Prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies in cancer patients and healthcare workers vaccinated with two doses of BNT162b2 or AZD122. A propensity analysis.

BACKGROUND: Vaccination is the most effective intervention for reducing the burden of SARS-CoV-2-related disease; however, gaps in knowledge regarding cancer patients (CPs) immune response persist. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the humoral response (anti-S antibodies) in CPs and healthcare workers (HCWs) vaccinated with two doses of BNT162b2 or AZD122 vaccines. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Polyspecific anti-SARS-CoV-2 spike protein (anti-S) antibodies were quantified, and a 1:1 propensity score was used to balance baseline characteristics. Multiple logistic regressions were carried out to evaluate the effect of humoral response-related variables. RESULTS: One-hundred and twenty-seven CPs (22%) and 439 HCWs (78%) were included. Both populations developed anti-S antibodies in response to vaccination. The mRNA-based vaccine (BNT162b2) was associated with higher odds of having anti-S antibody titers ≥ 1,000 U/mL, while active cancer was related to a lower probability of developing high antibody titers. CONCLUSIONS: The BNT162b2 vaccine was associated with a higher humoral response. It is necessary for more information and vaccination strategies to be available for immunosuppressed patients in order to select the best biologics for this population based on individual characteristics.

ANTECEDENTES: La vacunación es la intervención más efectiva para reducir la carga de enfermedad por SARS-CoV-2; sin embargo, persisten brechas en el conocimiento en relación con la respuesta inmunológica de los pacientes con cáncer (PC). OBJETIVOS: Evaluar la respuesta humoral (anticuerpos anti-S) en PC y trabajadores de salud (TS) vacunados con dos dosis de la vacuna BNT162b2 o AZD122. MATERIAL Y MÉTODOS: Se cuantificaron anticuerpos poliespecíficos contra la proteína de espiga de SARS-CoV-2 (anti-S) y se efectuó una puntuación de propensión 1:1 para equilibrar las características basales. Se realizaron regresiones logísticas múltiples para evaluar el efecto de las variables relacionadas con la respuesta humoral. RESULTADOS: Se incluyeron 127 PC (22 %) y 439 TS (78 %). Ambas poblaciones desarrollaron anticuerpos anti-S en respuesta a la vacunación. La vacuna de ARNm (BNT162b2) se asoció a mayor probabilidad de mostrar concentraciones de anticuerpos anti-S ≥ 1000 UI/mL, mientras que el cáncer activo se relacionó con menor probabilidad de presentar títulos altos de anticuerpos. CONCLUSIONES: La vacuna BNT162b2 se asoció a respuesta humoral mayor. Es necesario contar con más información y estrategias de vacunación en pacientes inmunosuprimidos. Es relevante la selección de los mejores biológicos para esta población y considerar las características individuales.

Systemic Anticancer Therapy and Thromboembolic Outcomes in Hospitalized Patients With Cancer and COVID-19.

Importance: Systematic data on the association between anticancer therapies and thromboembolic events (TEEs) in patients with COVID-19 are lacking. Objective: To assess the association between anticancer therapy exposure within 3 months prior to COVID-19 and TEEs following COVID-19 diagnosis in patients with cancer. Design, Setting, and Participants: This registry-based retrospective cohort study included patients who were hospitalized and had active cancer and laboratory-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection. Data were accrued from March 2020 to December 2021 and analyzed from December 2021 to October 2022. Exposure: Treatments of interest (TOIs) (endocrine therapy, vascular endothelial growth factor inhibitors/tyrosine kinase inhibitors [VEGFis/TKIs], immunomodulators [IMiDs], immune checkpoint inhibitors [ICIs], chemotherapy) vs reference (no systemic therapy) in 3 months prior to COVID-19. Main Outcomes and Measures: Main outcomes were (1) venous thromboembolism (VTE) and (2) arterial thromboembolism (ATE). Secondary outcome was severity of COVID-19 (rates of intensive care unit admission, mechanical ventilation, 30-day all-cause mortality following TEEs in TOI vs reference group) at 30-day follow-up. Results: Of 4988 hospitalized patients with cancer (median [IQR] age, 69 [59-78] years; 2608 [52%] male), 1869 had received 1 or more TOIs. Incidence of VTE was higher in all TOI groups: endocrine therapy, 7%; VEGFis/TKIs, 10%; IMiDs, 8%; ICIs, 12%; and chemotherapy, 10%, compared with patients not receiving systemic therapies (6%). In multivariable log-binomial regression analyses, relative risk of VTE (adjusted risk ratio [aRR], 1.33; 95% CI, 1.04-1.69) but not ATE (aRR, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.56-1.16) was significantly higher in those exposed to all TOIs pooled together vs those with no exposure. Among individual drugs, ICIs were significantly associated with VTE (aRR, 1.45; 95% CI, 1.01-2.07). Also noted were significant associations between VTE and active and progressing cancer (aRR, 1.43; 95% CI, 1.01-2.03), history of VTE (aRR, 3.10; 95% CI, 2.38-4.04), and high-risk site of cancer (aRR, 1.42; 95% CI, 1.14-1.75). Black patients had a higher risk of TEEs (aRR, 1.24; 95% CI, 1.03-1.50) than White patients. Patients with TEEs had high intensive care unit admission (46%) and mechanical ventilation (31%) rates. Relative risk of death in patients with TEEs was higher in those exposed to TOIs vs not (aRR, 1.12; 95% CI, 0.91-1.38) and was significantly associated with poor performance status (aRR, 1.77; 95% CI, 1.30-2.40) and active/progressing cancer (aRR, 1.55; 95% CI, 1.13-2.13). Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study, relative risk of developing VTE was high among patients receiving TOIs and varied by the type of therapy, underlying risk factors, and demographics, such as race and ethnicity. These findings highlight the need for close monitoring and perhaps personalized thromboprophylaxis to prevent morbidity and mortality associated with COVID-19-related thromboembolism in patients with cancer.

