Medication use in a cohort of adults with chronic intestinal failure: A prospective cross-sectional study.

BACKGROUND: Oral drug therapy may be compromised in chronic intestinal failure (IF) because of alterations in absorption and transit. Only scarce literature is available on which medication patients with chronic IF take in daily life. The aim was to describe the medication use in these patients. METHODS: A medication history was obtained from adults with chronic IF treated in our tertiary care IF center. Degree of polypharmacy, drug classes, Biopharmaceutics Classification System classes, route of administration, and formulation of drugs were analyzed. RESULTS: From October 2019 until December 2020, 72 patients (35 patients with short bowel syndrome [SBS] and 37 patients without SBS) were included. Polypharmacy was seen in 85.7% of patients with SBS and 75.7% of patients without SBS. The top three drug classes were proton-pump inhibitors, vitamin D or acetaminophen, and antimotility medication or laxatives/benzodiazepines. Approximately 25% of the drugs were classified as Biopharmaceutics Classification System class I drugs. In patients with SBS (78%) and patients without SBS (74.9%), most medication was taken orally, requiring gastrointestinal absorption of the active substance to be pharmacologically active. Most of these medications (77% in patients with SBS and 80.8% in patients without SBS) were formulated as a capsule or tablet, requiring disintegration and dissolution in the gastrointestinal tract before absorption can take place. CONCLUSION: Polypharmacy was observed in most patients with chronic IF. Most medication was taken orally in formulations requiring disintegration, dissolution, and gastrointestinal absorption, which could be compromised in chronic IF.

Bedside check of medication appropriateness (BED-CMA) as a risk-based tool for bedside clinical pharmacy services: A proof-of-concept study at the trauma surgery ward.

Background: Bedside clinical pharmacy prevents drug-related problems, but is not feasible in many countries due to limited resources. Hence, clinical rules using structural information in the electronic health record can help identifying potentially inappropriate prescriptions (PIPs). We aimed to develop and implement a risk-based clinical pharmacy service and evaluate its impact on prescribing at the trauma surgery ward. Methods: The proportion of residual PIPs per day, i.e. the number of PIPs that persisted up to 24 h after pharmacist intervention divided by the number of PIPs at T0, was evaluated before and after implementation of the intervention in an interrupted time series analysis. The pre-intervention cohort received usual pharmacy services, i.e. a 0.3 FTE clinical pharmacist trainee. Fifteen clinical rules, targeting antimicrobial, anticoagulant and analgesic therapy were implemented in the post-intervention period. The pre-intervention period was compared to two post-intervention scenarios: A) clinical rule alerts reviewed by a 0.3 FTE clinical pharmacist trainee; and B) clinical rule alerts reviewed daily for approximately 1 h by a clinical pharmacist trainee. Results: Pre-intervention, a median proportion of 67% (range 0%-100%) residual PIPs per day was observed. Scenario A showed an immediate relative reduction of 14% (p = 0.72) and scenario B a significant immediate relative reduction of 85% (p = 0.0015) in residual PIPs per day. In scenario A, recommendations were provided for 19% of clinical rule alerts, of which 67% was accepted by the surgeon within 24 h. In scenario B, recommendations were given for 56% of alerts, of which 84% was accepted. Conclusions: Using clinical rules is an effective approach to organize bedside clinical pharmacy services and improves prescribing at the trauma surgery ward. Advanced training and daily follow-up of the clinical rules are two requirements to be considered.

End-users feedback and perceptions associated with the implementation of a clinical-rule based Check of Medication Appropriateness service.

