Assessing Strengths, Challenges, and Equity Via Pragmatic Evaluation of a Social Care Program.

OBJECTIVE: Models of pragmatic social care program evaluations are needed as many are clinical services programs and are not focused on research, limiting the ability to address key evidence gaps. We describe the use of the Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation and Maintenance (RE-AIM) framework to conduct a pragmatic evaluation of a pediatric ambulatory social care program. METHODS: Our evaluation was based on automated electronic health record data on clinics, community partners, social care program processes, and social needs screen data linked to patient sociodemographic characteristics from February 2020 to September 2021. Two Reach outcomes were assessed: 1) the proportion of eligible patients that completed social needs screening and 2) the proportion of positive screens that receive social care program follow-up. The Effectiveness outcome was meeting families' resource need(s). RESULTS: Reach among eligible patients who completed screening was 79.2%. Reach for positive screens receiving social care program referrals demonstrated a higher proportion of referrals among patients with a preferred healthcare language (PHL) of Spanish (45.1%) compared to English (31.2%, P < .001). Effectiveness analyses demonstrated that overall, 75.1% of social care program referrals had all social resource needs met, 17.5% had some needs met, and 7.4% had no needs met. The percent of patients with all resource needs met was higher for patients with PHL of Spanish or Non-English, Non-Spanish (79% for each respectively) compared to English (73%, P = .023). CONCLUSIONS: Maximizing automated data collection is likely the most feasible way for social care programs to complete evaluation activities outside of the research context.

Mixed Methods Evaluation of the Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Immigrant Families.

Introduction: Little is known about the experiences of immigrant families with COVID-19 illness. This mixed methods study compared child and household experiences at the time of a child's COVID-19 diagnosis between immigrant and US-born parents and explored immigrant Latino perspectives on underlying causes of COVID-19 disparities between immigrant and US-born families. Methods: Study data includes surveys of parents of a child with a positive SARS-CoV2 test resulting at Children's Hospital Colorado and focus groups with Latino immigrant adults. We compared household COVID-19 experiences, use of mitigation measures, vaccine intention and sociodemographic information between survey participants stratified by nativity and completed thematic qualitative data analysis. Results: Findings from quantitative data were reinforced by qualitative data including: lower socio-economic status and higher employment in essential services increased infections and spread in immigrant families and higher risk of limited information access related to language barriers and prevalent misinformation. Survey results showed no difference in COVID-19 vaccine intention by nativity. Focus group participants reported limited access to non-English language culturally-tailored vaccine information and competing work demands decreased uptake. Conclusion: Avoiding exacerbating disparities in the face of another public health emergency requires focused investments in policies and approaches specifically directed at immigrant communities.

Variation over Time in Child and Neighborhood Characteristics Associated with COVID-19.

Introduction: To examine the associations between child and neighborhood characteristics and incidence of COVID-19 infection during the first 19 months of the pandemic. Study Design: We utilized individual electronic health record data and corresponding census tract characteristics for pediatric SARS-CoV-2 cases (age <18 years) from March 23, 2020 to September 30, 2021 with molecular tests resulted at a children's health system in Colorado. We compared associations between individual SARS-CoV-2 cases and census tract SARS-CoV-2 positivity rates over three time periods (TP1: March-September 2020; TP2: October 2020-March 2021; TP3: April-September 2021) using multinomial logistic regression for individual associations and negative binomial regression for census tract associations. Results: We included 7498 pediatric SARS-CoV-2 cases and data from 711 corresponding census tracts. Spanish preferred health care language was associated with SARS-CoV-2 positivity for TP1 (odds ratio [OR] 4.9, 95% confidence interval [CI] 3.7-6.5) and TP2 (OR 2.01, 95% CI 1.6-2.6) compared with TP3. Other non-English preferred health care language was associated with SARS-CoV-2 positivity in TP1 (OR 2.4, 95% CI 1.4-4.2). Increasing percentage internationally born in a census tract was associated with SARS-CoV-2 positivity for TP1 (multivariable incident rate ratio [IRR]=1.040, p<0.0001), TP2 (multivariable IRR=1.028, p<0.0001), and in all TP combined (multivariable IRR=1.024, p<0.0001). Discussion: Our study is notable for the identification of COVID-19 disparities among children in immigrant families and communities, particularly early in the pandemic. Addressing disparities for immigrant communities requires targeted investments in public health infrastructure.

