Bariatric Surgical Outcomes in the Elderly: A Comparison Study Between Primary and Revisional Procedures in the United Arab Emirates.

PURPOSE: Data reported on comparing primary and revisional procedures in the elderly is still limited. The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety between primary and revisional bariatric surgery in a cohort of older patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All patients ≥ 60 years old were divided into two cohorts, primary surgery cohort (PSC) and revisional surgery cohort (RSC). Baseline and perioperative outcomes were analyzed. RESULTS: Fifty-eight patients were included (34 PSC and 24 RSC) in the study. Forty-two (25 PSC and 17 RSC) 72.4% were female. The mean age was 64 (± 3.3 years) in the PSC and 65 (± 4.2 years) in the RSC, the median initial BMI was 46.7 and 47.4 kg/m2 (p < 0.848), respectively. The mean hospital stay was (3 PSC vs. 5 RSC, p < 0.022) days. Readmissions occurred in (1 PSC vs. 3 RSC, p = 0.158) patients within 30 days of discharge. Postoperative major complications included (1 PSC vs. 5 RSC, p < 0.0278) patients. Reoperations were reported in (0 PSC vs. 3 RSC, p < 0.034) patients. Patients who underwent surgery for weight management, the initial mean BMI was (46.7 PSC vs. 47.4 RSC kg/m2, p = 0.848). At 12-months post-procedure, the mean BMI was (34.3 PSC vs. 37.7 RSC kg/m2, p = 0.372) and (23.7 PSC vs. 19.1 RSC, p = 0.231) %TBWL. The mean overall follow-up was (12.4 PSC vs. 27.5 RSC, p < 0.004) months, and one unrelated death (cancer) was reported in the RSC. CONCLUSION: PSC and RSC are effective in the elderly, however postoperative complications occurred more often in the RSC group.

Cardiovascular disease risk scores in patients with optimal vs suboptimal weight loss after bariatric surgery: Translating improvements into clinical practice.

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to evaluate cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk modification in patients with optimal weight loss (OWL) versus suboptimal weight loss SWL following MBS. METHODS: This was a retrospective analysis. The 10-year risk CVD was estimated before and after one year of surgery using the "Framingham Score". RESULTS: 191 patients were included in our study. Mean baseline Framingham score was 7.2 â€‹± â€‹6.9%. According to the score, 54% of patients were classified as low risk (n â€‹= â€‹104), 23% as moderate (n â€‹= â€‹43), 20% moderately high (n â€‹= â€‹39) and 3% as high risk (n â€‹= â€‹5). One year after surgery, 91% of the patients showed reduction of their Framingham score. Mean CVD risk score decreased significantly to 4.1 â€‹± â€‹3.7% when compared to baseline (p-value is â€‹< â€‹0.001); 80% of patients classified as low risk (n â€‹= â€‹153), 13% as moderate (n â€‹= â€‹25), 7% moderately high (n â€‹= â€‹13) and 0% as high risk (n â€‹= â€‹0). CONCLUSION: Weight loss after bariatric surgery reduces CVD risk scores and the magnitude of effect correlates with the degree of weight loss.

Personalized Health Care Technology in Managing Postoperative Gastrointestinal Surgery Complications: Proof of Concept Study.

Background: Advances in three-dimensional (3D) printing technology have allowed the development of customized medical devices. Endoscopic internal drainage (EID) is a novel method to facilitate drainage of an abscess cavity into the lumen of the gastrointestinal tract by placing a double pigtail biliary stent through the fistula opening, originally designed for biliary drainage. They are available in manufacture-determined sizes and shapes. The aim of this study is to explore the feasibility of 3D printing personalized internal drainage stents for the treatment of leaks following gastrointestinal surgery over a sequential period. Methods: We retrospectively identified patients who underwent gastrointestinal anastomotic surgery complicated by postoperative leaks and underwent serial EID for treatment. Computerized Tomography scans were reviewed over a period of time, abscess cavity dimensions and characterizations were evaluated, and 3D reconstructions were obtained. The stents were designed, their shape and size were customized to the unique dimensions of the abscess and lumen of the patient. Stereolithography (SLA) 3D printing technique was used to produce the stents. Results: A total of 8 stents were produced, representing 3 patients. These stents corresponded to 2 or 3 stents per patients. Each patient underwent several endoscopic treatments, before resolution of leak. Conclusions: Customized stents may improve drainage of intra-abdominal abscesses after gastrointestinal surgery, if based on unique anatomy. This proof-of-concept study is a real-world application of personalized health care, which introduces the novel description of customizable 3D printed stents to manage complications following gastrointestinal surgery and may advance therapy for this complex clinical condition. Research Ethics Committees (REC) number is A-2021-012.

