Impact of the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic on the treatment of psoriasis with systemic therapies in France: Results from the PSOBIOTEQ cohort.

BACKGROUND: The nature of the COVID-19 pandemic led to concerns among patients and physicians about the potential impact of immunosuppressive treatments for chronic diseases such as psoriasis on the risk of severe COVID-19. OBJECTIVES: To describe treatment modifications and determine the incidence of COVID-19 infection among psoriasis patients during the first wave of the pandemic, and identify the factors associated with these events. METHODS: Data from PSOBIOTEQ cohort relating to the first COVID-19 wave in France (March to June, 2020), as well as a patient-centred COVID-19 questionnaire, were used to evaluate the impact of lockdown on changes (discontinuations, delays or reductions) in systemic therapies, and to determine the incidence of COVID-19 cases among these patients. Logistic regression models were used to assess associated factors. RESULTS: Among the 1751 respondents (89.3%), 282 patients (16.9%) changed their systemic treatment for psoriasis, with 46.0% of these changes being initiated by the patients themselves. Patients were more likely to experience psoriasis flare-ups during the first wave if they changed their treatment during this period (58.7% vs 14.4%; P < 0.0001). Changes to systemic therapies were less frequent among patients with cardiovascular diseases (P < 0.001), and those aged ≥ 65 years (P = 0.02). Overall, 45 patients (2.9%) reported having COVID-19, and eight (17.8%) required hospitalization. Risk factors for COVID-19 infection were close contact with a positive case (P < 0.001) and living in a region with a high incidence of COVID-19 (P < 0.001). Factors associated with a lower risk of COVID-19 were avoiding seeing a physician (P = 0.002), systematically wearing a mask during outings (P = 0.011) and being a current smoker (P = 0.046). CONCLUSIONS: Discontinuation of systemic psoriasis treatments during the first COVID-19 wave (16.9%) - mainly decided by patients themselves (46.0%) - was associated with a higher incidence of disease flares (58.7% vs 14.4%). This observation and factors associated with a higher risk of COVID-19 highlight the need to maintain and adapt patient-physician communication during health crises according to patient profiles, with the aim of avoiding unnecessary treatment discontinuations and ensuring that patients are informed about the risk of infection and the importance of complying with hygiene rules.

Switches between biologics in patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis: results from the French cohort PSOBIOTEQ.

BACKGROUND: Biologics are the cornerstone of treatment of patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis and switches between biologics are frequently needed to maintain clinical improvement over time. OBJECTIVES: The main purpose of this study was to describe precisely switches between biologics and how their pattern changed over time with the recent availability of new biologic agents. METHODS: We included patients receiving a first biologic agent in the Psobioteq multicenter cohort of adults with moderate-to-severe psoriasis receiving systemic treatment. We described switches between biologics with chronograms, Sankey and Sunburst diagrams, assessed cumulative incidence of first switch by competing risks survival analysis and reasons for switching. We assessed the factors associated with the type of switch (intra-class - i.e. within the same therapeutic class - vs. inter-class) in patients switching from a TNF-alpha inhibitor using multivariate logistic regression. RESULTS: A total of 2153 patients was included. The cumulative incidence of switches from first biologic was 34% at 3 years. Adalimumab and ustekinumab were the most prescribed biologic agents as first and second lines of treatment. The main reason for switching was loss of efficacy (72%), followed by adverse events (11%). Patients receiving a TNF-alpha inhibitor before 2016 mostly switched to ustekinumab, whereas those switching in 2016 or after mostly switched to an IL-17 inhibitor. Patients switching from a first-line TNF-alpha inhibitor before 2016 were more likely to switch to another TNF-alpha inhibitor compared with patients switching since 2018. Patients switching from etanercept were more likely to receive another TNF-alpha inhibitor rather than another therapeutic class of bDMARD compared with patients switching from adalimumab. CONCLUSION: This study described the switching patterns of biologic treatments and showed how they changed over time, due to the availability of the new biologic agents primarily IL-17 inhibitors.

Risks of second malignancies after breast cancer treatment: Long-term results.

