ABSTRACT
There is no consensus on the best surgical technique for treating thumb ulnar collateral ligament (UCL) ruptures. This systematic review and meta-analysis investigates which primary repair technique and postoperative immobilization protocol result in the best clinical outcomes. A literature search was conducted in Embase, Medline ALL Ovid, Web of Science Core Selection and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. Pain, stability, tip pinch strength, key pinch strength, grip strength, return to work and metacarpophalangeal joint range of motion were collected as postoperative outcomes. In total, 29 studies were included. All surgical techniques resulted in satisfactory clinical outcomes, with no significant differences between bone anchor reinsertion, suture fixation, K-wire fixation and a combination of techniques. K-wire immobilization resulted in worse postoperative pain, but similar stability compared to immobilization without a K-wire. Clinical outcomes after thumb UCL repair are excellent, with no differences in clinical outcomes noted among surgical techniques.
Subject(s)
Bone Wires , Collateral Ligament, Ulnar , Thumb , Humans , Collateral Ligament, Ulnar/surgery , Collateral Ligament, Ulnar/injuries , Thumb/surgery , Thumb/injuries , Rupture/surgery , Hand Strength , Range of Motion, Articular , Suture Anchors , Treatment Outcome , Ulnar Collateral Ligament ReconstructionABSTRACT
Instability of the distal radioulnar joint and scapholunate dissociation may cause pain, functional impairment and subsequent arthrosis. There is no consensus about whether these injuries should be treated acutely in patients undergoing surgery for distal radial fractures. We conducted a prospective cohort study to determine whether concomitant distal radioulnar joint instability or scapholunate dissociation negatively influence patient-related outcomes in these patients. The primary outcome was the patient-reported wrist/hand evaluation at 6 and 12 months after surgery. Out of 62 patients, 58% and 27% had intraoperative distal radioulnar joint instability and scapholunate dissociation, respectively. No significant differences were found in patient-reported scores at follow-up between patients with stable and unstable distal radioulnar joints, nor between patients with and without scapholunate dissociation. Sixty-three per cent of patients with an unstable distal radioulnar joint during surgery were stable on retesting after 6 months. Our study suggests that a wait-and-see policy in these patients therefore seems reasonable.Level of evidence: III.