Fibroblast activation protein and disease severity, progression, and survival in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis.

Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is characterized by progressive fibrosis in the lungs. Activated fibroblasts play a central role in fibrogenesis and express fibroblast activation protein α. A truncated, soluble form (sFAP) can be measured in blood and is a potential novel biomarker of disease activity. The aim was to study the association between sFAP and clinical, radiological, and histopathological measures of disease severity, progression, and survival in a prospective, multicentre, real-world cohort of patients with IPF. Patients with IPF were recruited from the tertiary interstitial lung disease centres in Denmark and followed for up to 3 years. Baseline serum levels of sFAP were measured by ELISA in patients with IPF and compared to healthy controls. Pulmonary function tests, 6-minute walk test and quality of life measures were performed at baseline and during follow-up. The study included 149 patients with IPF. Median sFAP in IPF was 49.6 ng/mL (IQR: 43.1-61.6 ng/mL) and in healthy controls 73.8 ng/mL (IQR: 62.1-92.0 ng/mL). Continuous sFAP was not associated with disease severity, progression or survival (p > 0.05). After dichotomization of sFAP below or above mean sFAP + 2 SD for healthy controls, higher levels of sFAP were associated with lower FVC % predicted during follow-up (p < 0.01). Higher than normal serum levels of sFAP were associated with longitudinal changes in FVC % predicted, but sFAP did not show clear associations with other baseline or longitudinal parameters. As such, sFAP has limited use as a biomarker of disease progression or survival in patients with IPF.

Anifrolumab treatment improves patient-reported quality of life and decreases disease activity and corticosteroid use in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus: A qualitative study in Denmark.

Anifrolumab is a new therapeutic approach for individuals with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) directed at blocking the type 1 interferon pathway. Despite the expanding body of literature on Anifrolumab, an essential aspect remains absent: the subjective patient experience of treatment effects and implications on patients' health-related quality of life (HRQoL). The present study aimed to fill this void by elucidating the nuanced perspectives of SLE patients receiving Anifrolumab treatment by conducting qualitative in-depth interviews (IDIs). SLE patients at Aarhus University Hospital who had received at least three infusions of Anifrolumab were approached for inclusion in the study, which comprised two main elements: (1) qualitative IDIs and (2) collection of patient data from electronic medical records (EMRs). The IDIs were semi-structured and based on a discussion guide that included open-ended and close-ended questions. Verbatim transcripts were coded and analysed using qualitative software to understand concepts important to patients and to understand patients' own experiences before and after Anifrolumab therapy. A clinical chart review was conducted using EMR data at baseline, 3 months, and 6 months after Anifrolumab initiation. IDIs were completed with 14 patients, and EMR data was collected from 16 patients (treatment days range: 62-474). Of the 23 symptoms spontaneously reported by patients prior to Anifrolumab treatment, fatigue, joint pain, sun sensitivity, joint stiffness, skin rashes, and hair loss were the most common. Most symptoms improved, and none worsened during treatment. Patients reported significant impacts of disease on daily life before treatment: day-to-day activities, social life, emotional aspects, physical activity, concentration/memory, work/employment, and family/romantic relationships. Patients reported improvements in all aspects after treatment but were still impacted. From the EMR data, we observed a fall in disease activity after treatment initiation with a concomitant reduction in the use of corticosteroids. This study provides valuable insights into the subjective experiences of SLE patients treated with Anifrolumab, and the findings collectively contribute to a comprehensive understanding of the treatment's efficacy from the patients' perspective and its tangible effects on both subjective and objective parameters in SLE patients.

Polyarticular juvenile idiopathic arthritis has a distinct co-inhibitor receptor profile.

OBJECTIVES: Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis (JIA) is the most common rheumatic disease of childhood; the pathogenesis is associated with T cell activation. T cell activation can be counter-balanced by signals generated by inhibitory receptors (IRs) such as CTLA-4, PD-1, LAG-3, and TIM-3. Here, we identify the role of IRs in the pathogenesis of different JIA subtypes. METHODS: In total, we included 67 oligoarticular JIA, 12 IgM-RF negative polyarticular JIA, 17 enthesitis related arthritis, 11 systemic JIA patients and 10 healthy controls. We collected plasma (and synovial fluid) samples from the patients either at the onset or during a flare of their disease. We measured the soluble levels of co-IRs (IL-2Rα, 4-1BB, CD86, TGF-ß1, CTLA-4, PD-L1, PD-1, TIM-3, LAG- 3, Galectin-9) by cytometric bead array kits and their cellular expression (PD-1, CTLA-4, TIM-3, LAG-3) by flow cytometry. We compared the plasma levels and cellular expressions of different co-IRs within different JIA subgroups. RESULTS: The polyarticular-JIA group was different from the three other examined JIA subgroups, having higher levels of plasma sCTLA-4(p< 0.001), sPD-1(p< 0.05), and s4-1BB(p< 0.05) when compared with the other JIA subgroups and healthy controls. We analyzed the cellular surface expression of different co-IRs on the PBMCs of different JIA subtypes. Similar to plasma levels, both the percentage(p< 0.05) and the MFI (mean fluorescence intensity) (p< 0.01) of CTLA4 expression were higher in the poly-JIA subgroup. CONCLUSION: This is the first report studying the expression profile of different co-IRs in different subtypes of JIA. Polyarticular JIA patients had a different co-IR profile, having more CTLA-4, PD-1 and 4-1BB in their plasma than the other subtypes of JIA.

School Well-Being and Academic Performance of Children With Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis: A National Register-Based Study.

OBJECTIVE: We aimed to investigate how school well-being (SWB) and academic performance of children with juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) compare to their peers on a national level using the Danish national registers. Further, we investigated the potential influence of socioeconomic status (SES). METHODS: A population-wide, register-based, cross-sectional study was performed. We compared the results of children with and without JIA in the Danish National Well-Being Questionnaire (DNWQ), the National Danish School Testing (NDST), and their ninth grade (aged approximately 16 yrs) final school marks in Danish and mathematics. The results were analyzed using adjusted ordinal logistic regression (SWB) and linear regression (tests and marks). RESULTS: In separate cohorts, we included a total of 505,340 children answering the DNWQ, 812,461 children with NDST results, and the ninth-grade final marks of 581,804 children. Of these children, 1042, 1541, and 1410, respectively, fulfilled the criteria of JIA. Children with JIA reported SWB comparable to their peers, except for the question "Do you perform well in school?" (odds ratio 0.89, 95% CI 0.81-0.99). In the NDST, the children with JIA in general did just as well as their peers. We found no differences in the ninth-grade final marks in either Danish or mathematics. Stratifying the analyses on SES showed no significant differences in the associations. CONCLUSION: Overall, children with JIA report SWB comparable to that of children without JIA and perform equally well in school as children without JIA.