The Breast Cancer Patient Experience of Telemedicine During COVID-19.

BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic has seen major shifts in the delivery of health care across the world, including adoption of telemedicine. We present a survey of patient experience with telemedicine for the treatment of breast cancer. METHODS: A questionnaire designed to assess patient satisfaction with telemedicine was distributed to all patients who underwent surgery at the Providence Breast Centre (PBC) for breast cancer or benign/high-risk lesions with surgery follow-up dates between October 13 and December 31, 2020. Surveys were conducted via phone or at in-person follow-ups. RESULTS: A total of 123 of 172 (72%) eligible patients completed the survey; 85% of these patients enjoyed their telemedicine consultation, 93% found there was enough time for dialogue, 66% would choose to have a telemedicine consultation again, 79% would recommend telemedicine at PBC to a friend or family member, and 92% found Zoom© easy to use. When asked whether they prefer a telemedicine initial consultation over an in-person, 28% of patients agreed. When patients are analyzed according to their home address, those more than 10-km away from PBC prefer telemedicine over in-person appointments (37%) more often than those who live less than 10-km away (23%) (p = 0.045). CONCLUSIONS: Patients report a high level of satisfaction with telemedicine. It may be worthwhile to continue telemedicine beyond the pandemic era, due to its convenience, efficiency, and low-cost while keeping patients, physicians, and office staff safe. It also may be more useful in large geographic areas, such as British Columbia to increase access to care.

COVID-19 and breast cancer at a Regional Breast Centre: our flexible approach during the pandemic.

PURPOSE: In British Columbia (BC), there have been 2790 confirmed COVID-19 cases as of June 20, 2020. The aim of this project is to capture the effect of COVID-19 on the volume of surgery and adaptations to the surgical care of patients at a breast centre in BC. METHODS: All proven or suspected breast cancer cases treated with surgery between March 16, 2019 and April 30, 2019 and March 16, 2020 and April 30, 2020 through the Providence Breast Centre were included in this review. The date ranges in 2020 mark the early COVID-19 pandemic period in BC and the large shift in operating room access during this time. RESULTS: In 2019, 99 patients underwent surgery for proven breast cancer and 30 patients for suspected breast cancer. In 2020, 162 patients underwent surgery for breast cancer and 34 for suspected breast cancer. Wait times from core biopsy to surgery and surgery to oncology consultation were improved in 2020 with a reduction of core biopsy to surgery time from 58 to 28 days for patients seen during the pandemic. There was an increased use of regional anesthesia and same day discharge compared to 2019 with increases in regional anesthesia (41%-89%) and same day discharge (64%-86%) after adaptations to the pandemic were implemented. CONCLUSIONS: Changes such as improved access to telemedicine, timing for cancer surgeries, and safer anesthetic techniques in response to the pandemic will change breast cancer surgical care beyond the pandemic era. Centralization and team-based care is the way forward.

Intersectionality of Gender and Visible Minority Status Among General Surgery Residents in Canada.

