Combination of a TGF-ß ligand trap (RAP-GRL) and TMPRSS6-ASO is superior for correcting ß-thalassemia.

A recently approved drug that induces erythroid cell maturation (luspatercept) has been shown to improve anemia and reduce the need for blood transfusion in non-transfusion-dependent as well as transfusion-dependent ß-thalassemia (BT) patients. Although these results were predominantly positive, not all the patients showed the expected increase in hemoglobin (Hb) levels or transfusion burden reduction. Additional studies indicated that administration of luspatercept in transfusion-dependent BT was associated with increased erythropoietic markers, decreased hepcidin levels, and increased liver iron content. Altogether, these studies suggest that luspatercept may necessitate additional drugs for improved erythroid and iron management. As luspatercept does not appear to directly affect iron metabolism, we hypothesized that TMPRSS6-ASO could improve iron parameters and iron overload when co-administered with luspatercept. We used an agent analogous to murine luspatercept (RAP-GRL) and another novel therapeutic, IONIS TMPRSS6-LRx (TMPRSS6-ASO), a hepcidin inducer, to treat non-transfusion-dependent BT-intermedia mice. Our study shows that RAP-GRL alone improved red blood cell (RBC) production, with no or limited effect on splenomegaly and iron parameters. In contrast, TMPRSS6-ASO improved RBC measurements, ameliorated splenomegaly, and improved iron overload most effectively. Our results provide pre-clinical support for combining TMPRSS6-ASO and luspatercept in treating BT, as these drugs together show potential for simultaneously improving both erythroid and iron parameters in BT patients.

PD-L1 quantification across tumor types using the reverse phase protein microarray: implications for precision medicine.

BACKGROUND: Anti-programmed cell death protein 1 and programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) agents are broadly used in first-line and second-line treatment across different tumor types. While immunohistochemistry-based assays are routinely used to assess PD-L1 expression, their clinical utility remains controversial due to the partial predictive value and lack of standardized cut-offs across antibody clones. Using a high throughput immunoassay, the reverse phase protein microarray (RPPA), coupled with a fluorescence-based detection system, this study compared the performance of six anti-PD-L1 antibody clones on 666 tumor samples. METHODS: PD-L1 expression was measured using five antibody clones (22C3, 28-8, CAL10, E1L3N and SP142) and the therapeutic antibody atezolizumab on 222 lung, 71 ovarian, 52 prostate and 267 breast cancers, and 54 metastatic lesions. To capture clinically relevant variables, our cohort included frozen and formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded samples, surgical specimens and core needle biopsies. Pure tumor epithelia were isolated using laser capture microdissection from 602 samples. Correlation coefficients were calculated to assess concordance between antibody clones. For two independent cohorts of patients with lung cancer treated with nivolumab, RPPA-based PD-L1 measurements were examined along with response to treatment. RESULTS: Median-center PD-L1 dynamic ranged from 0.01 to 39.37 across antibody clones. Correlation coefficients between the six antibody clones were heterogeneous (range: -0.48 to 0.95) and below 0.50 in 61% of the comparisons. In nivolumab-treated patients, RPPA-based measurement identified a subgroup of tumors, where low PD-L1 expression equated to lack of response. CONCLUSIONS: Continuous RPPA-based measurements capture a broad dynamic range of PD-L1 expression in human specimens and heterogeneous concordance levels between antibody clones. This high throughput immunoassay can potentially identify subgroups of tumors in which low expression of PD-L1 equates to lack of response to treatment.