Mixed methods evaluation of pediatric telehealth equity for patients/families who communicate in languages other than English.

Background: Emerging research demonstrates telehealth disparities for patients who communicate in languages other than English. A better understanding of pediatric telehealth use with families who communicate in languages other than English is needed to inform interventions to promote telehealth equity. Methods: We conducted a mixed methods study of telehealth care in a children's hospital health system using electronic health record data for outpatient video telehealth encounters from April 2020 to July 2021 and qualitative interviews with clinical staff and Spanish-speaking parents of telehealth patients. Results: The 16-month study period included 102,387 telehealth encounters; 5% of which were encounters in languages other than English. 83% of languages other than English encounters were with patients/families with a preferred healthcare language of Spanish. 11% of providers conducted ≥10 languages other than English telehealth encounters. This subset of providers conducted 71% of all languages other than English encounters. We conducted 25 interviews with clinical staff (n=13) and parents (n=12). Common themes identified across interviews were: (I) technology barriers affect access to and quality of telehealth; (II) clinical staff and parents are uncertain about the future role of telehealth for patients/families who communicate in languages other than English; (III) the well-known impact of language barriers on in-person healthcare access and quality for patients who communicate in languages other than English is also evident in telehealth. Conclusions: Patients who communicate in languages other than English were underrepresented among telehealth encounters and encounters were concentrated among few providers. Promoting equitable telehealth care requires investment to address technology barriers, increase the readiness of providers and clinics to provide telehealth care in languages other than English, and continued attention to reducing the healthcare impact of language barriers.

Health Care for Children in Immigrant Families: Key Considerations and Addressing Barriers.

One in four US children is a child in an immigrant family. Children in immigrant families (CIF) have distinct health and health care needs that vary by documentation status, countries of origin, and health care and community experience caring for immigrant populations. Health insurance access and language services are fundamental to providing health care to CIF. Promoting health equity for CIF requires a comprehensive approach to both the health and social determinants of health needs of CIF. Child health providers can promote health equity for this population through tailored primary care services and partnerships with immigrant-serving community organizations.

"The First Step to Changing Something": Addressing Latinx Childhood Obesity through Photovoice.

BACKGROUND: Latinx children in immigrant families have disproportionately high obesity rates; effective obesity treatment for this subset of Latinx children is critically needed. OBJECTIVES: To inform the development of weight management interventions we explored: 1) community facilitators and barriers to achieving childhood healthy weight through photovoice; and 2) participant reflections on the photovoice process. METHODS: Photovoice was conducted using established methods in a local church. After photovoice, participants completed semi-structured interviews to reflect on their experience. Transcripts were analyzed using a general thematic analysis approach to arrive at preliminary themes, which were presented to participants for validation. Participant input was used to finalize the themes. RESULTS: Six adults and two youth Latinx immigrants identified photograph themes over seven sessions. Four themes emerged regarding community barriers and facilitators to achieving childhood healthy weight: 1) family habits, 2) cultural influences on food, 3) built environment, and 4) food marketing. Participant reflections revealed they were motivated to participate in photovoice to learn more about health, recognized personal growth as a result of group sharing, valued representation as a community, and felt empowered to be role models. CONCLUSIONS: Findings from both photovoice and participant reflections reinforced the need for multi-level approaches to treating childhood obesity. Though participant reflections were gathered to inform continued engagement of Latinx families, they ultimately had a significant impact on our conclusions about priority intervention components.

Applying dissemination and implementation research methods to translate a school-based asthma program.

Our school-based asthma program has reduced asthma exacerbations for youth with health disparities in the Denver metropolitan area, due partly to addressing social determinants of health, such as access to health care and medications. Dissemination and implementation (D&I) science approaches accelerate the translation of evidence-based programs into routine practice. D&I methods are being applied more commonly to improve health equity. The purpose of this publication was to give an overview of D&I research methods, using our school-based asthma program as an example. To successfully scale out our program across the state of Colorado, we are applying a D&I framework that guides the adaptation of our existing implementation approach to better meet our stakeholders' local context-the Exploration, Preparation, Implementation, Sustainment framework. In a pragmatic trial design, we will evaluate the outcomes of implementing the program across 5 Colorado regions, with attention to health equity, using a second commonly used D&I framework-Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, and Maintenance. Our central hypothesis is that our program will have broad and equitable reach to eligible students (primary outcome) and will reduce asthma attacks and symptoms. This D&I approach accelerates dissemination of our program and is an applicable process for translating other effective allergy/asthma programs to address asthma and allergy-related disparities.

