ABSTRACT
AIM: To compare the results of the anoscope of the PPH kit and a modified anoscope during stapled haemorrhoidopexy. METHODS: The hospital records of 37 patients who underwent stapled haemorrhoidopexy between 2001 and 2006 were reviewed. The purse-string suture anoscope in the PPH kit was used on 15 patients (Group 1), and the modified anoscope was used on 22 patients (Group 2). Demographic characteristics of the patients, operation time, surgeon's performance, analgesic requirement, and complications were compared. RESULTS: Operation time was significantly longer in Group 1 (42.0 +/- 8.4 min vs 27.7 +/- 8.0 min, P = 0.039). The surgeons reported their operative performance as significantly better in Group 2 (the results of the assessments were poor in ten, medium in four and good in one in Group 1, while good in all patients in Group 2, P < 0.001). The need for haemostatic sutures was significantly higher in Group 1 (six cases) and was needed in two cases in Group 2 (P = 0.034). CONCLUSION: Operation time decreased and the surgeon's satisfaction increased with use of the modified anoscope, and fewer haemostatic sutures were required if the surgeon waited longer before and after firing the stapler.
Subject(s)
Gastroenterology/methods , Hemorrhoids/therapy , Surgical Stapling/instrumentation , Suture Techniques/instrumentation , Adult , Aged , Endoscopy/methods , Female , Hemorrhoids/surgery , Hemostasis , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Sutures , Time FactorsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Internal hemorrhoids and loose rectal mucosa may block exposure during the purse-string suturing in stapled hemorrhoidopexy, and this may lead to complications. MATERIALS AND METHODS: To retract the prolapsing rectal mucosa, we modified the purse-string anoscope of the PPH01 kit (Ethicon-Endosurgery, Cincinnati, OH, USA) and produced a special anoscope. The open part of the purse-string suture anoscope is covered by transparent acrylic (Orthoacryl, Dentaurum, Pforzheim, Germany). The covering had completely cylindrical outer and inner surfaces and was thin enough to let the anoscope easily rotate in the anal dilator and to let the 26 mm curved, round-bodied needle of the 2/0 polypropylene suture move in the anoscope. A window, 3 cm long and 3-4 mm wide, was opened at the angled part of the anoscope 2 cm to the tip. This special anoscope was used for the purse-string suture during the stapled hemorrhoidopexy procedure in five patients. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: No postoperative complications, early or late, were encountered, and we propose that stapled hemorrhoidopexy procedure can be applied more easily by using this special anoscope.
Subject(s)
Hemorrhoids/surgery , Proctoscopes , Proctoscopy/methods , Surgical Stapling , Suture Techniques , Equipment Design , Equipment Safety , Humans , Treatment OutcomeSubject(s)
Carcinoma, Signet Ring Cell/diagnosis , Duodenal Neoplasms/diagnosis , Intestinal Polyps/diagnosis , Neoplasms, Multiple Primary , Peutz-Jeghers Syndrome/diagnosis , Rectal Neoplasms/diagnosis , Stomach Neoplasms/diagnosis , Adult , Carcinoma, Signet Ring Cell/surgery , Diagnosis, Differential , Digestive System Surgical Procedures/methods , Duodenal Neoplasms/surgery , Fatal Outcome , Humans , Intestinal Polyps/surgery , Male , Rectal Neoplasms/surgery , Stomach Neoplasms/surgeryABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: In this study, the factors that effect the morbidity and mortality in patients with penetrating colonic injuries were evaluated. METHODS: Fourty-two patients (37 males, 5 females; mean age 30,1; range 14 to 63 years) with penetrating colonic trauma were evaluated according to age, gender, type of penetrating trauma, location and severity of the colonic injury, associated injury, interval between the trauma and the definitive operation, hemodynamic status, blood transfusion requirement, fecal contamination, surgical procedure, postoperative complication and mortality. RESULTS: Type of the penetrating trauma was stab injury in twenty-eight (67%) patients, and gunshot injury in fourteen (33%) patients. The mean Colon Injury Severity Score was 2,1. The mean Abdominal Trauma Index (ATI) was 17,2 and it was over than 25 in eight (19%) patients. The symptoms of shock were present in eleven (26%) patients at admission. Blood transfusions were applied in sixteen (38%) patients. In twenty-one patients intraabdominal bleeding was observed and it was more than 500 mL in eleven (26%) patients. Primary repair was performed in 36 (86%) of the 42 patients and colostomy was performed in six (14%) patients. Morbidity and mortality rates were 41% and 10% respectively. CONCLUSION: It was found that morbidity rates were increased in patients with ATI score higher than 25, and mortality rates were increased in patients presenting shock at admission, with the amount of intraabdominal blood more than 500 mL, and who needed three or more units of blood transfusion. The primary repair of the penetrating colon trauma can be performed confidently in the hemodynamically stable patients with ATI score less than 25.
