Patient-reported treatment toxicity and adverse events in Black and White women receiving chemotherapy for early breast cancer.

PURPOSE: It is not known whether chemotherapy-related symptom experiences differ between Black and White women with early breast cancer (Stage I-III) receiving current chemotherapy regimens and, in turn, influences dose delay, dose reduction, early treatment discontinuation, or hospitalization. METHODS: Patients self-reported their race and provided symptom reports for 17 major side effects throughout chemotherapy. Toxicity and adverse events were analyzed separately for anthracycline and non-anthracycline regimens. Fisher's exact tests and two-sample t-tests compared baseline patient characteristics. Modified Poisson regression estimated relative risks of moderate, severe, or very severe (MSVS) symptom severity, and chemotherapy-related adverse events.Please check and confirm that the authors and their respective affiliations have been correctly identified and amend if necessary.no changes RESULTS: In 294 patients accrued between 2014 and 2020, mean age was 58 (SD13) and 23% were Black. For anthracycline-based regimens, the only significant difference in MSVS symptoms was in lymphedema (41% Black vs 20% White, p = .04) after controlling for axillary surgery. For non-anthracycline regimens, the only significant difference was MSVS peripheral neuropathy (41% Blacks vs. 23% White) after controlling for taxane type (p = .05) and diabetes (p = .05). For all other symptoms, severity scores were similar. Dose reduction differed significantly for non-anthracycline regimens (49% Black vs. 25% White, p = .01), but not for anthracycline regimens or in dose delay, early treatment discontinuation, or hospitalization for either regimen. CONCLUSION: Except for lymphedema and peripheral neuropathy, Black and White patients reported similar symptom severity during adjuvant chemotherapy. Dose reductions in Black patients were more common for non-anthracycline regimens. In this sample, there were minimal differences in patient-reported symptoms and other adverse outcomes in Black versus White patients.

Correction to: Measuring and understanding adherence in a home-based exercise intervention during chemotherapy for early breast cancer.

In the original publication, the sixth author name was published incorrectly as A. Wood. The correct author name should read as W. A. Wood.

Measuring and understanding adherence in a home-based exercise intervention during chemotherapy for early breast cancer.

PURPOSE: Ensuring and measuring adherence to prescribed exercise regimens are fundamental challenges in intervention studies to promote exercise in adults with cancer. This study reports exercise adherence in women who were asked to walk 150 min/week throughout chemotherapy treatment for early breast cancer. Participants were asked to wear a FitbitTM throughout their waking hours, and Fitbit steps were uploaded directly into study computers. METHODS: Descriptive statistics are reported, and both unadjusted and multivariable linear regression models were used to assess associations between participant characteristics, breast cancer diagnosis, treatment, chemotherapy toxicities, and patient-reported symptoms with average Fitbit steps/week. RESULTS: Of 127 women consented to the study, 100 had analyzable Fitbit data (79%); mean age was 48 and 31% were non-white. Mean walking steps were 3956 per day. Nineteen percent were fully adherent with the target of 6686 steps/day and an additional 24% were moderately adherent. In unadjusted analysis, baseline variables associated with fewer Fitbit steps were: non-white race (p = 0.012), high school education or less (p = 0.0005), higher body mass index (p = 0.0024), and never/almost never drinking alcohol (p = 0.0048). Physical activity variables associated with greater Fitbit steps were: pre-chemotherapy history of vigorous physical activity (p = 0.0091) and higher self-reported walking minutes/week (p < 0.001), and higher outcome expectations from exercise (p = 0.014). Higher baseline anxiety (p = 0.03) and higher number of chemotherapy-related symptoms rates "severe/very severe" (p = 0.012) were associated with fewer steps. In multivariable analysis, white race was associated with 12,146 greater Fitbit steps per week (p = 0.004), as was self-reported walking minutes prior to start of chemotherapy (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Inexpensive commercial-grade activity trackers, with data uploaded directly into research computers, enable objective monitoring of home-based exercise interventions in adults diagnosed with cancer. Analysis of the association of walking steps with participant characteristics at baseline and toxicities during chemotherapy can identify reasons for low/non-adherence with prescribed exercise regimens.

CYP2C8*3 increases risk of neuropathy in breast cancer patients treated with paclitaxel.

