Clinicians' viewpoints on current paradigms of care and research in Parkinson's disease.

Aim of this review is to discuss the value of current ongoing research initiatives in Parkinson's disease from the clinicians' point of view. The repeat, recent failures on progress slowing reflect the drifting apart between initially promising experimental and then disappointing clinical outcomes in the translational trials with well selected Parkinson's disease patients. A similar development concerns the emerging gap between novel developed drugs with improved pharmacokinetic behaviour and their limited use in the clinical practice following approval. Restricted regional different worldwide availability and direct, respectively indirect budget limitations for neurologists in private practice are essential hurdles. They prevent the widespread prescription of these compounds. As a result return of investment for the pharmaceutical industry becomes more and more uncertain. The interest for research on novel treatment approaches for the amelioration of motor and non motor symptoms declines. Clinicians crucially scrutinize the claim for an optimum patient care by payers and regulators.

[Effectiveness and safety of safinamide as add-on to levodopa in patients with parkinson's disease: non-interventional study]. / Wirksamkeit und Sicherheit von Safinamid als Zusatztherapie zu Levodopa bei Parkinson-Patienten: eine nicht-interventionelle Beobachtungsstudie.

AIM: Safinamide (Xadago®) is a newly approved selective MAO-B inhibitor for the treatment of Parkinson's Disease (PD). The X-TRA study investigated the efficacy and tolerability of the substance under clinical practice conditions. METHODS: Prospective, observational study in unselected patients in line with safinamide product specifications. RESULTS: Of the 299 patients included (65.9 % males, age 72.7 ± 9.0 years, duration of disease 7.8 ± 5.9 years), at the beginning of the documentation 229 patients (81.2 %) received L-dopa, 108 (39.3 %) combination drugs containing L-dopa, 172 (59.3 %) a dopamine agonist and 23 (8.3 %) a COMT inhibitor. Of these, 203 patients were followed-up over a period of 6 months. The MDS-UPDRS Part III score for motor symptoms decreased from a baseline value of 48.2 ± 22.1 points by 6.8 ± 14.5 points at the end of the study. The Non-Motor Symptoms Scale score indicating the presence or absence of motor symptoms decreased from a baseline value of 57.6 ± 42.1 by 9.3 ± 2.1 points, the Abnormal Involuntary Movement Score from 4.6 ± 5.8 points by 0.9 ± 2.7 points.The Parkinson's Disease Score (PDQ-8) for assessing quality of life decreased from a baseline value of 39.4 ± 18.2 points by 4.3 ± 13.7 points, reflecting an improvement. In total, 300 adverse events were classified as related to safinamide in 132 patients (44.1 %). Fifty-three events were serious (in 15 patients; 5 %). Seventy-four patients (24.7 %) discontinued safinamide therapy because of adverse drug reactions. CONCLUSIONS: Safinamide therapy improved the motor and non-motor symptoms as well as the quality of life in PD. Most patients tolerated the therapy well. The only side effects that occurred are those described in the patient information leaflet.