Importance: Within medical specialties, surgical disciplines disproportionately and routinely demonstrate the greatest underrepresentation of women and individuals from racial/ethnic minority groups. Understanding the role that diversity plays in surgical resident training may identify strategies that foster resident resiliency, optimize surgical training, and improve patient outcomes. Objective: To examine the implication of gender and visible minority (VM [ie, nonaboriginal people who are not White individuals]) status for resiliency and training experiences of general surgery residents in Canada. Design, Setting, and Participants: In this survey study, a 129-item questionnaire was emailed from May 2018 to July 2018 to all residents enrolled in all Canadian general surgery training programs during the 2017-2018 training year. Survey responses were extracted and categorized into 5 major themes. The survey was designed by the Resident Committee and reviewed by the Governing Board of the Canadian Association of General Surgeons. French and English versions of the survey were created, distributed, and administered using Google Forms. Main Outcomes and Measures: Survey questions were formulated to characterize resident diversity and training experience. Self-perceptions of diversity, mentorship, and training experience were evaluated using a 5-point Likert scale (1 for strongly disagree, 2 for disagree, 3 for neither agree or disagree, 4 for agree, and 5 for strongly agree) and open-ended responses. The frequency of perceived unprofessional workplace encounters was evaluated using a 5-point scale (1 for daily, 2 for weekly, 3 for monthly, 4 for annually, and 5 for never). Results: Of the 510 general surgery residents invited, a total of 210 residents (40.5%) completed the survey. Most respondents were younger than 30 years (119 [56.7%]), were women (112 [53.3%]), reported English as their first language (133 [63.3%]), did not identify as a VM (147 [70.0%]), had no dependents (184 [87.6%]), and were Canadian medical graduates (178 [84.8%]). Women residents who identified as VM compared with male residents who did not identify as a VM were less likely to agree or strongly agree that they had a collegial relationship with staff, (21 [63.6%] vs 61 [89.7%]; P = .01), to feel like they fit in with their training programs (21 [63.6%] vs 56 [82.3%]; P = .003), and to feel valued at work (15 [45.4%] vs 47 [69.1%]; P = .03). Both female residents and female residents who identified as VM described significant concerns about receiving fewer training opportunities because of their gender vs their male peers (54 [48.2%] vs 3 [3.0%]; P < .001). Ninety-one of 112 female residents (81.2%) reported feeling that their medical expertise was dismissed because of their gender at least once annually, with 37 women (33.0%) experiencing dismissal of their expertise at least once every week (P < .001). In contrast, 98% of male residents reported never experiencing dismissal of their medical expertise because of their gender. Similarly, residents with VM status vs those without VM status reported at least monthly dismissal of their expertise because of their race/ethnicity (9 of 63 [14.3%] vs 1 of 147 [0.7%]; P < .001). Conclusions and Relevance: In this study, female sex and VM status appeared to be associated with adverse implications for the training experience of general surgery residents. These findings suggest that new strategies focused on the intersectionality of gender and race/ethnicity are needed to improve the training experience of at-risk residents.

Fluorescent Cholangiography in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: An Updated Canadian Experience.

Background. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) is one of the most common general surgery procedures in Canada with approximately 100 000 cases performed per year. Bile duct injury remains a morbid complication with an incidence rate of 0.3% to 0.5%. Indocyanine green (ICG) fluorescent cholangiography is a noninvasive technology aiding in real-time identification of biliary structures for safe dissection within Calot's triangle. The objectives were to provide an update to our initial experience with ICG aiding in the identification of biliary structures and ensuring that no adverse patient reactions occurred with ICG administration. Methods. Prospective case series from 2016 to 2018 for elective LC with ICG technology performed at a single academic teaching institution. Patient demographics, indications for operation, biliary structures visualized, amount of ICG used, operative times, and complications were recorded. Results. One hundred eight cases were included for review. The cystic duct, common hepatic duct, and common bile duct were identified with ICG in 90%, 48%, and 84% of cases, respectively. ICG simultaneously visualized at least 2 of 3 biliary structures 83.4% of the time. Only 1 biliary structure was identified in 10% of cases. No biliary structures were identified in 6% of cases. Mean initial ICG dose given was 1.65 mL. No adverse patient reactions to ICG were noted. Conclusions. This updated series illustrates that administration of ICG enhances visualization of the biliary system during outpatient LC. ICG is safe and its application should be further studied in early LC for acute cholecystitis.

A day in the life of emergency general surgery in Canada: a multicentre observational study.

