Two-dimensional correlated spectroscopy distinguishes clear cell renal cell carcinoma from other kidney neoplasms and non-cancer kidney.

Background: Routinely used clinical scanners, such as computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and ultrasound (US), are unable to distinguish between aggressive and indolent tumor subtypes in masses localized to the kidney, often leading to surgical overtreatment. The results of the current investigation demonstrate that chemical differences, detected in human kidney biopsies using two-dimensional COrrelated SpectroscopY (2D L-COSY) and evaluated using multivariate statistical analysis, can distinguish these subtypes. Methods: One hundred and twenty-six biopsy samples from patients with a confirmed enhancing kidney mass on abdominal imaging were analyzed as part of the training set. A further forty-three samples were used for model validation. In patients undergoing radical nephrectomy, biopsies of non-cancer kidney cortical tissue were also collected as a non-cancer control group. Spectroscopy data were analyzed using multivariate statistical analysis, including principal component analysis (PCA) and orthogonal projection to latent structures with discriminant analysis (OPLS-DA), to identify biomarkers in kidney cancer tissue that was also classified using the gold-standard of histopathology. Results: The data analysis methodology showed good separation between clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) versus non-clear cell RCC (non-ccRCC) and non-cancer cortical tissue from the kidneys of tumor-bearing patients. Variable Importance for the Projection (VIP) values, and OPLS-DA loadings plots were used to identify chemical species that correlated significantly with the histopathological classification. Model validation resulted in the correct classification of 37/43 biopsy samples, which included the correct classification of 15/17 ccRCC biopsies, achieving an overall predictive accuracy of 86%, Those chemical markers with a VIP value >1.2 were further analyzed using univariate statistical analysis. A subgroup analysis of 47 tumor tissues arising from T1 tumors revealed distinct separation between ccRCC and non-ccRCC tissues. Conclusions: This study provides metabolic insights that could have future diagnostic and/or clinical value. The results of this work demonstrate a clear separation between clear cell and non-ccRCC and non-cancer kidney tissue from tumor-bearing patients. The clinical translation of these results will now require the development of a one-dimensional (1D) magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) protocol, for the kidney, using an in vivo clinical MRI scanner.

A Simple Clinical Tool for Stratifying Risk of Clinically Significant CKD after Nephrectomy: Development and Multinational Validation.

BACKGROUND: Clinically significant CKD following surgery for kidney cancer is associated with increased morbidity and mortality, but identifying patients at increased CKD risk remains difficult. Simple methods to stratify risk of clinically significant CKD after nephrectomy are needed. METHODS: To develop a tool for stratifying patients' risk of CKD arising after surgery for kidney cancer, we tested models in a population-based cohort of 699 patients with kidney cancer in Queensland, Australia (2012-2013). We validated these models in a population-based cohort of 423 patients from Victoria, Australia, and in patient cohorts from single centers in Queensland, Scotland, and England. Eligible patients had two functioning kidneys and a preoperative eGFR ≥60 ml/min per 1.73 m2. The main outcome was incident eGFR <45 ml/min per 1.73 m2 at 12 months postnephrectomy. We used prespecified predictors-age ≥65 years old, diabetes mellitus, preoperative eGFR, and nephrectomy type (partial/radical)-to fit logistic regression models and grouped patients according to degree of risk of clinically significant CKD (negligible, low, moderate, or high risk). RESULTS: Absolute risks of stage 3b or higher CKD were <2%, 3% to 14%, 21% to 26%, and 46% to 69% across the four strata of negligible, low, moderate, and high risk, respectively. The negative predictive value of the negligible risk category was 98.9% for clinically significant CKD. The c statistic for this score ranged from 0.84 to 0.88 across derivation and validation cohorts. CONCLUSIONS: Our simple scoring system can reproducibly stratify postnephrectomy CKD risk on the basis of readily available parameters. This clinical tool's quantitative assessment of CKD risk may be weighed against other considerations when planning management of kidney tumors and help inform shared decision making between clinicians and patients.

Kidney cancer biobanking: considerations for a single institutional biorepository.

The Princess Alexandra Hospital Kidney Cancer Biobank, housed at the Translational Research Institute in Brisbane, is an Australian biorepository which contains fixed and fresh-frozen cancer and non-cancer kidney tissue, perinephric fat, urine and peripheral blood. The patient samples are linked to de-identified clinical information via a secure database. Participants undergoing nephrectomy for suspected renal malignancy are recruited prospectively. Recruitment began in 2013 and the biobank currently contains biofluids, tissue and clinical information for more than 330 participants. This biobank contains linked de-identified clinical data, which provide comprehensive information about biospecimens, and information about clinical outcomes.

