Chronic schistosomiasis imported in France: A retrospective multicentre analysis of 532 patients, calling for international recommendations.

BACKGROUND: Schistosomiasis is a major public health issue for migrants. This study aims to describe the clinical presentation and management of imported schistosomiasis in France. METHODS: We included all new cases of schistosomiasis in patients aged ≥18 years, defined by a positive specific Western blot and/or a positive parasitological analysis of urine, stool or biopsy, between January 1, 2016, and December 31, 2019, in 4 laboratories in Paris and Western France. RESULTS: Over the study period, 532 patients were included. Mean age was 37 years (18-91), and 461/532 (87 %) were men. Among 476/532 (89 %) patients born in an endemic area, 433 (91 %) were born in sub-Saharan Africa. Most of the patients (405/532, 76 %) had only a positive serology, and 127/532 (24 %) had ova on microscopic examination. Among 361/532 (68 %) who had at least one urine, stool or biopsy analysis, microscopic analysis was positive in 127 (35 %). Imaging showed lesions compatible with schistosomiasis in 88/164 (54 %) patients with clinical symptoms and 13/29 (45 %) patients without (p = 0.5). Patients who arrived in France less than one year before diagnosis were more likely to have clinical symptoms than those who arrived in France 1-5 years and >5 years prior to diagnosis (52 %, 41 % and 43 %, respectively, p = 0.03). Two-hundred and seventeen patients (40.8 %) were left untreated. CONCLUSION: Approximately 50 % of patients with imported chronic schistosomiasis have radiological abnormalities, whether they are symptomatic or not, and management is heterogeneous. Multidisciplinary international guidelines are requested to clarify the management of this neglected disease.

Immunization Catch-Up for Newly Arrived Migrants in France: A Cross-Sectional Study among French General Practitioners.

BACKGROUND: Migrants often undergo an incomplete vaccination program in regards to the French recommendations. The aim of this study was to evaluate the practices of French General Practitioners' (GPs) in terms of catch-up vaccination. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was carried-out in 2017-2018 in France. An online questionnaire was disseminated by email through scholarly societies to GPs involved in the care and the vaccination of migrants. Analyses included univariate and multivariate analysis with a logistic regression model. RESULTS: A total of 216 GPs completed the survey. A majority identified themselves with an average level regarding the prevention of infectious diseases among migrant populations (56.7%) and confirmed this is part of their daily practice (83.3%). The majority of respondents do not perform more than two injections on the same day. When compared to GPs working in health centres, those with a private practice are more likely to report returning to a full primary vaccination schedule (adjusted OR = 2.90, 95% CI [1.29-6.53]). Aside from the serology for hepatitis B and to a lesser extent for measles, other pre-vaccination serologies were not frequently used by GPs. When a migrant declares to be up-to-date with his immunisations, only 56.5% of doctors consider this information reliable. CONCLUSIONS: This study clarified the vaccination practices of GPs receiving migrant patients in consultation and showed its heterogeneity. An important need for benchmarks has been identified and these results were used for the elaboration of the French guidelines on vaccines catch-up.