Legislation Limiting Postoperative Opioid Prescribing Does Not Impact Patients' Perception of Pain Management After Total Joint Arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: In an effort to combat the opioid epidemic, state legislation was passed to limit postoperative narcotic prescribing. The purpose of this study was to assess if the legislation had an impact on patients' perception of pain management after total hip arthroplasty (THA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA). We hypothesized that patients would not perceive their pain management experience to be impacted. METHODS: A prospective survey study was performed on all consenting patients undergoing primary THA or TKA at a large academic center from July 2019 to February 2020. Patients taking opioids preoperatively were excluded. Surveys given preoperatively and at 2 weeks postoperatively assessed patients' concerns surrounding postoperative pain control and their perception of the impact of a newly implemented legislation. Descriptive analysis and Spearman's rho correlation coefficients were performed. RESULTS: Ninety-three patients met inclusion criteria and consented. Seventy-nine (29 THA and 50 TKA) completed both surveys. Preoperatively, 9.2% of patients were concerned that the legislation would impact their pain management, despite 43.0% having pain concerns. Postoperatively, 87.0% of patients felt that the legislation had no or mild effect on pain control. Although 36.7% of patients reported moderate to severe postoperative pain, 15.2% of patients reported being dissatisfied with pain control. There was no statistical correlation between preoperative pain concern and feelings that the legislation impacted pain. CONCLUSIONS: After primary THA and TKA, our data suggest that patients' perception of their pain management was not impacted by the legislation. Prescribers should be reassured that the decreased allowable opioids does not hinder the patients' perception of their pain management experience.

Reducing sedentary time using an innovative mHealth intervention among patients with total knee replacement: Rationale and study protocol.

INTRODUCTION: Although knee replacement is effective for improving pain and physical function, subsequent improvements in physical activity typically do not follow. As a result, many patients spend most of their day engaged in sedentary behavior, which may put them at higher risk of experiencing poor function and disability. Intervening on sedentary time, rather than physical activity, may be a more feasible first-step approach for modifying activity-related behaviors in adults who received knee replacement. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study is to examine the use of a mobile health (mHealth) intervention to reduce sedentary time among adults who received a knee replacement at 3 and 6 months after surgery. METHODS: Patients (n = 92) scheduled for knee replacement will be recruited and at 4 weeks after surgery, they will be randomized to either NEAT!2 or Control. NEAT!2 participants will use the NEAT!2 smartphone app, which provides a vibration and/or audible tone to interrupt prolonged bouts of sitting detected from the smartphone's internal accelerometer, until 3 months after surgery. NEAT!2 participants will receive biweekly coaching calls between 4 and 12 weeks after surgery. Control participants will receive an education control app and receive non-intervention calls to assess general surgery recovery. Both groups will receive 3 retention calls between 3 and 6 months. Data collection will occur pre-operatively and at 3 and 6 months after surgery. DISCUSSION: The results of this study will help to determine whether an innovative remotely-delivered, mHealth sedentary reduction intervention can decrease sedentary time in adults after knee replacement.

Musculoskeletal Health Literacy is Associated With Outcome and Satisfaction of Total Knee Arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to investigate if there is an association between musculoskeletal health literacy with outcome and satisfaction after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). METHODS: A cross-sectional study was performed at our tertiary center to include patients between one and six years postoperatively after primary TKA. Patients were provided a survey including basic demographics, validated musculoskeletal health literacy scale (Literacy in Musculoskeletal Problems), Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), and TKA satisfaction (whether they would choose to undergo the same operation again). Patients were categorized as either low or normal health literacy based on number of questions (cutoff 6 out of 9) answered correctly on the Literacy in Musculoskeletal Problems. Statistical analysis included multivariate regression with significance at P < .05. RESULTS: Four hundred fifty-three individuals fully completed the survey of eligible participants. Two hundred ninety-six individuals (65.3%) had normal health literacy, and one hundred fifty-seven individuals (34.7%) had low health literacy. Average WOMAC (/96) was 18.0 ± 19.7 in the low and 12.1 ± 15.4 in the normal health literacy groups. Patients with low health literacy had significantly higher WOMAC (worse function) than those with normal health literacy (P = .001). Patients with normal musculoskeletal health literacy were significantly more likely to undergo the same operation again (P = .01, odds ratio 2.163). CONCLUSION: This study shows that patients with low musculoskeletal health literacy have worse outcome scores and are less likely to be satisfied with their TKA. By identifying these patients preoperatively, emphasis can be placed on enhancing procedure expectations and understanding to improve outcome measures and overall satisfaction.