Outcome Measures Used to Report Kidney Function in Studies Investigating Surgical Management of Kidney Tumours: A Systematic Review.

CONTEXT: Most practice decisions relevant to preserving kidney function in patients managed surgically for kidney tumours are driven by observational studies. A wide range of outcome measures are used in these studies, which reduces comparability and increases the risk of reporting bias. OBJECTIVE: To comprehensively and succinctly describe the outcomes used to evaluate kidney function in studies evaluating surgical management of kidney tumours. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: Electronic search of the PubMed database was conducted to identify studies with at least one measure of kidney function in patients managed surgically for kidney tumours, published between January 2000 and September 2017. Abstracts were initially screened for eligibility. Full texts of articles were then evaluated in more detail for inclusion. A narrative synthesis of the evidence was conducted. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: A total of 312 studies, involving 127905 participants, were included in this review. Most were retrospective (n=274) studies and conducted in a single centre (n=264). Overall, 78 unique outcome measures were identified, which were grouped into six outcome categories. Absolute postoperative kidney function (n=187), relative kidney function (n=181), and postoperative chronic kidney disease (n=131) were most frequently reported. Kidney function was predominantly quantified using estimated glomerular filtration rate or creatinine clearance (n=255), most using the modification of diet in renal disease equation (n=182). Only 70 studies provided rationale for specific outcome measures used. CONCLUSIONS: There is significant variability in the reporting and quantification of kidney function in studies evaluating patients managed surgically for kidney tumours. A standardised approach to measuring and reporting kidney function will increase the effectiveness of outcomes reported and improve relevance of research findings within a clinical context. PATIENT SUMMARY: Although we know that the removal of a kidney can reduce kidney function, clinical significance of various approaches is a matter of debate. This article demonstrates significant variability in the way kidney function was reported across all studies of patients with kidney cancer undergoing surgery, indicating a need for standardisation.

Chronic kidney cortical damage is associated with baseline kidney function and albuminuria in patients managed with radical nephrectomy for kidney tumours.

This study evaluated the relationship between histological markers of chronic kidney damage in patients undergoing radical nephrectomy for kidney tumours and preoperative kidney function, degree of albuminuria, and changes in glomerular volume. A schema to grade chronic kidney damage could be used to identify patients at risk of developing CKD following nephrectomy. Non-neoplastic cortical tissue was sourced from 150 patients undergoing radical nephrectomy for suspected kidney cancer. This tissue was evaluated for indicators of chronic damage, specifically: glomerulosclerosis, arteriosclerosis, interstitial fibrosis, and tubular atrophy. Glomerular volume was determined using the Weibel and Gomez method. Associations between these parameters and both estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and albumin-creatinine ratio (ACR) were determined using either a Mann-Whitney U-test or a Kruskal-Wallis ANOVA. Associations between both eGFR and ACR and glomerular volume were assessed using linear regression. eGFR was inversely associated with the degree of glomerulosclerosis (p < 0.001), vascular narrowing (p = 0.002), tubular atrophy (p < 0.001), and interstitial fibrosis (p < 0.001). ACR was associated only with the degree of interstitial fibrosis (p = 0.02) and tubular atrophy (p = 0.02). Glomerular volume was greater for males, diabetics, hypertensive patients, and patients with a greater degree of interstitial fibrosis. Glomerular volume was positively associated with ACR. A schema to grade chronic damage was developed. The proposed schema is associated with baseline clinical indices of kidney function and damage. Longitudinal validation is necessary to determine the prognostic utility of this schema.