Robotic Revisional Single Anastomosis Duodenoileal Bypass After Sleeve Gastrectomy.

Introduction: Single anastomosis duodenoileal bypass with sleeve gastrectomy (SADI-S) is a metabolic operation emerging as an option for patients with morbid obesity. It is a promising revisional procedure for weight regain or suboptimal weight loss after sleeve gastrectomy (SG). Currently, there is limited literature describing robotic revisional SADI-S. This study describes the safety, feasibility, and early outcomes of robotic revisional SADI-S after previous SG. Methods: This is a retrospective review from May 26 2019 to January 31 2021. Perioperative outcomes were analyzed. Results: A total of 16 patients underwent the procedure. There were 11 females (69%) with a mean age of 39 ± 11 years. Mean body mass index (BMI) was 44.0 ± 5.1 kg/m2 and median ASA was two. Comorbidities included hypertension (25%), hyperlipidemia (19%), and obstructive sleep apnea (13%). Mean interval from primary to revisional surgery among patients was 5.5 ± 1.4 years. Median operative console time was 110 minutes (IQR = 103-137). There were no intraoperative complications. The median hospital stay was 2 days (IQR = 2-3). Perioperative outcomes included no reoperations, perioperative complications, or deaths. There were two (12.5%) emergency department visits for wound checks without infection but no readmissions. At a median follow-up of 4.5 months (IQR = 1-10), patients had a mean BMI of 38.3 ± 7.3 kg/m2 and a mean percent total body weight loss (%TBW) of 12.7%. Conclusions: Initial outcomes suggest that robotic revisional SADI-S after previous SG is feasible and safe. Future studies are needed to evaluate intermediate- and long-term postoperative outcomes.

The Effect of Fasting during Ramadan on Outcomes after Bariatric Surgery at an Academic Medical Center in the Middle East.

INTRODUCTION: Ramadan is characterized by a month of fasting between dawn and sunset. Cleveland Clinic Abu Dhabi is located in the United Arab Emirates, where the majority of our patients observe Ramadan. In many practices, bariatric surgery has been delayed until after Ramadan in order to avoid postoperative complications. However, there are no studies that evaluate this theory. OBJECTIVES: Our study aimed to evaluate perioperative outcomes between bariatric surgeries performed before/during Ramadan and at times distant to Ramadan. METHODS: All patients who underwent primary bariatric surgery at Cleveland Clinic Abu Dhabi between September 2015 and July 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. The Pre-Ramadan (PR) cohort included patients that underwent surgery during the month of Ramadan and up to 3 months before Ramadan. The Non-Ramadan (NR) cohort included patients from the remainder 8 months. RESULTS: Our study included 542 patients: 185 patients in the PR cohort and 357 patients in the NR cohort. Baseline characteristics were similar. There were no statistically significant differences in perioperative outcomes, including emergency department (ED) visits (23.2% PR vs. 24.4% NR, p = .77), readmission rates (2.2% PR vs. 4.5% NR, p = .17), reoperation (1.1% PR vs. 3.6% NR, p = .09), and complications within 30 days (3.8% PR vs. 7.0% NR, p = .13). CONCLUSIONS: There is no difference among patients who undergo surgery before/during Ramadan and at times distant to Ramadan. Based on this data, there does not appear to be an increased risk of performing bariatric surgery prior to or during Ramadan in a comprehensive, multi-disciplinary program.

Quality of Information About Bariatric Surgery on the Internet: A Two-Continent Comparison of Website Content.