Comparing Healthcare Utilization and Diagnoses in Immigrant Versus Nonimmigrant Youth.

INTRODUCTION: To inform efforts to provide healthcare to uninsurable, immigrant youth, we describe The Access Partnership (TAP) hospital-based charity care program and compare healthcare utilization and diagnoses among TAP and Medicaid patients. METHODS: We use propensity scores to match each TAP patient to three Medicaid patients receiving care at a pediatric clinic from October 2010 to June 2015 on demographic characteristics. We use descriptive statistics to compare healthcare visits and diagnoses. RESULTS: TAP (n = 78) and Medicaid patients (n = 234) had similar healthcare utilization, though Medicaid patients had more outpatient visits (10.8 vs. 7.7, p = .002), and TAP patients were more likely to have ever received subspecialty care (38.5% vs. 22.2%, p = .005). Diagnoses were similar between groups, with some exceptions: TAP patients more likely to present with genital and reproductive disease (33.3% vs. 19.7%, p = .013); Medicaid patients more likely to present with endocrine, metabolic, and nutritional disease (52.1% vs. 28.2%, p < .001), psychiatric, behavioral disease, and substance abuse (41.0, 26.9%, p = .026). CONCLUSIONS: TAP patients had similar healthcare utilization and diagnoses to matched sample of Medicaid patients. Findings indicate policy proposals that extend public health insurance to all children would likely benefit immigrant children and not incur higher costs than those of low-income U.S. citizen children.

From Clinic to Community: Adapting Evidence-Based Weight Management for Overweight Latinx Children to Better Address Social Determinants.

BACKGROUND: The U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommends referral of all obese children to intensive weight management programs. When available, programs are limited to clinical settings and do not address social determinants of health barriers to healthy weight among Latinx immigrant families. Active and Healthy Families, a Spanish-language, culturally tailored group visit intervention has demonstrated effectiveness in decreasing child body mass index but does not address barriers to frequent engagement with the health care system nor social determinants other than immigration. Adapting the intervention for community-based delivery, and to address additional social determinants, may facilitate participation and increase acceptability and engagement among Latinx immigrant families. PURPOSE: To engage a stakeholder network in planning adaptations of an evidence-based weight management intervention for community-based implementation. METHOD: Guided by the intervention mapping-adapt process, we solicited feedback from a stakeholder network from August 2018 to March 2020. The stakeholder network assessed fit, planned adaptations and identified essential intervention components using photovoice, a Participatory Action Research method, and meetings incorporating user-centered design approaches. RESULTS: The stakeholder network membership included Latinx immigrant families, community leaders, health care delivery experts, and researchers. Planned adaptations included curriculum changes to discuss social determinants barriers to behavior change and goal setting to mitigate them. CONCLUSIONS: We successfully engaged a stakeholder network and, using a systematic process, identified adaptations of an evidence-based weight management intervention to allow for community-based implementation. Sustainably addressing obesity disparities for Latinx children also requires addressing structural factors to reduce social determinants of health barriers at the population level.

Racial/Ethnic Disparities in Parent Activation: Implications for Developing Interventions Addressing Early Childhood Obesity.