BACKGROUND: Paclitaxel-induced neuropathy is an adverse event that often leads to therapeutic disruption and patient discomfort. We attempted to replicate a previously reported association between increased neuropathy risk and CYP2C8*3 genotype. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Demographic, treatment, and toxicity data were collected for paclitaxel-treated breast cancer patients who were genotyped for the CYP2C8*3 K399R (rs10509681) variant. A log-rank test was used in the primary analysis of European-American patients. An additional independent replication was then attempted in a cohort of African-American patients, followed by modeling of the entire patient cohort with relevant covariates. RESULTS: In the primary analysis of 209 European patients, there was an increased risk of paclitaxel-induced neuropathy related to CYP2C8*3 status [HR (per allele) = 1.93 (95% CI: 1.05-3.55), overall log-rank P = 0.006]. The association was replicated in direction and magnitude of effect in 107 African-American patients (P = 0.043). In the Cox model using the entire mixed-race cohort (n = 411), each CYP2C8*3 allele approximately doubled the patient's risk of grade 2+ neuropathy (P = 0.004), and non-Europeans were at higher neuropathy risk than Europeans of similar genotype (P = 0.030). CONCLUSIONS: The increased risk of paclitaxel-induced neuropathy in patients who carry the CYP2C8*3 variant was replicated in two racially distinct patient cohorts.

Ovarian ablation as adjuvant therapy for breast cancer.

For more than 100 years ovarian ablation has been used as treatment for breast cancer. There are several methods of ovarian ablation including surgical oophorectomy, radiation-induced ablation, and chronic use of luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone (LHRH) analogs. In addition, there is some suggestion that cytotoxic chemotherapy may act in part by inducing ovarian ablation in premenopausal breast cancer patients. Of the numerous case series and clinical trials of ovarian ablation performed in the past century, many have been fraught with methodologic problems. The Early Breast Cancer Trialists' Collaborative Group (EBCTCG) meta-analysis of 12 properly randomized trials shows a significant improvement in disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival for women who underwent ovarian ablation as adjuvant therapy compared with those who did not. However, a number of questions remain. The relative efficacy of chemotherapy and ovarian ablation and the value of combining ovarian ablation with chemotherapy or other endocrine therapy have not yet been determined. This articles reviews and compares the methods of ovarian ablation, and discusses the EBCTCG overview data, as well as the newer and ongoing trials, which may answer the remaining questions about the optimal use of this therapy in the adjuvant treatment of breast cancer.

A phase I and pharmacologic evaluation of the DNA intercalator CI-958 in patients with advanced solid tumors.

5-[(2-Aminoethyl)amino]-2-[2-(diethylamino)ethyl]-2H-[1]benzothiopyra no[4,3,2-cd]-indazol-8-ol trihydrochloride (CI-958) is the most active member of a new class of DNA intercalating compounds, the benzothiopyranoindazoles. Because of its broad spectrum and high degree of activity as well as a favorable toxicity profile in preclinical models, CI-958 was chosen for further development. The Phase I study described here was undertaken to determine the toxicity profile, maximum tolerated dose, and pharmacokinetics of CI-958 given as an i.v. infusion every 21 days. Adult patients with advanced refractory solid tumors who had adequate renal, hepatic, and hematological function, life expectancy, and performance status were eligible for this study. Written informed consent was obtained from all patients. Patients received a 1- or 2-h infusion of CI-958 at 21-day intervals. The starting dose was 5.2 mg/m2, and at least three patients were evaluated at each dose level before proceeding to a new dose level. A pharmacokinetically guided dose escalation design was used until reaching a predetermined target area under the plasma concentration versus time curve (AUC), after which a modified Fibonacci scheme was used. Forty-four patients (21 men and 23 women; median age, 59 years) received 162 courses of CI-958. Neutropenia and hepatorenal toxicity were the dose-limiting toxicities, which defined the maximum tolerated dose of CI-958 to be 875 mg/m2 when given as a 2-h infusion every 21 days. There were no tumor responses. Two patients had stable disease for >250 days. The recommended Phase II dose is 560 mg/m2 for patients with significant prior chemotherapy and 700 mg/m2 for patients with minimal prior chemotherapy. Pharmacokinetic analysis of plasma and urine concentration-time data from each patient was performed. At the recommended Phase II dose of 700 mg/m2, mean CI-958 clearance was 370 ml/min/m2, mean AUC was 33800 ng-h/ml, and mean terminal half-life (t1/2) was 15.5 days. The clearance was similar at all doses, and plasma CI-958 AUC increased proportionally with dose, consistent with linear pharmacokinetics. The percentage reduction in absolute neutrophil count from baseline was well predicted by AUC using a simple Emax model. The pharmacokinetically guided dose escalation saved five to six dose levels in reaching the maximum tolerated dose compared with a standard dose escalation scheme. This may represent the most successful application to date of this dose escalation technique.

A prospective pharmacologic evaluation of age-related toxicity of adjuvant chemotherapy in women with breast cancer.

