Real world treatment practice in patients with advanced melanoma in the nivolumab era: five novel Italian case reports and a literature review.

OBJECTIVE: The approval of the anti-PD1 antibody nivolumab has provided a significant therapeutic opportunity in the landscape of metastatic melanoma. In pivotal clinical trials, nivolumab improved clinical outcomes with a great safety profile. However, in real-world practice, the majority of the population with metastatic melanoma does meet one or more eligibility criteria of pivotal trials, since they have an ECOG-PS ≥ 2 or active/untreated known brain metastases. Waiting for larger real-wold studies that are currently lacking, but would be crucial to confirm the efficacy of nivolumab in challenging patients and to detect rare adverse events that could not be noticed in pivotal trials, this review collects both literature and unpublished case reports on nivolumab treatment in metastatic melanoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Case reports, published from 2016 to February 2018, and five, unpublished case reports, representative of Italian clinical practice, were reported and potential issues that physicians could face with the use of nivolumab in the real world were discussed. RESULTS: Among Italian cases, one patient had a huge retro-nuchal mass, which significantly decreased with few cycles of nivolumab; two patients were affected by cardiovascular comorbidities and one had brain metastasis; the last had a long history of disease, firstly diagnosed in 1997. A literature review was mainly focused on the experience in the management of rare immune adverse events related to treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Nivolumab confirmed its efficacy and safety in real-world; the decision-making process on starting and scheduling the treatment, even in the management of adverse events, should consider multiple factors related to both patient (i.e., BRAF status, ECOG PS, comorbidities) and disease (burden, metastasis).

Brain metastases: an overview.

So far brain metastases represent a critical stage of a disease course and the frequency is increasing over the years. The treatment of brain metastases should be individualized for each patient: in case of single brain metastasis, surgery or radiosurgery should be considered as first options of treatment; in case of multiple lesions, whole-brain radiotherapy is the standard of care in association with systemic therapy or surgery/radiosurgery. Chemotherapy should be considered when surgery or radiation therapy are not possible. In the last decades, TKIs or monoclonal antibodies have shown increase in overall response rate and overall survival in Phase II-III trials. The aim of this paper is to make an overview of the current approaches in management of patients with brain metastases.

Pattern of care and effectiveness of treatment for glioblastoma patients in the real world: Results from a prospective population-based registry. Could survival differ in a high-volume center?

BACKGROUND: As yet, no population-based prospective studies have been conducted to investigate the incidence and clinical outcome of glioblastoma (GBM) or the diffusion and impact of the current standard therapeutic approach in newly diagnosed patients younger than aged 70 years. METHODS: Data on all new cases of primary brain tumors observed from January 1, 2009, to December 31, 2010, in adults residing within the Emilia-Romagna region were recorded in a prospective registry in the Project of Emilia Romagna on Neuro-Oncology (PERNO). Based on the data from this registry, a prospective evaluation was made of the treatment efficacy and outcome in GBM patients. RESULTS: Two hundred sixty-seven GBM patients (median age, 64 y; range, 29-84 y) were enrolled. The median overall survival (OS) was 10.7 months (95% CI, 9.2-12.4). The 139 patients ≤aged 70 years who were given standard temozolomide treatment concomitant with and adjuvant to radiotherapy had a median OS of 16.4 months (95% CI, 14.0-18.5). With multivariate analysis, OS correlated significantly with KPS (HR = 0.458; 95% CI, 0.248-0.847; P = .0127), MGMT methylation status (HR = 0.612; 95% CI, 0.388-0.966; P = .0350), and treatment received in a high versus low-volume center (HR = 0.56; 95% CI, 0.328-0.986; P = .0446). CONCLUSIONS: The median OS following standard temozolomide treatment concurrent with and adjuvant to radiotherapy given to (72.8% of) patients aged ≤70 years is consistent with findings reported from randomized phase III trials. The volume and expertise of the treatment center should be further investigated as a prognostic factor.

FOLFOX6 and bevacizumab in non-optimally resectable liver metastases from colorectal cancer.

BACKGROUND: In patients with colorectal liver metastases (CLM) R0 resection significantly improves overall survival (OS). METHODS: In this report, we present the results of a phase II trial of FOLFOX6+bevacizumab in patients with non-optimally resectable CLM. Patients received six cycles of FOLFOX6+ five of bevacizumab. Patients not achieving resectability received six additional cycles of each. A PET-CT was performed at baseline and again within 1 month after initiating treatment. RESULTS: From September 2005 to July 2009, 21 patients were enrolled (Male/Female: 15/6; median age: 65 years). An objective response (OR) was documented in 12 cases (57.1%; complete responses (CRs): 3, partial response (PR): 9); one patient died from toxicity before surgery. Thirteen patients underwent radical surgery (61.9%). Three (23%) had a pathological CR (pCR). Six patients (46.1%) experienced minor postsurgical complications. After a median 38.8-month follow-up, the median OS was 22.5 months. Patients achieving at least 1 unit reduction in Standard uptake value (SUV)max on PET-CT had longer progression-free survival (PFS) (median PFS: 22 vs 14 months, P=0.001). CONCLUSIONS: FOLFOX6+bevacizumab does not increase postsurgical complications, yields high rates of resectability and pCR. Early changes in PET-CT seem to be predictive of longer PFS.