OBJECTIVE: Examine racial/ethnic differences in parent activation and associations with child obesity risk behaviors in low-income families. METHODS: Cross-sectional survey study of 300 low-income Black, Latinx, and White parents of patients aged 2 to 5 years receiving primary care within 2 health care systems (Systems 1 & 2). In-person and phone surveys were conducted. Parent activation, defined as parents' knowledge, confidence, and willingness to act concerning their child's health, was measured using the standardized 13-item Parent Patient Activation Measure (P-PAM). Differences in parent activation by race/ethnicity were assessed using analysis of variance. Multivariate regression analyses were used to test associations between parent activation and child obesity risk behaviors. RESULTS: In pooled unadjusted analyses, Latinx parents had significantly lower activation compared to Black parents (P = .023), but these differences were no longer statistically significant after adjusting for other sociodemographic characteristics (P = .06). Higher activation was associated with slightly greater odds of consuming ≥ 5 daily servings of fruits and vegetables for System 2 only (odds ratio: 1.04, 95% confidence interval: 1.01, 1.07). Associations between parental activation and child screen time or physical activity were not significant. CONCLUSIONS: Findings highlight potential measurement limitations of the P-PAM including the inability of the measure to capture barriers to health system navigation and cultural and linguistic considerations. Further attention to the nuanced interplay between parental activation and contextual and sociodemographic risk factors (eg, food availability, immigrant status, economic opportunity, language proficiency) should be considered in the development of early childhood obesity interventions in primary care settings.

Developing an audio-based communication tool for NICU discharge of Latino families with limited English proficiency.

OBJECTIVE: Research shows NICU Latino parents with limited English proficiency (LEP) feel less comfortable asking questions and participating in medical decision-making, which may negatively affect transition to community healthcare. Question prompt lists (QPL), suggested questions sometimes drawn from families and providers, can improve family-centered communication. We explored clinician and parent perceptions to inform development of and pilot a NICU discharge QPL. METHODS: Focus groups with NICU and primary care providers explored perceived educational needs of Latino parents LEP and barriers to effective transition to community healthcare. Semi-structured interviews with Latino parents LEP explored perceptions of knowledge gaps and recommendations to improve the transition process. A Spanish audio QPL for parents and an English written version for providers were developed and pilot tested for acceptability. RESULTS: Provider focus groups (n = 27) and parent interviews (n = 19) identified themes: decreased parent activation, knowledge gaps, limited-use interpreters, unfamiliarity with healthcare system, and social isolation as barriers to smooth NICU-to-home transition. Providers (n = 11) and parents (n = 10) favored QPL introduction early in NICU admission, finding it useful to improve communication and transition processes for families. CONCLUSION: Our QPL may address challenges faced by Latino parents LEP when transitioning home. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: QPLs may improve Latino NICU infants' healthcare outcomes.

Information and Communication Technology Access and Use Among Low-Income Latino Immigrant Parents.

INTRODUCTION: Development of mHealth interventions to address health disparities for Latino children in immigrant families requires understanding access to and use of information and communication technology. METHODS: We examined access to information and communication technology and use of common applications/programs by low-income immigrant Latino parents of infants to inform development of mHealth interventions for this population. Latino immigrant parents reported technology use and access of common applications/software via survey. RESULTS: Of the 157 participants, we found nearly all parents owned a smartphone and that 60% accessed the internet only via their smartphone. Around one-quarter of participants had access to unlimited data. Frequent use of text messaging was common, but frequent email use was less common. Less than 10% of participants frequently used health-oriented applications. DISCUSSION: Our findings suggest that mHealth interventions that use data, email, or an application interface may not have the intended reach or effectiveness among low-income immigrant Latino parents. Consideration of these findings is important in guiding the development of future mHealth programs for the low-income Latino population. This study was registered at clinicaltrials.gov (NCT02647814).

Social and Behavioral Variables in the Electronic Health Record: A Path Forward to Increase Data Quality and Utility.

PURPOSE: Social and behavioral determinants of health (SBDH) are important factors that affect the health of individuals but are not routinely captured in a structured and systematic manner in electronic health records (EHRs). The purpose of this study is to generate recommendations for systematic implementation of SBDH data collection in EHRs through (1) reviewing SBDH conceptual and theoretical frameworks and (2) eliciting stakeholder perspectives on barriers to and facilitators of using SBDH information in the EHR and priorities for data collection. METHOD: The authors reviewed SBDH frameworks to identify key social and behavioral variables and conducted focus groups and interviews with 17 clinicians and researchers at Johns Hopkins Health System between March and May 2018. Transcripts were coded and common themes were extracted to understand the barriers to and facilitators of accessing SBDH information. RESULTS: The authors found that although the frameworks agreed that SBDH affect health outcomes, the lack of model consensus complicates the development of specific recommendations for the prioritization of SBDH data collection. Study participants recognized the importance of SBDH information and individual health and agreed that patient-reported information should be captured, but clinicians and researchers cited different priorities for which variables are most important. For the few SBDH variables that are captured, participants reported that data were often incomplete, unclear, or inconsistent, affecting both researcher and clinician responses to SBDH barriers to health. CONCLUSIONS: Health systems need to identify and prioritize the systematic implementation of collection of a high-impact but limited list of SBDH variables in the EHR. These variables should affect care and be amenable to change and collection should be integrated into clinical workflows. Improved data collection of SBDH variables can lead to a better understanding of how SBDH affect health outcomes and ways to better address underlying health disparities that need urgent action.