BACKGROUND: To support appropriate prescribing hospital-wide, the 'Check of Medication Appropriateness' (CMA) service was implemented at the University Hospitals Leuven. The CMA concerns a clinical rule based and pharmacist-led medication review service. The aim of this study was to explore both physicians' and pharmacists' feedback on the optimised CMA service to further improve the service. METHODS: An anonymous e-questionnaire was sent to all physicians active in the University Hospitals Leuven (n = 1631) and to all clinical pharmacists performing the CMA service (n = 16). Feedback was collected using multiple choice questions. During a 5-month period, physicians were also contacted in case of non-acceptance of recommendations to investigate barriers affecting implementation. Thematic analysis was performed and additional acceptance after telephone contact within 24 h was registered. RESULTS: A total of 119 physicians (7.3%) and 16 pharmacists (100%) completed the e-questionnaire. The overall service was assessed as clinically relevant to highly relevant by 77.7% of physicians. The main reasons for non-acceptance of recommendations were related to workload, work environment and time constraints. About two thirds (66.3%) of initially not-accepted recommendations were accepted after phone contact. A nearly full consensus was reached among pharmacists (15/16) on the centralised CMA being complementary to current clinical pharmacy activities. Two major barriers were reported by pharmacists: (1) too limited time allocation and (2) a large number of irrelevant alerts. CONCLUSIONS: The CMA was perceived as clinically relevant by the majority of end-users. Acceptance rate of pharmaceutical recommendations was further increased by calling the physician. Increasing the specificity of clinical rules in the future is imperative.

Offering Guidance and Learning to Prescribers to Initiate Parenteral Nutrition using a Validated Electronic Decision TREE (OLIVE TREE).

Parenteral nutrition (PN) is recommended in patients nutritionally at risk and unable to receive oral or enteral nutrition. A standardized electronic PN order format could enhance appropriate PN prescribing. We developed the OLIVE TREE (Offering guidance and Learning to prescribers to Initiate PN using a Validated Electronic decision TREE), embedded in our electronic health record. We aimed to evaluate its validity and impact on physicians' prescribing behavior. A non-randomized before-after study was carried out in a tertiary care center. The OLIVE TREE comprises 120 individual items. A process validation was performed to determine interrater agreement between a pharmacist and the treating physician. To estimate the proportion of patients for whom the OLIVE TREE had an effective and potential impact on physicians' prescribing behavior, a proof of concept study was conducted. The proportion of patients for whom PN was averted and the proportion of decisions not in line with the recommendation were also calculated. The process validation in 20 patients resulted in an interrater agreement of 95.0%. The proof of concept in 73 patients resulted in an effective and potential impact on prescribing behavior in 50.7% and 79.5% of these patients, respectively. Initiation of PN was not averted and recommendations of the OLIVE TREE were overruled in 42.5% of the patients. Our newly developed OLIVE TREE has a good process validity. A substantial impact on prescribing behavior was observed, although initiation of PN was not avoided. In the next phase, the decision tree will be implemented hospital-wide.

From basic to advanced computerised intravenous to oral switch for paracetamol and antibiotics: an interrupted time series analysis.

OBJECTIVES: Early switch from intravenous to oral therapy of bioequivalent drugs has major advantages but remains challenging. At our hospital, a basic clinical rule was designed to automatically alert the physician to review potential intravenous to oral switch (IVOS). A rather low acceptance rate was observed. In this study, we aimed to develop, validate and investigate the effect of more advanced clinical rules for IVOS, as part of a centralised pharmacist-led medication review service. DESIGN AND SETTING: A quasi-experimental study was performed in a large teaching hospital in Belgium using an interrupted time series design. INTERVENTION: A definite set of 13 criteria for IVOS, focusing on the ability of oral absorption and type of infection, was obtained by literature search and validated by a multidisciplinary expert panel. Based on these criteria, we developed a clinical rule for paracetamol and one for ten bioequivalent antibiotics to identify patients with potentially inappropriate intravenous prescriptions (PIVs). Postintervention, the clinical rule alerts were reviewed by pharmacists, who provided recommendations to switch in case of eligibility. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: A regression model was used to assess the impact of the intervention on the number of persistent PIVs between the preintervention and the postintervention period. The total number of recommendations, acceptance rate and financial impact were recorded for the 8-month postintervention period. RESULTS: At baseline, a median number of 11 (range: 7-16) persistent PIVs per day was observed. After the intervention, the number reduced to 3 (range: 1-7) per day. The advanced IVOS clinical rules showed an immediate relative reduction of 79% (incidence rate ratio=0.21, 95% CI 0.13 to 0.32; p<0.01) in the proportion of persistent PIVs. No significant underlying time trends were observed during the study. Postintervention, 1091 recommendations were provided, of which 74.1% were accepted, resulting in a total 1-day cost saving of €4648.35. CONCLUSIONS: We showed the efficacy of advanced clinical rules combined with a pharmacist-led medication review for IVOS of bioequivalent drugs.

