Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 7 de 7
Filter
1.
J Cardiothorac Surg ; 19(1): 274, 2024 May 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38702789

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: To evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of intraoperative intravenous amiodarone for arrhythmia prevention in on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) patients. METHODS: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials was conducted. Pubmed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Ovid, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, and the Wan Fang database until July 1th, 2023. The primary outcomes of interest included the incidences of intra- and post-operative atrial fibrillation (POAF), ventricular fibrillation, or any arrhythmia, including atrial fibrillation, ventricular fibrillation, ventricular tachycardia, premature ventricular contraction, and sinus bradycardia. For continuous and dichotomous variables, treatment effects were calculated as the weighted mean difference (WMD)/risk ratio (RR) and 95% confidence interval (CI). RESULTS: A database search yielded 7 randomized controlled trials including 608 patients, where three studies, including three treatments (amiodarone, lidocaine, and saline), contributed to the clinical outcome of atrial fibrillation, ventricular fibrillation, or any arrhythmia. Meta-analysis demonstrated that amiodarone can significantly reduce the incidence of POAF (RR, 0.39; 95%CI: 0.20, 0.77; P = 0.007, I2 = 0%) in patients undergoing on-pump CABG; there was no statistically significant influence on intra-operative atrial fibrillation, intra- and post-operative ventricular fibrillation, or any arrhythmia. CONCLUSIONS: The current study suggests that intraoperative administration of intravenous amiodarone may be safe and effective in preventing POAF in patients undergoing on-pump CABG. More well-designed clinical trials are needed to validate this result.


Subject(s)
Amiodarone , Anti-Arrhythmia Agents , Coronary Artery Bypass , Humans , Amiodarone/administration & dosage , Amiodarone/adverse effects , Coronary Artery Bypass/adverse effects , Anti-Arrhythmia Agents/administration & dosage , Anti-Arrhythmia Agents/adverse effects , Anti-Arrhythmia Agents/therapeutic use , Arrhythmias, Cardiac/prevention & control , Intraoperative Care/methods , Administration, Intravenous , Postoperative Complications/prevention & control , Treatment Outcome , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
2.
J Integr Complement Med ; 30(1): 37-46, 2024 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37646752

ABSTRACT

Background: As a mind-body therapy, music may have a positive effect on patients with postoperative pain and anxiety. Objective: The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to explore the effects of perioperative music therapy on postoperative pain and anxiety based on existing clinical trials. Methods: The Cochrane Library, PubMed, and Embase were searched from their inception to August 2022, selected the literature according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, and completed the meta-analysis using RevMan 5.3. Results: A total of 19 eligible randomized controlled trials were enrolled, including 1803 patients. The results of the meta-analysis showed that the scores of pain (standardized mean difference [SMD], -0.90; 95% confidence interval [CI], -1.26 to -0.53; p < 0.00001) and anxiety (SMD, -0.75; 95% CI, -1.19 to -0.31; p = 0.0008) decreased in the music group on postoperative day 1. The blood pressure (mean difference [MD], -5.29; 95% CI, -9.53 to -1.06; p = 0.01) and heart rate (MD, -6.13; 95% CI, -11.69 to -0.58; p = 0.03) also decreased on the same day. Further, the score of change in pain (SMD, 0.35; 95% CI, 0.01 to 0.68; p = 0.04) and anxiety (SMD, 1.35; 95% CI, 0.01 to 2.69; p = 0.05) increased between preoperative and postoperative days in the music group. However, the scores of hospital satisfaction (MD, -0.07; 95% CI, -1.40 to 1.27; p = 0.92) and incidences of postoperative nausea and vomiting (risk ratio, 0.41; 95% CI, 0.13 to 1.34; p = 0.14) did not decrease in the music group. Conclusion: Perioperative music therapy can significantly reduce postoperative pain and anxiety and avoid fluctuations in blood pressure and heart rate but does not improve patient hospital satisfaction or incidences of postoperative nausea and vomiting.