PURPOSE: To estimate the long-term risk of second malignancies after breast cancer treatment in a large homogeneous cohort from a single institution. PATIENTS AND METHODS: All patients in this study were treated for non-metastatic breast cancer at the Curie institute, Paris, between 1981 and 2000. We calculated the cumulative incidence of second malignancies and the risk of developing each type of second malignancies over a period of 10 to 15 years. The observed crude incidence rates in the entire patient population were then compared to the expected incidence in the general population of French women, as provided by age-standardized data. A standardized incidence ratio (SIR) was calculated for all second malignancies. We also calculated second malignancies standardized incidence ratios for patients who underwent adjuvant therapy for breast cancer. RESULTS: The study cohort included a total of 17,745 women. The median follow-up since diagnosis was 13.4 years (range: 2-29 years). The 15-year cumulative incidence of second malignancies was 1.807 per 100,000 (CI 1.729-1.884). A total of 2370 second malignancies were observed during follow-up, 2010 in the radiotherapy arm and 360 in the no radiotherapy arm (relative risk [RR] 1.15 [1.03-1.28], P=0.0134). Crude incidence rates were significantly higher in our cohort than in the general population for contralateral breast cancer (SIR 2.96 [confidence interval (CI) 2.82-3.12], P<0.0001), sarcomas (SIR 8.48 [CI 6.41-11.22], P<0.0001), leukaemia (SIR 2.37 [CI 1.85-3.04], P<0.0001), lung cancer (SIR 1.39 [CI 1.13-1.72], P<0.0022) and gynaecological cancer (SIR 1.31 [CI 1.15-1.50], P=0.0001). Among patients treated for breast cancer, those who received radiotherapy was associated with an excess risk of sarcoma as compared to those have not had (RR 5.59 [CI 1.35-23.17], P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Women treated for breast cancer had a significantly increased risk of several kinds of second malignancies compared to the general population.

Association with pregnancy increases the risk of local recurrence but does not impact overall survival in breast cancer: A case-control study of 87 cases.

Pregnancy-associated breast cancer (PABC) constitutes 7% of all BCs in young women. The prognosis of PABC remains controversial. In this study, we evaluated the impact of the association of pregnancy with BC on the rates of overall survival (OS), disease free survival (DFS), and distant and local recurrence-free survival. We conducted a retrospective unicenter case-control study. We enrolled PABC patients treated at our institution between 1992 and 2009. For each case, 2 BC controls were matched for age and year of diagnosis. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to assess the parameters associated with prognosis. Eighty-seven PABC patients were enrolled and matched with 174 controls. The univariate analysis did not reveal any significant differences in OS, DFS or distant recurrence rates between the 2 groups. Pregnancy associated status, a tumor larger than T2 and neoadjuvant chemotherapy as the primary treatment were significantly associated with an increased risk of local relapse. The multivariate analysis showed that the pregnancy associated status and the tumor size were strong prognostic factors of local recurrence. Pregnancy associated status negates the prognostic value of tumor size, as both T0-T2 and T3-T4 PABC patients have the same poor prognosis as control BC patients with T3-T4 tumors. Interestingly, although PABC patients have more locally advanced tumors, they did not have a higher rate of radical surgery than the control BC patients. Pregnancy associated status is a strong prognostic factor of local relapse in BC. In PABC patients, when possible, radical surgery should be the preferred first treatment step.

Liver metastases from breast cancer: Surgical resection or not? A case-matched control study in highly selected patients.

AIM: To determine whether, in a highly selected patient population, medical treatment combined with surgical resection of liver metastases from breast cancer is associated with improved survival compared with medical treatment alone. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between 1988 and 2007, 100 liver resections for metastatic breast cancer were performed at Institut Curie, 51 of which met the criteria for inclusion in this case-control study. With the exception of bone metastases, patients with other distant metastasis sites were excluded. Surgery was only performed in patients with stable disease or disease responding to medical treatment evaluated by imaging evaluation. Surgical cases were individually matched with 51 patients receiving medical treatment only. All patients had 4 or fewer resectable liver metastases. The study group was matched with the control group for age, year of breast cancer diagnosis, time to metastasis, TNM stage, hormone receptor status and breast cancer tumour pathology. RESULTS: Univariate analysis confirmed a survival advantage for patients lacking bone metastases and axillary lymphadenopathy at the time of breast cancer diagnosis and for surgically treated patients. Multivariate analysis indicated that surgery and the absence of bone metastases were associated with a better prognosis. A multivariate Cox model adapted for paired data showed a RR = 3.04 (CI: 1.87-4.92) (p < 0.0001) in favour of surgical treatment. CONCLUSION: Surgical resection of liver metastases from primary breast cancer appears to provide a survival benefit for highly selected patients.