Community partnerships in emerging immigrant communities: Lessons learned addressing Latino childhood weight disparities.

Latino children have disproportionately high childhood obesity rates, and U.S.-born Latino children of immigrant parents experience higher overweight/obesity rates than other Latino children. Community-based participatory research (CBPR) to engage Latino immigrant families and Latino-serving community organizations is one mechanism to address the lack of effective and practical interventions addressing childhood obesity disparities among Latino children. We present lessons learned from applying CBPR methods to a partnership focused on developing a child obesity treatment program for Latino immigrant families in an emerging Latino immigrant destination to inform the use of CBPR methods in other partnerships in emerging immigrant communities. We encountered challenges working within the partnership related to entrenched sociopolitical hierarchies that were not inclusive of immigrant community leaders, capacity building for partners with limited literacy and administrative experience, and how best to use complementary methods and frameworks to support a community-engaged research process. This work is one way to promote shared learning among the community of researchers using CBPR and other engagement methods to partner with emerging immigrant communities. Together with our community partners, we can identify strategies to more effectively partner to promote health equity and work toward social justice for all members of our communities.

Leaving Paper Behind: Improving Healthcare Navigation by Latino Immigrant Parents Through Video-Based Education.

System barriers to effective healthcare engagement and navigation contribute to healthcare disparities among Latino children with immigrant parents in the US. We evaluated a nine-minute educational video supporting healthcare navigation and engagement skills of Spanish-speaking Latino parents of infants. Participants viewed the video at their child's 2-month well-visit, completed a pre-and post-video knowledge evaluation, and answered open-ended questions on video style. A paired t test was used to examine differences in knowledge and open-ended responses were coded using an iterative, consensus-based process. Of the 79 participants, 63.3% had an education level below high school diploma/GED and 84.8% were at risk for limited health literacy. There was a significant gain in healthcare navigation and engagement knowledge after watching the video (p < 0.001). Parents expressed that the video was interesting and provided useful information. Parents valued the knowledge gained and preferred videos over written materials for receiving culturally and linguistically tailored health education.

Immigrant Latino parents demonstrated high interactivity with pediatric primary care text messaging intervention.

BACKGROUND: The majority of Latino immigrants have been shown to have a mobile phone. Cellular phones offer a low-cost method of reaching larger populations and have the potential for increased tailoring and interactivity. This supports the development of mHealth interventions to address healthcare disparities in this population. In this study we sought to evaluate the feasibility and acceptability of interactive Spanish-language text messages sent throughout a child's first year of life in a low-income, limited-English proficient (LEP) Latino population to support families in accessing and using pediatric primary care more effectively. METHODS: Participants (n=79) received interactive text messages over a period of 12 months as a part of a multi-modal mHealth intervention conducted at an urban academic pediatric primary care practice. Inclusion criteria were: singleton infant <2 months of age, enrollment in public health insurance, parent age >18, parent preferred healthcare language of Spanish, and at least one household cellular phone. Interactive text messages were designed to promote increased healthcare engagement and prompted participant responses through preprogramed algorithms. Text message sequences included clinic appointment reminders, support for obtaining medicine and completing referral appointments, monitoring of illness care needs and use, and parent support program reminders. Descriptive analyses were used to examine text message volume, usability, and participant response to text sequences. RESULTS: Among participants, mean parent age was 30.1 years (SD: 6.1 years); mean years in the US was 7.5 years (SD: 5.1 years). 63.3% of parents had less than a high school education and 84.8% of parents had possible/high likelihood of limited health literacy. Participants completed the majority of sequences with appointment reminder sequences having the quickest response time. The top quartile of responders completed 88.3% of sequences; lower educational attainment was associated with lower text message sequence completion. Participants rated the program positively, especially the appointment reminders. CONCLUSIONS: LEP Latino parents successfully engaged with interactive Spanish-language text sequences and parent acceptability was high. This study demonstrates feasibility for interventions employing this technology. Text message interventions may be a feasible approach to reduce healthcare disparities and costs for vulnerable populations.