Reducing Opioid Prescriptions Lowers Consumption Without Detriment to Patient-Reported Pain Interference Scores After Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasties.

BACKGROUND: Opioid addiction is endemic in the United States. We developed a standardized opioid-prescribing schedule (SOPS) after total hip arthroplasty (THA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and evaluated opioid usage alongside Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) pain interference scores. We hypothesized that opioid usage would be less than prescribed and reducing prescription would decrease consumption without negatively impacting the PROMIS scores. METHODS: A prospective observational study was performed on all patients undergoing primary THA and TKA from April 7, 2018, to August 10, 2019. Opioid consumption and pain interference were determined 2 weeks after discharge via telephone and email surveys. SOPSs were implemented during the study. Outcomes were compared in patients before and after the SOPS. RESULTS: A total of 715 patients met inclusion criteria; 201 patients completed surveys. Before the SOPS, the mean opioid prescription was 81.2 ± 15.3 tablets for THA and 82.9 ± 10.6 for TKA. The mean usage was 35.1 ± 29.4 tablets and 35.4 ± 33.4, respectively. After the SOPS, the mean usage decreased to 19.4 ± 16.8 (P = .04) and 31.6 ± 20.9 (P = .52), respectively. After implementation of a second SOPS for THA, the mean number of tablets consumed was 21.5 ± 18.6 (P = .05 compared with pre-SOPS). The PROMIS 6B responses in patients who underwent THA demonstrated no significant changes. PROMIS 6B responses for TKA showed an increase in interference with recreational activities (P = .04) and tasks away from home (P = .04), but otherwise had no significant impact on reported scores. CONCLUSIONS: Implementation of the SOPS reduced postoperative opioid prescription and consumption without significantly impacting the reported pain interference, supporting the need to decrease opioid prescription after THA and TKA.

Analysis of Risks and Consequences of Postcatheter Urinary Retention After Primary Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: Postoperative urinary retention (POUR) in total joint arthroplasty (TJA) is common. However, risk factors for POUR and its consequences, specifically on postoperative renal function, have not been well defined. METHODS: We performed a review of prospectively collected data on consecutive adult patients undergoing primary total joint arthroplasty from August 2014 to December 2015. Catheters were placed preoperatively and removed on the first or second postoperative day. The exclusion criterion was traumatic catheter insertion or the presence of fracture or neoplasm. Univariate and multiple logistic regression identified associations with POUR and its invasive therapies. Subgroup analysis of renal function by incidence of preoperative bladder outlet obstruction (BOO) and POUR was performed with nonparametric testing. RESULTS: A total of 591 operations met inclusion criteria. The incidence of POUR was 6.4% and was directly related to a positive history of BOO (odds ratio [OR]: 4.15) and increased the duration of urinary catheterization (OR: 1.04). These factors, in addition to preoperative incontinence (OR: 8.36, 28.69) and lengthier hospitalizations (OR: 1.37, 1.30), were significantly associated with intermittent straight catheterization and reinsertion of an indwelling catheter to treat POUR. Serum creatinine increased with combined preoperative BOO and POUR (+0.22 mg/dL) but was preserved in others (+0.02-0.04 mg/dL) (P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative BOO and longer catheterization increased the risk of POUR and were associated with the use of invasive modalities to treat POUR. POUR was associated with a longer hospitalization and impaired renal function in those with preoperative BOO; therefore, renal function should be monitored closely and nephrotoxic medications used cautiously when using urinary catheters in this patient population. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Retrospective Analysis, Level IV.