BACKGROUND: Many patients considering bariatric surgery will obtain medical information through the Internet. The type and quality of information patients access may vary significantly by geographic region. METHODS: Searches were performed using commercial search engines in both the United States of America (USA) and United Arab Emirates (UAE) using search terms "bariatric surgery" and "weight loss surgery." Quality was assessed using the scoring systems previously published by DISCERN (United Kingdom (UK)), the Journal of the American Medical Association Benchmark (JAMA; USA), and Expanded Ensuring Quality Information for Patients (EQIP) (UK). RESULTS: Website types were more evenly distributed in UAE, though physician websites were also the most common (n = 25, 25%). Within the USA, most websites analyzed were from physicians (n = 32, 32%), followed by academic sources (n = 26, 26%). Academic websites were the highest average quality in the USA (p < .00001). The overall mean DISCERN scores for all websites in the UAE group and US group had no statistically significance differences (p = .950). The overall mean JAMA Benchmark for all websites in the UAE group and USA had no statistically significance differences (p = 0.202). There were no major differences between the USA and UAE in Expanded EQIP scores. CONCLUSIONS: The overall quality of information regarding bariatric surgery is poor to fair in both the USA and UAE. Additionally, there are differences in the types of sites retrieved by the most commonly used search engines in each region. The lack of high-quality, evidence-based, information regarding bariatric surgery online is a potential target to improve public education.

Sleeve gastrectomy in the elderly: A case-control study with long-term follow-up of 3 years.

BACKGROUND: Advanced age is considered to be a relative contraindication to bariatric surgery because of increased perioperative risk and suboptimal excess weight loss. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to analyze the safety and effectiveness of the sleeve gastrectomy (SG) procedure in a cohort of elderly patients (aged≥60 yr) compared with younger patients (aged<60 yr). SETTING: Hospital clinic, Barcelona, Spain. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of all cases of SG in patients≥60 years old between January 2006 and December 2012 was performed. RESULTS: The study included 206 patients, 103 in each group. The mean age was 63.3±2.8 years, and the body mass index was 45.8±22.8 kg/m2. The overall complication rate within the elderly group was 9.7% versus 15.5% in the younger group (P = .2). After SG, there was no statistical difference in body mass index between the groups until 24 (33.4 versus 31.5 kg/m2, P = .01) and 36 (34.6 versus 32.8 kg/m2, P = .01) months of follow-up, favoring the younger cohort. Mean percent excess weight loss was similar between the groups during all periods of follow-up. The mean percent total weight loss change was statistically higher in the younger group at 3 (15.1% versus 17.1%, P = .03); 6 (25.2% versus 27.5%, P = .04); 12 (32.4% versus 35.2%, P = .03); 24 (26.7% versus 32.4%, P<.01); and 36 months (24.9% versus 29.1%, P<.01). Neither groups revealed a statistical difference in resolution of all co-morbidities, except for obstructive sleep apnea (P = .02) in the younger group. CONCLUSIONS: SG is a safe and feasible procedure in the elderly with results comparable to those in the standard bariatric population.

Minimal invasive surgery: NOSE and NOTES in ulcerative colitis.

BACKGROUND: In patients with ulcerative colitis (UC), laparoscopic pelvic dissection for IPAA is not always straightforward: often, a hand-assistance incision is used to complete the proctectomy, lengthening operative times. Hybrid NOSE and NOTES are emerging as an alternative approach to conventional laparoscopy. We believe that UC patients could benefit from this new hybrid approach in three ways: by easing the proctectomy as performed down to up, avoiding additional incisions and decreasing surgical times. We present the short-term outcomes of our series. METHODS: All patients with UC who required IPAA were enrolled in a single-arm prospective study (July 2011 to March 2014). A three-step procedure was performed. The first step: laparoscopic colectomy (with transanal removal of the colon) and temporary ileostomy. The second step: "down-to-up" proctectomy (with transanal removal of the rectum) and IPAA with a covering ileostomy. We combined simultaneously transanal and laparoscopic approach. The third step: ileostomy closure. Functional outcomes were assessed 3 months after third step. RESULTS: Eighteen patients were enrolled. Two patients are waiting to complete the second stage, and 16 underwent all surgical steps. Twelve have been evaluated with functional scores. For the first step, the mean operative time was 162.2 min (SD 40.5) and 170 min (SD 50.1) for the second one. The median hospital stay was 6 days (IQR 5-14.75) for the first step and 5.5 (IQR 5-9.75) for the second one. No major complications occurred. Twenty-four-hour defecation frequency was 5.5 per day (SD 1.7), 0.5 per night. Seventy-five percentage of patients may retain stools for more than 30 min; the mean value of Oresland score was 4.7 and Wexner score 1.4. CONCLUSIONS: This is a safe and feasible technique to treat UC patients with good short-term outcomes. Long-term outcomes and controlled trials are needed.