Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 48
Filter
1.
World Neurosurg ; 2024 Apr 29.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38692566

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Acute upper airway compromise is a rare but catastrophic complication after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion. This study aims to develop a score to identify patients at risk of acute postoperative airway compromise (PAC). METHODS: Potential risk factors for acute PAC were selected by a modified Delphi process. Ten patients with acute PAC were identified of 1466 patients who underwent elective anterior cervical discectomy and fusion between July 2014 and May 2019. A comparison group was created by a randomized selection process (non-PAC group). Factors associated with PAC and a P value of < 0.10 were entered into a logistic regression model and coefficients contributed to each risk factor's overall score. Calibration of the model was evaluated using the Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test. Quantitative discrimination was calculated, and the final model was internally validated with bootstrap sampling. RESULTS: We identified 18 potential risk factors from our Delphi process, of which 6 factors demonstrated a significant association with airway compromise: age >65 years, current smoking status, American Society of Anesthesiologists class >2, history of a bleeding disorder, surgery of upper subaxial cervical spine (above C4), and duration of surgery >179 minutes. The final prediction model included 5 predictors with very strong performance characteristics. These 5 factors formed the PAC score, with a range from 0 to 100. A score of 20 yielded the greatest balance of sensitivity (80%) and specificity (88%). CONCLUSIONS: The acute PAC score demonstrates strong performance characteristics. The PAC score might help identify patients at risk of upper airway compromise caused by surgical site abnormalities.

3.
Neurocrit Care ; 39(1): 81-90, 2023 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37160848

ABSTRACT

One of the most serious complications after subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) is delayed cerebral ischemia, the cause of which is multifactorial. Delayed cerebral ischemia considerably worsens neurological outcome and increases the risk of death. The targets of hemodynamic management of SAH have widely changed over the past 30 years. Hypovolemia and hypotension were favored prior to the era of early aneurysmal surgery but were subsequently replaced by the use of hypervolemia and hypertension. More recently, the concept of goal-directed therapy targeting euvolemia, with or without hypertension, is gaining preference. Despite the evolving concepts and the vast literature, fundamental questions related to hemodynamic optimization and its effects on cerebral perfusion and patient outcomes remain unanswered. In this review, we explain the rationale underlying the approaches to hemodynamic management and provide guidance on contemporary strategies related to fluid administration and blood pressure and cardiac output manipulation in the management of SAH.


Subject(s)
Brain Ischemia , Hypertension , Subarachnoid Hemorrhage , Vasospasm, Intracranial , Humans , Subarachnoid Hemorrhage/complications , Subarachnoid Hemorrhage/therapy , Brain Ischemia/etiology , Brain Ischemia/prevention & control , Hemodynamics , Cerebral Infarction/complications , Hypertension/etiology , Vasospasm, Intracranial/etiology
4.
Neurocrit Care ; 39(1): 1-28, 2023 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37202712

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The neurointensive care management of patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH) is one of the most critical components contributing to short-term and long-term patient outcomes. Previous recommendations for the medical management of aSAH comprehensively summarized the evidence based on consensus conference held in 2011. In this report, we provide updated recommendations based on appraisal of the literature using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation methodology. METHODS: The Population/Intervention/Comparator/Outcome (PICO) questions relevant to the medical management of aSAH were prioritized by consensus from the panel members. The panel used a custom-designed survey instrument to prioritize clinically relevant outcomes specific to each PICO question. To be included, the study design qualifying criteria were as follows: prospective randomized controlled trials (RCTs), prospective or retrospective observational studies, case-control studies, case series with a sample larger than 20 patients, meta-analyses, restricted to human study participants. Panel members first screened titles and abstracts, and subsequently full text review of selected reports. Data were abstracted in duplicate from reports meeting inclusion criteria. Panelists used the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation Risk of Bias tool for assessment of RCTs and the "Risk of Bias In Nonrandomized Studies - of Interventions" tool for assessment of observational studies. The summary of the evidence for each PICO was presented to the full panel, and then the panel voted on the recommendations. RESULTS: The initial search retrieved 15,107 unique publications, and 74 were included for data abstraction. Several RCTs were conducted to test pharmacological interventions, and we found that the quality of evidence for nonpharmacological questions was consistently poor. Five PICO questions were supported by strong recommendations, one PICO question was supported by conditional recommendations, and six PICO questions did not have sufficient evidence to provide a recommendation. CONCLUSIONS: These guidelines provide recommendations for or against interventions proven to be effective, ineffective, or harmful in the medical management of patients with aSAH based on a rigorous review of the available literature. They also serve to highlight gaps in knowledge that should guide future research priorities. Despite improvements in the outcomes of patients with aSAH over time, many important clinical questions remain unanswered.