Ninety-Day Follow-up Is Inadequate for Diagnosis of Fracture-related Infections in Patients with Open Fractures.

BACKGROUND: Fracture-related infection (FRI) is a challenging complication in musculoskeletal trauma surgery and often complicates the management of open fractures. The CDC currently advocates a surveillance period of 90 days after fracture fixation, but it is unclear what duration of follow-up constitutes adequate surveillance for FRI. Inadequate follow-up will underestimate infections and, in clinical research, will make any interventions studied appear better than they really are, thereby resulting in misleading conclusions. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: (1) What is the timing of FRI onset in patients with open fractures? (2) What is the proportion of FRIs captured when follow-up is limited to 90 days postoperatively versus when follow-up is extended to 1 year? METHODS: This is a secondary analysis of patient data from a previous retrospective cohort study that investigated whether the duration of perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis was independently associated with FRI in patients with open fractures. Of the 530 eligible patients in the source study, 3% (14) died. Of the remaining 516 patients, 97% (502) patients with 559 long-bone open fractures had 2 years of follow-up constituted the base cohort. Forty-seven fractures in 46 patients were complicated by FRI and were the focus of this secondary analysis. Medical records were reviewed in detail specifically for the current study. Seventy-eight percent (36 of 46) of patients were male, and the mean ± SD age was 42 ± 16 years. The most common mechanism of injury was a motor vehicle accident (63% [29 of 46] of patients), and the tibia was the most involved site (53% [25 of 47] of fractures). The median (interquartile range) time to debridement was 3.0 hours (IQR 2.0 to 4.0). FRIs developed in 3% (7 of 247) of Type I open fractures, 7% (11 of 164) of Type II, 17% (18 of 107) of Type IIIA, 29% (9 of 31) of Type IIIB, and 20% (2 of 10) of Type IIIC open fractures. Each clinic visit of each patient was reviewed, and data about the time of onset of any symptoms and signs suggesting or confirming an FRI, as reported by patients and/or determined by treating surgeons, were recorded. The proportions of FRIs with onset by specific time periods were determined. A Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was performed, and the FRI event rates with 95% confidence intervals were calculated. RESULTS: The median (IQR) time to the onset of FRI was 52 days (IQR 15 to 153). Follow-up of 90 days captured only 64% (30 of 47) of FRIs, whereas follow-up of 1 year captured 89% (42 of 47) of FRIs. The proportion of FRIs with onset within 1 year increased to 95% (42 of 44) in the presence of an already healed fracture. CONCLUSION: Follow-up of 90 days after the management of an open long-bone fracture is inadequate for postoperative surveillance, especially for research purposes. Clinical research on interventions would report results appearing to be much better than they really are, potentially resulting in misleading conclusions. Follow-up of 1 year is preferable because most FRIs will develop before that time, especially when fracture union has occurred. A small percentage of patients may still develop infections beyond the first year after the management of an open fracture. The risk of missing these infections by not extending follow-up beyond 1 year must be balanced against the additional logistical burden. Future prospective multicenter studies and registries with long-term patient follow-up would help clarify this issue.Level of Evidence Level III, diagnostic study.

The effectiveness of Check of Medication Appropriateness for antimicrobial stewardship: an interrupted time series analysis.