Validation over time of a nomogram including HER2 status to predict the sentinel node positivity in early breast carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: The molecular subtypes of breast cancer have different axillary status. A nomogram including the interaction covariate between estrogen receptor (ER) and HER2 has been recently published (Reyal et al. PLOS One, May 2011) and allows to identify the patients with a high risk of positive sentinel lymph node (SLN). The purpose of our study was to validate this model on an independent population. METHODS: We studied 755 consecutive patients treated at Institut Curie for operable breast cancer with sentinel node biopsies in 2009. The multivariate model, including age, tumor size, lymphovascular invasion and interaction covariate between ER and HER2 status, was used to calculate the theoretical risk of positive sentinel lymph node (SLN) for all patients. The performance of the model on our population was then evaluated in terms of discrimination (area under the curve AUC) and of calibration (Hosmer-Lemeshow HL test). RESULTS: our population was significantly different from the training population for the following variables: median tumor size in mm, lymphovascular invasion, positive ER and age. The nomogram showed similar results in our population than in the training population in terms of discrimination (AUC=0.72 [0.68-0.76] versus 0.73 [0.7-0.75] and calibration (HL p=0.4 versus p=0.35). CONCLUSIONS: Despite significant differences between the two populations concerning variables which are part of the nomogram, the model was validated in our population. This nomogram is robust over time to predict the likelihood of positive SLN according to molecular subtypes defined by surrogate markers ER and HER2 determined by immunohistochemistry in clinical practice.

Appraising relative and excess mortality in population-based studies of chronic diseases such as end-stage renal disease.

PURPOSE: Modeling excess and relative mortality represents two ways of considering general population mortality rates (ie, background mortality) in cohort studies. Excess mortality is obtained by subtracting the expected mortality from the observed mortality (additive hazard model). Relative mortality is obtained by dividing the observed mortality by the expected mortality (multiplicative hazard model). Our first objective was to compare the results of these two models in a population-based cohort including 5115 dialyzed patients older than 70 years (mean age 79 years, range 70-97 years). Our second objective was to explore an alternative model combining both excess and relative mortality. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Effects of covariates on excess mortality and relative mortality were assessed using a generalized linear model and a Cox model, respectively. The model, combining both excess and relative mortality, is derived from the Aalen model. RESULTS: The effect of age and sex was different according to the additive or multiplicative model used, whereas the effect of the first modality of dialysis or the primary nephropathy was similar. Because there was no evidence of lack of fit, the choice of one of these two models was not obvious. The combined model showed that the two components, additive and multiplicative, had to be kept. In this case, the combined model led to results similar to the pure additive and multiplicative univariate models, except for the method of dialysis, which did not exert an effect on both excess and relative mortality. CONCLUSION: We underlined the complementary interest of modeling excess and relative mortality in looking for factors associated with mortality related to end-stage renal disease. The combined model appeared attractive in offering the possibility of reducing the model to the most appropriate one. When both components have to be retained, it better describes the effect of covariates on excess and relative mortality.

Male pattern baldness and the risk of prostate cancer.

BACKGROUND: Androgens play a role in the development of both androgenic alopecia, commonly known as male pattern baldness, and prostate cancer. We set out to study if early-onset androgenic alopecia was associated with an increased risk of prostate cancer later in life. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 669 subjects (388 with a history of prostate cancer and 281 without) were enrolled in this study. All subjects were asked to score their balding pattern at ages 20, 30 and 40. Statistical comparison was subsequently done between both groups of patients. RESULTS: Our study revealed that patients with prostate cancer were twice as likely to have androgenic alopecia at age 20 [odds ratio (OR) 2.01, P = 0.0285]. The pattern of hair loss was not a predictive factor for the development of cancer. There was no association between early-onset alopecia and an earlier diagnosis of prostate cancer or with the development of more aggressive tumors. CONCLUSIONS: This study shows an association between early-onset androgenic alopecia and the development of prostate cancer. Whether this population can benefit from routine prostate cancer screening or systematic use of 5-alpha reductase inhibitors as primary prevention remains to be determined.