Subject(s)
Subarachnoid Hemorrhage , Humans , Subarachnoid Hemorrhage/therapy , Case-Control Studies , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
5.
Respir Care ; 64(8): 1021-1022, 2019 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31346078

Subject(s)
Lung , Respiration , Humans , Tidal Volume
6.
Ann Am Thorac Soc ; 13(1): 72-80, 2016 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26523433

ABSTRACT

RATIONALE: Ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) is a prevalent and costly nosocomial infection related to instrumentation of the airway with an endotracheal tube (ETT), enabling microaspiration of contaminated secretions. Modification of the ETT design to reduce microaspiration and/or biofilm formation may play an important role in VAP prevention. However, there is insufficient evidence to provide strong recommendations regarding the use of modified ETT and unaddressed safety concerns. OBJECTIVES: We performed a pilot randomized controlled trial comparing two modified ETTs designed specifically to prevent VAP, with the standard ETT, to test the feasibility of and inform planning for a large, pivotal, randomized trial. METHODS: This study was conducted with institutional review board approval under exception from informed consent. We randomized in a blinded fashion patients undergoing emergency endotracheal intubation both out of and in hospital to receive one of three different ETT types: (1) a polyurethane-cuffed tube (PUC-ETT), (2) a polyurethane-cuffed tube equipped with a port for continuous aspiration of subglottic secretions (PUC-CASS-ETT), or a (3) standard polyvinylchloride-cuffed tube (PVC-ETT). In addition to investigating feasibility and safety, the study coprimary end points were tracheal bacterial colonization reaching a cfu count >10(6) cfu per milliliter and the incidence of invasively diagnosed VAP. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: A total of 102 subjects were randomized and met the eligibility criteria. Randomization procedures performed well and integrity of blinding at randomization was maintained. The majority of intubations occurred in the hospital setting (n = 77), and the remainder occurred out of hospital (n = 25). Compared with the PVC-ETT, there were no significant differences in tracheal colonization for PUC-ETT (odds ratio [OR], 0.98; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.31-3.09) or for PUC-CASS-ETT (OR, 1.26; 95% CI, 0.42-3.76). There were no differences in the risk of invasively diagnosed VAP (OR, 1.14; 95% CI, 0.21-6.08 for PUC-ETT; OR, 1.47; 95% CI, 0.30-7.10 for PUC-CASS-ETT), or of clinically diagnosed VAP by either clinical signs or chest radiograph criteria. We did not observe unexpected or serious adverse events related to the devices. CONCLUSIONS: A randomized trial of ETTs inserted during emergency intubation for the prevention of VAP is feasible and did not appear to carry heightened safety concerns. These preliminary data did not suggest different patterns of tracheal colonization or occurrence of VAP among the study groups. Clinical trial registered with www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT01744483).


Subject(s)
Intubation, Intratracheal , Pneumonia, Ventilator-Associated , Adult , Aged , Equipment Design , Equipment Safety , Female , Humans , Intubation, Intratracheal/adverse effects , Intubation, Intratracheal/instrumentation , Intubation, Intratracheal/methods , Male , Middle Aged , Pilot Projects , Pneumonia, Ventilator-Associated/diagnosis , Pneumonia, Ventilator-Associated/etiology , Pneumonia, Ventilator-Associated/prevention & control , Treatment Outcome
7.
J Am Heart Assoc ; 4(3): e001693, 2015 Mar 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25762805

