ABSTRACT
Electronic cigarettes are advertised as safer alternatives to traditional cigarettes yet cause serious injury. U.S. burn centers have witnessed a rise in both inpatient and outpatient visits to treat thermal injuries related to their use. A multicenter retrospective chart review of American Burn Association burn registry data from five large burn centers was performed from January 2015 to July 2019 to identify patients with electronic cigarette-related injuries. A total of 127 patients were identified. Most sustained less than 10% total body surface area burns (mean 3.8%). Sixty-six percent sustained second-degree burns. Most patients (78%) were injured while using their device. Eighteen percent of patients reported spontaneous device combustion. Two patients were injured while changing their device battery, and two were injured modifying their device. Three percent were injured by secondhand mechanism. Burn injury was the most common injury pattern (100%), followed by blast injury (3.93%). Flame burns were the most common (70%) type of thermal injury; however, most patients sustained a combination-type injury secondary to multiple burn mechanisms. The most injured body region was the extremities. Silver sulfadiazine was the most common agent used in the initial management of thermal injuries. Sixty-three percent of patients did not require surgery. Of the 36% requiring surgery, 43.4% required skin grafting. Multiple surgeries were uncommon. Our data recognize electronic cigarette use as a public health problem with the potential to cause thermal injury and secondary trauma. Most patients are treated on an inpatient basis although most patients treated on an outpatient basis have good outcomes.
Subject(s)
Blast Injuries/complications , Blast Injuries/diagnosis , Burns/diagnosis , Burns/etiology , Injury Severity Score , Adult , Alkalies/adverse effects , Burns, Chemical/etiology , Electronic Nicotine Delivery Systems , Facial Injuries/etiology , Female , Hand Injuries/etiology , Humans , Male , Retrospective Studies , Risk AssessmentABSTRACT
Incontinence-associated dermatitis (IAD) is considered a cause of moisture-associated skin damage after prolonged exposure to urinary and fecal incontinence. While partial-thickness burns are often managed with topical therapies, daily dressing changes, patient positioning, hydration, nutrition, and pain management, deep partial-thickness and full-thickness burn injuries require surgical excision and, ultimately, skin grafting. The elderly and very young as well as those with medical comorbidities can develop urinary and fecal incontinence. Urinary ammonia and gastrointestinal lipolytic enzymes and proteases can produce caustic damage to weakened elderly or immature skin. In this report, 2 cases of IAD are presented as chemical burns. After a prolonged interval of urinary and fecal incontinence, an incapacitated 65-year-old male with 14% total body surface area (TBSA) partial-thickness wounds, and an 85-year-old female with 4% TBSA full-thickness wounds were admitted to the burn center and underwent operative management.
Subject(s)
Dermatitis , Fecal Incontinence , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Dermatitis/etiology , Fecal Incontinence/complications , Female , Humans , Male , Skin , Skin Care , Skin TransplantationABSTRACT
This study assessed the performance of modeling approaches to estimate personal exposure in Kenyan homes where cooking fuel combustion contributes substantially to household air pollution (HAP). We measured emissions (PM2.5 , black carbon, CO); household air pollution (PM2.5 , CO); personal exposure (PM2.5 , CO); stove use; and behavioral, socioeconomic, and household environmental characteristics (eg, ventilation and kitchen volume). We then applied various modeling approaches: a single-zone model; indirect exposure models, which combine person-location and area-level measurements; and predictive statistical models, including standard linear regression and ensemble machine learning approaches based on a set of predictors such as fuel type, room volume, and others. The single-zone model was reasonably well-correlated with measured kitchen concentrations of PM2.5 (R2 = 0.45) and CO (R2 = 0.45), but lacked precision. The best performing regression model used a combination of survey-based data and physical measurements (R2 = 0.76) and a root mean-squared error of 85 µg/m3 , and the survey-only-based regression model was able to predict PM2.5 exposures with an R2 of 0.51. Of the machine learning algorithms evaluated, extreme gradient boosting performed best, with an R2 of 0.57 and RMSE of 98 µg/m3 .
Subject(s)
Air Pollution, Indoor/statistics & numerical data , Environmental Exposure/statistics & numerical data , Models, Statistical , Air Pollutants , Cooking , Environmental Monitoring , Family Characteristics , Household Articles , Humans , Kenya , Particulate Matter , Rural Population , Soot , VentilationABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Severe liver injuries pose a challenge to trauma surgeons. While the use of hepatic angioembolization (HAE) has been evaluated as a component of the nonoperative management of liver injury, little is known about the efficacy of postoperative HAE in patients who require hemorrhage control laparotomy (HCL) for liver injury. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the impact of HAE following HCL on patient survival. METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study using the American College of Surgeons Trauma Quality Improvement Program database from January 2013 to December 2014. In propensity score matched (2:1) patients who underwent HCL-only or HCL + HAE, the impact of adjunctive use of HAE on patient survival was examined with the Cox proportional hazards regression analysis adjusting for transfusion requirement within 4 hours. We also performed a subgroup analysis in patients without severe traumatic brain injury (Abbreviated Injury Scale head ≤3). RESULTS: A total of 1,675 patients met our inclusion criteria. Of those, 75 (4.5%) patients underwent HAE after HCL (median hours to HAE, 5 hours after admission). In 225 propensity score-matched patients, the use of HAE following HCL was significantly associated with improved 24-hour mortality, but not in-hospital mortality. In the subgroup of patients without severe traumatic brain injury (n = 189), we observed significant survival benefits (24-hour and in-hospital mortality) associated with the adjunctive use of HAE. CONCLUSION: The results of our study suggest that the adjunctive use of HAE might improve survival of patients who require HCL for liver injury. Further prospective study to determine the indication for postoperative HAE is still warranted. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic study, level III.