Disseminated tumor cells and the risk of locoregional recurrence in nonmetastatic breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: In early breast cancer patients, bone marrow (BM)-disseminated tumor cells (DTCs) were associated with distant metastasis and locoregional recurrence. Our aim was to determine whether BM DTC detection could be related to specific locoregional dissemination of cancer cells, according to radiotherapy volumes. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The relationship between locoregional recurrence-free survival (LRFS) and DTC detection was evaluated according to the various locoregional volumes irradiated after surgery. RESULTS: BM DTCs were detected in 94 of 621 stage I-III breast cancer patients (15%) and were not associated with axillary node status. Eighteen patients (2.9%) experienced locoregional recurrence (median follow-up 56 months), of whom eight (44%) were initially BM DTC positive. BM DTC detection was the only prognostic factor for LRFS [P = 0.0005, odds ratio = 5.2 (2.0-13.1), multivariate analysis]. In BM DTC-positive patients, a longer LRFS was observed in those who were given adjuvant hormone therapy (P = 0.03) and radiotherapy to supraclavicular nodes (SCNs)/internal mammary nodes (IMNs) (P = 0.055) (multivariate analysis; interaction test: P = 0.028). CONCLUSIONS: The presence of DTC in BM may be associated with a different pattern of locoregional cancer cell dissemination and influences LRFS. The possible reseeding of the primary cancer area by DTC could be prevented by systemic hormone therapy but also by SCN/IMN irradiation.

The relevance of image quality indices for dose optimization in abdominal multi-detector row CT in children: experimental assessment with pediatric phantoms.

This study assessed and compared various image quality indices in order to manage the dose of pediatric abdominal MDCT protocols and to provide guidance on dose reduction. PMMA phantoms representing average body diameters at birth, 1 year, 5 years, 10 years and 15 years of age were scanned in a four-channel MDCT with a standard pediatric abdominal CT protocol. Image noise (SD, standard deviation of CT number), noise derivative (ND, derivative of the function of noise with respect to dose) and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) were measured. The 'relative' low-contrast detectability (rLCD) was introduced as a new quantity to adjust LCD to the various phantom diameters on the basis of the LCD(1%) assessed in a Catphan phantom and a constant central absorbed dose. The required variations of CTDIvol(16) with respect to phantom size were analyzed in order to maintain each image quality index constant. The use of a fixed SD or CNR level leads to major dose ratios between extreme patient sizes (factor 22.7 to 44 for SD, 31.7 to 51.5 for CNR(2.8%)), whereas fixed ND and rLCD result in acceptable dose ratios ranging between factors of 2.9 and 3.9 between extreme phantom diameters. For a 5-9 mm rLCD1(%), adjusted ND values range between -0.84 and -0.11 HU mGy(-1). Our data provide guidance on dose reduction on the basis of patient dimensions and the required rLCD (e.g., to get a constant 7 mm rLCD(1%) for abdominal diameters of 10, 13, 16, 20 and 25 cm, tube current-time product should be adjusted in order to obtain CTDIvol(16) values of 6.2, 7.2, 8.8, 11.6 and 17.7 mGy, respectively).

Treatment of localised resectable neuroblastoma. Results of the LNESG1 study by the SIOP Europe Neuroblastoma Group.

Main objective of this study was to confirm that surgery alone is an effective and safe treatment for localised resectable neuroblastoma except stage 2 with amplified MYCN gene (MYCNA). Of 427 eligible stages 1-2 patients, 411 had normal MYCN and 16 had MYCNA. Of the 288 stage 1 patients with normal MYCN, 1 died of complications and 16 relapsed, 2 of whom died; 5-year relapse-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) rates were 94.3% (95% confidence interval (CI): 91.6-97) and 98.9% (95% CI: 97.7-100), respectively. Of the 123 stage 2 patients with normal MYCN, 1 died of sepsis and 22 relapsed, 8 of whom died (RFS 82.8%, 95% CI: 76.2-89.5; OS 93.2%, 95% CI: 88.7-97.8). In stage 2, OS and RFS were worse for patients with elevated LDH and unfavourable histopathology. Of 16 children with MYCNA, 7 were stage 1 (5 relapses and 4 deaths) and 9 were stage 2 (3 relapses and 2 deaths) patients. In conclusion, surgery alone yielded excellent OS for both stage 1 and 2 neuroblastoma without MYCNA, although stage 2 patients with unfavourable histopathology and elevated LDH suffered a high number of relapses. Both stage 1 and 2 patients with MYCNA were at greater risk of relapse.

[Methodological and statistical aspects of equivalence and non inferiority trials]. / Aspects méthodologiques et statistiques des essais d'équivalence et de non-infériorité.

