ABSTRACT
PURPOSE: This in vitro study assessed the accuracy of multiple implant-level impression techniques (open tray and closed tray) for the fabrication of 3-unit implant prostheses with strain gauge (SG) analysis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A polyurethane master model was designed to simulate a clinical situation. Two rigid custom trays were fabricated for the model. The impression material used was polysulfide. Transfer implant impressions were made using 2 techniques; ten tapered copings not splinted (custom closed tray) and ten square copings splinted with acrylic-resin (custom open tray). The improved stone models were allowed to set for 1 hour before being separated from the impression. The superstructures were sprued, invested, and cast with a cobalt-chromium alloy. Four SGs were bonded on the surface of each polyurethane block. RESULTS: A statistically significant difference was found between the 2 impression techniques tested (P = 0.000). This study found a significant average difference of 144.68 ± 5.53 µÎµ for open custom tray and 253.3 ± 16.7 µÎµ for closed custom tray. CONCLUSION: The custom open tray technique was the most accurate impression for multiple implants compared with closed custom tray.
ABSTRACT
PURPOSE: To quantify microstrain development during axial loading using strain gauge analysis for short implants, varying the type of fixture-abutment joint and thread design. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An internal hexagon implant (4 × 8 mm) and a plateau design implant (4 × 8 mm) were embedded on the center of 10 polyurethane blocks with dimensions of 190 × 30 × 12 mm. The respective abutments were screwed onto the implants. Four strain gauges (SGs) were bonded onto the surface of each block, and 4 vertical SGs were bonded onto the side of each block. Axial load of 30 kgf was applied for 10 seconds in the center of each implant. RESULTS: The data were analyzed statistically by analysis of variance for repeated measures and Tukey test (P < 0.05). The interaction between implant and region factors have been statistically significant (P = 0.0259). Tukey test revealed a difference on plateau's horizontal region. The cervical region presented higher microstrain values, when compared with the medium and apical regions of the implants. CONCLUSION: Within the purpose of the study, the type of fixture-abutment joint is a relevant factor to affect the amount of stress/strain in bone simulation. The microstrain development was concentrated on the cervical region of the implant.