Subject(s)
Embolization, Therapeutic/methods , Hemorrhage/therapy , Hemostasis, Surgical/methods , Liver/injuries , Postoperative Care/methods , Adult , Aged , Erythrocyte Transfusion/statistics & numerical data , Female , Hemorrhage/etiology , Hemorrhage/mortality , Hospital Mortality , Humans , Injury Severity Score , Liver/blood supply , Male , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Survival Analysis , Treatment Outcome , Young AdultABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) dressings are beneficial tools for promoting granulation tissue and wound healing. An NPWT dressing with instillation and dwell time (NPWTi-d) is becoming more frequently used to provide daily, effective wound cleansing between surgical debridement procedures. Either saline or other wound solutions, such has hypochlorous acid wound solution, can be instilled in small volume aliquots to irrigate the wound periodically. OBJECTIVE: This case series describes the effective use of NPWTi-d in conjunction with hypochlorous acid (HOCl) solution in 10 patients with necrotizing soft tissue infections (NSTIs). MATERIALS AND METHODS: The hospital registry of patients between July 2018 and June 2020 was queried to identify patients older than were 18 years or older, whose wounds were managed intermittently with NPWTi-d using HOCl wound solution, regardless of wound etiology. Wound and patient demographics were reported. RESULTS: A total of 10 cases in which NPWTi-d was utilized in conjunction with HOCl were identified. Of the 10 patients, 6 were admitted for NSTIs, 2 were admitted for sacral decubitus ulcers, and 2 were admitted for burn injuries. The patients' wounds ranged from 30 cm2 to 1000 cm2, and 80% of patients ultimately underwent skin grafting for wound closure. CONCLUSIONS: This case series highlights the spectrum of wounds that can be managed with NPWTi-d dressings to yield a clean wound environment to promote healing and preparation for wound closure.
Subject(s)
Negative-Pressure Wound Therapy , Pressure Ulcer , Bandages , Granulation Tissue , Humans , Wound HealingABSTRACT
A catalytic rocket stove was developed to reduce emissions and improve efficiency compared to open cooking fires or traditional semienclosed cookstoves, called poyos, typical of rural Guatemala. Traditional stoves often emit particulate matter and carbon monoxide at sufficient levels to cause respiratory illnesses and other health problems. Using focus group results, the stove was tailored to the needs of Guatemalan cooks. Field trial participants were provided with stove training to ensure that stoves were operated correctly. Somewhat surprisingly, the field trial demonstrated a high level of user acceptance in rural Guatemala, where users cooked 93% of the time with the catalytic stove despite having to change some cooking practices. In the field trial, the stove reduced emissions by as much as 68% and improved fuel efficiency by as much as 61% during real-world cooking events relative to the traditional poyo. An additional qualitative portion of the field study identified strengths and weaknesses of the stove that are being addressed as part of an iterative design process.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Helmet use in a motorcycle collision has been shown to reduce head injury and death. Its protective effect on the cervical spine (C-spine), however, remains unclear. The objective of this study was to explore the relationship between helmet use and C-spine injuries. METHOD: Retrospective National Trauma Data Bank (NTDB) study. All motorcycle collisions between 2007 and 2014 involving either a driver or passenger were included. Data collected included demographics, vital signs, Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS), Injury Severity Score (ISS) and specific injuries. The primary outcome was the prevalence of C-spine injuries. Secondary outcomes included were overall mortality, ventilation days, intensive care unit length of stay (LOS), total hospital LOS, and in-hospital complications. RESULTS: A total of 270,525 patients were included. Helmets were worn by 57.6% of motorcyclists. The non-helmeted group was found to have a higher incidence of head injury with head AIS>2 (27.6% vs 14.8%, p<0.001). Univariate analysis showed a higher prevalence of C-spine injuries in the non-helmeted group (10.4% vs 9.4%, p<0.001), with a higher proportion of severe C-spine injuries with AIS>2 (3.2% vs 2.6%, p<0.001). Additionally, traumatic brain injury (TBI) was found to be two times higher in the non-helmeted group (20.7% vs 10.9%, p<0.001). Multiple logistic regression showed helmet use to be an independent protective factor against mortality (OR=0.832, 95% CI 0.781-0.887, p<0.001). Although statistically significant in univariate analysis, helmet use was not associated with C-spine injuries after adjusting for relevant covariates. However, helmet use reduced the risk of severe head injuries by almost 50% (OR=0.488, 95% CI 0.475-0.500, p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Helmet use reduces the risk of head injury and death among motorcyclists; however, no association with C-spine injuries could be detected.