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Randomized trials of prehospital cooling after cardiac arrest have shown that neither prehospital cooling nor targeted temperature management differentially affected short-term survival or neurological function. In this follow-up study, we assess the association of prehospital hypothermia with neurological function at least 3 months after cardiac arrest and survival 1 year after cardiac arrest. METHODS AND RESULTS: There were 508 individuals who were discharged alive from hospitals in King County, Washington; 373 (73%) were interviewed by telephone 123±43 days after the initial event. Overall, 59% of the treatment group and 58% of the control group had Cerebral Performance Category (CPC) 1 or 2 (P=0.70), and 50% of the treatment group and 49% of the control group had slight disability or better by the Modified Rankin Scale (MRS; (P=0.35). One-year survival was 87% in the treatment group and 84% in the control group (P=0.42). Of those with CPC 1 at hospital discharge, 68% had CPC 1 or 2 at follow-up, and 59% had MRS of slight disability or better. Of 41 patients with CPC 3 or 4 at discharge, only 12% had CPC 2 at follow-up, and just 5% had MRS of slight disability or better. One-year survival was 92% for CPC 1 at discharge, but only 40% for CPC 4. CONCLUSION: In addition to excellent survival, patients who had good neurological function at discharge continued to have good function at least 3 months after the event. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: URL: Clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00391469.


Subject(s)
Emergency Medical Services/methods , Hypothermia, Induced , Nervous System/physiopathology , Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest/therapy , Aged , Disability Evaluation , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Hypothermia, Induced/adverse effects , Hypothermia, Induced/mortality , Kaplan-Meier Estimate , Male , Middle Aged , Neurologic Examination , Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest/diagnosis , Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest/mortality , Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest/physiopathology , Patient Discharge , Predictive Value of Tests , Prospective Studies , Recovery of Function , Risk Factors , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome , Washington
8.
Ann Am Thorac Soc ; 11(3): 367-74, 2014 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24597599

ABSTRACT

RATIONALE: Introduction of sedation protocols has been associated with improved patient outcomes. It is not known if an update to an existing high-quality sedation protocol, featuring increased patient assessment and reduced benzodiazepine exposure, is associated with improved patient process and outcome quality metrics. METHODS: This was an observational before (n = 703) and after (n = 780) cohort study of mechanically ventilated patients in a 24-bed trauma-surgical intensive care unit (ICU) from 2009 to 2011. The three main protocol updates were: (1) requirement to document Richmond Agitation Sedation Scale (RASS) scores every 4 hours, (2) requirement to document Confusion Assessment Method-ICU (CAM ICU) twice daily, and (3) systematic, protocolized deescalation of excess sedation. Multivariable linear regression was used for the primary analysis. The primary outcome was the duration of mechanical ventilation. Prespecified secondary endpoints included days of delirium; the frequency of patient assessment with the RASS and CAM-ICU instruments; benzodiazepine dosing; durations of mechanical ventilation, ICU stay, and hospitalization; and hospital mortality and ventilator associated pneumonia rate. RESULTS: Patients in the updated protocol cohort had 1.22 more RASS assessments per day (5.38 vs. 4.16; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.05-1.39; P < 0.01) and 1.15 more CAM-ICU assessments per day (1.49 vs. 0.35; 95% CI, 1.08-1.21; P < 0.01) than the baseline cohort. The mean hourly benzodiazepine dose decreased by 34.8% (0.08 mg lorazepam equivalents/h; 0.15 vs. 0.23; P < 0.01). In the multivariable model, the median duration of mechanical ventilation decreased by 17.6% (95% CI, 0.6-31.7%; P = 0.04). The overall odds ratio of delirium was 0.67 (95% CI, 0.49-0.91; P = 0.01) comparing updated versus baseline cohort. A 12.4% reduction in median duration of ICU stay (95% CI, 0.5-22.8%; P = 0.04) and a 14.0% reduction in median duration of hospitalization (95% CI, 2.0-24.5%; P = 0.02) were also seen. No significant association with mortality (odds ratio, 1.18; 95% CI, 0.80-1.76; P = 0.40) was seen. CONCLUSIONS: Implementation of an updated ICU analgesia, sedation, and delirium protocol was associated with an increase in RASS and CAM-ICU assessment and documentation; reduced hourly benzodiazepine dose; and decreased delirium and median durations of mechanical ventilation, ICU stay, and hospitalization.


