ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Nurse engagement is a modifiable element of the work environment and has shown promise as a potential safety intervention. PURPOSE: Our study examined the relationship between the level of engagement, staffing, and assessments of patient safety among nurses working in hospital settings. METHODS: A secondary analysis of linked cross-sectional data was conducted using survey data of 26 960 nurses across 599 hospitals in 4 states. Logistic regression models were used to examine the association between nurse engagement, staffing, and nurse assessments of patient safety. RESULTS: Thirty-two percent of nurses gave their hospital a poor or failing patient safety grade. In 25% of hospitals, nurses fell in the least or only somewhat engaged categories. A 1-unit increase in engagement lowered the odds of an unfavorable safety grade by 29% (P < .001). Hospitals where nurses reported higher levels of engagement were 19% (P < .001) less likely to report that mistakes were held against them. Nurses in poorly staffed hospitals were 6% more likely to report that important information about patients "fell through the cracks" when transferring patients across units (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Interventions to improve nurse engagement and adequate staffing serve as strategies to improve patient safety.
Subject(s)
Nursing Staff, Hospital/supply & distribution , Patient Safety , Personnel Staffing and Scheduling , Quality of Health Care/statistics & numerical data , Cross-Sectional Studies , Hospitals , Humans , Nursing Staff, Hospital/psychology , Surveys and Questionnaires , Workplace/psychologyABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: The objectives of this study were to examine differences in nurse engagement in shared governance across hospitals and to determine the relationship between nurse engagement and patient and nurse outcomes. BACKGROUND: There is little empirical evidence examining the relationship between shared governance and patient outcomes. METHODS: A secondary analysis of linked cross-sectional data was conducted using nurse, hospital, and Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (HCAHPS) survey data. RESULTS: Engagement varied widely across hospitals. In hospitals with greater levels of engagement, nurses were significantly less likely to report unfavorable job outcomes and poor ratings of quality and safety. Higher levels of nurse engagement were associated with higher HCAHPS scores. CONCLUSIONS: A professional practice environment that incorporates shared governance may serve as a valuable intervention for organizations to promote optimal patient and nurse outcomes.
Subject(s)
Cooperative Behavior , Interprofessional Relations , Nursing Staff, Hospital/psychology , Nursing, Team/organization & administration , Patient Satisfaction , Burnout, Professional/prevention & control , Female , Humans , Male , Patients/statistics & numerical data , Surveys and Questionnaires , United StatesABSTRACT
Two components of the Magnet Recognition Program® are exemplary professional practice and the generation of new knowledge through research and clinical innovation. Within Magnet® institutions, exemplary professional practice is evidenced by collaboration. Hospitals and schools of nursing can develop collaborative relationships to promote a culture of inquiry in clinical care and generate research to advance nursing practice and nursing science. The authors describe a collaborative model between clinical nurses and an academic nursing research center that promotes involvement of clinical nurses in research.
Subject(s)
Clinical Nursing Research/organization & administration , Evidence-Based Nursing/organization & administration , Nursing Staff, Hospital/organization & administration , Clinical Nursing Research/standards , Evidence-Based Nursing/standards , Hospitals , Humans , Interinstitutional Relations , Models, Nursing , Models, Organizational , Nursing Staff, Hospital/standards , Pennsylvania , Schools, NursingABSTRACT
The objective of this study was to investigate the associations between the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) work environment, quality of care, safety, and patient outcomes. A secondary analysis was conducted of responses of 1247 NICU staff nurses in 171 hospitals to a large nurse survey. Better work environments were associated with lower odds of nurses reporting poor quality, safety, and outcomes. Improving the work environment may be a promising strategy to achieve safer settings for at-risk newborns.
Subject(s)
Intensive Care Units, Neonatal , Patient Safety , Quality of Health Care/standards , Workplace , Cross-Sectional Studies , Health Care Surveys , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Intensive Care Units, Neonatal/standards , Job Satisfaction , Neonatal Nursing/statistics & numerical data , United States , WorkforceABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: There is a paucity of research examining the impact of standardized uniform style and color for registered nurses (RNs). OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to appraise published peer-refereed studies on the effect of a standardized uniform style and color for RNs. METHODS: Seven peer-refereed studies exploring standardized uniforms for RNs were identified. Using the Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine evidence hierarchy, each study was assigned a level of evidence and overall rating. RESULTS: Data suggest that patients felt that RNs appeared professional and were easily identified by a standardized uniform style and color. No strong evidence supports a patient's preference for a specific style and color of uniform. CONCLUSIONS: Findings are inconsistent but demonstrate that a standardized uniform style and color increased the perception of professionalism and recognition of RNs among patients.
