Standard versus low-dose computed tomography for assessment of acetabular fracture reduction using novel step and gap measurement technique.

PURPOSE: Quality of reduction is of paramount importance after acetabular fracture and is best assessed on computed tomography (CT). A recently proposed measurement technique for assessment of step and gap displacement is reproducible but has not been validated. The purpose of this study is to validate a well-established measurement technique against known displacements and to determine if it can be used with low dose CT. METHODS: Posterior wall acetabular fractures were created in 8 cadaveric hips and fixed at known step and gap displacements. CT was performed at multiple radiation doses for each hip. Four surgeons measured step and gap displacement for each hip at all doses, and the measurements were compared to known values. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in measurements across surgeons, and all measurements were found to have positive agreement. Measurement error < 1.5 mm was present in 58% of gap measurements and 46% of step measurements. Only for step measurements at a dose of 120 kVp did we observe a statistically significant measurement error. There was a significant difference in step measurements made by those with greater and those with fewer years in practice. CONCLUSION: Our study suggests this technique is valid and accurate across all doses. This is important as it may reduce the amount of radiation exposure for patients with acetabular fractures.

A Central Collinear Start Point for Reconstruction Nailing of Femur Fractures: A Technical Trick and Case Series.

SUMMARY: Selecting the optimal entry point for reconstruction nailing is critical to avoid iatrogenic malalignment and optimize mechanical stability. In-line nailing is familiar to surgeons and desirable for its on-axis position. However, there are several potential drawbacks. We describe a modified entry point and present an accompanying clinical series emphasizing an entry point in line with the medullary canal and central on the femoral neck. This central collinear start point is anterior to the traditional piriformis start point and may obviate some of the potential drawbacks with traditional piriformis nailing.

Nail diameter significantly impacts stability in combined plate-nail constructs used for fixation of supracondylar distal femur fractures.

OBJECTIVES: Plate-nail (PN) combinations have been described for fixation of supracondylar distal femur fractures. Small diameter retrograde intramedullary nails (rIMN) are commonly used. The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of nail diameter on construct stability. We hypothesized that a larger diameter rIMN would not significantly change the stiffness of the PN construct when tested in torsional or axial loading. METHODS: Twelve synthetic osteoporotic femurs were used to compare nail diameters in an extraarticular supracondylar distal femur fracture model (Orthopaedic Trauma Association/Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Osteosynthesefragen type 33-A3). Constructs were fixed with a 12-hole 4.5 mm pre-contoured lateral distal femoral locking plate combined with either a 9 mm (n = 6) or an 11 mm (n = 6) retrograde intramedullary nail (rIMN). Specimens were cyclically loaded in torsion and axial compression. The primary outcome was construct stiffness, calculated using the average slope of the force-displacement curves. RESULTS: The 11 mm PN construct was approximately 1.6 times stiffer than the 9 mm PN construct averaged across all torsional loads (2.39 +/- 0.41 Nm/deg vs 1.44 +/- 0.17 Nm/deg) and approximately 1.3 times stiffer than the 9 mm PN construct averaged across all axial loads (506.84 +/- 44.50 N/mm vs 376.77 +/- 37.65 N/mm). There were no construct failures. CONCLUSIONS: In this biomechanical model, nail diameter had a significant effect on both torsional and axial stiffness in PN constructs. While the use of smaller diameter rIMNs has been proposed to allow for easier placement of implants, the effect on overall construct stiffness should be considered in the context of the patient, their fracture and desired postoperative weight bearing recommendations.Level of Evidence: N/A.

Treatment of tibial plateau fractures with a novel fenestrated screw system for delivery of bone graft substitute.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to describe the incidence of subsidence in patients with AO/OTA 41 (tibial plateau) fractures which were repaired with a novel fenestrated screw system to used to deliver CaPO4 bone substitute material to fill the subchondral void and support the articular reduction. METHODS: Patients with unicondylar and bicondylar tibial plateau fractures were treated according to the usual technique of two surgeons. After fixation, the Zimmer Biomet N-Force Fixation System®, a fenestrated screw that allows for the injection of bone substitute was placed and used for injection of the proprietary calcium phosphate bone graft substitute into the subchondral void. For all included patients, demographic information, operative data, radiographs, and clinic notes were reviewed. Patients were considered to have articular subsidence if one or more of two observations were made when comparing post-operative to their most recent clinic radiographs: > 2 mm change in the distance between the screw and the lowest point of the tibial plateau, > 2 mm change in the distance between the screw and the most superior aspect of the plate. Data were analyzed to determine if there were any identifiable risk factors for complication, reoperation, or subsidence using logistic regression. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05. RESULTS: 34 patients were included with an average follow-up of 32.03 ± 22.52 weeks. There were no overall differences between height relative to the medial plateau or the plate. Two patients (5.9%) had articular subsidence. Six patients (15.2%) underwent reoperation, two (6%) for manipulations under anaesthesia due to arthrofibrosis, and four (12%) due to infections. There were 6 (19%) total infections as 2 were superficial and required solely antibiotics. One patient had early failure. CONCLUSION: Use of a novel fenestrated screw system for the delivery of CaPO4 BSM results in articular subsidence and complication rates similar to previously published values and appears to be a viable option for addressing subchondral defects in tibial plateau fractures. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.

Supplemental Fixation of Supracondylar Distal Femur Fractures: A Biomechanical Comparison of Dual-Plate and Plate-Nail Constructs.

OBJECTIVES: This biomechanical study compares the effectiveness of dual-plate (DP) and plate-nail (PN) constructs for fixation of supracondylar distal femur fractures in synthetic and cadaveric specimens. METHODS: Twenty-four synthetic osteoporotic femurs were used to compare 4 constructs in an extra-articular, supracondylar fracture gap model (OTA/AO type 33-A3). Constructs included: (1) distal lateral femoral locking plate (DLFLP), (2) retrograde intramedullary nail (rIMN), (3) DLFLP + medial locking compression plate (DP construct), and (4) DLFLP + rIMN (PN construct). DP and PN constructs were then directly compared using 7 matched pairs of cadaveric femurs. Specimens underwent cyclic loading in torsion and compression. Biomechanical effectiveness was measured by quantifying the load-dependent stiffness of each construct. RESULTS: In synthetic osteoporotic femurs, the DP construct had the greatest torsional stiffness (1.76 ± 0.33 Nm/deg) followed by the rIMN (1.67 ± 0.14 Nm/deg), PN construct (1.44 ± 0.17 Nm/deg), and DLFLP (0.68 ± 0.10 Nm/deg) (P < 0.01). The DP construct also had the greatest axial stiffness (507.9 ± 83.1 N/mm) followed by the PN construct (371.4 ± 41.9 N/mm), DLFLP (255.0 ± 45.3 N/mm), and rIMN (109.2 ± 47.6 N/mm) (P < 0.05). In cadaveric specimens, the DP construct was nearly twice as stiff as the PN construct in torsion (8.41 ± 0.58 Nm/deg vs. 4.24 ± 0.41 Nm/deg, P < 0.001), and over one-and-a-half times stiffer in compression (2148.1 ± 820.4 vs. 1387.7 ± 467.9 N/mm, P = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: DP constructs provided stiffer fixation than PN constructs in this biomechanical study of extra-articular distal femur fractures. In the clinical setting, fracture morphology, desired healing mode, surgical approach, and implant cost should be considered when implementing these fixation strategies.