Unmet Patient Expectations for Interventions Decrease Provider Satisfaction Scores.

As health care reimbursement evolves, physicians will continue to be evaluated based on the quality of care that they provide. One measure of quality is based on patient satisfaction as reported through the Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems Survey (CAHPS). Although previous studies have explored expectations and their role in patient satisfaction, no studies have investigated the role of patient expectations for interventions in surgical specialty clinics. Patients (N=126) were given 2 surveys, a pre-visit and a post-visit questionnaire, with options based on the CAHPS survey. Patients were asked to select common orthopedic services that they expected to receive from their appointments, rate their physicians on Likert scales, and report the services that were actually provided. Patients who left with unmet expectations for interventions (45%) rated their physicians lower than patients who had all of their expectations met (9.0±1.4 vs 9.5± 0.8; P<.05). For most individual interventions, there was no difference in satisfaction between patients with met and unmet expectations. However, patients who expected surgery and did not have their expectations met rated their physician lower than patients whose expectations for surgery were met (9.0±1.3 vs 9.7±0.6; P<.05). No statistically significant difference was found in physician rating with increased numbers of unmet expectations, individual surgeon rating, perceptions of their providers, and wait time. This study reports that patient expectations for interventions, and particularly a recommendation for surgery, may alter a patient's reported satisfaction, particularly when surgical expectations are unmet. [Orthopedics. 2020;43(5):e378-e382.].

Fate of the Morbidly Obese Patient Who Is Denied Total Joint Arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study is to investigate outcomes of patients denied total hip (THA) or knee arthroplasty (TKA) due to morbid obesity. METHODS: We performed an observational study of patients denied arthroplasty due to morbid obesity. A survey including the Harris Hip Score or pain and function components of the original Knee Society Score (KSS) was conducted with minimum 2-year follow-up. Statistical analysis was performed with parametric testing with significance at P < .05. RESULTS: In total, 125 (4.4%) of 2819 patients were denied THA or TKA due to morbid obesity. Twenty-four (19.2%) met target weight and underwent arthroplasty at our institution. Of the remaining 101 (80.8%) patients, 33 (32.7%) agreed to participate in the survey. None received THA and 6 received TKA elsewhere above target body mass index. Harris Hip Score was significantly higher in the successful weight loss cohort at our institution (70.5 ± 13.4 vs 34.6 ± 13.1). KSS Pain (maximum score of 50) and Function (maximum score of 100) were significantly higher in the successful weight loss cohort at our institution (32.9 ± 16.5; 51.1 ± 19.5) compared to the denied nonoperative cohort (7.2 ± 11.5; 33.0 ± 23.1); however, only KSS Pain was higher when compared to the TKA elsewhere cohort (14.2 ± 18.0; 29.2 ± 38.7). KSS Pain and Function were similar for both denial cohorts regardless of undergoing arthroplasty. CONCLUSION: Nearly 80% of patients denied never met target weight for arthroplasty. Those who met target weight prior to arthroplasty often reported better outcomes. Outcomes were similar when target weight was not met regardless of undergoing arthroplasty.

Effects of Virtual Exercise Rehabilitation In-Home Therapy Compared with Traditional Care After Total Knee Arthroplasty: VERITAS, a Randomized Controlled Trial.