Subject(s)
Analgesics/administration & dosage , Critical Care , Delirium/prevention & control , Hypnotics and Sedatives/administration & dosage , Respiration, Artificial , Adult , Aged , Benzodiazepines/administration & dosage , Clinical Protocols , Cohort Studies , Drug Administration Schedule , Female , Humans , Length of Stay , Male , Middle Aged , Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care , Psychomotor Agitation/prevention & control , Time Factors
9.
JAMA ; 311(1): 45-52, 2014 Jan 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24240712

ABSTRACT

IMPORTANCE: Hospital cooling improves outcome after cardiac arrest, but prehospital cooling immediately after return of spontaneous circulation may result in better outcomes. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether prehospital cooling improves outcomes after resuscitation from cardiac arrest in patients with ventricular fibrillation (VF) and without VF. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A randomized clinical trial that assigned adults with prehospital cardiac arrest to standard care with or without prehospital cooling, accomplished by infusing up to 2 L of 4°C normal saline as soon as possible following return of spontaneous circulation. Adults in King County, Washington, with prehospital cardiac arrest and resuscitated by paramedics were eligible and 1359 patients (583 with VF and 776 without VF) were randomized between December 15, 2007, and December 7, 2012. Patient follow-up was completed by May 1, 2013. Nearly all of the patients resuscitated from VF and admitted to the hospital received hospital cooling regardless of their randomization. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The primary outcomes were survival to hospital discharge and neurological status at discharge. RESULTS: The intervention decreased mean core temperature by 1.20°C (95% CI, -1.33°C to -1.07°C) in patients with VF and by 1.30°C (95% CI, -1.40°C to -1.20°C) in patients without VF by hospital arrival and reduced the time to achieve a temperature of less than 34°C by about 1 hour compared with the control group. However, survival to hospital discharge was similar among the intervention and control groups among patients with VF (62.7% [95% CI, 57.0%-68.0%] vs 64.3% [95% CI, 58.6%-69.5%], respectively; P = .69) and among patients without VF (19.2% [95% CI, 15.6%-23.4%] vs 16.3% [95% CI, 12.9%-20.4%], respectively; P = .30). The intervention was also not associated with improved neurological status of full recovery or mild impairment at discharge for either patients with VF (57.5% [95% CI, 51.8%-63.1%] of cases had full recovery or mild impairment vs 61.9% [95% CI, 56.2%-67.2%] of controls; P = .69) or those without VF (14.4% [95% CI, 11.3%-18.2%] of cases vs 13.4% [95% CI,10.4%-17.2%] of controls; P = .30). Overall, the intervention group experienced rearrest in the field more than the control group (26% [95% CI, 22%-29%] vs 21% [95% CI, 18%-24%], respectively; P = .008), as well as increased diuretic use and pulmonary edema on first chest x-ray, which resolved within 24 hours after admission. CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE: Although use of prehospital cooling reduced core temperature by hospital arrival and reduced the time to reach a temperature of 34°C, it did not improve survival or neurological status among patients resuscitated from prehospital VF or those without VF. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00391469.


Subject(s)
Hypothermia, Induced , Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest/physiopathology , Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest/therapy , Aged , Body Temperature , Brain Injuries/complications , Brain Injuries/etiology , Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation , Cognition Disorders/etiology , Cognition Disorders/prevention & control , Emergency Medical Services , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Sodium Chloride/administration & dosage , Survival Analysis , Ventricular Fibrillation/complications , Ventricular Fibrillation/therapy
10.
Respir Care ; 59(2): 178-85, 2014 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23882103

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Assessment of a patient's readiness for removal of the endotracheal tube in the ICU is based on respiratory, airway, and neurological measures. However, nearly 20% of patients require reintubation. We created a prediction model for the need for reintubation, which incorporates variables importantly contributing to extubation failure. METHODS: This was a cohort study of 2,007 endotracheally intubated subjects who required ICU admission at a tertiary care center. Data collection included demographic, hemodynamic, respiratory, and neurological variables preceding extubation. Data were compared between subjects extubated successfully and those who required reintubation, using bivariate logistic regression models, with the binary outcome reintubation and the baseline characteristics as predictors. Multivariable logistic regression analysis with robust variance was used to build the prediction model. RESULTS: Of the 2,007 subjects analyzed, 376 (19%) required reintubation. In the bivariate analysis, admission Simplified Acute Physiology Score II, minute ventilation, breathing frequency, oxygenation, number of prior SBTs, rapid shallow breathing index, airway-secretions suctioning frequency and quantity, heart rate, and diastolic blood pressure differed significantly between the extubation success and failure groups. In the multivariable analysis, higher Simplified Acute Physiology Score II and suctioning frequency were associated with failed extubation. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.68 for failure at any time, and 0.71 for failure within 24 hours. However, prior failed SBT, minute ventilation, and diastolic blood pressure were additional independent predictors of failure at any time, whereas oxygenation predicted extubation failure within 24 hours. CONCLUSIONS: A small number of independent variables explains a substantial portion of the variability of extubation failure, and can help identify patients at high risk of needing reintubation. These characteristics should be incorporated in the decision-making process of ICU extubation.


