31), for compassionate use (n = 25), in the Beta-Cath System trial (n = 27) and in the Beta Radiation in Europe (BRIE, n = 14). Since the Beta-Cath System has been commercialized in Europe, 57 patients have been treated and registered in RENO (Registry Novoste). In the Proliferation Reduction with Vascular Energy Trial (PREVENT), 37 patients were randomized using the Guidant-Nucletron remote control afterloader with a 32P source wire and a centering catheter. Radioactive 32P coated stents have been implanted in 102 patients. In the Isostent Restenosis Intervention Study 1 (IRIS 1), 26 patients received a stent with an activity of 0.75-1.5 microCi, and in the IRIS 2 (European 32P dose response trial), 40 patients were treated with an activity of 6-12 microCi. In two consecutive pilot trials, radioactive stents with non-radioactive ends (cold-end stents) and with ends containing higher levels of activity (hot-end stents) were implanted in 21 and 17 patients, respectively. RESULTS: In the BERT-1.5 trial, the radiation dose, prescribed at 2 mm from the source train (non-centered), was 12 Gy (10 patients), 14 Gy (10 patients) and 16 Gy (11 patients). At 6-month follow-up, 8 out of 28 (29%) patients developed restenosis. The target lesion revascularization rate (TLR) was 7 out of 30 (23%) at 6 months and 8 out of 30 (27%) at 1 year. Two patients presented with late thrombosis in the first year. For compassionate use patients, a restenosis rate (RR) of 53% was observed. In the PREVENT trial, 34 of 37 patients underwent an angiographic 6-month follow-up. The doses prescribed at 0.5 mm depth into the vessel wall were 0 Gy (8), 28 Gy (9), 35 Gy (11) and 42 Gy (8). TLR was 14% in the irradiated patients and 25% in the placebo group. One patient developed late thrombosis. In the IRIS 1 trial, 23 patients showed an RR of 17% (in-stent). In the IRIS 2 trial, in-stent restenosis was not seen in 36 patients at 6-month follow-up. However, a high RR (44%) was observed at the stent edges. CONCLUSIONS: The integration of vascular brachytherapy in the catheterization laboratory is feasible and the different treatment techniques that are used are safe. Problems, such as edge restenosis and late thrombotic occlusion, have been identified as limiting factors of this technique. Solutions have been suggested and will be tested in future trials.

A new applicator design for endocavitary brachytherapy of cancer in the nasopharynx.

INTRODUCTION: In attempting to improve local tumor control by higher doses of radiation, there has been a resurgence of interest in the implementation of brachytherapy in the management of primary and recurrent cancers of the nasopharynx. Brachytherapy with its steep dose fall-off is of particular interest because of the proximity of critical dose limiting structures. Recent developments in brachytherapy, such as the introduction of pulsed-dose-rate and high-dose-rate computerized afterloaders, have encouraged further evolution of brachytherapy techniques. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We have designed an inexpensive, re-usable and flexible silicone applicator, tailored to the shape of the soft tissues of the nasopharynx, which can be used with either low-dose-rate brachytherapy or high (pulsed)-dose-rate remote controlled afterloaders. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: This Rotterdam nasopharynx applicator proved to be easy to introduce, patient friendly and can remain in situ for the duration of the treatment (2-6 days). The design, technique of application and the first consecutive 5 years of clinical experience in using this applicator are presented.