End-Stage Kidney Disease following Surgical Management of Kidney Cancer.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: We investigated the incidence of ESKD after surgical management of kidney cancer in the Australian state of Queensland, and described patterns in the initiation of kidney replacement therapy resulting from kidney cancer across Australia. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS: All newly diagnosed cases of kidney cancer in the Australian state of Queensland between January of 2009 and December of 2014 were ascertained through the Queensland Cancer Registry. There were 2739 patients included in our analysis. Patients who developed ESKD were identified using international classification of disease-10-coded hospital administrative data. Incidence rate and 3-year cumulative incidence were calculated, and multivariable Cox proportional hazards models were used to identify factors associated with ESKD. Additional descriptive analysis was undertaken of Australian population data. RESULTS: The incidence rate of ESKD in all patients was 4.9 (95% confidence interval [95% CI], 3.9 to 6.2) per 1000 patient-years. The 3-year cumulative incidence was 1.7%, 1.9%, and 1.0% for all patients, and patients managed with radical or partial nephrectomy, respectively. Apart from preoperative kidney disease, exposures associated with increased ESKD risk were age≥65 years (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 2.0; 95% CI, 1.2 to 3.2), male sex (aHR, 2.3; 95% CI, 1.3 to 4.3), preoperative diabetes (aHR, 1.8; 95% CI, 1.0 to 3.3), American Society of Anesthesiologists classification ≥3 (aHR, 4.0; 95% CI, 2.2 to 7.4), socioeconomic disadvantage (aHR, 1.6; 95% CI, 0.9 to 2.7), and postoperative length of hospitalization ≥6 days (aHR, 2.1; 95% CI, 1.4 to 3.0). Australia-wide trends indicate that the rate of kidney replacement therapy after oncologic nephrectomy doubled between 1995 and 2015, from 0.3 to 0.6 per 100,000 per year. CONCLUSIONS: In Queensland between 2009 and 2014, one in 53 patients managed with radical nephrectomy and one in 100 patients managed with partial nephrectomy developed ESKD within 3 years of surgery. PODCAST: This article contains a podcast at https://www.asn-online.org/media/podcast/CJASN/2018_09_28_CJASNPodcast_18_1_.mp3.

Association between preoperative hydration status and acute kidney injury in patients managed surgically for kidney tumours.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to investigate whether preoperative dehydration and intraoperative hypotension were associated with postoperative acute kidney injury in patients managed surgically for kidney tumours. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of 184 patients who underwent nephrectomy at a single centre was performed, investigating associations between acute kidney injury after nephrectomy, and both intraoperative hypotension and preoperative hydration/volume status. Intraoperative hypotension was defined as mean arterial pressure < 60 mmHg for ≥ 5 min. Urine conductivity was evaluated as a surrogate measure of preoperative hydration (euhydrated < 15 mS/cm; mildly dehydrated 15-20 mS/cm; dehydrated > 20 mS/cm). Multivariable logistic regression was used to evaluate associations between exposures and the primary outcome, with adjustment made for potential confounders. RESULTS: Patients who were dehydrated and mildly dehydrated had an increased risk of acute kidney injury (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 4.1, 95% CI 1.3-13.5; and aOR 2.4, 95% CI 1.1-5.3, respectively) compared with euhydrated patients (p = 0.009). Surgical approach appeared to modify this effect, where dehydrated patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery were most likely to develop acute kidney injury, compared with patients managed using an open approach. Intraoperative hypotension was not associated with acute kidney injury. CONCLUSION: Preoperative dehydration may be associated with postoperative acute kidney injury. Avoiding dehydration in the preoperative period may be advisable, and adherence to international evidence-based guidelines on preoperative fasting is recommended.

The Correlates of Kidney Dysfunction ­ Tumour Nephrectomy Database (CKD-TUNED) Study: Protocol for a Prospective Observational Study

Background: Tumour nephrectomy conveys a significant risk of adverse renal functional outcomes postoperatively, however there are limited strategies for predicting patients at increased risk of these outcomes. The Correlates of Kidney Dysfunction ­ Tumour Nephrectomy Database (CKD-TUNED) study is a prospective observational study evaluating the risk of chronic kidney disease and end-stage kidney disease in tumour nephrectomy patients. Methods: The CKDTUNED study involves analysis of clinical data and collection of tissue, urine and blood samples for the purposes of forming a tissue repository resource for future investigation. Recruitment began in 2013 and is expected to continue until 2023, with a projected sample size between 700-1000 subjects. Results: All relevant ethics and site-specific approvals have been granted and all relevant infrastructure is in place. Study methods are undergoing validation and refinement. As of June 2017 there are 267 participants enrolled in the study. Conclusion: It is anticipated that this study will have the potential to identify risk factors for adverse renal functional outcomes following tumour nephrectomy, which can be used in the development of predictive models with clinical utility, and in turn improve patient outcomes.

Factors associated with acutely elevated serum creatinine following radical tumour nephrectomy: the Correlates of Kidney Dysfunction-Tumour Nephrectomy Database study.