Subject(s)
Intubation, Intratracheal , Respiration, Artificial , APACHE , Adult , Cohort Studies , Female , Humans , Intensive Care Units , Logistic Models , Male , Prognosis , ROC Curve , Retreatment , Risk Factors
11.
Shock ; 41(1): 12-24, 2014 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24351526

ABSTRACT

Sepsis-induced cardiomyopathy (SIC), which is a common morbid condition, occurs in patients with severe sepsis and septic shock. The clinical characterization of SIC has been largely concept-driven. Heart function has traditionally been evaluated according to two basic conceptual models: a hydraulic pump system, whereby the output from the heart is entirely dependent on its input, or a hemodynamic pump, whereby the cardiac output is a function of preload, global ventricular performance, and afterload. Minimal attention has been given to the intrinsic contractile function of the heart or to the interaction between the peripheral circulation and the intrinsic myocardial function in sepsis. Currently, SIC is assumed to be the result of the interaction of microorganisms that activate the physiopathological pathways and cellular signaling mechanisms that lead to intrinsic myocardial dysfunction. However, the animal models used to study SIC exhibit multiple limitations. This review addresses the conceptual background, historical perspectives, physiologic mechanisms, current evidence, and limitations of SIC characterization. It also highlights potential future directions for the hemodynamic assessment of the intrinsic contractile function of the heart to overcome current methodological limitations. Finally, the present review recommends the exploration of additional potential mechanisms underlying SIC.


Subject(s)
Cardiomyopathies/etiology , Shock, Septic/complications , Animals , Biomarkers/blood , Cardiomyopathies/diagnostic imaging , Cardiomyopathies/physiopathology , Coronary Circulation/physiology , Disease Models, Animal , Endothelium, Vascular/physiopathology , Humans , Myocardial Contraction/physiology , Shock, Septic/physiopathology , Ultrasonography
12.
Respir Care ; 58(4): 639-46, 2013 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22906838

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: In critically ill patients, induction with etomidate is hypothesized to be associated with an increased risk of mortality. Previous randomized studies suggest a modest trend toward an increased risk of death among etomidate recipients; however, this relationship has not been measured with great statistical precision. We aimed to test whether etomidate is associated with risk of hospital mortality and other clinical outcomes in critically ill patients. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study from January 1, 2001, to December 31, 2005, of 824 subjects requiring mechanical ventilation, who underwent adrenal function testing in the ICUs of 2 academic medical centers. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality, comparing subjects given etomidate (n = 452) to those given an alternative induction agent (n = 372). The secondary outcome was diagnosis of critical illness-related corticosteroid insufficiency following etomidate exposure. RESULTS: Overall mortality was 34.3%. After adjustment for age, sex, and baseline illness severity, the relative risk of death among the etomidate recipients was higher than that of subjects given an alternative agent (relative risk 1.20, 95% CI 0.99-1.45). Among subjects whose adrenal function was assessed within the 48 hours following intubation, the adjusted risk of meeting the criteria for critical illness-related corticosteroid insufficiency was 1.37 (95% CI 1.12-1.66), comparing etomidate recipients to subjects given another induction agent. CONCLUSIONS: In this study of critically ill patients requiring endotracheal intubation, etomidate administration was associated with a trend toward a relative increase in mortality, similar to the collective results of smaller randomized trials conducted to date. If a small relative increased risk is truly present, though previous trials have been underpowered to detect it, in absolute terms the number of deaths associated with etomidate in this high-risk population would be considerable. Large, prospective controlled trials are needed to finalize the role of etomidate in critically ill patients.


Subject(s)
Adrenal Insufficiency/epidemiology , Etomidate/adverse effects , Hypnotics and Sedatives/adverse effects , Respiration, Artificial , Sepsis/epidemiology , Adult , Aged , Critical Illness , Female , Hospital Mortality , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Risk Assessment
13.
Respir Care ; 58(1): 162-72, 2013 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23271826

ABSTRACT

The management of patients with traumatic brain injury has evolved in the last several years, due to the introduction of new, invasive monitoring devices. The ability to monitor parameters other than measurements related to pressures has generated substantial interest. Brain tissue oxygenation monitoring has been consistently shown to provide prognostic information, as indicated by poor prognosis associated with low brain tissue oxygen values. Furthermore, various physiologic manipulations, including increasing the P(aO(2)), have been associated with an increase in brain tissue oxygenation. Whether brain-oxygenation-guided therapy results in improvement in outcomes is debatable. Retrospective studies suggest benefit, while prospective studies have shown a higher intensity of therapeutic interventions with no outcome differences. Data from high quality randomized trials are necessary to determine if brain-oxygenation-guided therapy is beneficial. An oxygen challenge (transient increase in F(IO(2)) to 0.6 up to 1.0) to assess the responsiveness of the monitoring and ascertain the presence of technical malfunction is an accepted practice.