Molecular characterization and genotyping of isolates from cancer patients with Clostridioides difficile infection or asymptomatic colonization.

Introduction. Cancer patients with Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) are at a higher risk for adverse outcomes. In addition, a high prevalence of Clostridioides difficile asymptomatic colonization (CDAC) has been reported in this vulnerable population.Gap Statement. The molecular characteristics and potential role of CDAC in healthcare-related transmission in the cancer population have been poorly explored.Aim. We aimed to compare the molecular and genotypic characteristics of C. difficile isolates from cancer patients with CDAC and CDI.Method. We conducted a prospective cohort study of cancer patients with CDAC or CDI from a referral centre. Molecular characterization, typification and tcdC gene expression of isolates were performed.Results. The hospital-onset and community-onset healthcare facility-associated CDI rates were 4.5 cases/10 000 patient-days and 1.4 cases/1 000 admissions during the study period. Fifty-one C. difficile strains were isolated: 37 (72 %) and 14 (28 %) from patients with CDI or CDAC, respectively. All isolates from symptomatic patients were tcdA+/tcdB+, and four (10 %) were ctdA+/ctdB+. In the CDAC group, 10 (71 %) isolates were toxigenic, and none were ctdA+/ctdB+. The Δ18 in-frame tcdC deletion and two transition mutations were found in five isolates. After bacterial typing, 60 % of toxigenic isolates from asymptomatic carriers were clonal to those from patients with C. difficile-associated diarrhoea. No NAP1/027/BI strains were detected.Conclusions. We found a clonal association between C. difficile isolates from patients with CDAC and CDI. Studies are needed to evaluate the potential role of asymptomatic carriers in the dynamics of nosocomial transmission to support infection control measures and reduce the burden of CDI in high-risk groups.

Performance of Clostridioides difficile infection severity scores and risk factors related to 30-day all-cause mortality in patients with cancer.

PURPOSE: There are currently no standard definitions for assessing the severity of Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) in cancer patients. We evaluated the performance of scoring systems for severity and analyzed risk factors for mortality in a cancer cohort. METHODS: We conducted an observational study in patients with cancer and CDI. We calculated the incidence of hospital-onset (HO-CDI) and community-onset health-care facility associated (CO-HCFA-CDI) episodes. We classified severity using five prognostic scales and calculated sensitivity, specificity, positive (PPV), and negative predictive values (NPV) for mortality and intensive care unit (ICU) admission. In addition, multivariate regression was performed to assess variables associated with mortality. RESULTS: The HO-CDI and CO-HCFA-CDI incidence rates were 3.7 cases/10,000 patient-days and 1.9 cases/1,000 admissions, respectively. ESCMID criteria showed the higher sensitivity (97%, 95% CI; 85-100%) and NPV (98%, 95% CI; 85-100%), while ATLAS (≥ 6 points) had the highest specificity (95%, 95% CI; 90-98%) for 30-day all-cause mortality; similar performance was observed for ICU admission. Characteristics associated with fatal outcome were neutropenia (≤ 100 cells/ml) (aOR; 3.03, 95% CI; 1.05-8.74, p = 0.040), male gender (aOR; 2.90, 95% CI; 1.08-7.80, p = 0.034), high serum creatinine (aOR; 1.71, 95% CI; 1.09-2.70, p = 0.020), and albumin (aOR; 0.17, 95% CI; 0.07-0.42, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Some of the current scales may not be appropriate to discriminate severity in patients with cancer. The variables in this study associated with unfavorable outcomes could be evaluated in prospective studies to develop prognostic scores that identify susceptible patients, especially in immunocompromised populations.

Risk factors and clinical outcomes for Clostridioides difficile infections in a case control study at a large cancer referral center in Mexico.