BACKGROUND: Financial burden for patients, providers, and payers can reduce access to physical therapy (PT) after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The purpose of the present study was to examine the effect of a virtual PT program on health-care costs and clinical outcomes as compared with traditional care after TKA. METHODS: At least 10 days before unilateral TKA, patients from 4 clinical sites were enrolled and randomized 1:1 to the virtual PT program (involving an avatar [digitally simulated] coach, in-home 3-dimensional biometrics, and telerehabilitation with remote clinician oversight by a physical therapist) or to traditional PT care in the home or outpatient clinic. The primary outcome was total health-care costs for the 12-week post-hospital period. Secondary (noninferiority) outcomes included 6 and 12-week Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS); 6-week knee extension, knee flexion, and gait speed; and 12-week safety measures (patient-reported falls, pain, and hospital readmissions). All outcomes were analyzed on a modified intent-to-treat basis. RESULTS: Of 306 patients (mean age, 65 years; 62.5% women) who were randomized from November 2016 to November 2017, 290 had TKA and 287 (including 143 in the virtual PT group and 144 in the usual care group) completed the trial. Virtual PT had lower costs at 12 weeks after discharge than usual care (median, $1,050 compared with $2,805; p < 0.001). Mean costs were $2,745 lower for virtual PT patients. Virtual PT patients had fewer rehospitalizations than the usual care group (12 compared with 30; p = 0.007). Virtual PT was noninferior to usual PT in terms of the KOOS at 6 weeks (difference, 0.77; 90% confidence interval [CI], -1.68 to 3.23) and 12 weeks (difference, -2.33; 90% CI, -4.98 to 0.31). Virtual PT was also noninferior to usual care at 6 weeks in terms of knee extension, knee flexion, and gait speed and at 12 weeks in terms of pain and hospital readmissions. Falls were reported by 19.4% of virtual PT patients and 14.6% of usual care patients (difference, 4.83%; 90% CI, -2.60 to 12.25). CONCLUSIONS: Relative to traditional home or clinic PT, virtual PT with telerehabilitation for skilled clinical oversight significantly lowered 3-month health-care costs after TKA while providing similar effectiveness. These findings have important implications for patients, health systems, and payers. Virtual PT with clinical oversight should be considered for patients managed with TKA. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level I. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Local Infiltration Analgesia With Liposomal Bupivacaine Improves Early Outcomes After Total Knee Arthroplasty: 24-Hour Data From the PILLAR Study.

BACKGROUND: Enhanced postoperative care pathways have shifted total knee arthroplasty (TKA) to outpatient and short-stay settings, placing greater emphasis on predischarge outcomes. In this study, we report prespecified secondary and tertiary end points of the PILLAR study within 24 hours after TKA in patients receiving local infiltration analgesia (LIA) with or without liposomal bupivacaine (LB). METHODS: Patients with knee osteoarthritis were randomized 1:1 to receive LIA with LB 266 mg/20 mL admixed with bupivacaine HCl 0.5% 20 mL (n = 70) or bupivacaine HCl alone (n = 69). End points (0-24 hours postsurgery) were proportion of opioid-free patients, opioid consumption, areas under the curve of visual analog scale pain intensity scores, patient satisfaction, discharge readiness, and ambulation. Safety was also assessed. RESULTS: Patients receiving LIA with LB were 16% less likely to require opioid rescue within 24 hours postsurgery (17.1% vs 1.4%; relative risk, 0.085; 95% confidence interval, 0.011-0.633). LIA with LB was associated with a 91% reduction in opioid consumption (P = .0009) and 19% reduction in pain intensity (P = .0142). Significantly more patients receiving LB were discharge ready (42.9% vs 27.5%; P = .0449) and satisfied with pain treatment (84.6% vs 69.2%; P = .0306). A numerically lower but not significantly different proportion achieved steady gait/no dizziness with LIA with LB (42.9% vs 52.2%). Adverse event incidence was similar between groups. CONCLUSION: LIA with LB 266 mg plus bupivacaine HCl significantly reduced opioid requirements and pain intensity and significantly improved discharge readiness and satisfaction 0-24 hours after TKA compared with bupivacaine HCl alone. These findings support the use of LIA with LB for TKA when early discharge is the goal.

Age matters when comparing hemiarthroplasty and total hip arthroplasty for femoral neck fractures in Medicare patients.