Subject(s)
Brain Injuries/therapy , Brain/metabolism , Hypoxia/therapy , Oxygen/administration & dosage , Oxygen/metabolism , Brain Injuries/metabolism , Brain Injuries/physiopathology , Humans , Oxygen/blood , Partial Pressure , Treatment Outcome
14.
Intensive Care Med ; 38(11): 1800-9, 2012 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23011528

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Elevated intracranial pressure (ICP) has been associated with increased mortality in patients with severe traumatic brain injury (TBI). We have examined whether raised ICP is independently associated with mortality, functional status and neuropsychological functioning in adult TBI patients. METHODS: Data from a randomized trial of 499 participants were secondarily analyzed. The primary endpoints were mortality and a composite measure of functional status and neuropsychological function (memory, speed of information processing, executive function) over a 6-month period. The area under the curve of the ICP profile (average ICP) during the first 48 h of monitoring was the main predictor of interest. Multivariable regression was used to adjust for a priori defined confounders: age, Glasgow Coma Score, Abbreviated Injury Scale-head and hypoxia. RESULTS: Of the participants, 365 patients had complete 48-h ICP data. The overall 6-month mortality was 18 %. The adjusted odds ratio of mortality comparing 10-mmHg increases in average ICP was 3.12 (95 % confidence interval 1.79, 5.44; p < 0.01). Overall, higher average ICP was associated with decreased functional status and neuropsychological functioning (p < 0.01). Importantly, among survivors, increasing average ICP was not independently associated with worse performance on neuropsychological testing (p = 0.46). CONCLUSIONS: Average ICP in the first 48 h of monitoring was an independent predictor of mortality and of a composite endpoint of functional and neuropsychological outcome at the 6-month follow-up in moderate or severe TBI patients. However, there was no association between average ICP and neuropsychological functioning among survivors.


Subject(s)
Brain Injuries/mortality , Brain Injuries/rehabilitation , Intracranial Hypertension/epidemiology , Recovery of Function , Activities of Daily Living , Adult , Brain Injuries/diagnosis , Critical Care , Female , Humans , Male , Multivariate Analysis , Neuropsychological Tests , Prognosis , Prospective Studies , United States/epidemiology
15.
Respir Care ; 57(10): 1555-63, 2012 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22324979

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Timing and preparation for tracheal extubation are as critical as the initial intubation. There are limited data on specific strategies for a planned extubation. The extent to which the difficult airway at reintubation contributes to patient morbidity is unknown. The aim of the present study was to describe the occurrence and complications of failed extubation and associated risk factors, and to estimate the mortality and morbidity associated with reintubation attempts. METHODS: Cohort study of 2,007 critically ill adult patients admitted to the ICU with an ETT. Patients were classified in 2 groups, based on the requirement for reintubation: "never reintubated" versus "≥ 1 reintubations." Baseline characteristics, ICU and hospital stay, hospital mortality, and in-patient costs were compared between patients successfully extubated and those with reintubation outside the operating room, using regression techniques. Reasons, airway management techniques, and complications of intubation and reintubation were summarized descriptively. RESULTS: 376 patients (19%) required reintubation, and 230 (11%) were reintubated within 48 hours, primarily due to respiratory failure. Patients requiring reintubation were older, more likely to be male, and had higher admission severity score. Difficult intubation and complications were similar for initial and subsequent intubation. Reintubation was associated with a 5-fold increase in the relative odds of death (adjusted odds ratio 5.86, 95% CI 3.87-8.89, P < .01), and a 2-fold increase in median ICU and hospital stay, and institutional costs. Difficult airway at reintubation was associated with higher mortality (adjusted odds ratio 2.23, 95% CI 1.01-4.93, P = .05). CONCLUSIONS: Nearly 20% of critically ill patients required out of operating room reintubation. Reintubation was associated with higher mortality, stay, and cost. Moreover, a difficult airway at reintubation was associated with higher mortality.