Despite increasing evidence of benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy, older women with breast cancer are commonly given less aggressive treatment than younger patients. Conflicting prior data regarding age-related toxicity prompted this prospective study. Forty-four women (aged 35-79 years) with early-stage breast cancer were treated with four cycles of adjuvant therapy with doxorubicin 60 mg/m2 i.v. and cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m2 i.v. every 21 days. They were monitored for myelosuppression, cardiotoxicity, and decrease in quality of life. Pharmacokinetics were analyzed using cycle 1 plasma samples. Bone marrow granulocyte and macrophage colony-forming units (CFU-GM) were assayed in vitro for dose response to 4-hydroperoxycyclophosphamide and doxorubicin before cycle 1. There was moderate evidence of age-related decrease in nadir absolute neutrophil count (ANC) when age was viewed as a continuous variable. On average there was a 10/microliter drop in cycle 1 nadir ANC for every year increase in age (p = 0.02). However, when age was viewed as a categorical variable (age < 65 vs. > or = 65 years), a similar proportion of women in each group reached an ANC < 100 (18% vs. 19%). Neither neutropenic complications, alteration in cardiac function, nor change in quality of life scores were significantly age related (p > 0.12). Pharmacokinetic analyses did not demonstrate age-related differences in the clearance of either doxorubicin or cyclophosphamide (p > 0.8). Pharmacodynamic analysis of individual patient bone marrow progenitor cell sensitivity did not reveal any correlation with age (p > 0.48). In women undergoing adjuvant therapy for breast cancer, no clinically significant age-related trends in toxicity were observed. These data suggest that older age alone should not exclude patients from receiving adjuvant therapy with doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide.

Recent advances in systemic therapy for breast cancer.

During the past year there have been a number of important advances in the area of systemic therapy for breast cancer. Combined chemoendocrine therapy has been shown to be more effective than tamoxifen alone in the adjuvant therapy of node-negative estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer. Preliminary results of a randomized trial suggest that the addition of paclitaxel to adjuvant AC (Adriamycin and Cytoxan) improves survival in patients with operable node-positive disease. In the treatment of metastatic disease, preliminary results of a randomized trial have shown docetaxel to be superior to doxorubicin in response rate. In hormonal therapy, third generation aromatase inhibitors have replaced megestrol acetate as second-line hormonal therapy in receptor-positive disease. There are promising recent data about anti-HER-2 antibody therapy and other new approaches. This article reviews these and other recent advances in the systemic therapy of breast cancer.

Does information from axillary dissection change treatment in clinically node-negative patients with breast cancer? An algorithm for assessment of impact of axillary dissection.

OBJECTIVE: The authors assessed the impact of axillary dissection on adjuvant systemic therapy recommendations in patients with breast cancer. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: With increasing use of systemic therapy in node-negative women and the desire to reduce treatment morbidity and cost, the need for axillary dissection in clinically node-negative patients with breast cancer has been challenged. METHODS: Two hundred eighty-two women with clinically negative axillae were analyzed using a model treatment algorithm. Systemic therapy was assigned with and without data from axillary dissection. Treatment shifts based on axillary dissection data were scored. RESULTS: Twenty-seven percent of clinically node-negative women had pathologically positive nodes. Eight percent of T1a and 10% of T1b tumors had positive nodes and would have been undertreated without axillary dissection. Seven percent of premenopausal women with tumors < 1 cm and 13% with tumors > or = 1 cm had treatment changed by axillary dissection. For women 50 to 60 years of age, 10% with tumors < 1 cm, 17% with tumors 1 to 2 cm with positive prognostic features, and 4% with poor prognostic features had significant treatment shifts after axillary dissection. For clinically node-negative women older than 60 years of age not eligible for chemotherapy, only 3% of those with tumors < 1 cm and none of those with tumors > or = 1 cm had their treatment changed by findings at axillary dissection. Treatment shifts based on axillary dissection were larger if the treatment algorithm allowed for more varied or more aggressive treatment options. CONCLUSIONS: Data obtained from axillary dissection will alter adjuvant systemic therapy regimen in a significant number of clinically node-negative women younger than 60 years of age and for older women eligible to receive chemotherapy.

The product of the H19 gene may function as an RNA.

The mouse H19 gene was identified as an abundant hepatic fetal-specific mRNA under the transcriptional control of a trans-acting locus termed raf. The protein this gene encoded was not apparent from an analysis of its nucleotide sequence, since the mRNA contained multiple translation termination signals in all three reading frames. As a means of assessing which of the 35 small open reading frames might be important to the function of the gene, the human H19 gene was cloned and sequenced. Comparison of the two homologs revealed no conserved open reading frame. Cellular fractionation showed that H19 RNA is cytoplasmic but not associated with the translational machinery. Instead, it is located in a particle with a sedimentation coefficient of approximately 28S. Despite the fact that it is transcribed by RNA polymerase II and is spliced and polyadenylated, we suggest that the H19 RNA is not a classical mRNA. Instead, the product of this unusual gene may be an RNA molecule.