OBJECTIVES: Inappropriate prescribing of antimicrobials in hospitals contributes to the emergence of resistance and adverse drug events. To support antimicrobial stewardship (AMS), clinical decision rules focusing on antimicrobial therapy were implemented in the 'Check of Medication Appropriateness' (CMA). The CMA is a hospital-wide pharmacist-led medication review service consisting of a clinical rule-based screening for potentially inappropriate prescriptions (PIPs). We aimed to investigate the impact of the CMA on antimicrobial prescribing. METHODS: An interrupted time series study was performed at the University Hospitals Leuven. The pre-implementation cohort was exposed to standard-of-care AMS. Afterwards, an AMS-focused CMA comprising 41 specific clinical rules, targeting six AMS objectives, was implemented in the post-implementation period. A regression model was used to assess the impact of the intervention on the number of AMS-related residual PIPs between both periods. The total number of recommendations and acceptance rate was recorded for the 2 year post-implementation period. RESULTS: Pre-implementation, a median proportion of 75% (range: 33%-100%) residual PIPs per day was observed. After the CMA intervention, the proportion was reduced to 8% (range: 0%-33%) per day. Use of clinical rules resulted in an immediate relative reduction of 86.70% (P < 0.0001) in AMS-related residual PIPs. No significant underlying time trends were observed during the study period. Post-implementation, 2790 recommendations were provided of which 81.32% were accepted. CONCLUSIONS: We proved that the CMA approach reduced the number of AMS-related residual PIPs in a highly significant and sustained manner, with the potential to further expand the service to other AMS objectives.

Impact of duration of perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis on development of fracture-related infection in open fractures.

INTRODUCTION: Infection is a common complication of open fractures potentially leading to nonunion, functional loss, and even amputation. Perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis (PAP) is standard practice for infection prevention in the management of open fractures. However, optimal duration of PAP remains controversial. The objectives were to assess whether PAP duration is independently associated with infection in open fractures and if administration of PAP beyond the commonly-recommended limit of 72 h has any effect on the infection rate. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Over a 14-year period from 2003 to 2017, 530 skeletally-mature patients with operatively-treated, non-pathologic, long-bone open fractures were treated at one institution. Twenty-eight patients were excluded because of death or loss to follow-up and the remaining 502 patients (with 559 open fractures) who completed a 24-month follow-up were included in this retrospective study. The outcome was fracture-related infection (FRI), defined by the criteria of a recent consensus definition. A logistic generalized estimating equations regression model was conducted, including PAP duration and variables selected by a least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) method, to assess the association between PAP duration and FRI. Propensity score analysis using a 72-h cut-off was performed to further cope with confounding. RESULTS: PAP duration, adjusted for the LASSO selected predictors, was independently associated with FRI (OR: 1.11 [95%CI, 1.04-1.19] for every one-day increase in PAP duration, p = 0.003). PAP duration longer than 72 h did not significantly increase the odds for FRI compared to shorter durations (p = 0.06, analysis adjusted for propensity score). CONCLUSIONS: This study found no evidence that administration of prophylactic antibiotics beyond 72 h in patients with long-bone open fractures is warranted. Analyses adjusted for known confounders even revealed a higher risk for FRI for longer PAP. However, this effect cannot necessarily be considered as causal and further research is needed.

Development and External Validation of an Online Clinical Prediction Model for Augmented Renal Clearance in Adult Mixed Critically Ill Patients: The Augmented Renal Clearance Predictor.

