Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Ophthalmol Retina ; 8(3): 288-297, 2024 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37717827

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To describe the retinal phenotype associated with the p.Pro101Thr BEST1 variant. DESIGN: Retrospective, observational case series. PARTICIPANTS: Patients diagnosed with bestrophinopathies in which molecular genetic testing identified the p.Pro101Thr BEST1 as well as healthy carriers among their first-degree relatives. METHODS: Medical records were reviewed to obtain data on family history and ophthalmic examinations, including retinal imaging. The imaging protocol included OCT and fundus autofluorescence using Spectralis HRA + OCT (Heidelberg Engineering). Genetic analysis was performed by next-generation sequencing. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Results of ophthalmic examinations and multimodal imaging features of retinal phenotypes. RESULTS: The c.301C>A, p.Pro101Thr BEST1 missense variant was identified as the causative variant in 8 individuals (all men) from 5 families, accounting for 13% of cases (8/61) and 10% of pathogenic alleles (9/93) in our cohort of patients affected by bestrophinopathies. Seven individuals (14 eyes) had the variant in heterozygous status: all eyes had a hyperopic refractive error (median spherical equivalent of + 3.75 diopters [D]) and 4 individuals had a macular dystrophy with mildly reduced visual acuity (median of 20/25 Snellen), whereas the other 3 were asymptomatic carriers. On multimodal retinal imaging, 5 (36%) out of 14 eyes had subclinical bestrophinopathy, 4 (29%) had typical findings of adult-onset foveomacular vitelliform dystrophy (AOFVD), and the remaining 5 (36%) displayed a pattern dystrophy-like phenotype. Follow-up data were available for 6 subjects, demonstrating clinical stability up to 11 years, in both subclinical and clinical forms. An additional patient with autosomal recessive bestrophinopathy was found to harbor the p.Pro101Thr variant in homozygosity. CONCLUSIONS: The p.Pro101Thr BEST1 variant is likely a frequent cause of bestrophinopathy in the Italian population and can result in autosomal dominant macular dystrophies with incomplete penetrance and mild clinical manifestations as well as autosomal recessive bestrophinopathy. The spectrum of autosomal dominant maculopathy includes the typical AOFVD and a pattern dystrophy-like phenotype. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S): Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.


Subject(s)
Eye Diseases, Hereditary , Retinal Diseases , Retinal Dystrophies , Vitelliform Macular Dystrophy , Adult , Male , Humans , Retrospective Studies , Mutation , Pedigree , DNA Mutational Analysis , Vitelliform Macular Dystrophy/diagnosis , Vitelliform Macular Dystrophy/genetics , Vitelliform Macular Dystrophy/pathology , Phenotype , Bestrophins/genetics
2.
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci ; 64(15): 13, 2023 Dec 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38088826

ABSTRACT

Purpose: To determine if circulating antiretinal antibodies (ARAs) differ between patients affected by retinitis pigmentosa (RP) and control participants and to assess whether ARAs are associated with clinical outcomes in patients with RP. Methods: Cross-sectional study involving a group of patients clinically diagnosed with RP and a control group of healthy participants. Serum autoantibodies against enolase, heat shock protein 70 (HSP70), and carbonic anhydrase II (CAII) were tested in all participants using Jess capillary Western blot. We compared ARA prevalence between the RP and control groups and investigated the association of serum ARA positivity with macular edema and vitreomacular disorders in patients affected by RP. Results: Thirty-six patients affected by RP and a control group of 39 healthy individuals were included. Overall, at least one ARA positivity was detected in 89% and 80% of participants in the RP and control groups, respectively. We observed a similar prevalence of anti-CAII and anti-enolase ARA between patients and controls (P = 0.87 and P = 0.35, respectively). Sera from patients with RP tested positive for anti-HSP70 ARAs more frequently than those from controls (53% vs. 36%), albeit without reaching statistical significance (P = 0.29). Among the 72 eyes with RP, 25% presented with macular edema (most often bilateral) and 33% with epiretinal membrane and/or lamellar macular hole. None of the three ARAs was associated with an increased risk of any macular complications in eyes affected by RP (all P > 0.05). Conclusions: The prevalence of circulating ARAs against enolase, HSP70, and CAII is similar between patients affected by RP and healthy individuals. Our results provide evidence against the association of ARAs with macular edema and vitreomacular interface disorders in RP.


Subject(s)
Macular Edema , Retinitis Pigmentosa , Humans , Macular Edema/diagnosis , Macular Edema/etiology , Cross-Sectional Studies , Retinitis Pigmentosa/diagnosis , Retinitis Pigmentosa/complications , Retina , Phosphopyruvate Hydratase , Tomography, Optical Coherence/methods
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...