Subject(s)
Critical Illness/mortality , Critical Illness/therapy , Intubation, Intratracheal/adverse effects , Intubation, Intratracheal/mortality , Respiratory Insufficiency/mortality , Adult , Aged , Airway Obstruction/mortality , Airway Obstruction/therapy , Critical Care/statistics & numerical data , Female , Hospital Costs/statistics & numerical data , Hospital Mortality , Humans , Intubation, Intratracheal/economics , Length of Stay , Logistic Models , Male , Middle Aged , Multivariate Analysis , Odds Ratio , Respiratory Insufficiency/therapy
16.
Neurocrit Care ; 17(2): 191-8, 2012 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21688008

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: We sought to determine the association between early fluid balance and neurological/vital outcome of patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage. METHODS: Hospital admission, imaging, ICU and outcome data were retrospectively collected from the medical records of adult patients with aneurysmal SAH admitted to a level-1 trauma and stroke referral center during a 5-year period. Two groups were identified based on cumulative fluid balance by ICU day 3: (i) patients with a positive fluid balance (n = 221) and (ii) patients with even or negative fluid balance (n = 135). Multivariable logistic regression was used to adjust for age, Hunt-Hess and Fisher scores, mechanical ventilation and troponin elevation (>0.40 ng/ml) at ICU admission. The primary outcome was a composite of hospital mortality or new stroke. RESULTS: Patients with positive fluid balance had worse admission GCS and Hunt-Hess score, and by ICU day 3 had cumulatively received more IV fluids, but had less urine output when compared with the negative fluid balance group. There was no difference in the odds of hospital death or new stroke (adjusted OR: 1.47, 95%CI: 0.85, 2.54) between patients with positive and negative fluid balance. However, positive fluid balance was associated with increased odds of TCD vasospasm (adjusted OR 2.25, 95%CI: 1.37, 3.71) and prolonged hospital length of stay. CONCLUSIONS: Although handling of IV fluid administration was not an independent predictor of mortality or new stroke, patients with early positive fluid balance had worse clinical presentation and had greater resource use during the hospital course.


Subject(s)
Subarachnoid Hemorrhage/diagnosis , Water-Electrolyte Balance , Adult , Aged , Blood Volume , Female , Fluid Therapy/methods , Hemodilution/methods , Hospital Mortality , Humans , Hypertension/chemically induced , Logistic Models , Male , Middle Aged , Prognosis , Retrospective Studies , Stroke/complications , Subarachnoid Hemorrhage/complications , Subarachnoid Hemorrhage/physiopathology , Subarachnoid Hemorrhage/therapy , Vasospasm, Intracranial/complications
17.
Neurocrit Care ; 14(3): 354-60, 2011 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21409494

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Conivaptan is an arginine-vasopressin-receptor antagonist approved for the treatment of hyponatremia. We hypothesized that administration of conivaptan to normonatremic patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI) is safe and could reduce intracranial pressure (ICP). METHODS: Open-label, randomized, controlled trial enrolling 10 subjects within 24 h of severe TBI to receive a single 20 mg dose of conivaptan (n = 5) or usual care (n = 5). The primary endpoint was the evaluation of the safety profile defined by serum sodium increases averaging >1 mEq/h when measured every 4 h and any adverse events. Secondary endpoints were 48-h serum sodium, sodium load, change in ICP, and urine output. RESULTS: Ten patients were included in the intention-to-treat analysis. Three patients (2 conivaptan, 1 usual care group) experienced brief sodium increases averaging >1 mEq/h, with no patients achieving Na >160 mEq/l. There were no drug-related serious adverse events. At 48 h, the mean sodium was 142 ± 6 mEq/l (conivaptan) and 144 ± 10 mEq/l (usual care, P = 0.71). 48-h sodium load was 819 ± 724 mEq in the conivaptan and 1,137 ± 1,165 mEq in the usual care group (P = 0.62). At 4 h, serum sodium was higher (P = 0.02) and ICP was lower (P = 0.046) in the conivaptan compared with usual care group. 24-h but not 48-h urine output was different between the two groups (P < 0.01 and P = 0.20, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that a single dose conivaptan is safe in non-hyponatremic patients with severe TBI and may reduce ICP. Further studies are needed to establish the effect of conivaptan on clinically relevant endpoints, and its role in the management of intracranial hypertension.