BACKGROUND: - The existence of effective reference treatments means that the superior therapeutic efficacy of new treatments is less marked and thus more difficult to demonstrate statistically. Moreover, the potential value of a new treatment is also based on other criteria, such as costs, ease of use, non invasiveness, and immediate or long-term side effects. In this context, methodological issue becomes one of looking for equivalence or non inferiority of the new treatment in comparison with an existing, high-performance reference treatment. METHODS: - In the present work, we reexamine the statistical rational and methodological features of equivalence and non inferiority trials. RESULTS: - We address equivalence margin choice, hypotheses building, and the different approaches for establishing equivalence (hypothesis testing and confidence intervals). We then discuss key aspects of equivalence trial design and the important methodological quality criteria involved in performing such studies: choice of the reference treatment, subject eligibility criteria, primary endpoint, study population and the required sample size. Lastly, we consider the possibility of adopting a new analytical strategy (non inferiority/superiority). CONCLUSION: - A checklist of items to include when reporting the results of randomized controlled trials (Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials, the CONSORT recommendations) has been adapted for use in non inferiority and equivalence randomized controlled trials.

Second malignancies after breast cancer: the impact of different treatment modalities.

Treatment for non-metastatic breast cancer (BC) may be the cause of second malignancies in long-term survivors. Our aim was to investigate whether survivors present a higher risk of malignancy than the general population according to treatment received. We analysed data for 16 705 BC survivors treated at the Curie Institute (1981-1997) by either chemotherapy (various regimens), radiotherapy (high-energy photons from a 60Co unit or linear accelerator) and/or hormone therapy (2-5 years of tamoxifen). We calculated age-standardized incidence ratios (SIRs) for each malignancy, using data for the general French population from five regional registries. At a median follow-up 10.5 years, 709 patients had developed a second malignancy. The greatest increases in risk were for leukaemia (SIR: 2.07 (1.52-2.75)), ovarian cancer (SIR: 1.6 (1.27-2.04)) and gynaecological (cervical/endometrial) cancer (SIR: 1.6 (1.34-1.89); P<0.0001). The SIR for gastrointestinal cancer, the most common malignancy, was 0.82 (0.70-0.95; P<0.007). The increase in leukaemia was most strongly related to chemotherapy and that in gynaecological cancers to hormone therapy. Radiotherapy alone also had a significant, although lesser, effect on leukaemia and gynaecological cancer incidence. The increased risk of sarcomas and lung cancer was attributed to radiotherapy. No increased risk was observed for malignant melanoma, lymphoma, genitourinary, thyroid or head and neck cancer. There is a significantly increased risk of several kinds of second malignancy in women treated for BC, compared with the general population. This increase may be related to adjuvant treatment in some cases. However, the absolute risk is small.

[Impact of nutrition management in patients with head and neck cancers treated with irradiation: is the nutritional intervention useful?]. / Intérêt de la prise en charge nutritionnelle des patients traités par irradiation des voies aérodigestives supérieures: la consultation diététique est-elle utile?

AIMS: The head and neck tumors are most often associated with a precarious nutritional status. Radiotherapy increases the risk of denutrition because of its secondary effects on the secretory and sensorial mucous membranes. The purpose of our retrospectively study was to evaluate the interest of a precocious and regular nutritional therapy on the ability to maintain the nutritional status of the patient during the radiotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The fifty-two patients included in the survey have been classified retrospectively in two different groups based on their observance to the nutritional therapy: group 1 "good observance", group 2 "bad observance". RESULTS: The 31 patients of group 1 have lost an average of 1.9 kg by the end of the irradiation, whereas the 21 patients of group 2 have lost an average of 6.1 kg (p<0.001). The almost stability in weight of patients in group 1 was linked to a lower frequency of breaks in the radiotherapy (6 vs 33% p=0.03) and in a decrease in grade of inflammatory mucous membranes (10% of grade 3 in group 1 vs 52% in group 2, p=0.006). The quantity of calories ingested in form of nutritional supplements was greater in group 1 and consequently enabled patients to stabilized their weight (1200 calories in group 1 versus 850 calories in group 2, p<0.005). CONCLUSIONS: The given nutritional advice and the prescription of adapted nutritional supplements consequently allowed limiting efficiently the weight lost during the irradiation and the grade of mucositis. The systematization of a precocious nutritional therapy for patients irradiated for head and neck tumors seems absolutely essential.