BACKGROUND: Emergency general surgery (EGS) services are gaining popularity in Canada as systems-based approaches to surgical emergencies. Despite the high volume, acuity and complexity of the patient populations served by EGS services, little has been reported about the services' structure, processes, case mix or outcomes. This study begins a national surveillance effort to define and advance surgical quality in an important and diverse surgical population. METHODS: A national cross-sectional study of EGS services was conducted during a 24-hour period in January 2017 at 14 hospitals across 7 Canadian provinces recruited through the Canadian Association of General Surgeons Acute Care Committee. Patients admitted to the EGS service, new consultations and off-service patients being followed by the EGS service during the study period were included. Patient demographic information and data on operations, procedures and complications were collected. RESULTS: Twelve sites reported resident coverage. Most services did not include trauma. Ten sites had protected operating room time. Overall, 393 patient encounters occurred during the study period (195/386 [50.5%] operative and 191/386 [49.5%] nonoperative), with a mean of 3.8 operations per service. The patient population was complex, with 136 patients (34.6%) having more than 3 comorbidities. There was a wide case mix, including gallbladder disease (69 cases [17.8%]) and appendiceal disease (31 [8.0%]) as well as complex emergencies, such as obstruction (56 [14.5%]) and perforation (23 [5.9%]). CONCLUSION: The characteristics and case mix of these Canadian EGS services are heterogeneous, but all services are busy and provide comprehensive operative and nonoperative care to acutely ill patients with high levels of comorbidity.

CONTEXTE: Les services de chirurgie générale d'urgence (CGU) gagnent en popularité au Canada en tant qu'approches systémiques aux urgences chirurgicales. Malgré le volume élevé, le caractère urgent et la complexité des populations de patients desservies en CGU, peu de rapports ont porté sur la structure, les processus, les clientèles ou les résultats de ces services. La présente étude instaure une démarche de surveillance nationale qui servira à définir et à améliorer la qualité des chirurgies destinées à cette population importante et hétérogène. MÉTHODES: Une étude transversale nationale sur les services de CGU a été réalisée sur une période de 24 heures en janvier 2017 dans 14 hôpitaux de 7 provinces canadiennes recrutés par l'entremise du comité pour les soins aigus de l'Association canadienne des chirurgiens généraux. On y a inclus les patients admis dans les services de CGU, les nouvelles consultations et les patients de l'extérieur suivis par les services de CGU pendant la période de l'étude. On a recueilli les caractéristiques démographiques des patients et les données sur les interventions, les procédures et les complications. RÉSULTATS: Douze sites ont fait état de la couverture assurée par les résidents. La plupart des services ont exclu la traumatologie. Dix sites disposaient de temps protégé au bloc opératoire. En tout, 393 rencontres avec des patients ont eu lieu pendant la période de l'étude (195/386 [50,4 %] chirurgicales, 191/386 [49,5 %] non chirurgicales), avec une moyenne de 3,8 chirurgies par service. La population regroupait des cas complexes : 136 patients (34,6 %) présentaient plus de 3 comorbidités. La clientèle était diversifiée et comprenait des cas de maladie de la vésicule biliaire (69 cas [17,8 %]) et de l'appendice (31 [8,0 %]), de même que des situations d'urgence délicates, telle qu'obstruction (56 [14,5 %]) et perforation (23 [5,9 %]). CONCLUSION: Leurs caractéristiques et leurs clientèles sont hétérogènes, mais les services de CGU sont tous achalandés et ils offrent tous des soins chirurgicaux et non chirurgicaux complets à des patients gravement malades porteurs d'importantes comorbidités.

Process mapping as a framework for performance improvement in emergency general surgery.

BACKGROUND: Emergency general surgery conditions are often thought of as being too acute for the development of standardized approaches to quality improvement. However, process mapping, a concept that has been applied extensively in manufacturing quality improvement, is now being used in health care. The objective of this study was to create process maps for small bowel obstruction in an effort to identify potential areas for quality improvement. METHODS: We used the American College of Surgeons Emergency General Surgery Quality Improvement Program pilot database to identify patients who received nonoperative or operative management of small bowel obstruction between March 2015 and March 2016. This database, patient charts and electronic health records were used to create process maps from the time of presentation to discharge. RESULTS: Eighty-eight patients with small bowel obstruction (33 operative; 55 nonoperative) were identified. Patients who received surgery had a complication rate of 32%. The processes of care from the time of presentation to the time of follow-up were highly elaborate and variable in terms of duration; however, the sequences of care were found to be consistent. We used data visualization strategies to identify bottlenecks in care, and they showed substantial variability in terms of operating room access. CONCLUSION: Variability in the operative care of small bowel obstruction is high and represents an important improvement opportunity in general surgery. Process mapping can identify common themes, even in acute care, and suggest specific performance improvement measures.

