Interpersonal Violence and Psychological Well-Being: Perspectives of Low-Income Patients, Social Workers, and Medical Doctors in Mexico City, Mexico.

The violence epidemic in Mexico is becoming more widespread. Using a social-ecological framework, the current study sought to understand interpersonal violence among those impoverished communities in Mexico City, Mexico. Participants were recruited from Community Health Centers located within districts that were densely populated, had high rates of poverty and marginalization, and where people experience complex social needs. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with patients, social workers, and medical doctors (N = 15) who were either receiving or providing services in these centers. Data were analyzed using an inductive, thematic approach. Analysis resulted in three themes: (a) interpersonal violence permeates all settings in which people live and interact; (b) social and cultural factors increase the risk of becoming a perpetrator or victim of interpersonal violence; and (c) interpersonal violence is closely intertwined with mental health. Rapid changes within gender roles and expectations in Mexico, combined with widening income inequality, are shifting dynamics within families that may be inherently linked to interpersonal violence. Our findings support the conceptualization of interpersonal violence at the four levels of the social-ecological framework: individual, relationship, community, and societal. Prevention and interventions for violence reduction must be applied across the four levels simultaneously. Community-level efforts should go toward strengthening existing community health centers and equipping primary care providers with training and resources on the screening and triaging of patients encountering interpersonal violence.

Youth Perspectives of Prescription Pain Medication in the Opioid Crisis.

OBJECTIVE: To characterize current youth perspectives of prescription pain medication. STUDY DESIGN: In total, 1047 youths aged 14-24 years were recruited by targeted social media advertisements to match national demographic benchmarks. Youths were queried by open-ended text message prompts about exposure and access to prescription pain medication, perceived safety of prescribed and nonprescribed medication, and associations with the word "opioid." Responses were analyzed inductively for emerging themes and frequencies. RESULTS: Among 745 respondents (71.2% response rate), 439 identified as female (59.3%), 561 as white (75.8%), and mean age was 18.3 ± 3.2 years. Previous exposure to prescription pain medication was reported by 377 respondents (52.0%), most commonly related to dentistry (32.8%), surgery (19.2%), and injury (12.0%). Nonmedical sources of access to prescription pain medication were identified by 256 respondents (36.9%) and medical sources other than their doctor by an additional 111 respondents (16.0%). Three additional themes emerged from youth responses: (1) prescribed medication was thought to be safer than nonprescribed medication, based on trust in doctors; (2) risks of addiction and overdose were thought to be greater for nonprescribed medication; (3) respondents had a widely ranging understanding of the word "opioid," from historical to current events, medical to illicit substances, and personal to public associations. CONCLUSIONS: Although youths are aware of the opioid crisis, they perceive less risk of prescription pain medication prescribed by a doctor, than from other sources. Policies should target education to youth in clinical and nonclinical settings, highlighting the risks of addiction and overdose with all opioids.

Confidentiality in the Doctor-Patient Relationship: Perspectives of Youth Ages 14-24 Years.

OBJECTIVE: To describe the experiences of youth regarding confidentiality with their healthcare provider and how confidentiality affects their interactions with the healthcare system. STUDY DESIGN: Using MyVoice, a national mixed methods text message poll, 4 qualitative probes were asked to 1268 youth age 14-24 years from July 2017 through December 2017. Respondents were asked about their opinions and experiences with confidentiality in their healthcare. Data were analyzed using a modified grounded theory approach. RESULTS: The overall response rate was 75% (n = 948) with a mean age of 18.6 years (SD = 3.2). Respondents were mostly female (56%) and white (70%) with 44% reporting some college education or greater. Qualitative analysis revealed that the majority of youth have not had a conversation with their provider about confidentiality; many youth think all care should be confidential; youth worry about privacy and future discrimination; and youth may lie about their risk behaviors or not seek healthcare when concerned about confidentiality. CONCLUSIONS: Confidentiality in healthcare is concerning to many youth and affects how they interact with the healthcare system. It is imperative for healthcare providers to discuss confidentiality while building trusting relationships with each youth to provide the highest level of care for this vulnerable population.