INTRODUCTION: The optimal treatment of patients with a displaced intracapsular femoral neck fracture remains controversial. We utilised a national database of Medicare patients to determine if there was any difference in complications and reoperation rate of patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty (THA) or hemiarthroplasty (HA) for femoral neck fractures. METHODS: This study utilised the PearlDiver Patient Records Database, a national for-fee database of Medicare patient procedure and diagnosis records from 2005 to 2012. Outcome procedures and diagnoses including revision, dislocation, infection, and cardiovascular events that occurred during the study time period were also identified over the entire study period as well as 90 days and 2 years. RESULTS: We identified 275,439 patients with femoral neck fractures who underwent HA and 26,017 patients who underwent THA, respectively. Patients undergoing HA had significantly lower rates (p < 0.0001) of revision 2.48% versus 3.85% (OR = 0.633; 95% CI, 0.592-0.678), dislocation 1.76% versus 3.39% (0.512; 0.476-0.551), infection 3.44% versus 4.87% (0.694; 0.657-0.737). There was no statistical significant difference in 2-year cardiac morbidity (p = 0.252). However, when controlling for age, patients 65-69 years showed no significant difference in infection or revision over the study period or at 2 years. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, patients who underwent THA for femoral neck fractures had a higher rate of dislocations, infections and increased rates of repeat surgery than those who underwent HA but this difference was not significant in patients 65-69 years. Hemiarthroplasty may result in fewer complications in older Medicare patients although this difference may not be present in younger Medicare patients.

Systemic cobaltism manifesting as oral mucosal discoloration and metallic gustation after metal-on-metal hip resurfacing.

Systemic cobaltism is a debilitating complication of metal-on-metal (MoM) arthroplasty. In this report, we review a case of a 54-year-old female with metallosis from a MoM hip resurfacing and varying degrees of black discoloration of her tongue and metallic gustation as a result of systemic cobaltism. After explanting the metal components, thorough debridement, and conversion to ceramic-on-polyethylene arthroplasty, the patient's oral mucosal discoloration and metallic gustation resolved. This represents the first documentation of systemic cobaltism from MoM hip resurfacing manifesting as oral mucosal discoloration and metallic gustation with resolution after explant, debridement, and conversion to ceramic-on-polyethylene total hip arthroplasty.

Timed Up and Go test is predictive of Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System physical function in patients awaiting total knee arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: The Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Computerized Adaptive Test (CAT) physical function rapidly assesses self-reported function capability. The Timed Up and Go (TUG) test is often used in clinical practice, but administration may be impeded by space and patient limitations. PROMIS CAT can potentially address these limitations, but we lack evidence if TUG and health indicators are predictors of PROMIS CAT. This study assessed whether TUG, body mass index (BMI), numeric pain rating scale (NPRS), and smoking status were predictors of PROMIS CAT in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) candidates. METHODS: Sixty-five TKA candidates completed the PROMIS CAT physical function test using an iPad application. TUG, NPRS, BMI, and smoking status were obtained at the clinic visit or from medical records. Univariate and multiple regression analyses identified the strongest predictors of PROMIS CAT. RESULTS: TUG was the best predictor of PROMIS CAT physical function based on simple regression (r = -0.43, 95% CI = -0.62 to -0.20) or multiple regression ( ß Ë†  = -0.45, 95% CI = -0.73 to -0.17) analyses. BMI and NPRS did not incrementally help predict the PROMIS score beyond TUG. Smoking status did not contribute to the prediction of the PROMIS CAT score. CONCLUSIONS: The findings suggest that the PROMIS CAT physical function is not a surrogate for the TUG performance-based measure in candidates for TKA. However, TUG was the best predictor of PROMIS physical function compared with BMI, NPRS, and smoking status. Clinicians should consider both patient-reported and performance-based measures when evaluating function for TKA outcomes.

Local Infiltration Analgesia With Liposomal Bupivacaine Improves Pain Scores and Reduces Opioid Use After Total Knee Arthroplasty: Results of a Randomized Controlled Trial.