CONTEXTE: Les conditions dans lesquelles s'effectuent les interventions chirurgicales d'urgence sont souvent jugées trop pressantes pour que l'on puisse mettre au point des approches normalisées d'amélioration de la qualité. Malgré tout, la schématisation des processus, un concept largement appliqué à l'amélioration de la qualité en milieu manufacturier, est maintenant appliquée en santé. L'objectif de cette étude était de schématiser les processus suivis dans les cas d'obstruction du grêle afin de déterminer les aspects dont la qualité pourrait être améliorée. MÉTHODES: À partir de la base de données pilote du programme d'amélioration de la qualité des chirurgies générales d'urgence de l'American College of Surgeons, nous avons recensé les patients ayant reçu un traitement chirurgical ou non chirurgical pour une obstruction du grêle entre mars 2015 et mars 2016. Nous avons aussi utilisé cette base de données, de même que les dossiers des patients et les dossiers médicaux électroniques, pour schématiser les processus suivis de l'arrivée à l'hôpital jusqu'au congé. RÉSULTATS: Nous avons recensé 88 patients atteints d'une obstruction du grêle (33 soumis à une chirurgie, et 55 à un traitement non chirurgical). Les patients opérés ont présenté un taux de complications de 32 %. Les processus thérapeutiques de l'arrivée au suivi se sont avérés très détaillés et variables en durée; par contre, la séquence de soins était uniforme. Nous avons utilisé des stratégies de visualisation des données pour repérer les goulots d'étranglement au chapitre des soins, ce qui a révélé une variabilité substantielle dans l'accès au bloc opératoire. CONCLUSION: La variabilité observée dans les soins chirurgicaux pour l'obstruction du grêle est élevée et représente une importante occasion d'amélioration en chirurgie générale. La schématisation des processus permet de dégager des thèmes communs, même dans un contexte d'urgence, et met en lumière des possibilités précises d'amélioration du rendement.

Impact of the Acute Care Surgery Model on Disease- and Patient-Specific Outcomes in Appendicitis and Biliary Disease: A Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND: The acute care surgery (ACS) model was developed to acknowledge the complexity of a traditionally fractured emergency general surgery patient population, however, there are variations in the design of ACS service models. This meta-analysis analyzes the impact of implementation of different ACS models on the outcomes for appendicitis and biliary disease. STUDY DESIGN: A systematic, English-language search of major databases was conducted. From 1,827 papers, 2 independent reviewers identified 25 studies that reported on outcomes for patients with appendicitis (n = 13), biliary disease (n = 7), or both (n = 5), before and after implementation of an ACS service. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale was used to score quality. Outcomes were analyzed using random effect methodology and sensitivity analyses were performed. RESULTS: Significant heterogeneity existed between studies and ACS designs. The overall study quality rating was fair to poor with a moderate risk of bias. After implementation of an ACS service, there was an overall reduction in length of stay by 0.51 days (95% CI -0.81 to -0.20 days) and 0.73 days (95% CI 0.09 to 1.36 days) for appendicitis and biliary disease, respectively. Complication rates were lower after implementing ACS (odds ratio 0.65; 95% CI 0.49 to 0.86 and odds ratio 0.46; 95% CI 0.34 to 0.61). There was no difference in after-hours operating for either appendicitis or biliary disease, except when considering ACS models with dedicated theater time, which favors an ACS model (odds ratio 0.49; 95% CI 0.33 to 0.73) in appendicitis. CONCLUSIONS: The ACS model has been shown to benefit acute care surgery patients with improved access to care, fewer complications, and decreased length of stay for 2 common disease processes. The design and implementation of an ACS service can impact the magnitude of effect.