Subject(s)
Antidiuretic Hormone Receptor Antagonists , Benzazepines/administration & dosage , Brain Injuries/drug therapy , Intracranial Pressure/drug effects , Sodium/blood , Adult , Aged , Benzazepines/adverse effects , Brain Injuries/blood , Diuresis/drug effects , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Treatment Outcome
18.
J Crit Care ; 26(2): 144-51, 2011 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20869200

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Low tidal volume (LTV) ventilation reduces mortality in patients with acute lung injury (ALI) or acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). This study investigates adherence of intraoperative LTV and whether patient outcomes were different with or without continued intraoperative LTV ventilation in patients with previously established ALI or ARDS. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective analysis was performed of adults with ALI/ARDS over a 2-year period who underwent surgery between 24 hours and 14 days after the diagnosis of ALI/ARDS. The main outcome was intraoperative LTV use. Secondary outcomes included perioperative respiratory and clinical outcomes. RESULTS: Of the 249 patients who underwent surgery between 24 hours and 14 days after ALI/ARDS diagnosis, 101 (41%) received preoperative LTV ventilation. Fifty-four (53%) received intraoperative LTV ventilation, whereas 47 (47%) did not. Use of preoperative LTV ventilation was associated with use of intraoperative LTV ventilation (P < .01). No differences in respiratory or clinical outcomes between patients with or without intraoperative LTV ventilation were observed. CONCLUSIONS: Adherence to intraoperative LTV in surgical patients was low. Adherence of LTV intraoperatively was not associated with improved oxygenation, reductions in hospital length of stay, or in-hospital mortality. The importance of adhering to an intraoperative LTV strategy remains unclear.


Subject(s)
Acute Lung Injury/prevention & control , Critical Illness , Guideline Adherence , Positive-Pressure Respiration/methods , Practice Guidelines as Topic , APACHE , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Hospital Mortality , Humans , Injury Severity Score , Intraoperative Period , Length of Stay , Male , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Tidal Volume , Young Adult
19.
Neurocrit Care ; 14(1): 24-36, 2011 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20838932

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Medical management of cerebral vasospasm following aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) includes hypertensive, hypervolemic, and hemodilution ("triple-H") therapy. However, there is little information regarding the indications and guidance used to initiate and adjust triple-H therapy. METHODS: A 43-item questionnaire was e-mailed to 375 members of the Neurocritical Care Society. Questions were designed to investigate the diagnostic approach to cerebral vasospasm and prophylactic and therapeutic administration of triple-H therapy. RESULTS: Completed surveys were received from 167 respondents (45% response proportion). Eighty-six percent of respondents worked in hospitals with neurointensive care units (NICUs). SAH patients in hospitals with a NICU had longer ICU stay (P = 0.037) and had indwelling central venous catheters for longer (P < 0.01). Centers without dedicated NICUs were more likely to induce prophylactic hypervolemia (P < 0.01). Twenty seven percent of respondents (n = 45) reported using prophylactic hypervolemia in patients with SAH, while 100% reported inducing hypervolemia for severe or symptomatic vasospasm. Twelve percent (n = 20) of respondents reported inducing prophylactic hypertension, while all reported inducing hypertension with severe or symptomatic vasospasm. Half of respondents relied on the mean arterial pressure and half on systolic blood pressure as the clinical parameter for blood pressure titration. The most widely used agents to induce hypertension were phenylephrine (48%) and norepinephrine (39%). There was little variation in the use of hemodilution therapy comparing patients with or without evidence of vasospasm. CONCLUSIONS: There are substantial differences in the administration of prophylactic triple-H, but there was high agreement on indication for therapeutic use. There was wide variability in the extent of ICU monitoring, diagnostic approach, physiologic parameters and values used as target of therapy. NICU availability was associated with more intensive monitoring. Lack of evidence and guidelines for triple-H therapy might largely explain these findings.


Subject(s)
Critical Care/methods , Health Care Surveys , Hemodilution/methods , Neurology/methods , Subarachnoid Hemorrhage/therapy , Vasospasm, Intracranial/prevention & control , Blood Pressure , Blood Volume , Fluid Therapy/methods , Humans , Intracranial Hypertension , Professional Practice , Subarachnoid Hemorrhage/diagnosis , Surveys and Questionnaires , Vasospasm, Intracranial/diagnosis
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...