Addressing the Social Needs of Spanish- and English-Speaking Families in Pediatric Primary Care.

OBJECTIVE: To describe the social needs of families working with Health Leads (HL) at 18 pediatric practices in 9 US cities and how reported social needs and success addressing them varied according to parents' preferred health care language. METHODS: We evaluated the social needs of English and Spanish speakers who received assistance from HL from September 2013 to August 2015. The study sample included 11,661 households in the 4 regions where HL provided support within pediatric primary care practices. We used multivariable regression stratified by region to assess the association between language and successful resource connections. RESULTS: Reported social needs differed by language. Spanish speakers most frequently reported needs related to food (eg, food stamps, Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children, and food pantries). English speakers most frequently reported child-related needs (eg, childcare vouchers, Head Start, and school enrollment). The association between household language and the odds of a successful resource connection varied by region. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings highlight the importance of considering language barriers and community context when addressing unmet social needs as part of primary care.

Moving From Knowledge to Action: Improving Safety and Quality of Care for Patients With Limited English Proficiency.

Objective. This study assessed safety culture and staff communication with patients with limited English proficiency (LEP) to identify system-level approaches to increasing interpreter use and reducing health care disparities. Methods. An electronic survey and 7 focus groups were conducted with health care professionals in pediatrics and obstetrics/gynecology. Survey data were examined with univariate descriptive analysis. Focus group transcripts were coded through an iterative consensus process. Results. Survey participants (n = 68) reported less confidence in their ability to communicate effectively (74%) and form therapeutic relationships (56%) with LEP patients versus English-proficient patients. Focus groups identified knowledge as a facilitator of interpreter use. Workflow constraints, supply-demand mismatch, variable interpretation quality, and gaps in communication with interpretation services management were barriers. Conclusion. Knowledge gaps may not be a primary cause of interpreter underuse. Strategies to address workflow barriers and engage with interpretation services are critical to move from knowledge to action to improve LEP patient care.

Centro SOL Research Consultation Services: Improving Research with Limited English Proficiency Latinx Populations.

From 2014-2019, Centro SOL provided research consultation services to 77 investigators interested in including Latinx and limited English proficiency populations in their research. The most common requests were for study recruitment (the very most common) and for translation and materials review. Challenges to providing services included financial sustainability and variable institutional review board policies, among others.

A Texting Intervention in Latino Families to Reduce ED Use: A Randomized Trial.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Latino children in immigrant families experience health care disparities. Text messaging interventions for this population may address disparities. The objective of this study was to evaluate the impact of a Spanish-language text messaging intervention on infant emergency department use and well care and vaccine adherence. METHODS: The Salud al Día intervention, an educational video and interactive text messages throughout the child's first year of life, was evaluated via randomized controlled trial conducted in an urban, academic pediatric primary care practice from February 2016 to December 2017. Inclusion criteria were publicly insured singleton infant <2 months of age; parent age >18, with Spanish as the preferred health care language; and at least 1 household cellular phone. Primary outcomes were abstracted from the electronic medical record at age 15 months. Intention-to-treat analyses were used. RESULTS: A total of 157 parent-child dyads were randomly assigned to Salud al Día (n = 79) or control groups (n = 78). Among all participants, mean parent age was 29.3 years (SD: 6.2 years), mean years in the United States was 7.3 (SD: 5.3 years), and 87% of parents had limited or marginal health literacy. The incidence rate ratio for emergency department use for the control versus intervention group was 1.48 (95% confidence interval: 1.04-2.12). A greater proportion of intervention infants received 2 flu vaccine doses compared with controls (81% vs 67%; P = .04). CONCLUSIONS: This Spanish-language text messaging intervention reduced emergency department use and increased flu vaccine receipt among a population at high risk for health care disparities. Tailored text message interventions are a promising method for addressing disparities.