INTRODUCTION: Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) is recognized as the leading cause of nosocomial diarrhea. This study describes CDI's clinical characteristics, risk factors, and outcomes in the cancer population. METHODS: We conducted a case-control study on cancer patients from 2015-2018 at the Instituto Nacional de Cancerologia in Mexico. CDI case was defined as diarrhea episode and positive polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for toxigenic strains. Controls were cancer diagnosis-matched patients with diarrhea and negative PCR. Healthcare Facility-Onset (HO-CDI) and Community-Onset, Healthcare Facility-Associated (CO-HCFA-CDI) rates were calculated. For assessing associations, univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were conducted. RESULTS: We included 148 CDI cases and 148 controls. The CDI rate was 4.1 per 10,000 patient-days and 2.1 per 1,000 patient admissions for HO-CDI and CO-HCFA-CDI episodes, respectively. Clinical characteristics associated with CDI were fever, abdominal pain, and ≥4 episodes of diarrhea/24h. Previous use of proton pump inhibitors (P=.003), fluoroquinolones (P=.016), and cephalosporins (P=.026) increased the risk for CDI acquisition, while higher age (P=.022) and male gender (P=.015) were related to severe episodes. Thirty-day all-cause mortality was higher among CDI patients (18%) than controls (9%). CONCLUSION: The CDI rate was lower compared to other series. The incidence of CO-HCFA-CDI episodes increased, and HO-CDI cases decreased from 2016 to 2018. Risk factors for acquisition and severe infection were similar to those reported in non-cancer populations.

Clinical characteristics and outcomes in a cohort of oncologic patients with COVID-19 during the first year of the pandemic in Mexico.

BACKGROUND: Literature on severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection in cancer patients is scarce in Latin America. This population seems to have a higher risk for adverse outcomes. This study aims to correlate clinical characteristics with outcomes in patients with cancer. METHODS: We included all patients with cancer and confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection from April 19 to December 31, 2020, at the Instituto Nacional de Cancerologia, Mexico. Clinical information was obtained from medical and epidemiological records. For the association between variables and hospitalization, invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV), and mortality, univariate and multivariate logistic regression were performed; odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals were calculated. RESULTS: Four hundred thirty-three patients were included; 268 (62%) were female, the median age was 55 years. One hundred thirty-five (31%), 131 (30%), and 93 (21%) patients had obesity, hypertension, and diabetes mellitus (DM), respectively. Three hundred forty-one (79%) had solid cancer. One hundred seventy (39%) had advanced cancer. Two hundred (46%) patients were hospitalized. Age (p < 0.01), male gender (p = 0.03), hematological malignancies (HM) (p = 0.04) and advanced cancer (p = 0.03) increased the risk for hospital admission. Forty-five (10%) patients required IMV. Age (p = 0.02); DM (p = 0.04); high C-reactive protein (p < 0.01), and lactate dehydrogenase (p = 0.03) were associated with IMV. Mortality within 30 days after diagnosis was 18% (76 cases). Associated characteristics were age (p = 0.04) and low albumin (p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: In this study, patients with cancer showed higher mortality, need for hospitalization, and IMV compared with other non-cancer cohorts. We did not find an increased risk in mortality for HM. Although our cohort was younger than others previously reported, age was a strong predictor of adverse outcomes. Variables associated with IMV and death were similar to those previously described in cancer patients with COVID-19.

Vaccination Status and Other Preventive Measures in Medical Schools. Big Needs and Opportunities.

BACKGROUND: Proper immunization and knowledge in infection prevention are key factors in protecting medical students. AIM OF THE STUDY: To describe the status on vaccination recommended for healthcare workers (HCW) and infection prevention knowledge. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional study on medical students at clinical years of medical school from a public University in Mexico. RESULTS: A total of 1,824 medical students responded the survey. One thousand ninety (59.8%) were women. Median age was 22 years. One thousand six hundred twenty-two (88.9%) knew their childhood immunization status. One thousand seventy-one (58.7%) were vaccinated against influenza for the 2016-2017 season; 1667 (91.4%) had been vaccinated at least once against hepatitis B, only 315 (18.9%) of vaccinated had received a full course with 3 doses. Most students were vaccinated against measles, mumps and rubella during childhood, 542 (29.7%) received an additional dosage during or after adolescence. Six hundred ninety-seven (38.2%) were concerned about vaccine's safety. A total of 1,431 (78.5%) properly identified situations were standard precautions are recommended, and 1540 (84.4%) had received some training on safe care delivery and personal protective equipment. Regarding needle-stick injuries, 1165 (63.9%) had been informed on the protocols to follow if an injury occurred. Three hundred forty-nine (19.1%) had suffered needle-stick injuries, only 125 (35.8%) received immediate medical attention at the point of care. CONCLUSIONS: Most medical students were not vaccinated as recommended, and they were not adequately instructed on safe practices for medical attention, nor advised or followed when a health-care related accident occurs. The results may be useful for implementation strategies on vaccination compliance and training on infection prevention.