OBJECTIVES: Augmented renal clearance might lead to subtherapeutic plasma levels of drugs with predominant renal clearance. Early identification of augmented renal clearance remains challenging for the ICU physician. We developed and validated our augmented renal clearance predictor, a clinical prediction model for augmented renal clearance on the next day during ICU stay, and made it available via an online calculator. We compared its predictive performance with that of two existing models for augmented renal clearance. DESIGN: Multicenter retrospective registry-based cohort study. SETTING: Three Belgian tertiary care academic hospitals. PATIENTS: Adult medical, surgical, and cardiac surgery ICU patients. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Development of the prediction model was based on clinical information available during ICU stay. Out of 33,258 ICU days, we found augmented renal clearance on 19.6% of all ICU days in the development cohort. We retained six clinical variables in our augmented renal clearance predictor: day from ICU admission, age, sex, serum creatinine, trauma, and cardiac surgery. We assessed performance by measuring discrimination, calibration, and net benefit. We externally validated the final model in a single-center population (n = 10,259 ICU days). External validation confirmed good performance with an area under the curve of 0.88 (95% CI 0.87-0.88) and a sensitivity and specificity of 84.1 (95% CI 82.5-85.7) and 76.3 (95% CI 75.4-77.2) at the default threshold probability of 0.2, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Augmented renal clearance on the next day can be predicted with good performance during ICU stay, using routinely collected clinical information that is readily available at bedside. Our augmented renal clearance predictor is available at www.arcpredictor.com.

Preoperative joint aspiration culture results and causative pathogens in total hip and knee prosthesis infections: mind the gap.

OBJECTIVES: In prosthetic joint infections (PJIs), there is no consensus about the utility of the preoperative joint aspiration culture to guide antimicrobial treatment. The main objective of this retrospective study was to investigate the value of these preoperative samples to narrow immediate postoperative empirical antimicrobial treatment in patients with a knee or hip PJI. METHODS: Adult patients admitted for an exchange procedure between June 2007 and July 2016 for whom a preoperative joint aspiration within 6 months prior to the procedure was available and with an antibiotic-free interval before sampling, were eligible. Per PJI, taking both preoperative joint aspiration and intraoperative deep samples into account, causative pathogen(s) were assessed by the current Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) guidelines. Per PJI, agreement of preoperative joint aspiration cultures corresponding to the causative pathogen(s) was investigated both on species and on Gram/fungi level. RESULTS: From the 85 PJIs, on species level, the total agreement was found in 58 (68%) PJIs. On Gram/fungi level, when preoperative joint aspiration cultures yielded exclusively Gram-positive microorganisms (n = 61), a 100% predictive value for Gram positive causing pathogens was attained. Insufficient predictive value was observed in PJIs with preoperative joint aspiration yielding Gram-negative microorganisms (n = 4), a fungus (n = 1) or with sterile results (n = 19). CONCLUSION: In the immediate postoperative setting, the treating team might consider a broad spectrum empirical antibiotic regime, guided by the local epidemiology and susceptibility, which can be narrowed to Gram-positive coverage if preoperative joint aspiration cultures yield exclusively Gram-positive microorganisms.

Impact of an oral nutrition protocol in patients treated with elective radical cystectomy: a long term follow-up.

Background After radical cystectomy, delayed return of bowel function is relatively common. Although studies investigating on the best modality for delivering nutritional support to this patient group are limited, parenteral nutrition was standard of care in those patients at the urological ward of the University Hospitals Leuven. In 2015, we published the findings from our study conducted in patients undergoing elective regular radical cystectomy at the urological ward of the University Hospitals Leuven comparing the length of hospital stay in patients with early postoperative parenteral nutrition (n = 48) versus an immediate oral nutrition protocol (n = 46). It was demonstrated that the implementation of an oral nutrition protocol was associated with a significant reduced length of hospital stay (median [IQR] of 18 [15-22] to 14 [13-18] days (p < 0.001)). The sample size was however too small to investigate the impact of the oral nutrition protocol on the incidence of catheter-related bloodstream infection, a common parenteral nutrition related complication. Objective To investigate the long term impact of an oral nutrition protocol on the incidence of catheter-related bloodstream infection, duration of catheterization and the length of hospital stay. Method Retrospectively, before (parenteral nutrition group) and after the implementation of the oral nutrition protocol (since March 10th 2010), two cohorts of 549 patients who underwent an elective regular radical cystectomy were included. The incidence of a catheter-related bloodstream infection and the length of stay were compared. A central venous catheter was present in every patient, which is standard of care. Results Catheter-related bloodstream infection was reduced from 22 (4%) to 10 (1.8%) (p = 0.031). The median duration of catheterization was 10 [7-13] days for the parenteral nutrition versus 7 [7-7] days for the oral nutrition group (p < 0.001). The median length of stay between both groups, 20 [17-25] before versus 17 [14-21] days after the implementation of the oral nutrition protocol, also differed significantly (p < 0.001). Implementing the oral nutrition protocol resulted in a parenteral nutrition associated cost saving of €470 per patient. Conclusion This large follow-up study showed that the oral nutrition protocol is associated with a reduction in catheter-related bloodstream infection. Besides, postponing parenteral nutrition in favour of oral nutrition enhances recovery.

