Pediatric Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome in South African PICUs: A Multisite Point-Prevalence Study.

OBJECTIVES: To describe the prevalence of pediatric acute respiratory distress syndrome (pARDS) and the characteristics of children with pARDS in South African PICUs. DESIGN: Observational multicenter, cross-sectional point-prevalence study. SETTING: Eight PICUs in four South African provinces. PATIENTS: All children beyond the neonatal period and under 18 years of age admitted to participating PICUs. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Clinical and demographic data were prospectively collected on a single day of each month, from February to July 2022, using a centralized database. Cases with or at risk of pARDS were identified using the 2015 Pediatric Acute Lung Injury Consensus Conference criteria. Prevalence was calculated as the number of children meeting pARDS criteria/the total number of children admitted to PICU at the same time points. Three hundred ten patients were present in the PICU on study days: 166 (53.5%) male, median (interquartile range [IQR]) age 9.8 (3.1-32.9) months, and 195 (62.9%) invasively mechanically ventilated. Seventy-one (22.9%) patients were classified as being "at risk" of pARDS and 95 patients (prevalence 30.6%; 95% CI, 24.7-37.5%) fulfilled pARDS case criteria, with severity classified as mild (58.2%), moderate (25.3%), and severe (17.6%). Median (IQR) admission Pediatric Index of Mortality 3 risk of mortality in patients with and without pARDS was 5.6 (3.4-12.1) % versus 3.9 (1.0-8.2) % ( p = 0.002). Diagnostic categories differed between pARDS and non-pARDS groups ( p = 0.002), with no difference in age, sex, or presence of comorbidities. On multivariable logistic regression, increasing admission risk of mortality (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.02; 95% CI, 1.00-1.04; p = 0.04) and being admitted with a respiratory condition (aOR 2.64; 95% CI, 1.27-5.48; p = 0.01) were independently associated with an increased likelihood of having pARDS. CONCLUSIONS: The 30.6% prevalence of pARDS in South Africa is substantially higher than reports from other sociogeographical regions, highlighting the need for further research in this setting.

Hyperreduced left lateral living donor liver transplant in a 4.5 kg child-A first in Africa.

BACKGROUND: Supply-demand mismatch in solid organ transplantation is particularly pronounced in small children. For liver transplantation, advanced surgical techniques for reducing deceased and living donor grafts allow access to life-saving transplantation. Living donor left lateral segment liver grafts have been successfully transplanted in small children in our center since 2013, the only program providing this service in Sub-Saharan Africa. This type of partial graft remains too large for children below 6 kg body weight and generally requires reduction. METHODS: A left lateral segment graft was reduced in situ from a directed, altruistic living donor to yield a hyperreduced left lateral segment graft. RESULTS: The donor was discharged after 6 days without complications. The recipient suffered no technical surgical complications except for an infected cut-surface biloma and biliary anastomotic stricture and remains well 9 months post-transplant. CONCLUSIONS: We report the first known case in Africa of a hyperreduced left lateral segment, ABO incompatible, living donor liver transplant in a 4,5 kg child with pediatric acute liver failure (PALF).

Successful ABO-incompatible living donor liver transplant for acute liver failure secondary to Hodgkin's Lymphoma in a child.

We present a case of pediatric ALF, secondary to hepatic HL, who underwent a successful ABOi living donor liver transplant. We believe this is the first such case reported in academic literature. HL with liver involvement is extremely rare and is not considered an indication for transplantation. The 12-year-old, male patient presented with a viral illness prodrome, and parvovirus was detected in pre-transplant laboratory cultures. He received an ABOi living donor liver graft followed by a course of plasma exchange and rituximab after which standard immunosuppression was used. The HL was diagnosed on hepatic biopsy post-transplant. Subsequently, the patient commenced six cycles of R-CHOP chemotherapy. During chemotherapy, we stopped tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil. Immunosuppression was maintained with corticosteroids in-between cycles. The patient is alive and reports good quality of life 1-year post-transplant. The HL is in remission. During the post-operative period, the patient experienced four episodes of neutropenia, a bile leak, and gram-negative sepsis. One episode of acute rejection has been treated. Although we did not initially transplant the patient for ALF secondary to HL, its subsequent diagnosis and the patient's response to management raises many issues that warrant consideration. While the findings from a single case cannot be generalized, this could be a "proof of concept" for liver transplantation in hepatic HL. We hope it will facilitate discussions and potentially expand therapeutic options available to this very small group patients.