Comparison of three caval reconstruction techniques in orthotopic liver transplantation: A retrospective review.

BACKGROUND: Classic caval reconstruction during liver transplantation involves complete cross-clamping and resection of the recipient inferior vena cava (IVC) followed by donor IVC interposition. Other techniques preserve the IVC, with piggyback (PB) to the hepatic veins or side-to-side (SS) caval anastomosis. Avoidance of cross-clamping may be beneficial for minimizing hemodynamic instability and transfusion requirements. METHODS: Retrospective review of a provincial transplant database (2007-2011). MELD score was used to measure disease severity. Intraoperative blood loss and volume resuscitation were compared between three caval reconstruction techniques using ANOVA. RESULTS: 200 deceased-donor transplants (Classic:58, PB:72, SS:70) were included. Baseline disease severity was equal. Mean case duration was shorter in the PB technique (Classic:366, PB:306, SS:385 min, p < 0.001). Despite similar blood loss, there was significantly less cell saver return, FFP, platelets, and overall resuscitation volume (Classic:12.8, PB:9.5, SS:13.2 L, p = 0.001) utilized in the piggyback technique. CONCLUSIONS: The PB technique was faster and used less cell saver return, FFP and platelets, despite similar blood loss. Availability of different caval reconstruction techniques allows for a breadth of options in difficult cases.

Processes of Health Care Delivery, Education, and Provider Satisfaction in Acute Care Surgery: A Systematic Review.

In recent years, significant workload, high acuity, and complexity of emergency general surgery conditions have led hospitals to replace the traditional on-call model with dedicated acute care surgery (ACS) service models. A systematic search of Ovid, EMBASE, and MEDLINE was undertaken to examine the impact of ACS services on health-care delivery processes and cost, education, and provider satisfaction. From 1827 papers, reviewers identified 22 studies that met inclusion criteria and subsequently used The Evidence-Based Practice for Improving Quality method and Newcastle-Ottawa Scale to score quality and level of evidence. Most studies found an increase in daytime operating, improved patient transit from emergency department to operating room to home, and decreased length of stay. Higher and more diverse case volumes improved resident education and operative experience. ACS services enhanced the educational experience of residents on subspecialty services by offloading emergency work from those services. Finally, surgeons generally felt that ACS services improved job satisfaction, productivity, and billing. The ACS model has demonstrated improvement in timeliness of care, diversified case mix, decreased costs, improved trainee learning, and increased surgeon job satisfaction.

Use of safety scalpels and other safety practices to reduce sharps injury in the operating room: what is the evidence?

BACKGROUND: The occupational hazard associated with percutaneous injury in the operating room (OR) has encouraged harm reduction through behaviour change and the use of safety-engineered surgical sharps. Some Canadian regulatory agencies have mandated the use of "safety scalpels." Our primary objective was to determine whether safety scalpels reduce the risk of percutaneous injury in the OR, while a secondary objective was to evaluate risk reduction associated with other safety practices. METHODS: We used evidence review methods described by the International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation and conducted a systematic, English-language search of Ovid, MEDLINE and EMBASE using the following search terms: "safety-engineered scalpel," "mistake proofing device," "retractable/removable blade/scalpel," "pass tray," "hands free passing," "neutral zone," "sharpless surgery," "double/cutproof gloving" and "blunt suture needles." Included articles were scored according to level of evidence; quality; and whether they were supportive, opposed or neutral to the study question(s). RESULTS: Of 72 included citations, none was supportive of the use of safety scalpels. There was high-level/quality evidence (Cochrane reviews) in support of risk reduction through double-gloving and use of blunt suture needles, with additional evidence supporting a pass tray/neutral zone for sharps handling (4 of 5 articles supportive) and use of suturing adjuncts (1 article supportive). CONCLUSION: There is insufficient evidence to support regulated use of safety scalpels. Injury-reduction strategies should emphasize proven methods, including double-gloving, blunt suture needles and use of hands-free sharps transfer.