Challenges in the stratification of breast tumors for tailored therapies.

Studying the molecular stratification of breast carcinoma is a real challenge considering the extreme heterogeneity of these tumors. Many patients are now treated following recommendation established at several NIH and St Gallen consensus conferences. However a significant fraction of these breast cancer patients do not need adjuvant chemotherapies while other patients receive inefficacious therapies. High density gene expression arrays have been designed to attempt to establish expression profiles that could be used as prognostic indicators or as predictive markers for response to treatment. This review is intended to discuss the potential value of these new indicators, but also the current weaknesses of these new genomic and bioinformatic approaches. The combined analysis of transcriptomic and genomic alteration data from relatively large numbers of well annotated tumor specimens may offer an opportunity to overcome the current difficulties in validating recently published non overlapping gene lists as prognostic or therapeutic indicators. There is also hope for identifying and deciphering signal transduction pathways driving tumor progression with newly developed algorithms and semi quantitative parameters obtained in simplified in vitro or in vivo models for specific transduction pathways.

UVA radiation is highly mutagenic in cells that are unable to repair 7,8-dihydro-8-oxoguanine in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

UVA (320-400 nm) radiation constitutes >90% of the environmentally relevant solar UV radiation, and it has been proposed to have a role in skin cancer and aging. Because of the popularity of UVA tanning beds and prolonged periods of sunbathing, the potential deleterious effect of UVA has emerged as a source of concern for public health. Although generally accepted, the impact of DNA damage on the cytotoxic, mutagenic, and carcinogenic effect of UVA radiation remains unclear. In the present study, we investigated the sensitivity of a panel of yeast mutants affected in the processing of DNA damage to the lethal and mutagenic effect of UVA radiation. The data show that none of the major DNA repair pathways, such as base excision repair, nucleotide excision repair, homologous recombination, and postreplication repair, efficiently protect yeast from the lethal action of UVA radiation. In contrast, the results show that the Ogg1 DNA glycosylase efficiently prevents UVA-induced mutagenesis, suggesting the formation of oxidized guanine residues. Furthermore, sequence analysis of UVA-induced canavanine-resistant mutations reveals a bias in favor of GC-->TA events when compared with spontaneous or H(2)O(2)-, UVC-, and gamma-ray- induced canavanine-resistant mutations in the WT strain. Taken together, our data point out a major role of oxidative DNA damage, mostly 7,8-dihydro-8-oxoguanine, in the genotoxicity of UVA radiation in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Therefore, the capacity of skin cells to repair 7,8-dihydro-8-oxoguanine may be a key parameter in the mutagenic and carcinogenic effect of UVA radiation in humans.

Better results with rhenium-186 radiosynoviorthesis than with cortivazol in rheumatoid arthritis (RA): a two-year follow-up randomized controlled multicentre study.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this international multicentric randomized phase 3 clinical trial was to compare prospectively radiosynoviorthesis (RSO) with rhenium-186-sulfide (186Re) to intra-articular corticotherapy in patients with clinically controlled rheumatoid arthritis (RA), but in whom one or a few medium-sized joints remained painful or swollen. METHODS: One hundred and twenty-nine joints in 81 RA patients [stratified into 2 groups: wrists (group 1, n = 78) and all the other joints (group 2, n = 51, including 18 elbows, 21 shoulders and 12 ankles)] were randomized to receive intra-articular injections of either 186Re-sulfide (64 +/- 4 MBq), or cortivazol (Altim) 3.75 mg. Clinical assessment was performed before and then at 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months after local therapy, using a 4-step verbal rating scale (VRS) and a 100 mm visual analog scale for pain, a 4-step VRS for joint swelling and mobility and a 2-step VRS for the radiological stage. The Mantel-Haenszel test was used for qualitative variables, analysis of variance (ANOVA) for quantitative pain analysis and Kaplan-Meyer survival test for relapse analysis. RESULTS: 186Re was observed to be statistically superior to cortivazol at 18 and 24 months while no statistical difference was seen for any criterion at 3, 6 and 12 months post injection. At 24 months, the difference in favor of 186Re was significant for pain (p = 0.024), joint swelling (p = 0.01), mobility (p = 0.05, non-wrists only), pain and swelling (p = 0.03) and pain or swelling (p = 0.02). "Survival" studies (Kaplan-Meyer) demonstrated a greater relative risk of relapse in corticoid treated joints, but only from the second year of follow-up. No serious side effect was observed in any patient, with only light and transient local pain and/or swelling occurring in 24% of cases, regardless of the treatment used. CONCLUSION: 186Re-sulfide and cortivazol had similar efficacy up to 12 months post-injection, but 186Re became clearly more effective at 18 and 24 months, for all criteria monitored and for RA outcome. Therefore, 186Re RSO can be recommended for routine clinical use.

