Association between proton pump inhibitors and severe hematological toxicity in patients receiving pemetrexed-based anticancer treatment: The prospective IPPEM study.

OBJECTIVE: Pemetrexed is associated with hematological toxicity. Drug-drug interactions (DDIs) between methotrexate and proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) induce a higher risk of hematological toxicity due to the inhibition of methotrexate excretion by PPIs. As pemetrexed and methotrexate are both excreted by human organic anion transporter 3 (hOAT3), this study investigates the hypothetical DDI between pemetrexed and PPIs in lung cancer patients. The primary objective was the occurrence of severe (grade ≥ 3) hematological toxicity. The secondary objectives were to describe the type of hematological toxicity and associated clinical consequences (NCT03537833). MATERIALS AND METHODS: PPI consumption was collected for each patient receiving pemetrexed-based anticancer chemotherapy from May 2018 to October 2020 in a prospective multicentric observational and nonrandomized study. Multivariate Cox regression and propensity score (PS) adjustment, PS matching and inverse weighting on PS (IPTW) methods were used. RESULTS: PPI consumption (55 among 156 included patients) was associated with a significantly higher risk of severe hematological toxicity in the multivariable Cox regression model (hazard ratio HR = 2.51, 95% confidence interval [1.47-4.26]; p = 0.005). Similar results were found with PS adjustment (HR = 1.91 CI95% [1.14-3.20]; p = 0.002), PS-matching (HR = 1.93 CI95% [1.08-3.45]; p = 0.02) and IPTW method (HR = 2.06 CI95% [1.27-3.35]; p = 0.004). Severe neutropenia and anemia occurred in 32.7% and 14.1% of patients, respectively. This resulted in 48 anticancer chemotherapy postponements and 24 dose adjustments, 26 growth factor prescriptions, 24 red blood cell transfusions, and 20 hospitalizations. CONCLUSIONS: The results strongly suggest an association between PPI consumption and pemetrexed-related severe hematological toxicity. Deprescription of PPIs when feasible should be considered to prevent this DDI.

Evidence of slight improvement in five-year survival in non-small-cell lung cancer over the last 10 years: Results of the French KBP-CPHG real-world studies.

BACKGROUND: Although improved during the last decades, the prognosis of lung cancer is poor. In 2000, the French College of general hospital respiratory physicians, conducted KBP-2000-CPHG, a prospective multicenter epidemiological study including all volunteer adult patients diagnosed for primary lung cancer; with the five-year survival as primary endpoint. The primary objective of KBP-2010-CPHG was to compare overall five-year survival data with KBP-2000-CPHG ones. MATERIAL AND METHODS: All consecutive patients≥18 years of age with primary lung cancer diagnosed between 1st January and 31st December 2010 were included. The KBP-2010-CPHG protocol was approved by the advisory committee on research information processing in the health field (CCTIRS) on November 19, 2009. RESULTS: Respectively, 5667 and 7051 patients were included in KBP-2000-CPHG and KBP-2010-CPHG. Five-year survival was improved: 12.7% [11.9%-13.5%] in 2010 versus 10.0% [9.2%-10.9%] in 2000 (P<0.001). Non-small-cell lung cancer showed improvement (13.8% [13.0%-14.8%] in 2010 versus 11.4% [10.5%-12.4%] in 2000; P<0.001); but not small-cell lung cancer (5.7% [4.4%-7.4%] in 2010 versus 3.3% [2.3%-4.7%] in 2000; P=0.56). The KBP-2010-CPHG study showed an overall 6% reduction in risk of death (HR=0.94 [0.89-0.98]; P=0.004). CONCLUSIONS: Survival of patients with lung cancer improved over a 10-year period. This improvement was slight and limited to non-small-cell lung cancer, possibly partly because of 2010 advances in diagnosis and targeted therapy.

Multidimensional analyses to assess the relations between treatment choices by physicians and patients' characteristics: the example of COPD.

BACKGROUND: In some situations, practice guidelines do not provide firm evidence-based guidance regarding COPD treatment choices, especially when large trials have failed to identify subgroups of particularly good or poor responders to available medications. METHODS: This observational cross-sectional study explored the yield of four types of multidimensional analyses to assess the associations between the clinical characteristics of COPD patients and pharmacological and non-pharmacological treatments prescribed by lung specialists in a real-life context. RESULTS: Altogether, 2494 patients were recruited by 515 respiratory physicians. Multiple correspondence analysis and hierarchical clustering identified 6 clinical subtypes and 6 treatment subgroups. Strong bi-directional associations were found between clinical subtypes and treatment subgroups in multivariate logistic regression. However, although the overall frequency of prescriptions varied from one clinical subtype to the other for all types of pharmacological treatments, clinical subtypes were not associated with specific prescription profiles. When canonical analysis of redundancy was used, the proportion of variation in pharmacological treatments that was explained by clinical characteristics remained modest: 6.23%. This proportion was greater (14.29%) for non-pharmacological components of care. CONCLUSION: This study shows that, although pharmacological treatments of COPD are quantitatively very well related to patients' clinical characteristics, there is no particular patient profile that could be qualitatively associated to prescriptions. This underlines uncertainties perceived by physicians for differentiating the respective effects of available pharmacological treatments. The methodology applied here is useful to identify areas of uncertainty requiring further research and/or guideline clarification.

Lung cancer among women in France. Analysis of the 904 French women with lung cancer included in the KBP-2000-CPHG study of the French College of General Hospital-based Pneumologists (CPHG).

As the incidence of primary lung cancer in women seems to be increasing in parallel with that of smoking, we conducted an exhaustive epidemiological study in 137 hospitals in 2000. We identified 904 women with proven primary lung cancer (mean age 63.9 years), many of whom have never smoked (32.3%), particularly in cases of adenocarcinoma (43.4%). Small cell cancer accounted for 16.1% of cases. Adenocarcinomas were the most frequent (45.3%) of the non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), followed by squamous cell (23.4%), large cell (11.6%) and bronchoalveolar (1.9%) carcinomas. About one third (32.2%) of NSCLC were stage III and 48.1% were stage IV. Over half of all adenocarcinomas were stage IV. According to multivariate analysis, adenocarcinoma is related to less smoking and younger age. In conclusion, many women affected by lung cancer have never smoked. Adenocarcinoma appears to be the most frequent form and more often at a metastatic stage.