Subject(s)
Music Therapy , Music , Humans , Music Therapy/methods , Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting , Anxiety/prevention & control , Pain, Postoperative/prevention & control
3.
Acad Radiol ; 31(4): 1344-1354, 2024 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37775450

ABSTRACT

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to develop and validate a deep learning and radiomics combined model for differentiating complicated from uncomplicated acute appendicitis (AA). MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective multicenter study included 1165 adult AA patients (training cohort, 700 patients; validation cohort, 465 patients) with available abdominal pelvic computed tomography (CT) images. The reference standard for complicated/uncomplicated AA was the surgery and pathology records. We developed our combined model with CatBoost based on the selected clinical characteristics, CT visual features, deep learning features, and radiomics features. We externally validated our combined model and compared its performance with that of the conventional combined model, the deep learning radiomics (DLR) model, and the radiologist's visual diagnosis using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. RESULTS: In the training cohort, the area under the ROC curve (AUC) of our combined model in distinguishing complicated from uncomplicated AA was 0.816 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.785-0.844). In the validation cohort, our combined model showed robust performance across the data from three centers, with AUCs of 0.836 (95% CI: 0.785-0.879), 0.793 (95% CI: 0.695-0.872), and 0.723 (95% CI: 0.632-0.802). In the total validation cohort, our combined model (AUC = 0.799) performed better than the conventional combined model, DLR model, and radiologist's visual diagnosis (AUC = 0.723, 0.755, and 0.679, respectively; all P < 0.05). Decision curve analysis showed that our combined model provided greater net benefit in predicting complicated AA than the other three models. CONCLUSION: Our combined model allows the accurate differentiation of complicated and uncomplicated AA.


Subject(s)
Appendicitis , Deep Learning , Adult , Humans , Appendicitis/diagnostic imaging , Radiomics , Acute Disease , Area Under Curve , Retrospective Studies
4.
5.
J Perianesth Nurs ; 38(5): 787-791, 2023 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37269278

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Some patients experience sleep disturbances after endoscopy performed under sedation. This study aimed to evaluate the effects of propofol on sleep quality after gastrointestinal endoscopy (GE). DESIGN: This study was a prospective cohort study. METHODS: This study enrolled 880 patients who underwent GE. Patients who chose to undergo GE under sedation received intravenous propofol, whereas the control group did not. The Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) was measured before GE (PSQI-1) and 3 weeks (PSQI-2) after GE. The Groningen Sleep Score Scale (GSQS) was used before GE (GSQS-1) and 1 (GSQS-2) and 7 days (GSQS-3) after GE. FINDINGS: There was a significant increase in GSQS scores from baseline to days 1 and 7 after GE (GSQS-2 vs GSQS-1, P < .001, GSQS-3 vs GSQS-1, P = .008). However, no significant changes were observed in the control group (GSQS-2 vs GSQS-1, P = .38, GSQS-3 vs GSQS-1, P = .66). On day 21, there were no significant changes in the baseline PSQI scores over time in either group (sedation group, P = .96; control group, P = .95). CONCLUSIONS: GE with propofol sedation negatively affected sleep quality for 7 days after GE but not 3 weeks after GE.


Subject(s)
Propofol , Humans , Propofol/adverse effects , Sleep Quality , Prospective Studies , Endoscopy, Gastrointestinal , Administration, Intravenous
6.
Fish Shellfish Immunol ; 139: 108885, 2023 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37290612

ABSTRACT

Liver fibrosis is a pathological process whereby the liver is subjected to various acute and chronic injuries, resulting in the activation of hepatic stellate cells (HSCs), an imbalance of extracellular matrix generation and degradation, and deposition in the liver. This review article summarizes the current understanding of liver fibrosis in fish research. Liver fibrosis is a common pathological condition that occurs in fish raised in aquaculture. It is often associated with poor water quality, stressful conditions, and the presence of pathogens. The review describes the pathophysiology of liver fibrosis in fish, including the roles of various cells and molecules involved in the development and progression of the disease. The review also covers the various methods used to diagnose and assess the severity of liver fibrosis in fish, including histological analysis, biochemical markers, and imaging techniques. In addition, the article discusses the current treatment options for liver fibrosis in fish, including dietary interventions, pharmaceuticals, and probiotics. This review highlights the need for more in-depth research in this area to better understand the mechanisms by which liver fibrosis in fish occurs and to develop effective prevention and treatment strategies. Finally, improved management practices and the development of new treatments will be critical to the sustainability of aquaculture and the health of farmed fish.


Subject(s)
Signal Transduction , Veterinary Drugs , Animals , Signal Transduction/physiology , Veterinary Drugs/metabolism , Liver Cirrhosis/veterinary , Liver Cirrhosis/pathology , Liver/metabolism , Extracellular Matrix , Fibrosis
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...