BACKGROUND: To identify factors associated with acutely elevated serum creatinine (SCr) within 7 days of radical tumour nephrectomy. METHODS: The study population consisted of 130 consecutive patients managed for renal tumours. The primary outcome was acute kidney injury (AKI) (defined as SCr increase ≥50% above baseline), assessed using multivariable logistic regression analysis. The secondary outcome was SCr percentage increase, assessed using multivariable linear regression analysis. RESULTS: Following nephrectomy, the mean percentage increase in SCr in the first week was 55%±29%, and 77 (59%) patients experienced AKI. Independent predictors of AKI post-nephrectomy were male gender [adjusted odds ratio (OR): 2.67; 95% confidence interval (95% CI): 1.01, 6.93], urine albumin-creatinine ratio (OR: 0.66; 95% CI: 0.47, 0.91), preoperative estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) (OR: 1.03; 95% CI: 1.00, 1.05), laparoscopic nephrectomy (OR: 3.02; 95% CI: 1.00, 9.12), and non-clear cell renal cell carcinoma (RCC) (OR: 2.93; 95% CI: 1.04, 8.29). Independent predictors of a SCr increase were male gender (ß: 12.0; 95% CI: 2.69, 21.3), urine albumin-creatinine ratio (ß: -3.36; 95% CI: -6.55, -0.16), preoperative eGFR (ß: 0.38; 95% CI: 0.10, 0.66), laparoscopic nephrectomy (ß: 12.7; 95% CI: 1.05, 24.3) and obesity (ß: 9.94, 95% CI: 0.61, 19.3). CONCLUSIONS: Male gender, albuminuria, eGFR and laparoscopic nephrectomy independently associated with acutely elevated serum creatinine following radical tumour nephrectomy.

Multifocal Primary Neoplasms in Kidney Allografts: Evaluation of Two Cases.

Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is the fifth most common malignancy in kidney transplant recipients, with increased risk arising due to immunosuppression. De novo RCC occurrence in kidney allografts is much less common when compared with the native kidneys. Multifocal RCC in allograft kidneys is rarely described. In this report, we discuss two cases of de novo multifocal renal neoplasms in allograft kidneys. Case 1 had three distinct neoplastic lesions of >5 mm, and case 2 had four. Using the World Health Organization 2016 classification of adult renal tumours, case 1 had one clear-cell (cc) RCC (grade 3) and two papillary adenomas; all confined to the kidney. Case 2 had a nodular lesion classified as ccRCC (grade 4) with focal rhabdoid differentiation and some infiltration of renal sinus fat; a cc tubulopapillary RCC; a multilocular cystic renal neoplasm of low malignant potential; and a mucinous tubular and spindle cell carcinoma; the last three all confined to the kidney. This is the first report of mucinous tubular and spindle cell carcinoma in a kidney allograft. When considering multifocal RCC with discordant histology, it is likely that these represent independent tumourigenic events.

The graft-to-capacity ratio: volumetric planning in large-volume fat transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Variability in large-volume fat transplantation has been linked to technique. Meanwhile, the recipient-site volume and its relation to the volume of grafted fat have been relatively overlooked. Graft-to-capacity concepts are evidenced in other soft-tissue transplantation procedures such as skin and hair transplantation. The authors define the graft-to-capacity ratio as the volume of grafted fat in relation to the volume of the recipient site. The authors postulate its theoretical limits, and empirically analyze its potential clinical importance in large-volume fat transplantation. METHODS: Thirty cases of large-volume fat transplantation to the breast were reviewed. All patients underwent (1) preoperative quantitative volumetric analysis using three-dimensional breast imaging and (2) large-volume fat transplantation using the large-syringe technique. The volume of fat transplanted into each breast at the time of surgery was noted. Quantitative volumetric breast imaging was repeated 12 months postoperatively. RESULTS: The average graft-to-capacity ratio was 117 percent, with a standard deviation of 22 percent, consistent with deduced theoretical limits. Cases where the graft-to-capacity ratio exceeded 1 SD demonstrated lower percentage volume maintenance. Cases where the graft-to-capacity ratio was lower than 1 SD appeared to demonstrate higher percentage volume maintenance. Univariate linear regression of percentage volume maintenance as a function of the graft-to-capacity ratio demonstrated a significant inverse relationship. CONCLUSION: The graft-to-capacity ratio appears to be a relevant variable in percentage volume maintenance outcomes and may be useful in establishing consistency in large-volume fat transplantation. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, IV.