BACKGROUND: Local infiltration analgesia (LIA) with liposomal bupivacaine (LB) in patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty (TKA) has yielded mixed results. The PILLAR study, which was designed to minimize limitations associated with previous studies, compared the effects of LIA with or without LB on pain scores, opioid consumption, including proportion of opioid-free patients, time to first opioid rescue, and safety after primary unilateral TKA. METHODS: Patients (N = 140) were randomized to LIA with LB 266 mg/20 mL (admixed with bupivacaine HCl 0.5%, 20 mL) or LIA with bupivacaine HCl 0.5%, 20 mL. Standardized infiltration techniques and a standardized multimodal pain management protocol were used. The coprimary efficacy endpoints were area under the curve (AUC) of visual analog scale pain intensity scores 12-48 hours (AUC12-48) postsurgery and total opioid consumption 0-48 hours postsurgery. RESULTS: Mean AUC12-48 of visual analog scale pain intensity score was 180.8 with LB and 209.3 without LB (least squares [LS] mean treatment difference -26.88, P = .0381). LS mean total opioid consumption 0-48 hours postsurgery was 18.7 mg with and 84.9 mg without LB (LS ratio 0.220, P = .0048). Significant differences in favor of LB were observed for the percentage of opioid-free patients (P < .01) and time to first opioid rescue (P = .0230). Treatments were similarly well tolerated. CONCLUSION: This study provides data on LIA with LB administered using optimal techniques specific to TKA. In this setting, LIA with LB significantly improved postsurgical pain, opioid consumption, and time to first opioid rescue, with more opioid-free patients and no unexpected safety concerns.

The Effect of a Door Alarm on Operating Room Traffic During Total Joint Arthroplasty.

Operating room traffic has been implicated in several studies to contribute to the risk of surgical site infections and periprosthetic joint infections. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of a door alarm on operating room traffic during total joint arthroplasty. This prospective cohort study evaluated 100 consecutive primary total hip and knee arthroplasty surgeries performed by a single surgeon. An inconspicuous electronic door counter was placed on the substerile operating room door. Door openings and time left ajar were recorded. After 50 cases, an audible alarm was placed on the substerile operating room door that sounded continuously when the door was ajar. Door-opening data were then recorded for an additional 50 cases. There was a significant difference in the overall mean door openings per minute (P<.001) between the period with no alarm (0.53±0.1) and with an alarm (0.42±0.1). This effect slowly decreased over the time of the intervention, with door openings per minute increasing by a factor of 1.01. The percentage of time the door was left ajar per case also decreased significantly (P<.001) with the alarm (6.63%±1.6%) compared with no alarm (8.65%±1.5%). This study indicates that the use of a door alarm can decrease door openings and potentially the risk for surgical site infection. However, the effect is subject to tolerance and may not result in the elimination of unnecessary operating room traffic long term. [Orthopedics. 2017; 40(6):e1081-e1085.].

ESR and CRP are useful between stages of 2-stage revision for periprosthetic joint infection.

BACKGROUND: Serum erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) and C-reactive protein (CRP) are important tests in the initial diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection. Many surgeons also use these tests to determine if infection has resolved between stages of a 2-stage procedure, but little data exist regarding this practice. METHODS: A retrospective review of our institutional total joint databases was conducted to determine sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values of elevated ESR and/or CRP to diagnose persistent infection between stages. RESULTS: Among 16 knees and 5 hips, sensitivity was 50% for CRP, 75% for ESR, and 100% when combined. The negative predictive value of persistent infection was 100% when neither test was elevated. CONCLUSIONS: Results of this study support the use of CRP and ESR as indicators of the resolution of periprosthetic joint infection between stages of 2-stage revision.

Acetabular Reconstruction With the Medial Protrusio Technique for Complex Primary and Revision Total Hip Arthroplasties.