Prognostic role of EGFR gene copy number and KRAS mutation in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer treated with preoperative chemoradiotherapy.

BACKGROUND: Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), evaluated by immunohistochemistry, has been shown to have prognostic significance in patients with colorectal cancer. Gene copy number (GCN) of EGFR and KRAS status predict response and outcome in patients treated with anti-EGFR therapy, but their prognostic significance in colorectal cancer patients is still unclear. METHODS: We have retrospectively reviewed the baseline EGFR GCN, KRAS status and clinical outcome of 146 locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) patients treated with preoperative chemoradiotherapy. Pathological response evaluated by Dworak's tumour regression grade (TRG), disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were analysed. RESULTS: Tumour regression grade 4 and TRG3-4 were achieved in 14.4 and 30.8% of the patients respectively. Twenty-nine (19.9%) and 33 patients (19.2%) had an EGFR/nuclei ratio >2.9 and CEP7 polisomy >50% respectively; 28 patients (19.2%) had a KRAS mutation. Neither EGFR GCN nor KRAS status was statistically correlated to TRG. 5-year DFS and OS were 63.3 and 71.5%, respectively, and no significant relation with EGFR GCN or KRAS status was found. CONCLUSION: Our data show that EGFR GCN and KRAS status are not prognostic factors in LARC treated with preoperative chemoradiation.

Sorafenib in patients with advanced biliary tract carcinoma: a phase II trial.

BACKGROUND: Advanced biliary tract carcinoma has a very poor prognosis, with chemotherapy being the mainstay of treatment. Sorafenib, a multikinase inhibitor of VEGFR-2/-3, PDGFR-beta, B-Raf, and C-Raf, has shown to be active in preclinical models of cholangiocarcinoma. METHODS: We conducted a phase II trial of single-agent sorafenib in patients with advanced biliary tract carcinoma. Sorafenib was administered at a dose of 400 mg twice a day. The primary end point was the disease control rate at 12 weeks. RESULTS: A total of 46 patients were treated. In all, 26 (56%) had received chemotherapy earlier, and 36 patients completed at least 45 days of treatment. In intention-to-treat analysis, the objective response was 2% and the disease control rate at 12 weeks was 32.6%. Progression-free survival (PFS) was 2.3 months (range: 0-12 months), and the median overall survival was 4.4 months (range: 0-22 months). Performance status was significantly related to PFS: median PFS values for ECOG 0 and 1 were 5.7 and 2.1 months, respectively (P=0.0002). The most common toxicities were skin rash (35%) and fatigue (33%), requiring a dose reduction in 22% of patients. CONCLUSIONS: Sorafenib as a single agent has a low activity in cholangiocarcinoma. Patients having a good performance status have a better PFS. The toxicity profile is manageable.

Detection of circulating tumor cells by reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction of maspin in patients with breast cancer undergoing conventional-dose chemotherapy.

PURPOSE: To establish, in patients with breast cancer subjected to primary conventional chemotherapy and enrolled in a prospective study, the mobilizing effect of therapy on potentially neoplastic cells by means of a reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) assay for mRNA of maspin, a protein related to the serpin family of protease inhibitors. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Peripheral-blood samples were collected from 30 patients with histologically proven breast cancer before and 4 and 8 days after conventional chemotherapy for three consecutive courses. A total of 216 samples were screened for the presence of maspin mRNA by RT-PCR. RESULTS: Before therapy, all samples but one were negative. After chemotherapy, 11 patients (38%) had positive samples. No difference in the rate of positivity was observed between groups defined according to initial stage, type of chemotherapy, Ki-67-related proliferative activity, or CA 15.3 expression. CONCLUSION: Our results confirm that RT-PCR for maspin mRNA is a sensitive assay for the study of circulating potentially neoplastic mammary cells in patients with breast cancer. Moreover, our findings indicate a marked effect of conventional-dose chemotherapy on the mobilization of these cells in breast tumors. In our series of patients, this phenomenon does not seem to be associated with other known risk factors. Finally, the data suggest, without proving, an association between the presence of circulating maspin positive cells and a higher risk of disease progression. If this association could be confirmed, then the assay could have prognostic significance. However, larger confirmatory studies are necessary.

A comparison of the antiemetic efficacy and safety of intramuscular and intravenous formulations of granisetron in patients receiving moderately emetogenic chemotherapy.

A total of 120 patients were treated with granisetron either intramuscular (i.m.) or intravenous (i.v.) in a crossover design, over two successive cycles of moderately emetogenic chemotherapy. Of the 117 patients evaluable for efficacy, 74.4% receiving i.m. and 76.9% receiving i.v. treatment experienced a complete response (no vomiting, no more than mild nausea, no need for rescue medication and no study withdrawal in the 24 h following the onset of chemotherapy). Only a small proportion of the patients experienced any vomiting, either during the first 24 h or in the follow-up period of 4-10 days. There were no statistically significant differences in any of the efficacy parameters between the two routes administration of granisetron. Both formulations of granisetron were also equally well tolerated. The main treatment-related adverse effects were headache and constipation (experienced by 13-15% of patients); local reactions to i.m. injection of granisetron were experienced by 2.6% of patients.