Reliability of serum creatinine-based formulae estimating renal function in non-critically ill surgery patients: Focus on augmented renal clearance.

WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVES: Formulae estimating glomerular filtration rate (GFR) are frequently used to guide drug dosing. The objectives of this prospective single-center study were to evaluate agreement between these equations and measured creatinine clearance (CrCl) in non-critically ill surgery patients with normal kidney function and augmented renal clearance (ARC, CrCl ≥ 130 mL/min/1.73 m²), to determine predictors for disagreement, define a GFR estimator cut-off value identifying ARC and determine the ARC prevalence and duration in non-critically ill surgical patients. METHODS: Hospitalized adult non-critically ill abdominal and trauma surgery patients were eligible for inclusion. Measured CrCl based on an 8-hour urinary collection (CrCl8h ) was used as the primary method for determining kidney function. Agreement between equations and measured CrCl8h was assessed in terms of precision, defined as a bias within ±10 mL/min/1.73 m². Predictors for disagreement were identified for the most precise estimator using an ordinal logistic regression model with negative bias, agreement and positive bias as outcome variables. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was performed to identify an estimator cut-off predicting ARC, which was subsequently applied for the daily proportion of patients displaying ARC and ARC duration. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: During the study period (14/11/2013 - 13/05/2014), in 232 adult non-critically ill abdominal and trauma surgery patients, all estimators tend to underestimate CrCl8h (mean bias ranging from 17 to 22 mL/min/1.73 m²), especially in patients displaying ARC (mean bias ranging from 44 to 56 mL/min/1.73 m²). eGFRCKD-EPI performed the best. Younger age and low ASA score independently predicted underestimation of CrCl8h . Three different eGFRCKD-EPI cut-offs with decreasing sensitivity and increasing specificity (84, 95 and 112 mL/min/1.73 m²) identified, respectively, 65%, 44% and 14% patients displaying ARC. The median ARC duration was 4, 4 and 3 days, respectively. WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSION: In surgical patients, eGFR frequently underestimates measured CrCl, especially in young patients with low ASA score. eGFR cut-offs predicting ARC were identified.

Evaluation of the FreeStyle® Libre Flash Glucose Monitoring System in Children and Adolescents with Type 1 Diabetes.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: The FreeStyle® Libre Flash Glucose Monitoring System (FGM, Abbott) measures glucose concentrations in the interstitial fluid for up to 14 days. It has been approved for use in children aged > 4 years in January 2016. Experience in children is still limited. We evaluated the accuracy and usability of the FGM in children with type 1 diabetes mellitus (DM). METHODS: 67 children with type 1 DM (35 girls), aged 4-18 years, were included. Subjects wore a sensor on the back of their upper arm. For the first 14 days, they regularly measured capillary blood glucose (BG) with their usual BG meter (Accu-Chek® Mobile [ACM], Roche [n = 24]; Contour® Next Link [CNL], Bayer [n = 26]; OneTouch® Verio® IQ [OTV], LifeScan [n = 17]) followed by a sensor glucose (SG) scanning. SG readings were compared to BG measurements by consensus error grid (CEG) analysis; the mean difference (MD), the mean relative difference (MRD), the mean absolute difference (MAD), and the mean absolute relative difference (MARD) were calculated. After 14 days, subjects were asked to fill in a questionnaire on the usability of the FGM. RESULTS: 2,626 SG readings were paired with BG results. FGM readings were highly correlated with BG (r = 0.926, p < 0.001). 80.3% of the data pairs were in zone A (= no effect on clinical action) and 18.4% were in zone B (= altered clinical action with little or no effect on the clinical outcome) of the CEG. Overall MD was +7.5 mg/dL; MD varied with the BG meter: ACM +10.4 mg/dL, CNL +14.2 mg/dL, OTV -3.6 mg/dL (p < 0.001). Overall, MARD was 16.7%. We observed a large interindividual variability in the accuracy parameters. MD and MRD were inversely related to BMI (r = -0.261 [p < 0.05]; r = -0.266 [p < 0.05], respectively). MARD was inversely related to age (r = -0.266 [p < 0.05]). Twenty-nine patients (43.3%) reported sensor problems, mainly early detachment of the sensor. Nonetheless, the usability questionnaire indicated high levels of satisfaction. CONCLUSIONS: Our results showed a reasonable agreement between the FGM SG readings and capillary BG measurements in children. There was, however, a large interindividual variability. The wearing of the sensor requires special attention. Further studies in children are imperative in order to document the accuracy and safety of the FGM in the paediatric population.