BACKGROUND: In the setting of acetabular deficiency during total hip arthroplasty (THA), the medial protrusio technique (MPT) allows for increased component coverage while avoiding excessive component abduction or elevation of the hip center. The technique involves controlled reaming through the medial acetabular wall while maintaining the continuity of the anterior and posterior columns. The purpose of this study is to analyze the results of the largest reported series to date of primary and revision THAs using the MPT. METHODS: A retrospective review of THAs performed by a single surgeon from July 2004 to July 2010 identified 102 patients who underwent THA necessitating the use of the MPT (primary 86 and revision 16), with at least 2 years follow-up. RESULTS: This study reports the largest series to date of primary and revision THAs using the MPT for acetabular deficiency. Postoperatively, mean Harris hip score was 86 (range 31-96). There was no correlation with degree of medialization and change in Harris hip score (P = .12). At mean follow-up of 41.1 months (range 24-92 months), there were no intrapelvic structure injuries and no acetabular components required revision. The MPT provided a safe and effective method for addressing acetabular deficiency and avoiding component malposition. CONCLUSION: The MPT provided a safe and effective method for addressing acetabular deficiency in this large series of patients. The technique was successful at improving component coverage while maintaining an anatomic hip center and avoiding excessive component abduction. Fixation remained durable with no cases of loosening at final follow-up.

Ultrasound-guided percutaneous peripheral nerve stimulation for analgesia following total knee arthroplasty: a prospective feasibility study.

BACKGROUND: Peripheral nerve stimulation has been used for decades to treat chronic pain but has not been used for postoperative analgesia due to multiple limitations, beginning with invasive electrode placement. With the development of small-diameter/gauge leads enabling percutaneous insertion, ultrasound guidance for accurate introduction, and stimulators small enough to be adhered to the skin, neurostimulation may now be provided in a similar manner to continuous peripheral nerve blocks. Here, we report on the use of ultrasound-guided percutaneous peripheral nerve stimulation to treat postoperative pain. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Subjects within 60 days of a total knee arthroplasty with pain insufficiently treated with oral analgesics had a 0.2-mm-diameter electrical lead (pre-loaded into a 20 gauge needle) introduced percutaneously using ultrasound guidance with the tip located approximately 0.5-1.0 cm from the femoral nerve (a second lead was inserted approximately 1.0-3.0 cm from the sciatic nerve for posterior knee pain). An external stimulator delivered current. Endpoints were assessed before and after lead insertion and the leads subsequently removed. Due to the small sample size for this pilot/feasibility study, no statistics were applied to the data. RESULTS: Leads were inserted in subjects (n = 5) 8-58 days postoperatively. Percutaneous peripheral nerve stimulation decreased pain an average of 93% at rest (from a mean of 5.0 to 0.2 on a 0-10 numeric rating scale), with 4 of 5 subjects experiencing complete resolution of pain. During passive and active knee motion pain decreased an average of 27 and 30%, respectively. Neither maximum passive nor active knee range-of-motion was consistently affected. CONCLUSIONS: Ultrasound-guided percutaneous peripheral nerve stimulation may be a practical modality for the treatment of postoperative pain following orthopedic surgical procedures, and further investigation appears warranted.

Patient Satisfaction Is Associated With Time With Provider But Not Clinic Wait Time Among Orthopedic Patients.

Clinic wait time is considered an important predictor of patient satisfaction. The goal of this study was to determine whether patient satisfaction among orthopedic patients is associated with clinic wait time and time with the provider. The authors prospectively enrolled 182 patients at their outpatient orthopedic clinic. Clinic wait time was defined as the time between patient check-in and being seen by the surgeon. Time spent with the provider was defined as the total time the patient spent in the examination room with the surgeon. The Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems survey was used to measure patient satisfaction. Factors associated with increased patient satisfaction included patient age and increased time with the surgeon (P=.024 and P=.037, respectively), but not clinic wait time (P=.625). Perceived wait time was subject to a high level of error, and most patients did not accurately report whether they had been waiting longer than 15 minutes to see a provider until they had waited at least 60 minutes (P=.007). If the results of the current study are generalizable, time with the surgeon is associated with patient satisfaction in orthopedic clinics, but wait time is not. Further, the study findings showed that patients in this setting did not have an accurate perception of actual wait time, with many patients underestimating the time they waited to see a provider. Thus, a potential strategy for improving patient satisfaction is to spend more time with each patient, even at the expense of increased wait time. [Orthopedics. 2017; 40(1):43-48.].