CONTEXTE: Les risques professionnels associés aux lésions percutanées subies à la salle d'opération ont favorisé la réduction des préjudices grâce à des changements de comportement et à l'utilisation d'aiguilles et de lames chirurgicales conçues en fonction de la sécurité. Certaines agences de réglementation du Canada ont imposé l'utilisation de « scalpels de sécurité ¼. Nous voulions déterminer principalement si les scalpels de sécurité réduisent le risque de lésions percutanées à la salle d'opération et, dans un deuxième temps, évaluer la réduction du risque associée à d'autres mesures de sécurité. MÉTHODES: Nous avons utilisé des méthodes d'examen des données probantes décrites par le Comité international de liaison sur la réanimation et procédé à une recherche systématique en anglais dans les bases de données Ovid, MEDLINE et EMBASE en utilisant les termes de recherche suivants : « safety-engineered scalpel ¼, « mistake proofing device ¼, « retractable/removable blade/scalpel ¼, « pass tray ¼, « hands free passing ¼, « neutral zone ¼, « sharpless surgery ¼, « double/cutproof gloving ¼ et « blunt suture needles ¼. Nous avons évalué les articles inclus en fonction du niveau de preuve, de la qualité et de la prise de position en faveur des questions à l'étude, contre celles ci ou neutre. RÉSULTANTS: Sur 72 citations incluses, aucune n'appuyait l'utilisation des scalpels de sécurité. Des éléments probants de haut niveau ou de grande qualité (examens Cochrane) appuyaient la réduction des risques par le port de doubles gants et l'utilisation d'aiguilles émoussées, et d'autres éléments de preuve appuyaient l'utilisation d'un plateau de transition ou d'une zone neutre pour la manipulation des aiguilles ou des lames (4 articles sur 5 en faveur) et l'utilisation de moyens auxiliaires de suture (1 article en faveur). CONCLUSIONS: Il n'y a pas suffisamment de preuves pour appuyer l'utilisation réglementée de scalpels de sécurité. Les stratégies de réduction des traumatismes devraient mettre l'accent sur les méthodes éprouvées, y compris le port de doubles gants, l'usage d'aiguilles émoussées et l'utilisation de moyens mains libres de transfert des aiguilles et des lames.

Biliary and vascular anomalies in living liver donors: the role and accuracy of pre-operative radiological mapping.

BACKGROUND: The aim of the present study was to determine the utility of computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) anatomic mapping in the detection of biliary and vascular anomalies prior to a living liver donor (LLD) operation. METHODS: A retrospective study of all LLD patient charts, operative and radiology reports from 1 January 2002 to 1 January 2012 was conducted. Primary post-operative outcomes assessed included mortality, re-operation, readmission and need for endoscopic or percutaneous intervention. Sensitivity and specificity of MR and CT pre-operative screening was calculated against the gold standard of intra-operative findings. RESULTS: A total of 34 donors had an average age of 38 years (range: 22-58) with a body mass index (BMI) of 25.6 kg/m(2) (range: 19.8-32.5) and a length of stay (LOS) of 10.1 days (range: 5-41). There were no donor mortalities. Sensitivity and specificity of CT was 70.0% and 91.3%, and of MRI screening 23.1% and 100.0%, respectively. Patients with inaccurate pre-operative CT or MRI did not have an increased risk of complications. CONCLUSIONS: Even although it was specific, pre-operative MR screening missed up to 77.0% of biliary anomalies. An impeccable surgical technique remains the key in preventing biliary complications of a living donor hepatectomy where pre-operative MRI screening is false.