169Erbium-citrate synoviorthesis after failure of local corticosteroid injections to treat rheumatoid arthritis-affected finger joints.

OBJECTIVES: Intra-articular injection of 169Erbium-citrate (169Er-citrate; radiosynoviorthesis or radiosynovectomy) is an effective local treatment of rheumatic joint diseases. However, its efficacy in corticosteroid-resistant rheumatoid arthritis-affected joints has not been clearly demonstrated. METHODS: A double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled, international multicentre study was conducted in patients with rheumatoid arthritis with recent (< or = 24 months) ineffective corticosteroid injection(s) into their finger joint(s). Eighty-five finger joints of 44 patients were randomised to receive a single injection of placebo (NaCl 0.9%) or 169Er-citrate. Results of evaluation 6 months later were available for 82 joints (46 metacarpophalangeal and 36 proximal interphalangeal joints) of 42 patients: 39 169Er-citrate-injected joints and 43 placebo-injected joints. Efficacy was assessed using a rating scale for joint pain, swelling and mobility. RESULTS: Intent-to-treat analysis of the results of the 82 joints showed a significant effect of 169Er-citrate compared to placebo for the principal criteria decreased pain or swelling (95 vs 79%; p = 0.038) and decreased pain and swelling (79 vs 47%; p = 0.0024) and for the secondary criteria decreased pain (92 vs 72%; p = 0.017), decreased swelling (82 vs 53%; p = 0.0065) and increased mobility (64 vs 42%; p = 0.036). Per-protocol analysis, excluding 18 joints of patients who markedly changed their usual systemic treatment for arthritis, gave similar percentages of improvement but statistical significance was lower owing the reduced power of the statistical tests. CONCLUSION: These results confirm the clinical efficacy of 169Er-citrate synoviorthesis of rheumatoid arthritis-diseased finger joints after recent failure of intra-articular corticotherapy.

A score test for establishing non-inferiority with respect to short-term survival in two-sample comparisons with identical proportions of long-term survivors.

In recent years randomized trials designed to establish non-inferiority of a new treatment as compared to a standard one have been more widely used. Two-sample statistics have been proposed for this equivalence testing problem. However, they are not suited to situations where a long-term survivor fraction is expected. In this paper we propose a score test designed for establishing non-inferiority for the new treatment as compared to the standard one while assuming identical long-term survivor rates. Simulations results show that the proposed statistic has satisfactory size and power as long as certain restricting conditions are verified. A breast cancer trial is analysed as an example.

Conformal radiotherapy (CRT) planning for lung cancer: analysis of intrathoracic organ motion during extreme phases of breathing.

PURPOSE: Conformal radiotherapy beams are defined on the basis of static computed tomography acquisitions by taking into account setup errors and organ/tumor motion during breathing. In the absence of precise data, the size of the margins is estimated arbitrarily. The objective of this study was to evaluate the amplitude of maximum intrathoracic organ motion during breathing. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Twenty patients treated for non-small-cell lung cancer were included in the study: 10 patients at the Institut Curie with a personalized alpha cradle immobilization and 10 patients at Tenon Hospital with just the Posirest device below their arms. Three computed tomography acquisitions were performed in the treatment position: the first during free breathing and the other two during deep breath-hold inspiration and expiration. For each acquisition, the displacements of the various intrathoracic structures were measured in three dimensions. RESULTS: Patients from the two centers were comparable in terms of age, weight, height, tumor site, and stage. In the overall population, the greatest displacements were observed for the diaphragm, and the smallest displacements were observed for the lung apices and carina. The relative amplitude of motion was comparable between the two centers. The use of a personalized immobilization device reduced lateral thoracic movements (p < 0.02) and lung apex movements (p < 0.02). CONCLUSION: Intrathoracic organ movements during extreme phases of breathing are considerable. Quantification of organ motion is necessary for definition of the safety margins. A personalized immobilization device appears to effectively reduce apical and lateral displacement.