A comparison between minimized extracorporeal circuits and conventional extracorporeal circuits in patients undergoing aortic valve surgery: is 'minimally invasive extracorporeal circulation' just low prime or closed loop perfusion ?

INTRODUCTION: Even though results have been encouraging, an unequivocal conclusion on the beneficial effect of minimally invasive extracorporeal circulation (MiECC) in patients undergoing aortic valve surgery cannot be derived from previous publications. Long-term outcomes are rarely reported and a significant decrease in operative mortality has not been shown. Most studies have a limited number of patients and are underpowered. They merely report on short-term results of a heterogeneous intraoperative group using different types of ECC system in aortic valve surgery. The aim of the present study was to determine whether MiECC systems are more beneficial than conventional extracorporeal systems (CECC) with regard to mortality, hospital stay and inflammation and with only haemodilution and blood-air interface as differences. METHODS: We retrospectively analysed data regarding mortality, hospital stay and inflammation in patients undergoing isolated aortic valve surgery. Forty patients were divided into two groups based on the type of extracorporeal system used; conventional (n=20) or MiECC (n=20). RESULTS: Perioperative blood product requirements were significantly lower in the MiECC group (MiECC: 0.2±0.5 units vs CECC: 0.9±1.2 units, p=0.004). No differences were seen postoperatively regarding mortality (5% vs 5%, p=0.99), total length of hospital stay (10.6±7.2 days (MiECC) vs 12.1±5.9 days (CECC), p=0.39) or inflammation markers (CRP: MiECC: 7.09±13.62 mg/L vs CECC: 3.4±3.2 mg/L, p=0.89). CONCLUSION: MiECC provides circulatory support that is equally safe and feasible as conventional extracorporeal circuits. No differences in mortality, hospital stay or inflammation markers were observed.

Augmented renal clearance in non-critically ill abdominal and trauma surgery patients is an underestimated phenomenon: A point prevalence study.

BACKGROUND: Augmented renal clearance refers to increased renal elimination of circulating solutes as compared with normal baseline and could lead to underexposure of frequently used renally eliminated antimicrobials. The primary objective was to assess the prevalence of augmented renal clearance in an adult non-critically ill surgery population. Besides, predictors for augmented renal clearance were investigated. A prospective observational single-center point prevalence study was conducted. METHODS: The measured creatinine clearance based on an 8-hour urinary collection was used as primary method for determining kidney function. Augmented renal clearance was defined as measured creatinine clearance of 130 mL/min per 1.73m² or greater. A Poisson regression model was applied to identify predictors for augmented renal clearance. RESULTS: Augmented renal clearance prevalence was 30% and 35% in 103 abdominal and 129 trauma surgery patients, respectively. Younger age (abdominal cohort: relative risk, 0.963 (95% CI, 0.949-0.978); trauma cohort: relative risk, 0.971 [95% CI, 0.960-0.983]) and also for trauma surgery patients, male sex (relative risk, 1.808 [95% CI, 1.026-3.185]) were found to be independent predictors for augmented renal clearance. CONCLUSIONS: Augmented renal clearance is an underestimated phenomenon in adult non-critically ill surgery patients. Especially younger patients, and, in the subset of trauma surgery, males are prone to exhibit augmented renal clearance. Since augmented renal clearance is a risk factor for lower antimicrobial exposure, the impact of augmented renal clearance in relation to antimicrobial underexposure should be investigated in this population. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic/epidemiological study, level III.

Evaluation of parenteral nutrition use in patients undergoing major upper gastro-intestinal surgery.

BACKGROUND: After major upper gastro-intestinal surgery, enteral feeding is often hampered. There is still no consensus on which route of nutrition is preferable in patients undergoing this type of surgery. Current ESPEN guidelines recommend parenteral nutrition in undernourished patients, if caloric requirements cannot be met orally/enterally within 7 days and enteral nutrition is contraindicated. OBJECTIVE: The current practice of systematic parenteral nutrition at the thoracic surgery ward of the University Hospitals Leuven was evaluated based on the ESPEN guidelines. METHOD: This prospective observational study included patients undergoing upper gastro-intestinal surgery and receiving postoperative parenteral nutrition. Parenteral nutrition use was considered appropriate when patients were undernourished and unable to obtain adequate caloric requirements by oral or enteral feeding within 7 days. RESULTS: Twenty-five out of 35 patients were nutritionally at risk. In 9 of 25 patients, the indication for parenteral nutrition was considered justified. As the intestinal tract below the anastomosis site remains accessible in the total studied population, enteral nutrition might be an option. Unfortunately, an appropriate jejunostomy tube was not available at our institution. CONCLUSION: In accordance to the ESPEN guidelines, enteral nutrition can replace parenteral nutrition in most thoracic surgery patients, but only if an appropriate enteral access is available.

Reduced length of stay in radical cystectomy patients with oral versus parenteral post-operative nutrition protocol.

BACKGROUND: In Europe, parenteral nutrition is often used after radical cystectomy to avoid postoperative malnourishment. To the best of our knowledge, however, there is a paucity of data to conclude on the best modality for delivering nutritional support to this patient group. OBJECTIVE: The parenteral nutrition policy was reconsidered and an oral nutrition protocol was implemented by the clinical pharmacist and evaluated in terms of length of stay, number and type of postoperative complications and parenteral nutrition avoided costs. SETTING: A prospective interventional non-randomized before-after study was conducted. Regular radical cystectomy patients presenting without preoperative contra-indications for enteral nutrition were eligible. METHODS: Postoperatively, in the control group, the parenteral nutrition policy from the ward was applied. Parenteral nutrition was initiated systematically and continued until the patient was able to tolerate solid food. In the interventional group, an oral nutrition protocol was implemented. Parenteral nutrition could be initiated if oral intake remained insufficient after 5 days. Main outcome measure The primary end point was postoperative length of stay. Secondary endpoints included the number of patients in whom the oral nutrition protocol was implemented successfully, as well as the number and type of postoperative complications. RESULTS: A total of 94 eligible patients was assigned consecutively to the control (n = 48) and to the interventional group (n = 46). Baseline demographics were comparable. A significant reduction in median length of stay was associated with the oral nutrition protocol [18 days (IQR 15-22) in the control group vs. 14 days (IQR 13-18) in the interventional group (p < 0.001)]. In 40 out of 46 patients from the interventional group, the oral nutrition protocol was implemented successfully. The number and type of postoperative complications did not differ significantly. Implementing the oral nutrition protocol resulted in a direct parenteral nutrition infusion bag cost saving of approximately €512 and a reduction in hospitalization cost of €2,608 per patient. CONCLUSION: The findings of our study showed that an oral nutrition protocol, when compared to the systematic postoperative use of parenteral nutrition, was associated with a decreased length of stay and costs in a regular radical cystectomy patient population.